European Banks Have Best Quarterly Streak Since Financial Crisis
(Bloomberg) -- The rally in European banking stocks shows few signs of cooling down after another stellar quarter.
Why Did the Government Declare War on My Adorable Tiny Truck?
How SUVs Are Making Traffic Worse
Gold-Rush Fever Returns to Historic New Zealand Mining Town
Trump Slashed International Aid. Geneva Is Feeling the Impact.
These US Bridges Face High Risk of Catastrophic Ship Strikes
The Stoxx 600 Banks Index has surged 25% this year, its best three months since 2020. That's made it the top-performing sector in Europe by far as investors keep increasing their exposure, and strategists see more gains ahead.
Their appetite is being driven by series of factors: firstly strong earnings seasons, hefty share buybacks and M&A potential, and now massive public spending plans that will probably keep European interest rates high. Over a 10-quarter winning streak — the longest since before the financial crisis — banks have returned over 160% including dividends, triple the 52% for the broader Stoxx Europe 600.
'The operating environment is very different today to almost any time over the past 20 years – we have banks talking about loan growth again, an upward sloping yield curve and governments at least talking about reducing the regulatory burden,' said Keefe, Bruyette & Woods's head of European bank research Andrew Stimpson. 'That likely means there is still more good news.'
Following this run, some bears had expected lenders' outperformance to start fading, particularly as central banks are now cutting rates. Instead earnings have proved their business remains resilient, while buyback programs are also driving up shares. The likes of Societe Generale SA, Commerzbank AG and Banco Santander SA — repurchasing their own shares — have climbed more than 40% this year.
The latest tailwind has been Germany passing a landmark spending package, creating a potentially unlimited supply of money to rearm to deter Russia. It will also set up a €500 billion ($540 billion) fund to invest in the country's aging infrastructure. The country's banks are set to benefit, with Deutsche Bank AG jumping 35% this year to trade near 10-year highs.
'The shift in fiscal policy will likely drive a stronger outlook for loan growth given the increased government expenditure on defense, infrastructure, and state/local projects,' JPMorgan Chase & Co. analysts led by Kian Abouhossein wrote in a note. They expect a long term re-rating for lenders in the region.
The geopolitical landscape, along with cooling inflation, are reducing the chances of the European Central Bank cutting rates below 1.5%, implying less pressure on lending revenue, the JPMorgan analysts said. While the ECB this month lowered rates for the sixth time since June, it indicated its cutting phase may be drawing to a close.
The combination of lower rates and longer-term government borrowing plans has steepened the German bond yield curve the most since 2021. That means banks are able to borrow money at a lower cost and lend at higher rates.
Investors keep upping their exposure. According to Bank of America Corp.'s European fund manager survey this month, positioning in financials has increased, with banks now the largest sector overweight in Europe. And half of European investors think lenders still look attractive, up from 41% a month earlier, it found.
The last earnings season proved profitability remains robust. The sector delivered 'another quarter of positive surprises,' Jefferies analysts said, noting the solid performance of net interest income. The European Union's largest banks posted another record year for profit, while 20 banks in the region announced over €18 billion in share buybacks during the first two months of the year alone.
Mergers and acquisitions also remain a hot topic. Spain's BBVA SA is waiting for approval for its hostile bid for smaller lender Banco Sabadell SA, while Italy's UniCredit SpA has a move on both Commerzbank and Banco BPM.
Easy Money
Some analysts are questioning how long the positive fundamentals can last. After the series of stellar earnings seasons, profit growth is expected to plateau. The consensus for the sector sees very little return on average over the next 12 months, so the potential upside lies more with sentiment and valuation expansion.
For Roberto Scholtes, head of strategy at wealth manager Singular Bank, the banking rally has been sound and based on genuine improvement in profitability, but the 'easy money' has already been made. 'Valuations are no longer that cheap, expectations aren't depressed, investor positioning is already quite long, and net interest margins are at an inflection point,' he said.
Positioning is now a more crowded bet. Lenders were deeply overbought for much of January and February, and valuations are closing in on their long-term average.
