Amazon Profits Surge 35% But Forecast Sinks Share Price
But the Seattle-based company's profit outlook for the current quarter came in lower than hoped for, with investors worried that the cost of AI was weiging on the bottom line.
Amazon's share price was trading about six percent lower in after hours trading.
This was despite a stellar second quarter that exceeded analyst expecations, much like it did for its AI focused rivals Google, Microsoft and Meta, which posted bumper results for the period.
"Our conviction that AI will change every customer experience is starting to play out," said Chief Executive Andy Jassy, pointing to the company's expanded Alexa+ service and new AI shopping agents.
Amazon posted net profit of $18.2 billion for the second quarter that ended June 30, compared with $13.5 billion in the same period last year.
Net sales climbed 13 percent to $167.7 billion, beating analyst expectations and signaling that the company was surviving the impacts of the high-tariff trade policy under US President Donald Trump.
"There continues to be a lot of noise about the impact that tariffs will have on retail prices and consumption. Much of it thus far has been wrong and misreported," Jassy told analysts.
Amazon Web Services (AWS), the company's world leading cloud computing division, led the charge with sales jumping 17.5 percent to $30.9 billion.
The unit's operating profit rose to $10.2 billion from $9.3 billion a year earlier.
The strong AWS performance reflects surging demand for cloud infrastructure to power AI applications, a trend that has benefited major cloud providers as companies race to adopt generative AI technologies.
But investors seemed worried about Amazon's big cash outlays to pursue its AI ambitions, sending its share price more than three percent lower in after-hours trading.
The company's free cash flow declined sharply to $18.2 billion, down from $53 billion in the same period last year, as Amazon ramped up capital spending on AI infrastructure and logistics.
The company spent $32.2 billion on property and equipment in the quarter, nearly double the $17.6 billion spent a year earlier, reflecting massive investments in data centers and backroom capabilities.
Amazon has pledged to spend up to $100 billion this year, largely on AI-related investments for AWS.
For the current quarter, Amazon forecast net sales between $174.0 billion and $179.5 billion, representing solid growth of 10-13 percent compared with the third quarter of 2024.
But operating profit was forecast in a wide range from $15.5 billion to $20.5 billion in the current third quarter, which was more cautious than some had hoped for.
The caution indicates that "there's still potential for curveballs from ongoing trade negotiations and accelerating competition on the AI front," said Emarketer analyst Sky Canaves.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
an hour ago
- Int'l Business Times
Trump's 'Dividend' Promise For Americans Leaves Open Questions
If Donald Trump is to be believed, millions of Americans could receive a financial slice of the fortunes generated by the US president's sweeping tariffs. But the eyebrow-raising suggestion from a leader with a flair for creating headlines is largely opaque -- with key questions left open about how the giveaway would be funded. Trump himself has acknowledged the difficulty in splashing cash at a time when the United States faces crushing debt. "We have so much money coming in, we are thinking about a little rebate," Trump said last month, "but the big thing we want to do is pay down debt." He has since referred to the so-called rebate as a "dividend," and said it could be for "people that would be middle income people and lower income people." His idea has, naturally, roused interest. Republican Senator Josh Hawley introduced a bill in July that would see $600 checks sent to each adult and dependent child in American families. Trump has a track record in dishing out money -- or at least taking the credit for it. During the Covid pandemic, he insisted that his name be put on government checks distributed to tens of millions of Americans as financial support. Trump's latest plan raises a key question: How will it be financed? The United States faces a national deficit that worsened from October to June compared to the same period a year earlier. That was despite a rise in revenue generated by tariffs that Trump has slapped on dozens of US trading partners. Handing out cash to Americans would add to the deficit and increase the country's debt, which was at more than $36.8 trillion by early August. Trump, when explaining his dividend idea, has claimed the United States is raking in trillions of dollars from other countries thanks to his protectionist agenda. The Republican has also cited large investments promised by Japan and the European Union -- deals that coincided with agreements on US tariffs. But foreign leaders paint a different picture. Japan, for example, has stated that its $550 billion pledge will largely be in the form of loans and guarantees -- certainly not just hard cash. And Trump's claims about the revenue generated by tariffs can also be misleading. The president claims -- wrongly -- that tariffs are paid by foreign countries to the US government. Yet, in reality, it is importers in the United States that are on the hook. Most economists note that American consumers therefore end up paying more as businesses, facing rising costs, raise prices on their products.
