Perspective: Why are we telling women that motherhood will make them miserable?
Coralie begins as a single woman sad about being alone. Then she becomes a woman living with a man she loves and his daughter. But then she is sad they do not have a child of their own. And then she is sad they do not have a second child. And then she is sad because with three children, she doesn't have enough time to pursue her writing career. And her husband doesn't pitch in enough. And he works too much, but also she wants to spend more time with her kids, so he needs to work more. And she needs to spend time away from him in order to rediscover her true self. 'How could the world … be made fair,' she wonders, 'when two people who loved each other couldn't even manage a life?'
Maybe the world isn't 'fair,' but Coralie's life is hardly evidence of that. And is this really the question that upper-middle-class educated women with husbands and children and nice houses need to be asking about themselves?
But all of these complaints about husbands and children and work are not restricted to individual grievances, because, well, that might seem petty. Instead, they are complaints about the system, about the institution of marriage, capitalism, the patriarchy … you name it.
If you want to read the nonfiction version of these complaints, look no further than two recent features in The New York Times. The first, from a couple of months ago, was a video series called 'Motherhood Should Come With a Warning Label.' More than 2,000 women responded to a request from the paper to 'tell us about your journey to motherhood.' The women in these videos are angry. They are angry that they had less successful careers as a result of time spent with their children. They are angry that they have less money in their retirement accounts, that their partners didn't suffer similar consequences. It is excruciating to listen to all these women talk about how the system is stacked against them, despite the fact that many of them have good jobs and loving families. And one can only imagine how young women at the start of their adult lives must feel about hearing all this.
Which brings us to the second New York Times feature, published last week, 'The Trouble With Wanting Men.' Unlike the earlier piece, this one was focused less on the career frustrations and more on the men they are stuck with. 'Men are what is rotten in the state of straightness,' Jean Garnett writes. 'And why shouldn't we have an all-inclusive byword for our various pessimisms about them? Domestic pessimism (they still do less of the housework and child care); partner-violence pessimism (femicide is still gruesomely routine); erotic pessimism …' etc. etc.
Even the 'good, sweet men,' Garnett notes, are really not very helpful. She laments: 'Most of us can neither renounce our heterosexuality nor realize a significant renegotiation of its terms.'
How is a 20-year-old woman supposed to take this? You might assume that the solution is just to forgo finding a partner or having children. It's not just that it's heartache, because even the most naïve young woman 20 or 50 or 100 years ago would be aware of the potential for unhappiness or even tragedy when she decided to put down roots.
It's that the whole system is out to get you. Sure, it may seem as if women have made progress, but these novelists and journalists are here to tell you that you are destined for misery. The result is a self-fulfilling prophecy. Instead of finding someone you love earlier and trying to build a family together, you will put your career first, rejecting multiple decent, loving men because it's too early to settle down. If and when you finally do enter a partnership and have kids, you will walk around with a chip on your shoulder wondering why you have to cut back on work to be with your kids — even though chances are you actually do want to be with your kids more. You will blame this all on your partner or your boss or the world. Rinse and repeat.
Part of growing up is realizing that we have autonomy, that our life outcomes are not just a product of structural forces acting on us. In reality, women have a lot of choices open to them, but there are only a few that will genuinely make them happy. Instead of giving them the message that they are destined to be miserable and it's someone else's fault, maybe we could find a fictional or nonfictional portrait of a woman who manages to find fulfillment in an imperfect world.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Book Review: A sudden blizzard strands a detective and murder suspects in a hunting lodge