The sector now trades at about nine times forward earnings, yet it remains the second cheapest in Europe after autos. Banks are also on par with their forward book value, only half the level seen before the global financial crisis, implying there is still room to run.
Deutsche Bank strategists including Maximilian Uleer and Carolin Raab are 'optimistic on banks given structurally higher bund yields, an economic recovery and a steeper yield curve.'
Business Schools Are Back
Google Is Searching for an Answer to ChatGPT
Israel Aims to Be the World's Arms Dealer
A New 'China Shock' Is Destroying Jobs Around the World
The Richest Americans Kept the Economy Booming. What Happens When They Stop Spending?
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oil falls as investors weigh chance of US intervention in Iran-Israel conflict
By Colleen Howe BEIJING (Reuters) -Oil prices slipped on Thursday as investors hesitated to take new positions after U.S. President Donald Trump gave mixed signals on the country's potential involvement in the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict. Brent crude futures fell 37 cents, or 0.48%, to $76.33 a barrel by 0110 GMT after gaining 0.3% in the previous session marked by high volatility, with prices falling as much as 2.7%. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude for July fell 28 cents, or 0.37% to $74.86 a barrel, after settling up 0.4% in the previous despite dropping by as much as 2.4%. The July contract expires on Friday and the more active August contract was down 21 cents, or 0.29%, to $73.29 a barrel. There is still a "healthy risk premium baked into the price as traders await to see whether the next stage of the Israel-Iran conflict is a U.S. strike or peace talks", Tony Sycamore, market analyst at IG, said in a note. The former could lead prices to rise by $5 while peace talks could lead to a drop of around the same magnitude, Sycamore said. Trump on Wednesday told reporters that he may or may not decide for the U.S. to join Israel in its missile attacks on Iran. The conflict stretched into its seventh day on Thursday. Direct U.S. involvement would widen the conflict, putting energy infrastructure in the region at higher risk of attack, analysts say. Iran is OPEC's third-largest producer, extracting about 3.3 million barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil. But more crucially, about 19 million bpd of oil and oil products move through the key Strait of Hormuz waterway and there is widespread concern the fighting could disrupt trade flows there. The U.S. Federal Reserve kept interest rates steady on Wednesday but pencilled in two rate cuts by the end of the year. Chair Jerome Powell however cautioned the rate cuts would be "data-dependent" and that more consumer inflation is expected from President Trump's planned import tariffs. Lower interest rates would stimulate the economy, and as a result demand for oil, but that could exacerbate inflation. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Politico
30 minutes ago
- Politico
Facing Colorado River crunch, Trump admin eyes SoCal groundwater
The situation on the Colorado River — the water supply for 40 million Westerners and half of all Californians — is dire. The waterway's flows have shrunk 20 percent since the turn of the century and climate scientists say it's not unreasonable to think that another 20 percent could be lost in the coming decades. To cities, farmers, tribes and industries from Wyoming to Mexico — but especially in legally vulnerable Arizona — that looks like pain. To the Los Angeles-based water company Cadiz Inc., that looks like opportunity. After trying and failing for more than two decades to pump ancient groundwater from beneath the Mojave Desert and sell it to Southern California water districts, the controversial company has set its sights on new customers over the border in the Grand Canyon State. 'We are hopeful that our projects can support the Bureau's efforts to manage Colorado River resources and Lake Mead,' Cadiz CEO Susan Kennedy (a former chief of staff to California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger) said on Wednesday. Her pitch: There's up to 2.5 million acre-feet of untapped water in the Mojave Desert her company can move and store across the arid Southwest. In California, the project is a perpetual political football, opposed by the likes of the late Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who was broadly a champion of water projects but was concerned it would harm the desert environment. One former state lawmaker compared the dispute to 'Hatfield and McCoy, Palestinians and the Jews.' Now, Trump is getting in the mix. On Monday, the Interior Department announced plans to sign a memorandum of understanding with the latest incarnation of the project, called the Mojave Groundwater Bank, touting it as 'an important tool to improve drought resiliency in the Colorado River Basin' though recognizing that it is only in 'early development.' And on Tuesday, the Trump administration official leading Colorado River negotiations for the federal government suggested to water power players in Arizona that they consider the project. 