Int'l Business Times
4 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Major Climate-GDP Study Under Review After Facing Challenge
A blockbuster study published in top science journal Nature last year warned that unchecked climate change could slash global GDP by a staggering 62 percent by century's end, setting off alarm bells among financial institutions worldwide. But a re-analysis by Stanford University researchers in California, released Wednesday, challenges that conclusion -- finding the projected hit to be about three times smaller and broadly in line with earlier estimates, after excluding an anomalous result tied to Uzbekistan. The saga may culminate in a rare retraction, with Nature telling AFP it will have "further information to share soon" -- a move that would almost certainly be seized upon by climate-change skeptics. Both the original authors -- who have acknowledged errors -- and the Stanford team hoped the transparency of the review process would bolster, rather than undermine public confidence in science. Climate scientist Maximilian Kotz and co-authors at the renowned Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), published the original research in April 2024, using datasets from 83 countries to assess how changes in temperature and precipitation affect economic growth. It became the second most cited climate paper of the year, according to the UK-based Carbon Brief outlet, and informed policy at the World Bank, International Monetary Fund, US federal government and others. AFP was among numerous media outlets to report on it. Yet the eye-popping claim that global GDP would be lowered by 62 percent by the year 2100 under a high emissions scenario soon drew scrutiny. "That's why our eyebrows went up because most people think that 20 percent is a very big number," scientist and economist Solomon Hsiang, one of the researchers behind the re-analysis, also published in Nature, told AFP. When they tried to replicate the results, Hsiang and his Stanford colleagues spotted serious anomalies in the data surrounding Uzbekistan. Specifically, there was a glaring mismatch in the provincial growth figures cited in the Potsdam paper and the national numbers reported for the same periods by the World Bank. "When we dropped Uzbekistan, suddenly everything changed. And we were like, 'whoa, that's not supposed to happen,'" Hsiang said. "We felt like we had to document it in this form because it's been used so widely in policy making." The authors of the 2024 paper acknowledged methodological flaws, including currency exchange issues, and on Wednesday uploaded a corrected version, which has not yet been peer-reviewed. "We're waiting for Nature to announce their further decision on what will happen next," Kotz told AFP. He stressed that while "there can be methodological issues and debate within the scientific community," the bigger picture was unchanged: climate change will have substantial economic impacts in the decades ahead. Frances Moore, an associate professor in environmental economics at the University of California, Davis, who was not involved in either the original paper or the re-analysis, agreed. She told AFP the correction did not alter overall policy implications. Projections of an economic slowdown by the year 2100 are "extremely bad" regardless of the Kotz-led study, she said, and "greatly exceed the costs of reducing greenhouse gas emissions to stabilize the climate, many times over." "Future work to identify specific mechanisms by which variation in climate affects economic output over the medium and long-term is critical to both better understand these findings and prepare society to respond to coming climate disruption," she also noted. Asked whether Nature would be retracting the Potsdam paper, Karl Ziemelis, the journal's physical sciences editor, did not answer directly but said an editor's note was added to the paper in November 2024 "as soon as we became aware of an issue" with the data and methodology. "We are in the final stages of this process and will have further information to share soon," he told AFP. The episode comes at a delicate time for climate science, under heavy fire from the US government under President Donald Trump's second term, as misinformation about the impacts of human-driven greenhouse gases abounds. Yet even in this environment, Hsiang argued, the episode showed the robust nature of the scientific method. "One team of scientists checking other scientists' work and finding mistakes, the other team acknowledging it, correcting the record, this is the best version of science." Researchers AFP spoke to said the effects of heat on economies of countries near the tropics is magnified, like the riverbank dwellers carrying banana produce in northern Brazil AFP
DW
8 hours ago
- DW
