Does your life insurance policy cover death due to war, terror attacks? Now is the time to check
Live Events
Are the terms and conditions different for different life insurance policies from same insurer?
Common exclusions in a life insurance policy
The recent Pahalgam attack has shown that the threat to life is increasing with rising uncertainties in the world. While buying a life insurance policy , it is important to read the exclusions to ensure that your family and loved ones receive the death cover benefits easily. Earlier, most life insurance policies used to exclude deaths related to war and terror attacks from coverage. This has changed now. Many insurers have started including death due to war and terrorist attacks in their life insurance policies' coverage.ET Wealth online decodes the latest life insurance policy exclusions and what you need to know when buying a life insurance policy.ET Wealth spoke to several insurance experts. Here's what they say:Kapil Mehta, co-founder of SecureNow, an insurance broking firm says, "In case of life insurance policies, most of them provide the death benefit in case of war and terror acts."Concurring with the view, Varun Agarwal, Head of Term Insurance at Policybazaar, says, "Most term life insurance policies in India do cover death resulting from war or terrorist acts. These events are generally not excluded, which means nominees are eligible for the death benefit in such unfortunate circumstances. However, it's always advisable to check the specific policy wording or consult the insurer for clarity."Anil Kumar Singh, Chief Actuarial Officer, Aditya Birla Sun Life Insurance, says, "All term life insurance policies of Aditya Birla Sun Life Insurance (ABSLI) include coverage for deaths of victims resulting from war or acts of terrorism. The policyholder should understand the difference between victims and perpetrators. If a policyholder is a victim of war or terrorism and the policy is active and in force at the time of the incident, the death benefit is payable. However, if the policyholder is involved in terrorist activities, resulting deaths are generally excluded from coverage."Shilpa Arora, co-founder and chief operating officer at Insurance Samadhan, says, "As per the terms and conditions of major insurance companies, there are only three exclusions. Until 2001, deaths during war or terrorism were not covered, but today there is no exclusion. However, as a rule, policyholders must declare occupational risks, including working in a combat role. If an underwriter accepts this risk, whether at standard or increased rates, it has to be covered. On the other hand, if occupational risk is not declared, claims can be denied within the first 36 months; non-disclosure would not affect the claim."Hence, all insurance experts advise policyholders to read the exclusions list before buying a life insurance policy.Agarwal from PolicyBazaar, says, "No, the terms related to death due to war or terrorist acts are generally similar across term and other types of life insurance policies. The insurer's underwriting typically governs coverage or exclusion of such causes of death."Singh from ABSLI concurs, "No, the coverage terms for death due to terrorist acts are consistent across both term and other life insurance plans offered by ABSLI. In both cases, death due to a terrorist attack is covered by default, and no additional rider is required. However, death due to unlawful acts and involvement in terrorist activities remains excluded across all plans."However, it may happen that while one insurer covers deaths related to war and terrorist acts, another insurer does not due to differences in their underwriting policies. Hence, it is important to read the policy conditions while buying the insurance.Many people don't read the exclusion lists carefully when buying a life insurance policy. Mehta says, "Generally, the only exclusion allowed in life insurance is suicide in the first policy year."Agarwal says, "A key exclusion in most term insurance policies is suicide within the first year of the policy commencement. This one-year suicide exclusion helps prevent moral hazard and ensures the integrity of the insurance pool. Other exclusions may vary but can include death due to participation in hazardous activities, criminal acts, or substance abuse, depending on the insurer."Arora says, "In the case of term insurance plans, suicide within the first policy year is a common exclusion across providers. As per Section 45, claims can be denied under non-disclosure, pre-existing conditions, substance abuse, involvement in criminal acts, and injuries or death due to participation in hazardous activities are among the other common exclusions. However, consumers must note that each insurance provider may have a different set of exclusions. This is why I urge everyone to review the policy document for exclusions."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
