
Sen. Elizabeth Warren targets price gouging in new bill as tariff costs, inflation increase
The Price Gouging Bill of 2025 — introduced on Thursday by Warren along with Senator Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), Senator Tammy Baldwin (D-WI ), and Rep. Chris Deluzio (D-PA) — would make price gouging illegal and give the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general the power to litigate alleged abuses of market power.
The proposed legislation comes just days after the June consumer price index showed a resurgence of inflation and as the tariffs toll continues to grow.
Warren says that in the past big corporations have taken advantage of market shocks, hiding behind factors like inflation and supply chain disruptions to raise prices excessively, but this time the culprit is President Trump's global trade war.
"Donald Trump's reckless tariff policies are giving companies cover to squeeze families and raise prices more than necessary. My bill is an opportunity for Congress to stand up for families by cracking down on price gouging and fighting back against corporate abuse," Warren said in a statement.
The text of the bill, as seen by CNBC, lists "abrupt trade policies" and "exceptional market shock" as factors to be considered in analysis of price increases.
A version of the bill introduced last year, The Price Gouging Prevention Act of 2024, did not specify trade policies. That legislation, sponsored by Warren along with former Senator Bob Casey (D-PA) was introduced in February 2024, but failed to pass. Senator Casey lost his Senate seat in the 2024 election to Republican David McCormick.
The price gouging bill would require companies with over $100 million in revenue to publicly report in Securities and Exchange Commission filings on any changes in pricing that exceed the average price in the past 120 days before the reporting period, and provide details on product costs and margins. Businesses with less than $100 million in revenue would be protected from price gouging litigation if they show legitimate cost increases.
The bill would allocate an additional $1 billion in funding to the Federal Trade Commission to enforce the price gouging law.
"The biggest corporations in our country jack up the cost of everyday household items, take in record profits, and give their executives huge bonuses – all on the backs of hard-working Wisconsin families," said Senator Baldwin in a statement. "Donald Trump claimed he would lower prices – so far, he has done just the opposite and is even opening the door to more price gouging. ... Our bill will finally crack down on corporate greed and help stop those big companies at the top of the food chain from sticking families with exorbitant costs," she stated.
In second-quarter earnings calls, companies from Costco to Best Buy and Newell Brands cited tariffs as a reason for price increases.
Rep. Deluzio said price increases are a result of "out-of-control" corporate power. "Prices are still too high, and inflation is still pounding folks," Deluzio said in a statement. "Especially now, we need to rein in monopolists and other huge corporations with the power to price-gouge the American people," he added.
The AFL-CIO and United Steelworkers both voice support for the bill and tell CNBC the bill is long overdue.
The price gouging policy has been criticized on both the right and left in recent history. During Kamala Harris's run for the presidency, Obama economic advisor Jason Furman told the New York Times that a plan to ban grocery story "price gouging" was not sound economics. "This is not sensible policy, and I think the biggest hope is that it ends up being a lot of rhetoric and no reality," he told the Times. "There's no upside here, and there is some downside."
During a heated CNBC interview in August 2024 about the same Harris plan, Warren said three dozen states including Florida and Texas already have price gouging laws and have used them effectively. "Pricing gouging laws are not price controls. Price gouging laws are there to say sometimes that markets goes off the rails and when they do we need some ways to get them back on the rails. We need some curbs on that behavior," Warren said during a "Squawk Box" interview.
The issue has been a long-time focus for Warren, who along with former Senator Casey sent a letter to Kroger CEO Rodney McMullen questioning the grocer's rollout of electronic shelf labels, arguing the technology could make it easier to increase prices of high-demand items.
In separate price gouging accusation last November, Warren, along with Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., sent a letter to the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Agriculture on Sunday, calling on the agencies to investigate Albertsons and its subsidiaries Safeway and Vons for mislabeling items sold by weight, including produce, meat and baked goods and unlawfully charging customers prices higher than their lowest advertised or posted price.
A month before, Safeway, Albertsons, and Von paid nearly $4 million to resolve allegations of price-gouging and false weight advertising in California.
