logo
Sen. Elizabeth Warren targets price gouging in new bill as tariff costs, inflation increase

Sen. Elizabeth Warren targets price gouging in new bill as tariff costs, inflation increase

CNBC17-07-2025
With expectations that prices will rise throughout the economy over the summer as more tariffs stack up, a group of legislators on Capitol Hill highlighted by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) is introducing a bill to target price gouging by the market's biggest companies.
The Price Gouging Bill of 2025 — introduced on Thursday by Warren along with Senator Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), Senator Tammy Baldwin (D-WI ), and Rep. Chris Deluzio (D-PA) — would make price gouging illegal and give the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general the power to litigate alleged abuses of market power.
The proposed legislation comes just days after the June consumer price index showed a resurgence of inflation and as the tariffs toll continues to grow.
Warren says that in the past big corporations have taken advantage of market shocks, hiding behind factors like inflation and supply chain disruptions to raise prices excessively, but this time the culprit is President Trump's global trade war.
"Donald Trump's reckless tariff policies are giving companies cover to squeeze families and raise prices more than necessary. My bill is an opportunity for Congress to stand up for families by cracking down on price gouging and fighting back against corporate abuse," Warren said in a statement.
The text of the bill, as seen by CNBC, lists "abrupt trade policies" and "exceptional market shock" as factors to be considered in analysis of price increases.
A version of the bill introduced last year, The Price Gouging Prevention Act of 2024, did not specify trade policies. That legislation, sponsored by Warren along with former Senator Bob Casey (D-PA) was introduced in February 2024, but failed to pass. Senator Casey lost his Senate seat in the 2024 election to Republican David McCormick.
The price gouging bill would require companies with over $100 million in revenue to publicly report in Securities and Exchange Commission filings on any changes in pricing that exceed the average price in the past 120 days before the reporting period, and provide details on product costs and margins. Businesses with less than $100 million in revenue would be protected from price gouging litigation if they show legitimate cost increases.
The bill would allocate an additional $1 billion in funding to the Federal Trade Commission to enforce the price gouging law.
"The biggest corporations in our country jack up the cost of everyday household items, take in record profits, and give their executives huge bonuses – all on the backs of hard-working Wisconsin families," said Senator Baldwin in a statement. "Donald Trump claimed he would lower prices – so far, he has done just the opposite and is even opening the door to more price gouging. ... Our bill will finally crack down on corporate greed and help stop those big companies at the top of the food chain from sticking families with exorbitant costs," she stated.
In second-quarter earnings calls, companies from Costco to Best Buy and Newell Brands cited tariffs as a reason for price increases.
Rep. Deluzio said price increases are a result of "out-of-control" corporate power. "Prices are still too high, and inflation is still pounding folks," Deluzio said in a statement. "Especially now, we need to rein in monopolists and other huge corporations with the power to price-gouge the American people," he added.
The AFL-CIO and United Steelworkers both voice support for the bill and tell CNBC the bill is long overdue.
The price gouging policy has been criticized on both the right and left in recent history. During Kamala Harris's run for the presidency, Obama economic advisor Jason Furman told the New York Times that a plan to ban grocery story "price gouging" was not sound economics. "This is not sensible policy, and I think the biggest hope is that it ends up being a lot of rhetoric and no reality," he told the Times. "There's no upside here, and there is some downside."
During a heated CNBC interview in August 2024 about the same Harris plan, Warren said three dozen states including Florida and Texas already have price gouging laws and have used them effectively. "Pricing gouging laws are not price controls. Price gouging laws are there to say sometimes that markets goes off the rails and when they do we need some ways to get them back on the rails. We need some curbs on that behavior," Warren said during a "Squawk Box" interview.
The issue has been a long-time focus for Warren, who along with former Senator Casey sent a letter to Kroger CEO Rodney McMullen questioning the grocer's rollout of electronic shelf labels, arguing the technology could make it easier to increase prices of high-demand items.
In separate price gouging accusation last November, Warren, along with Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., sent a letter to the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Agriculture on Sunday, calling on the agencies to investigate Albertsons and its subsidiaries Safeway and Vons for mislabeling items sold by weight, including produce, meat and baked goods and unlawfully charging customers prices higher than their lowest advertised or posted price.
A month before, Safeway, Albertsons, and Von paid nearly $4 million to resolve allegations of price-gouging and false weight advertising in California.
Co-sponsors of the new bill include Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), John Fetterman (D-Pa.), Andy Kim (D-N.J.), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.), and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.). In the House, sponsors include Representatives Angie Craig (D-Minn.), Maggie Goodlander (D-N.H.), Hank Johnson (D-Ga.), Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.), Jerry Nadler (D-NY), Mary Gay Scanlon (D-Pa.), Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), and Paul Tonko (D-N.).
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Free trade carveouts key in potential deal between U.S. and Canada: business groups
Free trade carveouts key in potential deal between U.S. and Canada: business groups

