Silver Analogies, Copper's FAKE Breakout, and Tariffs
Dr. Copper can have meaningful insights into the health of the economy. But what if the Dr. himself is sick?
The precious metals market is relatively calm today – just small declines across the board.
This doesn't mean that we have no interesting news to report – they are simply not that clear at the first sight. Gold moved slightly lower, and so did the rest of the sector. One interesting thing that's not visible above is happening in the GDXJ, and something quite different (and even more interesting) is happening on the copper market.
Let's start with GDXJ.
The proxy for junior and mid-tier miners reversed yesterday and this was the seventh trading day after we saw the black candlestick that was heralding an upcoming top. In previous two out of three cases, the top formed on the very next day, and in the remaining case – in February – it formed after seven trading days.
I marked both cases with orange rectangles. So far, today's decline is tiny, but it might be the start of something profound. Especially that the volume during yesterday's move higher was very small – which is a sign of exhaustion. The buying power is drying up here.
Moving on to the situation in copper – the latter just broke to new highs.
Bullish?
Absolutely not. And it's not just because the breakout is not confirmed yet. It's not just because of today's reversal. It's also because this is absolutely typical for copper to form its final top in this way – slightly above the first one.
That's how copper topped in 2008 and that's how copper topped in 2022. In 2011, there was also a final attempt to move higher, but back then there wasn't enough strength to move to a new high.
Either way, copper's final tops aligned with major tops in the precious metals market – in particular ones in mining stocks and silver (and the orange, vertical lines show that).
Those were not some short-term indications. No. Multi-month declines followed that created small fortunes for those who were correctly positioned to take advantage of those moves.
Why would copper be rallying now? And why is this move likely fake?
Tariffs and tariff threats. I already wrote about that on March 5, and we pretty much go more or the same since that time. The announcements and threats were what kept pushing prices higher, but the final effect is likely to be bearish.
The Tariff Effect on Copper: History Repeating Itself
My March 5th analysis on tariffs and their market implications provides crucial historical context for what we're witnessing now in the copper market. The relationship between tariff announcements and copper prices follows a remarkably consistent pattern:
"Remember how when the tariffs were announced, copper rallied very temporarily, and I wrote that it was likely the top at that time (and it was)? We're likely seeing the same kind of effect right now in the case of copper and the opposite in the USD Index."
This temporary euphoria in copper markets is currently being replayed as Trump's April 2nd "Liberation Day" approaches. What's particularly significant is how the pattern typically unfolds:
"Copper soared once again, and this move is likely fake, exactly for the same reasons it was likely fake previously when the tariffs were announced. Just as copper declined shortly thereafter (and FCX declined much more), the same is likely this time."
Historical Examples of Tariff Impact on the USD Index
My March 5th analysis documented several historical cases of tariff implementations and their market effects, providing a roadmap for what we can expect now.
US-China Trade War (2018-2020)
Tariff Actions:
March 2018: 25% tariffs on steel imports, 10% on aluminum
July 2018: 25% tariffs on $34 billion of Chinese goods
August 2018: 25% tariffs on additional $16 billion of Chinese goods
September 2018: 10% tariffs on $200 billion of Chinese goods
May 2019: Increase from 10% to 25% on the $200 billion of goods
USD Impact:
Initial strengthening: The Dollar Index (DXY) rose from around 89 in January 2018 to 97 by December 2018 (approximately 9% increase)
The USD strengthened against the Chinese yuan from 6.3 CNY/USD to nearly 7.0 CNY/USD
The dollar's appreciation was driven partly by a "flight to safety" amid global trade uncertainty
Trade tensions also contributed to the Federal Reserve slowing its rate hike cycle, which eventually limited the dollar's rise
Steel and Aluminum Tariffs (2018)
Tariff Actions:
March 2018: 25% tariffs on steel and 10% tariffs on aluminum imports from various countries
Initially included allies such as the EU, Canada, and Mexico, though some exemptions were later granted
USD Impact:
Short-term boost: The dollar strengthened by approximately 2-3% in the month following the announcement
The DXY index climbed from around 90 to 92.5
The USD gained particularly against currencies of major steel exporters like Canada, with USD/CAD rising from 1.28 to 1.31
However, as allies announced retaliatory measures, dollar gains slowed
Section 301 Tariffs on European Union (Airbus Dispute, 2019)
Tariff Actions:
October 2019: 10% tariffs on European aircraft and 25% tariffs on various EU products (wine, cheese, agricultural products) worth $7.5 billion annually
This was authorized by the WTO in response to illegal subsidies to Airbus
USD Impact:
Modest strengthening against the euro: EUR/USD moved from about 1.12 to 1.09 over the following weeks
Limited overall impact on the broader DXY as markets were more focused on Fed policy
The impact was smaller than the China tariffs due to the more targeted nature and lower total value
Solar Panel and Washing Machine Tariffs (January 2018)
Tariff Actions:
January 2018: 30% tariffs on imported solar panels and 20-50% on washing machines
USD Impact:
Minimal direct impact on USD as these were relatively narrow tariffs
These measures served as a prelude to the broader tariff actions that would follow
The dollar remained relatively stable in the weeks immediately following these specific tariffs
US Tariffs on Chinese EVs and Critical Minerals (2024)
Tariff Actions:
May 2024: Quadrupling tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles from 25% to 100%
Increased tariffs on Chinese semiconductors, batteries, and critical minerals
USD Impact:
Short-term modest strengthening: The DXY moved up by about 0.5% in the week following the announcement
Limited impact as markets had largely anticipated these measures
Effect was overshadowed by broader macroeconomic factors, particularly Fed policy expectations
Key Patterns in USD Response to US Tariffs
Initial Strengthening: Almost all significant US tariff actions have led to short-term USD appreciation, particularly against the currencies of targeted countries.