Co-sponsors of the new bill include Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), John Fetterman (D-Pa.), Andy Kim (D-N.J.), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.), and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.). In the House, sponsors include Representatives Angie Craig (D-Minn.), Maggie Goodlander (D-N.H.), Hank Johnson (D-Ga.), Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.), Jerry Nadler (D-NY), Mary Gay Scanlon (D-Pa.), Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), and Paul Tonko (D-N.).
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration appeals to Supreme Court to allow $783 million research-funding cuts
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court on Thursday to allow it to cut hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of research funding in its push to roll back federal diversity, equity and inclusion efforts. The Justice Department argued a federal judge in Massachusetts was wrong to block the National Institutes of Health from making $783 million worth of cuts to align with President Donald Trump's priorities. U.S. District Judge William Young found that the abrupt cancellations ignored long-held government rules and standards. Young, an appointee of Republican President Ronald Reagan, also said the cuts amounted to 'racial discrimination and discrimination against America's LGBTQ community.' The ruling came in lawsuits filed by 16 attorneys general, public-health advocacy groups and some affected scientists. His decision addressed only a fraction of the hundreds of NIH research projects that have been cut. The Trump administration's appeal also takes aim at nearly two dozen cases over funding. Solicitor General D. John Sauer pointed to a 5-4 decision on the Supreme Court's emergency docket from April that allowed cuts to teacher training programs to go forward. That decisions shows that district judges shouldn't be hearing those cases at all, but rather sending them to federal claims court, he argued. Lindsay Whitehurst, The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump signs order aimed at removing homeless from streets
President Donald Trump on Thursday signed an executive order aimed at removing homeless people from streets. The measure, titled by the White House as 'Ending Crime and Disorder on America's Streets,' calls on Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek to overturn legal rulings the Trump administration says make it difficult for cities and states to force homeless people into shelters and substance-abuse centers, USA Today first reported. It will also redirect federal funding for homeless programs, many of which aim to provide housing to those in need, to addiction programs and mental health resources, although it was not immediately clear how much money would be involved. 'By removing vagrant criminals from our streets and redirecting resources toward substance abuse programs, the Trump administration will ensure that Americans feel safe in their own communities and that individuals suffering from addiction or mental health struggles are able to get the help they need,' White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said. The order also seeks to prioritize federal grants to cities and states that 'enforce prohibitions on open illicit drug use, urban camping and loitering, and urban squatting, and track the location of sex offenders.' Official figures say America's homeless population is more than 700,000 and rising. But advocates say the number is actually much higher. New York City is one of a few jurisdictions with a 'right to shelter,' meaning in theory that any homeless person has the right to a spot in a shelter. Trump has made fighting big city crime and disorder a major plank of his second White House term, although most measures show crime is declining. Instead of working with Congress or big city mayors, most of whom are Democrats, he has preferred to enact executive orders, some of which have faced critical scrutiny from courts. The edict is touted as forming part of Trump's commitment to ending homelessness, according to a White House fact sheet. It comes after an executive order in March directed the National Park Service to clear homeless encampments and graffiti on federal lands. The Supreme Court ruled in June that that authorities can fine or arrest homeless people for sleeping in public spaces. The ruling, which was approved by a 6-3 margin along ideological lines, overturned a lower court's ruling that it is cruel and unusual punishment to enforce camping bans when shelter is lacking. ________
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘You just added a third building': Powell fact checks Trump's Fed renovation as awkward hard-hat visit turns tense
President Donald Trump's attempt to shame Federal Reserve Board of Governors chair Jerome Powell over the cost of a long-running renovation to the central bank's Washington headquarters went horribly wrong on Thursday when Powell had a ready response for the president's accusations during a tour of the construction site. After viewing parts of the costly renovation, Trump and Powell stopped briefly to speak to reporters who'd traveled to the Federal Reserve headquarters with the president. Trump said the cost of the years-long project was now 'about $3.1 billion' rather than the $2.7 billion previously stated by Powell. 