36 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Asim Munir's anti-India statement: He is is only as big a problem as Delhi let's him be
Issuing nuclear threats seems to be an easy way to grab global headlines. A former Russian president did it twice in recent weeks. Joining him now is Pakistan's Chief of Army Staff, the newly promoted Field Marshal, Asim Munir. Addressing the Pakistani diaspora in the United States, on his second visit in under two months, he reportedly declared: 'We are a nuclear nation. If we think we are going down, we'll take half the world down with us.' Incidentally, Munir's remark came on the 80th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Nagasaki during the World War II — the last time nuclear weapons were used in warfare. For now, though, for all his undisguised bombast, Munir appears to be enjoying a moment in the sun, having lunch with the US President, theatrically threatening India. New Delhi's official reaction to what it has described as his 'nuclear sabre-rattling' was to reaffirm its refusal to yield to nuclear blackmail and assert that India would take all measures necessary to safeguard national security. Yet, given the clearly staged nature of Munir's provocations — he also repeated the 'jugular vein' remark on Kashmir that he had made ahead of the Pahalgam attack — delivered on the soil of a nation friendly to India despite the recent trade-related turbulence, New Delhi would do well to not take them too seriously. Munir's tirade does offer a window to understanding the Pakistani military's inclination towards economic warfare. He reportedly vowed to target Reliance Industries' Jamnagar refinery in Gujarat, the largest single-site refining complex in the world, in the event of a future conflict. He invoked the Indus Waters Treaty, which New Delhi placed in abeyance after the Pahalgam attack, threatening missile strikes should India proceed with dam construction. Far from projecting strength, these remarks present a sorry picture of a Field Marshal straining to cast Pakistan as a viable rival to India. The reality is different: India's GDP is roughly 10 times Pakistan's, and the gap is widening, not just economically but also in terms of the two countries' global standing. Munir's own analogy likening India to a Mercedes and Pakistan to a dump truck is telling of the military establishment's mindset: That, in a conflict, India has far more to lose. Yet, much like three decades ago, when Rawalpindi invested significant time and effort in nefarious cross-border activities aimed at destabilisation, India should continue to press ahead with diplomatic partnerships, accelerate economic reforms, strengthen technological capabilities, and foster internal unity. Ultimately, Field Marshal Asim Munir can only become as big for India as India allows him to be. Pakistan is far more than the folie de grandeur of one man bent on forcing India-Pakistan hyphenation on the international stage — unsuccessfully. India must keep its eye on the big picture, and focus on partnerships with nations pivotal to its rise as an economic power.
Mint
10 hours ago
- Mint
India approves its first Maxar-like private satellite data project worth $135mn
A consortium of four startups, led by Bengaluru-based Pixxel, has won a mandate to create and operate India's first privately-built satellite imaging system. Approved by the country's space regulator on Tuesday, the project worth $135 million ( ₹ 1,200 crore) over five years, will see the birth of private Indian space firms that sell earth observation data at scale to commercial clients. The move mimics an established American model of satellite operation, where firms such as Maxar Technologies sell high-resolution satellite images to any paying customer, for a fee. While Maxar's data ran into a controversy when reports highlighted its involvement in the planning of the Pahalgam terror attack in Jammu & Kashmir on 22 April, industry stakeholders have consistently flagged the importance of the technology in modern-day industries—such as civic planning, forestry, agriculture, disaster management, maritime exploration and more. In the mission, Pixxel, along with fellow startups Dhruva, SatSure and Piersight, will develop a constellation of 12 satellites with 'panchromatic, multispectral, hyperspectral, and microwave SAR sensors'—a statement by the Indian National Space Promotion and Authorization Centre (In-Space) said. While the description does not specify a resolution of data, it refers to images that can clearly convey close-range information such as depth and textures. Pawan Goenka, chairman of In-Space, said in the statement that the project 'demonstrates the capability and confidence of Indian companies to lead large-scale, technologically advanced, and commercially viable