Thousands of South Carolinians could recieve a check from the State Treasurer's Office this month. Here's why
COLUMBIA, S.C. (WCBD) — More than 3,800 checks will be mailed out to people in South Carolina in the coming weeks as the State Treasurer's Office works to return hundreds of thousands of dollars in unclaimed property.
The office has launched a new initiative called 'Palmetto Payback,' which matches qualified unclaimed property to its owner and automatically generates checks without needing to file a claim.
The first wave of payments, totaling more than $600,000, is expected to hit mailboxes in the coming days, according to the treasurer's office.
'We want to make it easier for South Carolinians to get their forgotten funds back, putting money directly into their hands,' said Treasurer Curtis Loftis. 'This is about efficiency, accuracy, and ultimately, about serving the people of our state.'
The Treasurer's Office, which acts as custodian of the funds until the rightful owners come forward, estimates that one in seven people in South Carolina have unclaimed property, averaging about $500. The office currently has over $950 million available to claim.
The Treasurer's Office, which acts as custodian of the funds until the rightful owners come forward, currently has over $950 million available to claim.
Student loan default collections resume: What you need to know
Businesses transfer millions of dollars to the unclaimed property program each year when the owner of the funds cannot be located. The funds can come from dormant bank accounts, stock certificates, uncashed checks, unclaimed insurance proceeds, and forgotten utility deposits, for example.
'While we are excited to automatically return funds to thousands of South Carolinians, not all unclaimed property can be validated through this special initiative,' Loftis said.
All South Carolinians — including those who receive automatic checks — are encouraged to check the treasurer's website to see if missing money might be waiting for them.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Charleston County received $9.4 million from an Airbnb settlement. Here's how they plan to use it
CHARLESTON COUNTY, S.C. (WCBD) — Charleston County leaders are developing a plan for how to spend millions of dollars received as part of a settlement with vacation rental giant Airbnb. The company agreed in February to pay $60 million to settle a lawsuit brought by more than a dozen South Carolina communities over unpaid accommodations taxes and business license fees. Charleston County recouped $9.4 million as part of that settlement, and members of the county's finance committee offered a first glimpse at how that money will be allocated at its June 5 meeting. The recommendations included roughly $1.4 million for housing initiatives, $1.6 million for financial system upgrades, $2.25 million for drainage projects, and $1.1 million for the visitors bureau. Officials also decided to put $2.5 million into a reserves fund that could be used for disaster relief in anticipation of possible cuts to FEMA. In addition, $500,000 will be allocated toward the City of Charleston's Rapid Housing program as a one-time startup cost, but a county spokesperson said the money would go back to the reserves if the city doesn't receive matching funds from other municipalities. The proposal is expected to go before the full council for a vote on Tuesday. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Electric vehicle battery company halts construction of SC manufacturing plant
Gov. Henry McMaster, center right, and state Commerce Secretary Harry Lightsey, right, attended a groundbreaking ceremony Wednesday, June 7, 2023 in Florence for Japan-headquartered AESC's proposed battery cell plant. AESC is now pausing construction. (Provided by Florence County Economic Development) A battery cell maker is pausing work on its manufacturing plant under construction in the Pee Dee, delaying its pledge of 1,600 new jobs for South Carolinians. Envision Automotive Energy Supply Co. (AESC) announced the work stoppage Thursday, two years after breaking ground on the facility near Florence. 'AESC has informed the state of South Carolina and our local partners that due to policy and market uncertainty, we are pausing construction at our South Carolina facility at this time,' spokesman Brad Grantham said in a statement. 'We anticipate being able to resume construction once circumstances stabilize.' The Japanese-headquartered firm already has invested more than $1 billion into the Florence facility, Grantham said. He said the company 'fully intends to meet our commitments to invest $1.6 billion and create 1,600 jobs in the coming years,' but did not indicate what the new timeline might be. The company declined to provide further comment. Gov. Henry McMaster, while speaking to reporters, pointed to uncertainty over rising tariffs enacted by the Trump Administration, as well provisions in Republicans' massive bill on taxes and spending that could eliminate electric vehicle tax credits — both for people who purchase new or used electric vehicles and those that install EV charging stations at their homes or business. 'We hate to see that happen, but a pause is OK,' McMaster said. 'We're just urging caution. Let things play out, because all of these changes are taking place,' the governor added. 