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Free trade carveouts key in potential deal between U.S. and Canada: business groups

Business leaders and academics say they hope to see Canada and the U.S. maintain free trade protections for most goods once an agreement is reached, even if the negotiations can't stave off certain sectoral tariffs. It's unclear if the two countries will stick to the Aug. 1 deadline for wrapping up talks, as Prime Minister Mark Carney said Monday negotiations were in an "intense phase" but U.S. President Donald Trump told reporters last week that Canada wasn't a priority for his administration. Whether a deal is announced Friday or later, Canadian Federation of Independent Business president Dan Kelly says his organization's members feel "a good chunk" of trade must remain tariff-free in order for talks to be considered successful. He says it wouldn't be a win for Canada if the trade agreement ends up looking similar to the deal struck by the U.S. with the European Union on Sunday. That framework imposes a 15 per cent tariff on most goods imported into the U.S., including European automobiles, and no carveouts for key products like pharmaceuticals and steel. Kelly says Canadian business leaders will also be watching to find out what levies will remain on imports from the U.S., noting Canada's ongoing retaliatory tariffs "are really crippling small businesses even more than the U.S. tariffs." This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 29, 2025. Sammy Hudes, The Canadian Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

FTSE 100 LIVE: Markets higher as attention turns to slew of earnings reports
FTSE 100 LIVE: Markets higher as attention turns to slew of earnings reports