Trump tariffs: India faces 25% hike as deadline looms – DW – 08/06/2025
US President Donald Trump has increased the tariffs to be imposed on Indian imports to a total of 50%. This comes a day before many of Trump's vaunted tariffs targeting various countries are due to come into effect. Many of Trump's tariffs are due to come into effect on Thursday, with varying rates being imposed on different countries. The US president has announced that India will face an extra 25% tariff on their imports to the US, bringing the total rate to 50%. Trump said the steep rate was over India's continued purchase of Russian oil. New Delhi has called the move "unfair, unjustified and unreasonable."Donald Trump is tightening sanctions loopholes that fund Moscow's war machine. What does a crackdown on Russia's oil trade mean for global markets — and economic heavyweights like China and India? DW has some of the answers here. US President Donald Trump's pressure on India to halt its oil imports from Russia and comply with sanctions on Iran has strained ties between Washington and New Delhi, who have enjoyed a healthy strategic partnership for decades. India has already said it saw the tariffs are "unjustified and unreasonable" and that it would take "all necessary measures" to safeguard its "national interests and economic security." Trump has claimed Indian authorities "don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine" and are helping fund Russia's war effort in Ukraine through their purchases of Russian oil. The tougher rhetoric is a marked shift in relations between India and the US. Ties have deteriorated in recent months, despite the display of personal warmth and symbolic friendship when Prime Minister Narendra Modi met with President Trump earlier this year in Washington. Experts believes that despite Trump's "intimidatory" approach, India "does not seek a confrontation." Read the full story on the tense relations between the US and India over Trump's tariffs. Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter said she had a "very good meeting" with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Wednesday, discussing the incoming US tariffs on Switzerland. In the meeting, the pair "discussed bilateral cooperation between Switzerland and the US, and the tariff situation, and international issues," Karin-Sutter said. "We had a very friendly and open exchange," Keller-Sutter told reporters after the meeting in Washington, yet stopped short of mentioning whether it would help the country avert the 39% tariff set to come into effect on Thursday. A US State Department spokeswoman said the talks included "the importance of a fair and balanced trade relationship that benefits the American people." On July 31 last week, Trump announced a new set of "reciprocal tariffs," affecting some 67 countries. The levies, due to kick in on August 7, include a 10% so-called baseline tariff on countries where the US sells more products than it imports. The US president argued in a White House statement that "conditions reflected in large and persistent annual US goods trade deficits constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and economy of the US that has its source in whole or substantial part outside the US." Leading trading partners including the European Union, Japan and South Korea will be subject to a 15% tariff. All are engaged in trade negotiations with Washington. Countries which meanwhile reached tentative trade agreements with the US, such as the Philippines, Vietnam and Indonesia, will be subject to tariffs ranging from 19% to 20%. Much higher rates will fall on smaller economies such as Syria (41%, the highest on the list), which is just getting out of a civil war which spanned over a decade. Myanmar (40%), is still grappling with a civil war. Similar rates will also be applied to Laos (40%) and Iraq (35%). Despite being a significant trading partner, Switzerland is set to face a whopping 39% tariff. The latest tariff announcement means India is facing the highest US levy along with Brazil. This could put New Delhi at a significant disadvantage, particularly against regional competitors such as Vietnam and Bangladesh. The move could also shatter India's image as an alternative for US companies to Chinese manufacturing. Trump had already criticized tech giant Apple for its efforts to shift iPhone production to India to avoid the tariffs that had been planned for China. "I don't want you building in India," Trump said he told Apple CEO Tim Cook earlier this year. However, smartphones are on a list of exempted products for now, shielding Apple from a major hit, even as it moves production from China to India. On Wednesday, Trump is expected to celebrate a commitment by Apple to increase its US investments by an additional $100 billion over the