'So we're taking a look, and it looks like it's about 3.1 billion went up a little bit or a lot. So the 2.7 is now 3.1 it just came out,' he said reading from a piece of paper, as Powell looked on and shook his head in the negative before interjecting. The chairman replied: 'I haven't heard that from anybody' and asked if the paper Trump was reading from came from the central bank. At that point, Trump handed him the paper and continued talking while Powell pulled out his reading glasses to look. He then told the president that the higher number he was claiming included a separate project that wasn't part of the renovation at issue. 'You just added in a third building,' he said. When Trump replied that the building in question was currently 'being built,' Powell spoke up once more to disabuse the president of his misunderstanding of what he was reading. He told Trump that he was mistakenly counting long-completed renovations to a building named for William Martin Jr., who served as Fed chair from 1951–1970, as part of the renovation of the Fed's main headquarters. 'No, it's been it was built five years ago. We finished Martin five years ago,' he said. Asked by reporters if he expects more overruns on the lengthy project, Powell said the Fed is 'ready' for any but doesn't expect more. 'We have a little bit of a reserve that we may use, but no,' he said before adding that he expects to project will wrap in 2027 — a year after his term as chairman is set to end. Trump and his allies have said the $2.5 billion renovation of the Fed headquarters and a neighboring building reflects an institution run amok — a belief they had hoped to verify in an afternoon tour of the construction site. The site visit by the president is an attempt to further ratchet up pressure on Powell, whom the Republican president has relentlessly attacked for not cutting borrowing costs. Trump's attacks have put the Fed, a historically independent institution, under a harsh spotlight. Undermining its independence could reduce the Fed's ability to calm financial markets and stabilize the U.S. economy. The president has made no secret of his distaste for Powell, whom he nominated to lead the Federal Reserve in 2017, primarily because of Powell's refusal to lower interest rates, particularly in light of Trump's decision to levy tariffs. Powell has said that the central bank needs time to see what effects tariffswill have on inflation and employment before making a determination on interest rates. This has prompted Trump to call Powell a 'stupid person.' The president can do little to remove Powell. Joe Biden re-nominated Powell for another five-year term in 2021 based on his steady leadership during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, and his term would expire in May. Federal statute says the president can only remove Powell 'for cause.' For a time, it appeared as if Trump and his allies had found such a cause in the costly renovation of the Fed's headquarters. But Trump, a former real estate developer, appeared to soften his criticisms of the project after viewing it himself. Appearing in his element while sporting a hard hat, Trump said he would like to see the project finish. 'In many ways it's too bad it started, but it did start, and it's been under construction for a long time. Gonna be it's going to be a real long time, because it looks like it's got a long way to go,' he said. A short time later, he told reporters that he'd had a 'very good tour' and declined to repeat his earlier criticisms of the project. He did, however, give a detailed description of the project's complexity with regard to a basement being dug beneath the Washington, D.C. water table. 'I was given a very nice tour by the head of construction. And, you know, look, if you look over here, they're trying to open up the basement. When you open up a basement, first of all, it's the worst space — always. A basement is the worst space in a building, and it's also the most expensive space to build, and especially here, because you have a water line, you know, you they're going down into the water. So they have to build a reverse, what's called a reverse bathtub. The water has to be kept out. It's very expensive construction,' he said. 'There's always Monday morning quarterbacks. I don't want to be that. I want to help them get it finished. It's been going around for years, and I want to help them get it finished.' He later wrote on Truth Social that it had been a 'great honor' to tour the building. 'It's got a long way to go, would have been much better if it were never started, but it is what it is and, hopefully, it will be finished ASAP,' he said. 'The cost overruns are substantial but, on the positive side, our Country is doing very well and can afford just about anything — Even the cost of this building!' He added that he'd be 'watching' the project and hoped to add his own expertise, citing his eponymous real estate company's renovation of the historic Old Post Office building into the hotel that became a MAGA hotspot during his first term before it was sold in 2021. 'The total Construction cost was a small fraction of the Fed Building's cost, and it is many times the size. With all of that being said, let's just get it finished and, even more importantly, LOWER INTEREST RATES!' he said. Despite the president's past criticism, it appears he has backed down from his implicit threat to fire Powell due to negative reaction from markets. Last week during an Oval Office press opportunity, Trump told reporters it was 'highly unlikely' that he would upend nearly a century of precedent by attempting to sack Powell less than a day after he reportedly polled a group of Republican lawmakers on whether he should sack the central bank boss during a Tuesday night meeting in the Oval Office after the 12 House Republicans blocked a cryptocurrency bill favored by the president. With additional reporting by agencies and Washington Bureau Chief Eric Garcia