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

FTSE 100 LIVE: Markets higher as attention turns to slew of earnings reports

The FTSE 100 (^FTSE) and European stocks headed higher on Tuesday morning, recouping losses from the previous session as traders' attention turns to the crop of quarterly company updates slated for this week. Barclays (BARC.L) bank reported second quarter results before the opening bell in London, with its stock price hovering as it announced £1bn in share buybacks. The bank's earnings call is at 2.30pm. In Europe a crop of fashion and luxury retailers are set to report, including Kering ( Christian Dior ( and L'Oreal ( In the US, reports from Visa (V), Procter & Gamble (PG), United Health (UEEC), Boeing (BA), Spotify (SPOT) and Starbuck's (SBUX) are on the agenda. Eyes will also be on movement in the UK's position on sending aid to Gaza, as prime minister Keir Starmer recalls his cabinet today following a meeting with president Donald Trump in Scotland. London's premier index gained 0.1% in early trade. At the top of the index were Melrose Industries (MRO.L) and Games Workshop (GAW.L). Over in Germany, the DAX (^GDAXI) added 0.6%. Paris shares rose, with the CAC 40 (^FCHI) also adding 0.6%. The pan-European STOXX 600 (^STOXX) up 0.3%. Tea and meat feed UK food price increases Yahoo Finance UK's Pedro Goncalves writes: UK families are paying more every time they go grocery shopping, as food price inflation surged for the sixth consecutive month in July, driven by a rise in the costs of meat and tea, according to the British Retail Consortium (BRC). The figures show that food prices are now 4% higher than a year ago, up from 3.7% in June and surpassing the three-month average of 3.5%. Fresh food inflation remained steady at 3.2%, while ambient food prices saw a more significant jump, climbing to 5.1% compared to last June, up from 4.3% the previous month. Overall, shop price inflation also increased, rising to 0.7% in July, up from 0.4% in June, and above the three-month average of 0.3%. Helen Dickinson, chief executive of the BRC, warned that the increase in food price inflation will be felt by households across the country. 'Families will have seen their food bills increase as food price inflation rose for the sixth consecutive month," she said. "Staples such as meat and tea were hit the hardest as wholesale prices for both categories have been hit by tighter global supplies. This has helped push up overall shop prices." Read more on Yahoo Finance UK Average rent surges to £2,712 in London and £1,365 across UK The cost of rent in London has climbed for a 15th consecutive quarter to hit a record high of £2,712 per month, while tenants across the rest of the UK are paying on average £1,365. The data from property site Rightmove (RMV.L) showed that new tenants are now paying an average of £417 more in monthly rent compared to 2020. This is a 44% increase in rents, well above the 36% rise in average earnings over the same period. Rightmove's property expert Colleen Babcock said: 'Despite another new record in average asking rents for tenants, the big picture is that yearly rent increases continue to slow, which is good news for tenants." "Supply and demand is slowly rebalancing towards more normal levels, though we still have a way to go before we reach pre-2020 levels of available homes for tenants. The good news is that the latest industry snapshot suggests more investors are taking out buy-to-let loans compared with last year, which should help to bring even more homes to the rental market.' Read more on Yahoo Finance UK How Barclays shares are faring in early trade Barclays announces £1bn buyback Yahoo Finance UK's Vicky McKeever writes: Barclays (BARC.L) beat profit expectations in the second quarter and announced a further £1bn in share buybacks. Pre-tax profit rose 28% in the second quarter to £2.84bn, results released on Tuesday showed. That exceeded expectations of £2.24bn, according to consensus estimates provided by the bank. For the first half, profit before tax totalled £5.2bn, which was up 23% from the same period last year. Total income was up 14% in the second quarter at £7.19bn, which was also ahead of expectations of £7.01bn. Group net interest income — the gap between what the bank pays out to savers and receives from borrowers in interest — excluding Barclays Investment Bank and head office, came in at £3.1bn, up 13% year-on-year. Barclays also recorded a return on tangible equity — a key measure of profitability — of 12.3% in the second quarter, up from 9.9% for the same period in 2024. Read more on Yahoo Finance UK US stock futures higher ahead of Fed and earnings Our US team writes: US stock futures made gains as Wall Street prepared for fresh earnings and economic data amid a blockbuster week poised to shake markets. Futures attached to the Dow Jones