Diminishing Returns: Each successive round of tariffs during the 2018-2020 trade war had a smaller positive impact on the dollar, as markets increasingly priced in trade tensions.
Policy Offset: The economic uncertainty created by tariffs often led to more accommodative Fed policy expectations, which eventually counteracted some of the dollar's tariff-driven strength.
Differentiated Impact:
Higher impact from broad-based tariffs (China trade war)
Lower impact from targeted, sector-specific tariffs (solar panels, EU goods)
Compounding effect when combined with other dollar-positive factors
Correlation with Trade Deficit Changes: When tariffs demonstrably reduced the US trade deficit (temporarily), the dollar strengthened more significantly.
So, what the USD Index is actually likely to do here is to become stronger.
Does it make sense from the technical point of view?
Yes! The invalidation of the move below the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement level is a classic buy signal. This, plus the tariffs' real implications for the USDX creates a very bullish picture for the latter.
This, in turn, is likely to have a profoundly bearish effect on the prices of copper, stocks (S&P 500) and – most importantly – precious metals (and miners!).
Thank you for reading this analysis. If you'd like to access our complete premium analysis, including specific technical targets (we adjusted a part of our trading positions today), detailed analysis of mining stocks, and comprehensive portfolio insights, consider subscribing to our Gold Trading Alerts. I also invite you to stay updated with our free analyses - sign up for our free gold newsletter now.
Thank you.
Przemyslaw K. Radomski, CFA
Founder, Editor-in-chief
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
What Canadian investors need to know about the Trump tax bill
If the first six months are any indication, the reign of U.S. President Donald Trump is going to be a rough one for Canadian investors. First, the stock market plunged earlier this spring as Mr. Trump's tariffs started a global trade war. Stocks have mostly recovered, but a new threat has emerged in the form of legislation that would allow Washington to ramp up the taxation of Canadians holding U.S. stocks. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act is not yet law – it passed in the U.S. House of Representatives by a single vote but must still pass in the Senate – and may change in scope. For now, it has the potential to more than double the tax applied to dividends from U.S. companies received by Canadian investors and corporations. The ultimate effect of the tax changes could be costly in total but perhaps not so bad on an individual basis. Regardless, it's too early to make changes in your investment portfolio. 'Currently, we're not making any moves, and I'm recommending everyone do the same thing and just wait to see what the information actually is,' said Justin Bender, a portfolio manager at PWL Capital. 'Then we can assess and see if there's any changes necessary.' Wealth managers brace for proposed U.S. tax bill's impacts on Canadian clients What's in Trump's big budget bill? From cuts to taxes and Medicaid, here's what to know Ultimately, Section 899 of the legislation could introduce a withholding tax of 20 to 50 per cent of dividends received by Canadians. There are estimates that this extra tax could cost individual investors, pension funds and others billions of dollars. The point of Section 899 is to give the U.S. a weapon to punish what it considers to be unfair taxes in other countries. Thought to be a target is our digital services tax, which mainly applies to U.S. tech giants generating revenue in Canada. Estimates from Mr. Bender show a worst-case additional drag on returns of 0.46 percentage points from U.S. stocks and U.S. equity exchange-traded funds when the higher withholding tax is fully phased in over four years. Think of this cost as being in addition to the management expense ratio of an ETF or mutual fund. If your return from a U.S. equity fund was a net 10 per cent with the management expense ratio (MER) included, then a higher withholding tax could ultimately leave you with as little as 9.54 per cent. Note that fund returns are always published on a net basis, with the MER included and, where applicable, foreign withholding taxes already deducted. Under existing U.S. tax law, there is a base withholding tax rate of 30 per cent for foreign investors holding U.S. stocks. A Canada-U.S. tax treaty generally reduces this rate to 15 per cent. No withholding tax applies to U.S. dividends paid into registered retirement savings plans and registered retirement income funds by U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs. There's no clear sense of whether this exemption would continue to apply under Section 899. In a non-registered account, you can offset the 15-per-cent withholding tax by claiming an offsetting foreign tax credit. In a TFSA, registered education savings plan, first home savings account or registered disability savings plan, the withholding tax cannot be recovered; it is also non-recoverable in RRSPs and RRIFs if you hold a Canadian-listed U.S. equity ETF. Canadian investors have a massive level of exposure to U.S. stocks directly and through funds. About $60-billion is invested in just four TSX-listed ETFs that track the S&P 500 index. But investing in the S&P 500, and the even more tech-focused Nasdaq, is much more about growth than dividend income. The dividend yield on the S&P 500 right now is about 1.3 per cent, half the level of the yield on Canada's S&P/TSX composite index. 'It's very low, which is why this tax maybe isn't as much of an issue as people are making it out to be,' Mr. Bender said. 