Book Review - Hunter's Heart Ridge - 3x2 for APNews In 1965, as the Vietnam War escalates, a small group of wealthy, powerful men gather at a Vermont lodge to drink and hunt deer. Shortly after they arrive, one of their number, William Moulton, a supporter of the war and a former ambassador to West Germany, is found dead in the woods. State Trooper Franklin Warren, first introduced by author Sarah Stewart Taylor in 'Agony Hill,' (2024) is dispatched to investigate when 'Hunter's Heart Ridge' opens. The surviving members of the group speculate that Moulton died in a hunting accident or, perhaps, killed himself; but Warren promptly determines the man was murdered in a most unusual way. He was stabbed through the heart, and then someone fired a rifle shot through the stab wound as if trying to conceal the cause of death. The group, like the rest of the nation, had been hotly debating the wisdom and morality of the war. However, it soon becomes evident that most of them had a variety of additional reasons to dislike Moulton. As Warren proceeds with his investigation, it becomes evident that nearly everyone is lying to him about one thing or another, although it is not clear whether what each of them has to hide is related to the murder. Then a sudden, early season blizzard strikes, bringing down the telephone lines and stranding Warren with a house full of suspects, including members of the lodge service staff. 'It's like a movie, isn't it,' says one of the kitchen help. 'Or an Agatha Christie novel.' Yes, except that the story's pace sometimes drags. A subplot involving Franklin's friends Alice and Sylvie builds on characters who played a role in 'Agony Hill,' but it adds little to the main story and will be lost on those who have not read the previous novel. Nevertheless, the main plot is clever and suspenseful, and as usual in Taylor's novels (this is her tenth), the settings are vividly drawn and the characters — especially an excitable teenage girl named Jenny — are quirky and memorable. ___ Bruce DeSilva, winner of the Mystery Writers of America's Edgar Award, is the author of the Mulligan crime novels including 'The Dread Line.' ___ AP book reviews:


Geek Tyrant
10 minutes ago
- Geek Tyrant
Liam Neeson Rips Into His STAR WARS Death Scene: 'Oh, Please. Hardly a Master Jedi' — GeekTyrant
Liam Neeson didn't hold back when recnetly critiquing his own Star Wars legacy. While promoting his upcoming comedy The Naked Gun , Neeson sat down with GQ to reflect on some of his most iconic roles, and when it came time to talk about Star Wars: The Phantom Menace , the actor criticized how his Jedi Master went out. During the video, Neeson looked back on playing Qui-Gon Jinn, and called out what he felt was a lackluster demise at the hands of Darth Maul. Neeson said: 'I'm supposed to be a master Jedi, you know. My character fell for that 'Oh! I'm going for your face! No I'm not. I'm going for your stomach.' [makes death noises] 'Oh, you got me!' Like, oh please. Hardly a master Jedi. But still, [making the film] was great.' To be fair, Qui-Gon's death has always sparked debate among fans. While Maul was undeniably a fearsome and highly trained Sith apprentice, Neeson makes a valid point. A Jedi Master who had easily dispatched battle droids throughout the film probably shouldn't have gone down so quickly. Especially when he was supposed to be one of the Order's most powerful and wise warriors, and crucially, the one meant to guide Anakin Skywalker's future. After The Phantom Menace , Neeson did return to the galaxy far, far away for a brief cameo as Qui-Gon's Force ghost in Star Wars: Obi-Wan Kenobi , and also lent his voice to the animated series Star Wars: Tales of the Jedi . His son, Micheál Richardson, even voiced a younger version of Qui-Gon in the show. But as far as doing anything more in the Star Wars universe, Neeson isn't feeling it. 'It's diluting it to me, and it's taken away the mystery and magic in a weird way.' He makes it pretty clear he's not eager to return again. The number of spinoffs and prequels might be chipping away at the specialness that made Star Wars so beloved in the first place. Sure, Maul was a beast in combat, trained by none other than Darth Sidious himself, and Qui-Gon had just come off an exhausting lightsaber duel earlier in the movie. But it still feels like his character deserved more of a legendary send-off. Unlike Obi-Wan's noble sacrifice in A New Hope , Qui-Gon was actively trying to survive and fulfill his purpose. He wasn't giving up — he was taken out. Maybe Neeson's criticism isn't just about his character's death being too easy, but more about how it undermined Qui-Gon's importance and capability. For a Jedi Master who was meant to be pivotal in Anakin's journey, getting stabbed after a simple feint feels like a weak exit. What do you think? Was Qui-Gon Jinn's death scene a letdown or a powerful turning point in the saga?


TechCrunch
10 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Amazon shuts down Wondery podcast studio, cuts 110 jobs
In Brief Amazon is shutting down its Wondery podcast studio, acquired in late 2020, and cutting 110 jobs as part of a broad reorganization of its audio business, according to a new report from Bloomberg. The company plans to move existing Wondery series under its Audible banner or to a new 'creator services' team, which will house personality-driven shows, such as Jason and Travis Kelce's podcast. 'The podcast landscape has evolved significantly over the past few years,' Steve Boom, Amazon's vice president of audio, Twitch, and games, wrote in a staff memo seen by Bloomberg. 'The rise of video has also blurred the lines on what it means to be a podcast creator.' The story notes that the changes indicate that Amazon's push into podcasts hasn't gone as planned. Despite securing big names in the business, the company is now shifting its strategy in an effort to better compete with rivals like Spotify and YouTube as the podcasting industry embraces video formats.