space missions that serve both national and global markets.' However, he could not be reached for a comment on the government's role in the project. The constellation project, once completed, will become the first private imaging system in India. In-Space did not reveal the breakdown of the final bids till press time. In June, In-Space kicked up a row for awarding a $60-million contract to privatize the Indian Space Research Organisation (Isro)'s small satellite launch vehicle to state-run Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL). The Centre holds over 70% stake in HAL, leaving analysts wondering whether the sale of the government-built rocket truly qualified as privatization. Industry stakeholders had also raised concerns around stifling of the private sector, at a time when HAL struggled to deliver on previous Isro and Air Force contracts. Tuesday's announcements appear to have made amends by awarding a large commercial contract to private space firms. While the government has thrown open the space sector to private players, various industry veterans, including former Isro chief S. Somanath, have raised concerns over the Centre not being the anchor customer for India's nascent space industry. They fear that without the government's regular and guaranteed orders, the startups may not be able to grow. 'There is no clear statement of intent that for the new private satellite constellation, the government will be an anchor customer. But, this is a sign of intent that India is ready to offer contracts exceeding a few hundred thousand dollars to private companies—which in turn would help the industry grow further,' a senior industry executive said, requesting anonymity, since he was a part of the bidding process for this very contract. Earth observation satellites, Mint reported on 13 July, is giving an increasing fillip to India's space startups in terms of revenue and client base—as governments as well as private firms see a more geopolitically divided world. However, while the likes of Digantara applied and won a ministry of defence surveillance satellite contract, Pixxel itself is a part of an increasing number of companies setting up shop in the US for more lucrative American space contracts. Other finalists of the imaging satellite project included public-sector firm Bharat Electronics, and Bengaluru-based startup GalaxEye—which is also building its own surveillance satellite to offer as a product or service around the world.
India.com
11 hours ago
- India.com
What is Asim Munir's net worth? Pakistan's Army Chief has a total of..., even Mukesh Ambani...
New Delhi: Pakistan's Army Chief Asim Munir has come into the limelight since the cowardly Pahalgam terrorist attack and the subsequent Operation Sindoor. During his second US visit, he has threatened India with a nuclear bomb and Pakistani missiles. What is interesting about Asim Munir is that he lives a luxurious life while Pakistan is plunged into poverty. What is the most popular perception about the Pakistan Army? It is often said that the Pakistani Army is the largest business group of Pakistan. According to reports, the Pakistani Army runs more than 100 companies. Many of these companies earn huge profits, which gives a huge income to the army. Along with this, big officials like the Army Chief of Pakistan, Asim Munir, also benefit a lot. Being an Army officer in Pakistan is very rewarding and lucrative. It is like being the CEO of a very big company. In other words, Asim Munir is the CEO of more than 100 companies. Even Reliance Industries Chairman and Asia's richest man, Mukesh Ambani, is not the CEO of so many companies. Where does the Pakistan Army invest the most? The influence of the Pakistan Army is not limited to the defence sector only. The army also has a big dominance in the real estate market. The army runs many big organisations. These include Fauji Foundation, Army Welfare Trust, Shaheen Foundation, Bahria Foundation, etc. These sound like welfare organisations, but in reality, they work like business corporations. What other areas are dominated by the Pakistan Army? The Pakistani army is also involved in cement, banking, dairy, and transport. In cities like Karachi, Lahore and Islamabad, land is acquired in the name of national security and then converted into profitable housing projects. The Defense Housing Authority (DHA) is one of the most famous real estate brands run by the army. Its value is in billions of dollars. According to estimates, the total current value of the army's businesses could be around 100 billion US dollars. What is Munir's net worth? Talking about Field Marshal Asim Munir, his total assets are around 800000 US dollars (about 7 crores rupees). In such a situation, it can be said that the post of Army Chief is not limited to just uniform and gun in Pakistan, but it is also a means of wealth and fame.