next four years. Other exemptions include goods targeted under sector-specific tariffs such as steel and aluminum, and sectors that could be hit later, such as pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. India's government spokesperson has defended New Delhi's purchase of Russian oil, saying that "imports are based on market factors and done with the overall objective of ensuring the energy security of 1.4 billion people of India." "It is therefore extremely unfortunate that the US should choose to impose additional tariffs on India for actions that several other countries are also taking in their own national interest," the spokesperson said in a statement. "We reiterate that these actions are unfair, unjustified and unreasonable. India will take all actions necessary to protect its national interests." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video US President Donald Trump promised in his inaugural address this year to "tariff and tax foreign countries to enrich our citizens." By setting new tariff rates, Trump aimed at reducing the country's trade deficit, which is when the US imports more from a country than it exports to that country, and first announced plans for a "reciprocal" tariff on February 13. But experts have warned that tariffs could cause chaos for global markets and disrupt the US economy at home. April 2: Trump's so-called "Liberation Day" when he announces long-promised "reciprocal" tariffs, declaring a 10% baseline tax on imports across the board starting April 5, as well as higher rates for dozens of countries that have a high trade deficit with the US. The calculations for the tariff rates cause widespread confusion. April 5: Trump's 10% minimum tariff on nearly all countries and territories takes effect. April 9: Trump's higher "reciprocal" rate goes into effect, but his administration says just hours later it is pausing higher rates while maintaining the 10% levy on most global imports. April 10: EU suspends its steel and aluminium tariff retaliation measures for 90 days — those measures were a response to Trump's 25% tariffs on imported steel and aluminium that took effect in March. May 23: Trump threatens a 50% tax on all imports from the EU as well as a 25% tariff on smartphones unless those products are made in America. Trump says frustrated by lack of progress in talks with EU, writing on Truth Social: "Our discussions with them are going nowhere!" May 26: Trump says the US will delay implementation of a 50% tariff on goods from the EU from June 1 until July 9 to buy time for negotiations with the bloc. July 7: Trump signs an executive order to push the deadline for higher tariffs to August 1 and sends his first letters telling 14 countries' leaders that their exports to the US would face a new tariff rate. July 8: Trump says he's not going back on his word and insists that the August 1 deadline is the final one. July 9: Trump sends more letters, hitting Brazil with a 50% tariff rate. Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva promises to reciprocate. July 12: Trump announces a 35% tariff on Canadian goods, claiming Canada had "financially retaliated" to earlier duties. He says the EU will receive a similar letter soon. July 13: Trump announces a 30% tariff rate on the EU and Mexico, telling both that "whatever the number you choose to raise them by, will be added on to the 30% that we charge." July 31: Trump signs an executive order delaying the tariff deadline for the EU and other partners from August 1 to August 7. August 6: Trump announces a further 25% tariff rate on India's imports due to their purchase of Russian oil, bringing the total to 50%. US President Donald Trump said Wednesday he signed an executive order to impose an additional 25% tariff on India. He cited India's continued purchase of Russian oil. The order comes just a day before a separate 25% tariff on Indian goods was due to take effect. The latest decision is set to come into force in three weeks. Trump had threatend allies of Russia to stop importing oil from Moscow or face high tariffs. Ties between the US and India have taken a downturn as they failed to reach a trade agreement to avert Trump's tariffs. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video US President Donald Trump's tariffs on the EU and other trading partners are set to finally come into effect on Friday, following numerous delays since his first "Liberation Day" announcement back in April. The tariff threats have triggered widespread uncertainty and concerns about the impact on the global economy. Countries facing heavy tariff rates have sought to make deals with the Trump administration, but have also threatened to impose their own counter tariffs. Stick with our Trump tariffs blog for the latest updates, analysis and explainers.
