
When athletes decide the right time to retire
Shrenik Avlani For most athletes the end comes abruptly. But some like P.R. Sreejesh are prudent enough to leave on their own terms P.R. Sreejesh, who recently received the Padma Bhushan, retired after the Paris Olympics in 2024. Gift this article
All through April the Indian Premier League (IPL) was in full swing, and then came the cross-border tensions. On either side of that tense week, two of India's greatest World Cup winning batsmen announced their retirement.
All through April the Indian Premier League (IPL) was in full swing, and then came the cross-border tensions. On either side of that tense week, two of India's greatest World Cup winning batsmen announced their retirement.
Before the Board of Control for Cricket in India announced the squad for India's forthcoming tour of England in June, both Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli decided that the time was right to step away. To retire from a profession, in this case a highly skilled and niche one, is a very personal life event. Yet, it isn't as if millions of fans hadn't voiced pretty strong sentiments in favour of Kohli and Sharma retiring after India lost the away Test series in Australia in November-January. Also read: Virat Kohli had at least 2 years of cricket left in him, should have been Test captain, says Ravi Shastri
2024 was a big year for retirements, not uncommon, especially after a mega sporting event like the Olympics. Tennis legend Rafael Nadal put down his racket for good. Football royalty Toni Kroos won the Champions League with Real Madrid, turned out for Germany one last time in the Euros and called time on his glorious career. Ravichandran Ashwin announced his retirement from Test cricket midway through India's tour of Australia.
One of world hockey's best and India's most successful goalkeeper, P.R. Sreejesh, won his second consecutive Olympic bronze medal in Paris 2024 and left on a high.
With tennis star Novak Djokovic, 38, basketball legend LeBron James, 40, world football's biggest stars Cristiano Ronaldo, 40, and Lionel Messi, 37, advancing in age, this year is likely to see a few more retirement announcements.
Had Sharma and Kohli still been in the plans for India's summer tour of England, many cricket-obsessed Indians, who have no clue about what it takes in terms of fitness, skill and focus to play at the highest level, would most likely have decided for the two champions that it is high time they quit. Self-proclaimed pundits would have flooded YouTube with lengthy videos and clickbait shorts, armchair trolls would have typed out poorly spelled and expletive-laden filth on X, while reels and posts would have popped up on Instagram.
The thing is, no one but the player and their coach have the right to decide when it is time to retire. And that's because they are in the best position to know, says former India Test cricketer-turned television pundit Deep Dasgupta. 'In cricket, selectors could drop a player and then it is up to the player to take a call," he adds.
To Sreejesh, who is now the coach of India's under-21 men's hockey team, it is clear that retirement is the player's decision. 'The only other person who can contribute to a player's decision on retirement is their coach. No one else," says the double Olympics medal-winner. SLOWING DOWN
Most athletes hit their peak between the ages of 25 and 30, though this varies by sport. Peak performance can last from three-five years, depending on factors like training, genetics and injury management. During those golden years, a player performs effortlessly. Once that window of perfect equilibrium passes, performance gradually declines. This can be due to a lot of interconnected physiological and psychological factors, says sports scientist Vaibhav Daga, head of sports science and rehabilitation and sports medicine consultant at the Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital, Mumbai.
'Athletes at their peak seem to perform effortlessly due to years of training, refined technique and mental mastery. With age, they undergo physiological changes, including deterioration in reaction time, flexibility and range of motion, loss of muscle mass and strength, decline in cardiovascular efficiency and recovery rate, changes in hormone levels, neuromuscular decline and metabolic changes. These changes make it harder for athletes to maintain the speed, power, endurance, and flexibility needed for elite performance," he says.
'This combination of physical wear, psychological strain and external pressures makes it hard to maintain peak performance indefinitely," explains Daga, who has also worked with the Indian cricket team and multiple IPL franchises.
But this decline doesn't mean that the player's hard-earned skills simply disappear. It just becomes a lot harder, and takes a lot more work to continue to keep performing at a very high level. Stories of ageing players using cryo chambers, ice baths and sleep pods have been around for decades now.