'Some extra withholding taxes are probably not going to blow up your financial plan.' Mr. Bender added that the impact is further diminished by the fact that most investors have diversified their U.S. exposure with bonds and Canadian stocks, plus international markets in many cases. Investors who use ETFs for exposure to U.S. stocks can buy funds listed on U.S. exchanges as well as those located in Canada. Among Canadian-listed funds, there are those that hold U.S. stocks directly and those that are effectively a wrapper for a U.S.-listed fund in the same corporate family. Mr. Bender said each of these three ETF types would be affected similarly by higher U.S. withholding taxes. Are you a young Canadian with money on your mind? To set yourself up for success and steer clear of costly mistakes, listen to our award-winning Stress Test podcast.
Globe and Mail
5 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
U.S. and Chinese officials meet in London for high-stakes trade talks
Top U.S. and Chinese officials were meeting in London on Monday to try to defuse a high-stakes trade dispute that has widened beyond tit-for-tat tariffs to restrictions over rare earths, threatening to cripple supply chains and slow global growth. Officials from the two superpowers were meeting at the ornate Lancaster House to try to get back on track with a preliminary agreement struck last month in Geneva that had briefly lowered the temperature between Washington and Beijing. Since then, the U.S. has accused China of slow-walking on its commitments, particularly around rare earths shipments. U.S. economic adviser Kevin Hassett said on Monday that the U.S. team wanted a handshake from China on rare earths after Presidents Donald Trump and Xi Jinping spoke last week. 'The purpose of the meeting today is to make sure that they're serious, but to literally get handshakes,' Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, told CNBC in an interview. He said the expectation was that immediately after the handshake, export controls would be eased and rare earths released in volume. The talks, which could run into Tuesday, come at a crucial time for both economies, with investors looking for relief from Trump's cascade of tariff orders since his return to the White House in January. China's export growth slowed to a three-month low in May while its factory-gate deflation deepened to its worst level in two years. In the U.S., the trade war has put a huge dent in business and household confidence, and first-quarter gross domestic product contracted due to a record surge in imports as Americans front-loaded purchases to beat anticipated price increases. But for now, the impact on inflation has been muted, and the jobs market has remained fairly resilient, though economists expect cracks to become more apparent over the summer. Attending the talks in London will be U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, and a Chinese contingent helmed by Vice-Premier He Lifeng. The inclusion of Lutnick, whose agency oversees export controls for the U.S., is one indication of how central rare earths have become. China holds a near-monopoly on rare earth magnets, a crucial component in electric vehicle motors. Lutnick did not attend the Geneva talks at which the countries struck a 90-day deal to roll back some of the triple-digit tariffs they had placed on each other. The second round of meetings comes four days after Trump and Xi spoke by phone, their first direct interaction since Trump's Jan. 20 inauguration. During the more than one-hour-long call, Xi told Trump to back down from trade measures that roiled the global economy and warned him against threatening steps on Taiwan, according to a Chinese government summary. But Trump said on social media the talks focused primarily on trade led to 'a very positive conclusion,' setting the stage for Monday's meeting in London. The next day, Trump said Xi had agreed to resume shipments to the U.S. of rare earths minerals and magnets, and Reuters reported on Friday that China has granted temporary export licenses to rare earth suppliers of the top three U.S. automakers. China's decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets upended the supply chains central to automakers, aerospace manufacturers, semiconductor companies and military contractors around the world. White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt told the Fox News program 'Sunday Morning Futures' that the U.S. wanted the two sides to build on the progress made in Geneva in the hope they could move towards more comprehensive trade talks. The preliminary deal in Geneva sparked a global relief rally in stock markets, and U.S. indexes that had been in or near bear market levels have recouped the lion's share of their losses. The S&P 500 Index, which at its lowest point in early April was down nearly 18 per cent after Trump unveiled his sweeping 'Liberation Day' tariffs on goods from across the globe, is now only about 2 per cent below its record high from mid-February. The final third of that rally followed the U.S.-China truce struck in Geneva. Still, that temporary deal did not address broader concerns that strain the bilateral relationship, from the illicit fentanyl trade to the status of democratically governed Taiwan and U.S. complaints about China's state-dominated, export-driven economic model. While the U.K. government will provide a venue for Monday's discussions, it will not be party to them and will have separate talks later in the week with the Chinese delegation. The dollar slipped against all major currencies on Monday as investors waited for news, while oil prices were little changed.