Industrial Average (YM=F) and the benchmark S&P 500 (ES=F) gained 0.2%. While contracts on the Nasdaq 100 (NQ=F) ticked up 0.3%. On Monday, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq eked out record highs amid an otherwise subdued trading session as Wall Street digested a new trade deal between the US and EU. Good morning! Hello from London. Lucy Harley-McKeown here — ready to bring you the business and markets news of the day. We kicked off the week with an EU-US trade deal. There will no doubt be more details on that to come. In central bank news, the US's Federal Reserve kicks of a two-day meeting about rates today. Traders are also readying themselves for a week of earnings. This morning in London: Barclays' (BARC.L) second quarter report In the US we're looking out for: Visa (V), Procter & Gamble (PG), United Health (UEEC), Boeing (BA), Spotify (SPOT), Starbuck's (SBUX), among others. Let's get to it. Tea and meat feed UK food price increases Yahoo Finance UK's Pedro Goncalves writes: UK families are paying more every time they go grocery shopping, as food price inflation surged for the sixth consecutive month in July, driven by a rise in the costs of meat and tea, according to the British Retail Consortium (BRC). The figures show that food prices are now 4% higher than a year ago, up from 3.7% in June and surpassing the three-month average of 3.5%. Fresh food inflation remained steady at 3.2%, while ambient food prices saw a more significant jump, climbing to 5.1% compared to last June, up from 4.3% the previous month. Overall, shop price inflation also increased, rising to 0.7% in July, up from 0.4% in June, and above the three-month average of 0.3%. Helen Dickinson, chief executive of the BRC, warned that the increase in food price inflation will be felt by households across the country. 'Families will have seen their food bills increase as food price inflation rose for the sixth consecutive month," she said. "Staples such as meat and tea were hit the hardest as wholesale prices for both categories have been hit by tighter global supplies. This has helped push up overall shop prices." Read more on Yahoo Finance UK Yahoo Finance UK's Pedro Goncalves writes: UK families are paying more every time they go grocery shopping, as food price inflation surged for the sixth consecutive month in July, driven by a rise in the costs of meat and tea, according to the British Retail Consortium (BRC). The figures show that food prices are now 4% higher than a year ago, up from 3.7% in June and surpassing the three-month average of 3.5%. Fresh food inflation remained steady at 3.2%, while ambient food prices saw a more significant jump, climbing to 5.1% compared to last June, up from 4.3% the previous month. Overall, shop price inflation also increased, rising to 0.7% in July, up from 0.4% in June, and above the three-month average of 0.3%. Helen Dickinson, chief executive of the BRC, warned that the increase in food price inflation will be felt by households across the country. 'Families will have seen their food bills increase as food price inflation rose for the sixth consecutive month," she said. "Staples such as meat and tea were hit the hardest as wholesale prices for both categories have been hit by tighter global supplies. This has helped push up overall shop prices." Read more on Yahoo Finance UK Average rent surges to £2,712 in London and £1,365 across UK The cost of rent in London has climbed for a 15th consecutive quarter to hit a record high of £2,712 per month, while tenants across the rest of the UK are paying on average £1,365. The data from property site Rightmove (RMV.L) showed that new tenants are now paying an average of £417 more in monthly rent compared to 2020. This is a 44% increase in rents, well above the 36% rise in average earnings over the same period. Rightmove's property expert Colleen Babcock said: 'Despite another new record in average asking rents for tenants, the big picture is that yearly rent increases continue to slow, which is good news for tenants." "Supply and demand is slowly rebalancing towards more normal levels, though we still have a way to go before we reach pre-2020 levels of available homes for tenants. The good news is that the latest industry snapshot suggests more investors are taking out buy-to-let loans compared with last year, which should help to bring even more homes to the rental market.' Read more on Yahoo Finance UK The cost of rent in London has climbed for a 15th consecutive quarter to hit a record high of £2,712 per month, while tenants across the rest of the UK are paying on average £1,365. The data from property site Rightmove (RMV.L) showed that new tenants are now paying an average of £417 more in monthly rent compared to 2020. This is a 44% increase in rents, well above the 36% rise in average earnings over the same period. Rightmove's