'We believe that give it some time and it'll work out.' Electric vehicle sales have continued to rise, both nationally and globally. Still, the speed of that growth has not met with early expectations. Electric vehicle battery companies in SC among the latest to hit speed bumps The lag has led to multiple setbacks for the fledgling industry, with canceled investments both nationally and in the Palmetto State, as well as automakers easing away from goals of going all-electric in favor of a mix of electric and plug-in hybrids. A repeal of consumer tax credits could further slow progress. AESC's pause comes just four months after the battery cell manufacturer pulled back on earlier plans to expand the plant beyond its original scope. BMW contracted with AESC to produce battery cells for the German auto giant's U.S. manufacturing facilities in the Upstate. The automaker has already invested $700 million dollars in its own battery plant in Woodruff, planning to place the cells it receives from AESC into the batteries it assembles there. BMW spokesman Steve Wilson said those battery assembly plans are still on schedule to begin in 2026. Between the initial announcement in 2022 and March 2024, AESC rolled out three separate rounds of investment and promises of jobs in Florence. In addition to supplying BMW's Spartanburg County assembly plant, the company made plans for a second building the was supposed to produce battery cells for a BMW plant in Mexico. But in February, AESC told the state the first factory would be enough to meet the demand for both of BMW's facilities. It pulled out of plans for a second, $1.5 billion building, along with the 1,080 jobs that came with it. In turn, South Carolina withdrew its offer of $111 million in state funding for that particular phase. The incentives claw back was a rare move for the state. But even with the pull back, AESC's remaining plant had still been on track to become the largest economic development deal in the Pee Dee region, according to the state Department of Commerce. The remaining $121 million in bonds and $135 million in grants Commerce offered as an initial incentive to lure AESC to South Carolina are so far unaffected by the shutdown, Commerce spokeswoman Alex Clark. 'South Carolina is fully and unequivocally committed to supporting existing companies, including AESC,' Clark said.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
SC may have to come up with $100M or more for food assistance under federal GOP proposal
SC could face costs upwards of $100 million annually under proposed changes to the country's largest federal food assistance program. (File photo by Getty Images) Continuing to provide grocery assistance to more than half a million South Carolinians could cost the state upwards of $100 million annually under proposed changes to the federal program. For the last half-century, the federal government has fully funded benefits provided through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, also known as food stamps. But Republicans' massive bill on taxes and spending, as passed by the U.S. House, would require states to pay a portion of those benefits starting in 2028, plus a greater share of what it costs to administer the program. While the U.S. Senate is likely to make changes to what's dubbed the 'big, beautiful bill,' advocates worry about major cuts to the 61-year program and what that would mean to the families who rely on it. U.S. House Republican plan would force states to pay for a portion of SNAP benefits 'I can't imagine the state is even closely prepared for all this,' said Sue Berkowitz, director of the Appleseed Legal Justice Center. If the House plan holds, the Palmetto State's total cost could triple, or in the worst-case scenario, increase elevenfold to $370 million. That's because it bases states' share of the cost on how well they distribute benefits correctly: States with an error rate of 6% or less would be responsible for paying 5%. Those with an error rate higher than 10% would have to pay one-quarter of the cost. And the latest data puts South Carolina in the latter category. In 2023, the state's error rate was a whopping 22.6%, the fourth-worst in the nation, overwhelmingly due to overpayments. State officials say that's an anomaly. Prior to the coronavirus pandemic, South Carolina's error rate was historically in the lowest category. That changed in 2022, when the state's error rate went to 9% amid changes to the SNAP program during the global pandemic. Then it shot up in 2023. After a re-training of staff, the state Department of Social Services expects a big drop in the 2024 error rate, which should be released next month. The chief budget writer of the South Carolina House said the state has the money to continue the program, as long as the error rate returns to pre-pandemic levels. Ways and Means Chairman Bruce Bannister pointed to hefty surpluses in tax collections in recent years as an example of the state's fiscal health. SC legislators get extra $1B to spend as budget negotiations begin The budget that takes effect July 1 includes $1.2 billion placed in reserves. About $500 million more is unspent and available following an update in revenue estimates last month. The question is whether funding for the food program will stand up against other budget priorities in the years to come, said Bannister, R-Greenville. Rep. Bill Herbkersman was less certain of South Carolina's ability to pay. The Bluffton Republican chaired the subcommittee that oversees the budget for South Carolina's child welfare and social services agency for many years. He does not think the state can guarantee it will have the funding every year to keep the program going on a recurring basis. In total, the federal government provides South Carolinians $1.3 billion in annual benefits for groceries, according to the latest figures. The U.S. Department of Agriculture, which heads the SNAP program, and the state split the $66 million bill for administrative costs. What frustrates Herbkersman the most are the overhead costs just to operate the program — three-quarters of which South Carolina will have to pay under the proposed changes. 