Sreejesh explains this using the analogy of a car. 'A new car is usually very good and requires little maintenance. But with age and use, it goes through wear and tear and it requires regular and more frequent servicing to perform well. The human body needs special treatment and care to perform at the elite level and as you age it needs a lot more of that."
In a professional athlete's case, that 'servicing" means extra focus on training, nutrition and recovery—one has to work harder and longer in the gym to ensure strength, speed, mobility and flexibility are maintained, and pay more attention to the recovery protocol.
Dasgupta points out that players with that requisite amount of extra focus are the ones who can keep playing for a longer period of time. 'When you are in your 20s, you have all the energy in the world and are trying to make your name in the game. By 35-36, if you are still playing, you have made it and become famous. The question that arises then is do you still have the hunger, are you ready to make the sacrifices and put in 10-12 hours each day to be able to play at the top level? That's the first thing that hits you," says Dasgupta.
'I still loved the game and wanted to continue playing cricket, but I didn't want to put in such long hours. So, I quit. It happens early in the career for some and late for others… but everyone reaches this stage," he says.
I realised hockey is just a game I love, and I have to prepare for life after hockey. So, I read, educated myself, went to the market and did the school runs to prepare for life after I stop playing IN THE MIND
Professional sports can also take a toll on an athlete's mental health and emotional state. Anyone with a long career in professional sports goes through periods of shock and denial (in case of injuries), anger and frustration (when they make errors or miss games), depression and anxiety (over performance, fear of injury, loss of form) and eating disorders (in an effort to stay in shape). The transition away from a sports career is usually challenging for athletes, say sportspersons and sports medicine experts.
Till the moment that Sreejesh was injured in 2017, and was forced to take a few months out, hockey was everything to him. 'Overnight, someone else was hailed as the Great Wall of India," recalls Sreejesh. 'That put things in perspective… I realised hockey is just a game I love, and I have to prepare for life after hockey. So, I read, educated myself, went to the market and did the school runs to prepare for life after I stop playing."
Not everyone is this practical. As they approach their mid-30s, many players begin to fear for their post-sport future as they have no clue what to do once their career is over. And for most athletes, the end comes abruptly. Studies show that athletes suffer more depressive episodes than the general population.
'An athlete's professional career winds down at a time when those of their friends and peers are just about taking off in their mid to late 30s. It's natural for them to feel lost as they have known or done little else in their lives," says Dasgupta. When one has no clue what's coming up next, it's a very good reason to just continue doing what they have done all their life.
One more game. One more series. One more tournament. Every player has a greedy mindset, that's why they succeed, says Sreejesh. Athletes try to keep playing as long as possible, adds Dasgupta.
'After all, you start playing sport as a child because you love the game and enjoy playing it. The love of the game and the hunger to keep playing don't diminish at the same rate as your body's abilities do," he says.
But some, like Sharma and Kohli, are content with what they have achieved and level-headed enough to go out on their own terms.
'I could have played on…I still had two more years in me, but I wanted to leave at the top of my game. The biggest compliment to me today is when people ask me, 'Why did you stop playing,'" says Sreejesh.