Globe and Mail
5 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Tesla Stock's Outlook Was Already Hazy. Musk's Feud With Trump Makes It Even Worse.
Tesla stock (TSLA) has whipsawed this year amid a mix of factors. The company's recent financial performance has been disappointing, to say the least. Its Q1 2025 deliveries fell well short of estimates, and so did its earnings for the quarter. Along with the dismal financial performance and tepid deliveries, Tesla has been in the news for CEO Elon Musk's political activities. While the billionaire was among President Donald Trump's biggest backers and headed his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) until the end of May, he has since left the White House. While it seemed that Musk's politics would take a backseat now and he would start focusing on his companies, the Tesla CEO has now emerged among the fiercest critics of Trump over his tax-and-spending bill. Musk's Feud with Trump The relationship between Musk and Trump seems to have deteriorated significantly. Musk's bitter breakup with Trump could have multiple implications. Bulls would want to believe that by disassociating from Trump, Musk might be able to placate those on the left of the political divide. The flip side, however, could be that Musk alienates Trump supporters. Tesla is no longer a play on 'Trump trade,' and if anything, the stock might be in the 'penalty box' if Trump retaliates against the company. As for fundamentals, they are a lot less favorable now than they were before Trump's election. Tesla's Growth Has Stalled Tesla is currently battling one of the worst phases in its history, even as I agree with Musk that it's nowhere near the 'many near-death experiences' that the company went through in the past. That said, those were different times, and Tesla was at best a marginal player in the automotive industry. The company has since reached scale, selling 1.8 million cars last year profitably. To Tesla and Musk's credit, they proved naysayers wrong by ramping up efficiently. However, while no one really expects Tesla to go bankrupt, market expectations for the near-$1 trillion behemoth are much different now. Cut to 2025, and Tesla is struggling for growth, and deliveries fell year-over-year in 2024 for the first time in history. The company's deliveries declined 13% in Q1 2025, reaching the lowest level since Q2 2022. The data for Q2 2025 deliveries, set for release early next month, is likely to show yet another yearly decline, given the tepid sales in China and Europe. Tesla was still hopeful for delivery growth in 2025 when it released its Q1 earnings in April, but we should see management take a more circumspect stance when it revisits its guide during the Q2 update. Tesla's once industry-leading margins have since fizzled away, thanks to the steep price cuts, and if not for the juicy regulatory credits it earns, the Elon Musk-run company would have posted a net loss in Q1. Given the ongoing EV price war, it would be foolhardy to expect Tesla to reach those fat margins anytime soon. Moreover, the company's China business continues to face serious headwinds from domestic Chinese companies, and the sales from its China Gigafactory – which include both domestic sales and exports – have fallen year-over-year for eight consecutive months. Tesla Bets on Autonomous Driving and Robotics Musk has virtually withdrawn the 50% annual delivery growth compound annual growth rate guidance he once shared, and Tesla officially omitted its goal of reaching 20 million deliveries by 2030 in its last year's impact report. The demand for electric cars, especially in the U.S., did not turn out to be as strong as many expected, and automakers are learning it the hard way, as they are now bogged down with excess production capacity. With the core automotive business facing a severe slowdown and the energy business incapable of filling the void, Tesla (and analysts bullish on the company) have been instead fixated on other aspects of the business. These include autonomous driving and robotaxis in the short to medium term, and robotics over the long term. Long-time Tesla bull and Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas argues that Tesla might even enter the electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) and drone space, capitalizing on its strength in manufacturing and autonomy. Meanwhile, apart from the robotaxi launch that Musk has confirmed is on track for a launch this month, I don't see many other events that could help drive the stock in the near term. Overall, while Tesla's growth outlook hasn't been this hazy in years, Musk's bitter feud with Trump might end up making things even worse for the company.