'The Cadiz sponsors think they have a lot of groundwater that could go somewhere. If it turns out they are right, would Arizona want to have a conversation about that water?' Scott Cameron, an acting assistant secretary at the Interior Department, asked at a meeting of a state water committee. For the Trump administration, trumpeting Cadiz is a chance to show it's doing something about the Colorado River despite the seven Western states remaining sharply divided over how to divvy up water cuts after current rules expire in 2026. For Cadiz, the endorsement is a political lifeline after decades of in-state opposition — and a return to more favorable treatment under the Trump administration even after the company dumped a lobbying firm with powerful Trump ties, Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, after Biden took office. Under the Biden administration, Cadiz rebranded itself as an environmental justice-focused company seeking to fill accessibility gaps in economically depressed regions of the state. Kennedy even expressed concern after the November election that a new Trump administration would push back on its plans to repurpose 80 miles of steel pipe it purchased from the terminated Keystone XL oil pipeline to transport water. Opponents of the project, including conservation groups who say it could harm sensitive desert ecosystems, still see it as the same old concept. 'It's not surprising that an administration that wasted over 2 billion gallons of water under the guise of wildfire response thinks it's a good idea to overdraft a desert aquifer that supports federally protected land,' said Neal Desai, the senior program director for the National Parks Conservation Association. It's likely the project will draw some interest within Arizona, especially among the lowest-priority water users who are desperate to protect their Colorado River supplies as the seven states that share the waterway negotiate over new rules to govern the river. The state has already committed to cutting more than a quarter of its use from the river, and any cuts beyond that will fall first on Central Arizona cities and tribes unless alternative deals can be reached. But it will take a lot more than interest to make a deal happen. Cadiz has run into opposition from California state lawmakers and the State Lands Commission, which after urging from state Sen. Monique Limón and Assemblymember Isaac Bryan told Kennedy in a letter last week not to start construction on the pipeline that would transfer water without agency buy-in, which could take a year to two years. Crucially, Cadiz would almost certainly need buy-in from the long-skeptical Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, because any deals with Arizona would likely include Metropolitan taking Cadiz's water and leaving a portion of its Colorado River water in Lake Mead in exchange. Many of the hurdles Metropolitan has cited in the past, from water quality concerns to operational challenges, remain — and the district's board of directors also includes two prominent California environmentalists. Cadiz has yet to formally approach Metropolitan about its new plan. 'Metropolitan's board does not currently have any pending items from Cadiz to consider and none are planned for the foreseeable future,' Metropolitan spokesperson Rebecca Kimitch said by email. The last time the board reviewed anything from Cadiz was in 2002, when it voted to reject the project, she said. But, amid high-stakes Colorado River negotiations, it might be hard for Metropolitan to say no to a request that could help ease the path to a deal for another state. Like this content? Consider signing up for POLITICO's California Climate newsletter.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
First Solar (FSLR) Fell by Over 12% This Week. Here is Why.
The share price of First Solar, Inc. (NASDAQ:FSLR) fell by 12.59% between June 10 and June 17, 2025, putting it among the Energy Stocks that Lost the Most This Week. A solar panel farm with an orange sky illuminating the vast landscape. First Solar, Inc. (NASDAQ:FSLR) is a leading American solar technology company and global provider of responsibly produced eco-efficient solar modules. First Solar, Inc. (NASDAQ:FSLR) plunged this week after it was revealed that the Senate version of President Trump's sweeping tax-and-spending bill has retained the cuts to renewable energy tax credits. The Senate committee's draft bill proposes cutting solar and wind incentives to 60% of their value in 2026 and ending them completely by 2028. With solar energy being First Solar's core business, the proposed legislation is a direct strike to the company. Following the recent downturn, the share price of First Solar, Inc. (NASDAQ:FSLR) has fallen by around 45% over the last year. While we acknowledge the potential of FSLR as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 10 Best Nuclear Energy Stocks to Buy Right Now and Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data