property expert Colleen Babcock said: 'Despite another new record in average asking rents for tenants, the big picture is that yearly rent increases continue to slow, which is good news for tenants." "Supply and demand is slowly rebalancing towards more normal levels, though we still have a way to go before we reach pre-2020 levels of available homes for tenants. The good news is that the latest industry snapshot suggests more investors are taking out buy-to-let loans compared with last year, which should help to bring even more homes to the rental market.' Read more on Yahoo Finance UK How Barclays shares are faring in early trade Barclays announces £1bn buyback Yahoo Finance UK's Vicky McKeever writes: Barclays (BARC.L) beat profit expectations in the second quarter and announced a further £1bn in share buybacks. Pre-tax profit rose 28% in the second quarter to £2.84bn, results released on Tuesday showed. That exceeded expectations of £2.24bn, according to consensus estimates provided by the bank. For the first half, profit before tax totalled £5.2bn, which was up 23% from the same period last year. Total income was up 14% in the second quarter at £7.19bn, which was also ahead of expectations of £7.01bn. Group net interest income — the gap between what the bank pays out to savers and receives from borrowers in interest — excluding Barclays Investment Bank and head office, came in at £3.1bn, up 13% year-on-year. Barclays also recorded a return on tangible equity — a key measure of profitability — of 12.3% in the second quarter, up from 9.9% for the same period in 2024. Read more on Yahoo Finance UK Yahoo Finance UK's Vicky McKeever writes: Barclays (BARC.L) beat profit expectations in the second quarter and announced a further £1bn in share buybacks. Pre-tax profit rose 28% in the second quarter to £2.84bn, results released on Tuesday showed. That exceeded expectations of £2.24bn, according to consensus estimates provided by the bank. For the first half, profit before tax totalled £5.2bn, which was up 23% from the same period last year. Total income was up 14% in the second quarter at £7.19bn, which was also ahead of expectations of £7.01bn. Group net interest income — the gap between what the bank pays out to savers and receives from borrowers in interest — excluding Barclays Investment Bank and head office, came in at £3.1bn, up 13% year-on-year. Barclays also recorded a return on tangible equity — a key measure of profitability — of 12.3% in the second quarter, up from 9.9% for the same period in 2024. Read more on Yahoo Finance UK US stock futures higher ahead of Fed and earnings Our US team writes: US stock futures made gains as Wall Street prepared for fresh earnings and economic data amid a blockbuster week poised to shake markets. Futures attached to the Dow Jones Industrial Average (YM=F) and the benchmark S&P 500 (ES=F) gained 0.2%. While contracts on the Nasdaq 100 (NQ=F) ticked up 0.3%. On Monday, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq eked out record highs amid an otherwise subdued trading session as Wall Street digested a new trade deal between the US and EU. Our US team writes: US stock futures made gains as Wall Street prepared for fresh earnings and economic data amid a blockbuster week poised to shake markets. Futures attached to the Dow Jones Industrial Average (YM=F) and the benchmark S&P 500 (ES=F) gained 0.2%. While contracts on the Nasdaq 100 (NQ=F) ticked up 0.3%. On Monday, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq eked out record highs amid an otherwise subdued trading session as Wall Street digested a new trade deal between the US and EU. Good morning! Hello from London. Lucy Harley-McKeown here — ready to bring you the business and markets news of the day. We kicked off the week with an EU-US trade deal. There will no doubt be more details on that to come. In central bank news, the US's Federal Reserve kicks of a two-day meeting about rates today. Traders are also readying themselves for a week of earnings. This morning in London: Barclays' (BARC.L) second quarter report In the US we're looking out for: Visa (V), Procter & Gamble (PG), United Health (UEEC), Boeing (BA), Spotify (SPOT), Starbuck's (SBUX), among others. Let's get to it. Hello from London. Lucy Harley-McKeown here — ready to bring you the business and markets news of the day. We kicked off the week with an EU-US trade deal. There will no doubt be more details on that to come. In central bank news, the US's Federal Reserve kicks of a two-day meeting about rates today. Traders are also readying themselves for a week of earnings. This morning in London: Barclays' (BARC.L) second quarter report In the US we're looking out for: Visa (V), Procter & Gamble (PG), United Health (UEEC), Boeing (BA), Spotify (SPOT), Starbuck's (SBUX), among others. Let's get to it. Sign in to access your portfolio