'As a taxpayer, I'm incensed by that,' he said. As for payment errors, those can occur from miscalculations in a household's expenses and families struggling to provide the necessary documents updating their income in the case of a job change or loss, according to the USDA. According to state officials, the federal government calculates the error rate by checking a small sample of beneficiaries. DSS also has struggled to process applications for benefits within the 30-day window allowed under federal regulations. The USDA put the state on notice last year, both for timeliness and for not properly informing people of denied benefits. As millions wait on food stamp approvals, feds tell states to speed it up To address that, DSS started making much-needed upgrades to its technology. The agency has set aside about half of the $74 million it needs to replace equipment that's as much as five decades old. Those upgrades 'will significantly improve the state's ability to process applications in a timely manner,' according to an agency statement. But the fundamental issue is a rise in the need, according to DSS. South Carolina, like many other states, has seen the weekly application volume for SNAP benefits rise substantially — 7,000 applications for benefits each week on average, a nearly 50% increase over pre-COVID numbers. As of last September, one in nine South Carolinians were receiving SNAP benefits. More than half went to families with children, while more than one-third went to families with an elderly or disabled adult, according to the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Lee Patterson has seen that firsthand as Richland County Library's social work director who helps people fill out applications. She's not sure why more people are applying for aid, but she suspects it's closely tied to the rising cost of housing. 'The first bill people usually pay is the rent,' she said. 'When the price of housing goes up, then the ability to pay for food goes down.' Applicants who aren't elderly or disabled can deduct only $672 from their income when calculating whether they qualify for food benefits. Meanwhile, the median cost of rent and utilities in South Carolina is nearly double that, according to U.S. Census data. Patterson and her team have the experience to help smooth the way for people seeking aid. But for those applying on their own, especially for the first time, it can be tricky. For example, when it comes to proving income changes, applicants often have to go back to a former employer and ask for documentation that shows they no longer work for that company. Those employers don't always respond, and in some cases may have closed entirely, Patterson said. A second pain point for applicants can be waiting for a phone interview with DSS staff, which the federal government requires for benefits. South Carolina was allowed to waive those interviews during the pandemic, likely contributing to the state's increased error rate, but they resumed in July 2023. The call volume for these interviews is often high, and it's not uncommon for an applicant to wait on hold for an hour. The library has a phone available for applicants to use. If they don't get through, they may have to return multiple days in a row to complete their interview, Patterson said. Advocates expect changes to the U.S. House proposal, as several key Republicans in the Senate have publicly opposed shifting food benefit costs to states. Negotiations are expected to continue into next week, Politico reported, with the goal of passing the bill by July 4. The final plan remains to be seen. The executive director of Foodshare South Carolina is concerned about what might ultimately happen to other SNAP-related programs. Omme-Salma Rahemtullah said she relies heavily on the state-funded program known as Healthy Bucks, which provides additional money for SNAP recipients to purchase fruits and vegetables. They can use these benefits at farmers markets. Or they can get a box of produce worth $20 from Foodshare. Rahemtullah worries that if the state has to spend more on general SNAP benefits, there may be less available to keep Healthy Bucks operating. Healthy Bucks began as a pilot in six counties in 2014. It's since expanded to all 46 counties, according to the state Department of Social Services. In 2023, the Legislature provided an additional $5 million to the agency to further expand the program. Beyond upping the cost to states, the federal proposal also expands requirements for SNAP recipients. Under existing rules, people under 55 who can work — what the government calls 'able-bodied adults' — are limited to three months of food benefits over a three-year period unless they can prove they work, volunteer or attend job training at least 80 hours each month, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The proposal would expand those rules by a decade — to people under 65 and, for parents of school-age children, they would be exempt if their children are younger than 8, rather than 18. 'As less money comes into the state from the federal level, the state will have to find ways to make that up for a lot of things,' said Berkowitz, the Appleseed advocate. 'I just hope feeding people will be a priority.'
