Centre to introduce bills that can sack the PM, CMs and top ministers held in custody for 30 days
Union home minister Amit Shah will bring three important bills in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday. These bills say that if any minister, chief minister, or even the prime minister is arrested or kept in custody for 30 days in a row for a crime that can lead to at least five years in jail, they will have to leave their post.
The government's schedule for the Lok Sabha shows that the three bills are – The Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill, The Jammu & Kashmir Reorganization (Amendment) Bill, and The Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill.
The schedule also mentions that after the bills are introduced, there will be a proposal to send them to a joint parliamentary committee for review. Together, these bills aim to create a new system that will apply to ministers and chief ministers in states and Union territories like Jammu & Kashmir, as well as Union ministers and even the prime minister at the Centre.
However, the bills also make it clear that once the arrested leader is released, they can be appointed to their position again.
The new bills, which also include a constitutional amendment, say that if the Prime Minister, a Chief Minister, or any minister in a state or Union Territory (including Delhi) is arrested and kept in custody for 30 days in a row on charges that carry at least five years of jail, they will have to step down on the 31st day. If they don't resign, they will automatically lose their post.
For Union Territories like Jammu and Kashmir, the bill states that if a minister or the Chief Minister is detained for 30 days, the Lieutenant Governor must remove them if the Chief Minister advises so. But if no advice is given by the 31st day, then from the next day the minister or Chief Minister will automatically lose their position.
The same rule is proposed for the Union government and the states. If the Prime Minister or any minister is in custody for 31 days straight, they will automatically be removed from office.
The explanation attached to the bill says this step is necessary to protect constitutional values and keep people's trust in their leaders. It points out that while leaders represent the hopes and faith of citizens, the Constitution does not currently have any rule to remove a Prime Minister or minister if they are arrested on serious criminal charges.
The note adds that ministers are expected to have integrity and set an example. If a minister is facing grave criminal allegations and remains in custody, it can harm constitutional values, weaken good governance, and break the trust that people have placed in them.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
a minute ago
- Business Standard
Nuclear energy can help power India's economic growth, private push welcome
For decades, state control was justified by concerns over radiation safety, misuse of nuclear material, and strategic security Business Standard Editorial Comment Mumbai Listen to This Article The Union government's plans to end decades-long state monopoly over uranium mining, import, processing, and nuclear-power generation, opening the door for private firms to participate, mark a significant shift in the sector. The policy shift, first signalled in the Union Budget, builds on the country's ambitious goal of scaling up nuclear power capacity to 100 gigawatts (Gw) by 2047. Accordingly, Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman had announced a Nuclear Energy Mission with an allocation of ₹20,000 crore, aimed at raising nuclear-power capacity from the current 8.18 Gw. These recent developments mark a belated but necessary recognition of nuclear energy's role
The Hindu
a minute ago
- The Hindu
PM expresses disappointment over Opposition's absence from debates over crucial Bills
At the customary end of session tea held after the conclusion of the Monsoon Session of Parliament, Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday (August 21, 2025) noted with disappointment the lack of debates due to disruption, leading to the passage of several Bills amid the Opposition's protests, adding that bright and young MPs of the Congress did not get to participate in discussions due to the 'insecurity' of its leadership. Parliament Monsoon Session: Follow highlights, major updates on August 21, 2025 The customary tea is hosted by Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla in his chambers and was attended by leaders of the NDA allies and in the absence of the Opposition. Sources present at the meeting said Mr. Modi did not name Rahul Gandhi, Leader of the Opposition in the Lower House, who is leading his Congress's agitation against the Election Commission's drive to revise electoral rolls in Bihar, but his remarks were apparently aimed at him. He reportedly said the Monsoon session covered several important Bills and regretted that they could not be discussed in Parliament. Mr. Modi singled out the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, which bans all real-money games and was passed by the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha without discussion due to din, for praise and its wide positive implications due to the adverse impact on society by these online games. With Opposition leaders skipping the meeting, one of the leaders present at the get-together remarked that it had become increasingly difficult to bring the Congress on board as few of its leaders, who the government interacts with regularly, can influence the party's decision, the Prime Minister responded to this and said the Opposition had some bright young MPs. They may be making the leadership 'insecure', he said, according to the sources. This is not the first time Mr. Modi had expressed these views while criticising the Gandhi family for putting its own interest above anything else. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju, speaking later, added that Congress functionaries who attend the meeting with the government over the business in Parliament often come to some understanding but cannot implement it. They might be facing pressure, he said, in an apparent swipe at Mr. Gandhi.
The Hindu
a minute ago
- The Hindu
Have written to EC on preparations for corporation elections: DKS
Deputy Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar announced in the Legislative Council on Thursday that the government had written to the Election Commission of India about preparations for corporation elections. Replying to a question raised by member Jawarayee Gowda T.N. about the implementation of the Greater Bengaluru Authority Act, 2024, he said, 'The delimitation of wards will take place by November 1. This is being handled by a separate team under the leadership of the BBMP Commissioner. We have submitted an affidavit to the court. We will issue a GO for delimitation of wards'. Replying to a member who urged the government to conduct elections early, he said, 'I completely agree with the suggestion.' The Council approved the Greater Bengaluru Governance (Amendment) Bill, which clarifies that the authority will not interfere in the functioning of municipal bodies in violation of the 74th amendment of the Constitution. Replying to queries raised by members - Govindaraju (JD-S), T.A. Saravana (JD-S), and H.S. Gopinath (BJP) - he said the amendment ensures that the government does not have any overbearing power on the corporations. 'Some people have spoken about ward restructuring based on population. As per the 2011 census, there were about 18,000 people in each ward, but now it would be 30,000. We will take members' feedback when we are adding new areas to the corporations,' he added.