Analysis: Supreme Court shows unflinching regard for Trump
Analysis: Supreme Court shows unflinching regard for Trump

CNN

time24 minutes ago

  • CNN

Analysis: Supreme Court shows unflinching regard for Trump

Ever since Chief Justice John Roberts swore in Donald Trump at the US Capitol January 20 – with the eight other Supreme Court justices looking on – the question has been whether they would restrain a president who vowed to upend the constitutional order. The answer, a half-year later, is no. That was underscored this month by the court's decisions allowing Trump to fire another set of independent regulators, to dismantle the Department of Education and to deport migrants to dangerous countries where they have no citizenship or connection. Meanwhile, the fissures among the nine have deepened. They have condemned each other in written opinions and revealed the personal strains in public appearances. The conservative majority that controls the court has repeatedly undercut the US district court judges on the front lines who've held hearings, discerned the facts, and issued orders to check Trump actions. In the most significant case so far related to Trump's second term, touching on birthright citizenship, Justice Amy Coney Barrett pointedly addressed the role of lower court judges, saying they have a limited ability to block arguably unconstitutional moves. '(F)ederal courts do not exercise general oversight of the Executive Branch; they resolve cases and controversies consistent with the authority Congress has given them,' Barrett wrote for the conservative majority as it reversed a series of lower court decisions. 'When a court concludes that the Executive Branch has acted unlawfully, the answer is not for the court to exceed its power, too.' Dissenting in that late June case, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said the majority had essentially 'shoved lower court judges out of the way.' More recently, last Wednesday, the conservative majority overrode US district and appellate court judges to let Trump fire Biden-appointed members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission who'd been confirmed by the Senate and were still serving their terms. To justify the action, the conservative majority referred to an earlier action in May letting Trump remove members of two independent entities that protect private employees and federal workers, respectively, the National Labor Relations Board and Merit Systems Protection Board. Neither in the earlier case nor the new one centered on the commission that shields consumers from hazardous products did the majority acknowledge that a 1935 precedent, Humphrey's Executor v. United States, had protected such independent board members from being fired without legitimate reason such as misconduct. As lower court judges have noted, the justices have never reversed Humphrey's Executor, leaving it as a precedent that judges – at least those below the nine justices – must follow. Without formally taking up the issue, calling for briefing and holding arguments, the high court is nonetheless signaling a new course – obliquely. 'Although our interim orders are not conclusive as to the merits, they inform how a court should exercise its equitable discretion in like cases,' the Supreme Court said in its unsigned order on July 23. 'The stay we issued in (the May case) reflected 'our judgment that the Government faces greater risk of harm from an order allowing a removed officer to continue exercising the executive power than a wrongfully removed officer faces from being unable to perform her statutory duty.'' The message: They did it before, they can do it again. Referring to the consequences, dissenting Justice Elena Kagan wrote, 'By means of such actions, this Court may facilitate the permanent transfer of authority, piece by piece by piece, from one branch of Government to another.' The high court similarly brushed aside lower court determinations when it ruled on July 14 against states and labor unions that had sued the Department of Education for its actions to dissolve the agency. The majority declined to offer any hint of its rationale. However, the dissenting liberal justices in a 19-page opinion picked up lower court judges' emphasis on the history of the agency created by Congress nearly a half-century ago: '(T)he Department plays a vital role in this Nation's education system, safeguarding equal access to learning and channeling billions of dollars to schools and students across the country each year. Only Congress has the power to abolish the Department.' Referring to Education Secretary Linda McMahon's directives removing half the staff and aiming for an eventual shutdown of the department, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justices Kagan and Jackson, added, 'When the Executive publicly announces its intent to break the law, and then executes on that promise, it is the Judiciary's duty to check that lawlessness, not expedite it.' The six Republican-appointed conservatives have expressed no dread, offered no warnings that Trump's actions might ever go too far, unlike the Democratic-appointed liberal dissenters. The conservatives, in fact, took pains to avoid any disapproval of Trump's plan to end birthright citizenship – that is, the constitutional guarantee that children born in the US become citizens even if their parents are not – as they clipped lower courts' power to impose nationwide injunctions. That June 27 decision's effect on his proposed lifting of birthright citizenship is still working its way through lower courts. Sotomayor and Jackson have routinely protested in provocative terms. When Sotomayor dissented in a high-profile deportation case earlier this month, she warned that migrants flown out of the US to South Sudan could face torture or death. The two liberals have also referred to the personal costs. Sotomayor said in a May speech that she sometimes returns to her office after a decision is issued, closes her door and weeps. Jackson, who seems most isolated from the rest of the justices, told an audience earlier this month she is kept up at night by 'the state of our democracy.' The conservatives who dominate have directed any angst or anger not toward the executive branch but toward their judicial colleagues. In the birthright citizenship case, Barrett (in the majority) and Jackson (dissenting) traded insults that suggested a lack of mutual respect. 'We will not dwell on Justice Jackson's argument,' Barrett wrote, even as she criticized her for choosing 'a startling line of attack that is tethered neither to these sources nor, frankly, to any doctrine whatsoever. … Rhetoric aside, Justice Jackson's position is difficult to pin down.' Jackson wrote that the Barrett majority had reduced the case to 'a mind-numbingly technical query.' And Jackson, writing alone, asserted, 'the majority sees a power grab—but not by a presumably lawless Executive choosing to act in a manner that flouts the plain text of the Constitution. Instead, to the majority, the power-hungry actors are … (wait for it) … the district courts.' Roberts signed onto all of Barrett's opinion in that late June case. If he and fellow conservatives engage in any special regard or deference, it's not for their lower court colleagues or the liberals with whom they sit. It's for Donald Trump.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store