Shrenik Avlani is a writer and editor and the co-author of The Shivfit Way, a book on functional fitness. Topics You May Be Interested In Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Deccan Herald
2 hours ago
- Deccan Herald
Young India passes tough English test
Right after Mohammed Siraj picked up the final wicket of Gus Atkinson, the entire Indian team erupted in jubilation. First the pacer leapt in the air with his customary 'Siuu' celebration, then his teammates converged around him while a few members of the support staff beyond the boundary line rushed into the middle, all of them dancing in joy. A few moments later, the entire team proceeded for a victory lap around The Oval, which was packed to the rafters and roaring in delight after watching an epic 6-run win for the ages. The Indians didn't clinch the newly coined Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy, but the boisterous celebrations—like they'd won a World Cup—showed how much the 2-2 verdict meant for this transitional team under new captain Shubman Gill. Having achieved some incredible success—home and away—over the past decade, the Indian team was hit by the sudden retirements of Virat Kohli, Rohit Sharma and R Ashwin. Transitions are an inevitable part of sport, but when three big superstars bid adieu around the same time, especially after lifting a team to rarefied heights, it's an extremely challenging affair. It's what new captain Shubman Gill and head coach Gautam Gambhir, who took charge from Rahul Dravid after the T20 World Cup a year ago, were tasked with — and to be fair, they've come out with flying colours. The biggest concern for the Indians before arriving here was on the batting front. Among the top order batters, only KL Rahul and Rishabh Pant had previous experience of playing a full series in England. Skipper Gill's form outside the subcontinent too was very average. Can this young crop deliver in a country where sound technique is of utmost importance? Yes, they did — with Gill leading from the front with a jaw-dropping 754 runs that included a career-best 269. Rahul scored 532 runs with two centuries and an equal number of half-centuries, his opening partner Yashasvi Jaiswal hit 411, starting and ending the series with a ton each, while vice-captain Pant was in elements, amassing 479 runs with two centuries and three fifties and earning a lot of praise for batting with a fractured foot. On the batting front, the find of the series was Washington Sundar. The Tamil Nadu off-spinning all-rounder scored a career-defining 101 not out to help India pull off a remarkable draw against all odds in the fourth Test in Manchester that ensured the series was still alive in the fifth. He was backed to the hilt by captain Gill, whose decision to play him instead of attacking spinner Kuldeep Yadav was pilloried by many critics — but Sundar repaid all that faith with performances on the field. No praise can be too high for Ravindra Jadeja, who yet again proved why he's the Most Valuable Player in the team still. One of the remnants of the old guard, the 36-year-old all-rounder brought his A-game in exceptional fashion, amassing 516 runs with one century and five half-centuries, playing several game-changing knocks. On the bowling front too, the southpaw didn't disappoint, bagging seven wickets. With regards to Gill's captaincy, the 25-year-old marshalled his resources incredibly well. He faced numerous challenges, especially in terms of fielding a settled bowling unit because of Jasprit Bumrah's 3-match availability 'clause', but he did a job with whatever he had. He made some bold calls in backing Sundar instead of Kuldeep because of the former's superior batting abilities and stood firm by his decision despite a lot of outside noise. There have been times when he has looked clueless and turned defensive when England batters were on the assault, but like he said, there are lessons to be learnt and he's willing to incorporate them in future assignments. On the bowling front, this tour has been Mohammed Siraj's. The Hyderabadi bowled with a lion's heart, sending down 185.3 overs with barely a dip in intensity. The spotlight was on Bumrah but Siraj deservedly stole the limelight with a mesmerising performance at The Oval. Prasidh Krishna and Akash Deep fared decently as understudies but it's the back-ups where India have a problem with. During Kohli's reign they had a wealth of resources on the fast bowling front — but suddenly the barrel appears a little dry. It's something that needs serious addressing if India are to continue dominating.


The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Pakistan pulls out of Hockey Asia Cup in Rajgir
The Pakistan men's hockey team will not be taking part in the Asia Cup to be held in Rajgir, Bihar from August 29 to September 7, according to a Hockey India official. Speaking to Sportstar on Wednesday, an official from Hockey India said that even though the Indian Government was willing to provide visas to Pakistan, the Pakistan Hockey Federation (PHF) refused, citing security reasons. 'In fact, PHF has written a letter to Asian Hockey Federation on Wednesday, saying that it won't be able to complete in the Asia Cup due to security reasons. We have invited Bangladesh now,' the source said. Pakistan's participation in the competition — a qualifying event for the 2026 World Cup — had been uncertain given the continued tensions between the two nations, with the PHF making it clear that it had security concerns and even suggesting moving the tournament elsewhere as an option. This was despite the Indian government's assurances in early July that no Pakistan team would be stopped from travelling to India. Officials had claimed as late as July-end that the Pakistan team had already applied for visas. However, the Pakistan government had recently ordered that no invitation to travel to India should be accepted by any sports federation without its explicit approval. The decision also casts a shadow on Pakistan's participation in the Junior World Cup to be held in Chennai and Madurai in November-December. Pakistan had also missed out on the JWC in 2016 – which India won – after the Pathankot and Uri terror attacks. Interestingly, Pakistan last travelled to India for the 2023 Asian Champions Trophy in Chennai, finishing fifth in the six-team competition. (with inputs from Uthra Ganesan).


Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Economic Times
2028 Olympics bombshell: Donald Trump demands gender tests for all female competitors
Donald Trump suggests gender testing for female athletes at the Los Angeles Olympics. This follows controversy at the Paris Games involving boxers. Trump wants strict testing to ensure fairness. He cites concerns about athletes gaining unfair advantages. The proposal sparks debate about gender verification in sports. World Athletics already uses genetic testing. The IOC's policies face scrutiny. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Why did Donald Trump want gender testing at the Olympics? What was the reason for the Imane Khelif scandal? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Will the rules for gender testing in World Athletics also apply to the Olympics? What will happen next for the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics? FAQs US President Donald Trump is upending Olympic planning with a contentious new proposal. In a fiery press conference, he stated that all female athletes competing in the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics should be subjected to, a move prompted by the controversy surrounding two female boxing champions from the 2024 Paris Games, who previously failed gender eligibility tests. He also announced a White House task force to oversee Olympic has made people more worried about fairness in women's sports and how governing bodies are dealing with issues of gender answered a reporter's direct question about transgender athletes in women's combat sports at a press event for the upcoming Los Angeles Olympics. He didn't beat around the bush when he said, "There will be a very strict way to test." And if the test results aren't right, they won't be able to compete in the Olympics, as per a report by the US president didn't say exactly how the testing would be done, but he was clear that he supports stricter eligibility rules for female two boxers, Algeria's Imane Khelif and Taiwan's Lin Yu-ting, won gold medals at the Paris 2024 Olympics by dominating their weight classes, gender testing is once again being looked at there was a lot of talk when it came out that both had been disqualified from the 2023 Women's World Championships in India for failing gender eligibility International Boxing Association (IBA), which was later stripped of Olympic governance by the International Olympic Committee (IOC), claimed the two athletes were ruled ineligible after confidential tests revealed they did not meet the "necessary eligibility criteria,' as per a report by the US IOC defended the policy at the time, saying that the athletes could compete in Paris based on their took advantage of the inconsistency. He stressed how important it is to keep American athletes safe and said that his administration would think about taking legal action against any male athletes who "masquerade as women" to gain an unfair advantage in a he left it up to the Department of Justice to decide what charges to bring, as per a report by the US Khelif and Lin Yu-ting made the news for their great performances at the Paris Games. But their history of failing previous eligibility tests has brought up the global debate about how to classify gender in elite sports IBA disqualified both athletes in 2023 because they were worried about biological advantages. Even though they could compete in the Paris Olympics under the IOC's rules, their past disqualifications made people worry about inconsistent policy enforcement. Critics say that the IOC's use of passports to determine gender doesn't do enough to make women's events fair, especially in combat testing is already common in sports other than boxing. World Athletics, the organization that runs track and field around the world, has announced new rules that will go into effect in September. These rules say that all female athletes who want to compete in big events like the World Championships must take a genetic test for the SRY gene, which tells you what biological sex you rule applies to famous athletes like Keely Hodgkinson and Georgia Hunter Bell from Britain, who are expected to follow it before the Tokyo World Championships start on September 13. The tests, which can be done with a cheek swab or a blood test, are not invasive and are meant to give a clear rules aren't in place for all Olympic events yet, but Trump's comments suggest that a similar system could be put in place for the LA 2028 Games, which he is in charge of. He even said he would lead a task force at the White House to oversee important parts of the Games, which could put him at the center of this heated rules about gender, eligibility, and fairness in women's sports are changing quickly as the Los Angeles Games get closer. There may be legal and moral problems with Trump's plan to make sex testing mandatory, but it has started a debate that is unlikely to go proposal follows a backlash from the Paris 2024 Games, where two female boxing gold medalists were previously disqualified due to gender eligibility isn't official yet. Trump has proposed "strong testing," but the specific procedures and legal approval are unclear.