logo
China is choking supply of critical minerals to Western defence companies

China is choking supply of critical minerals to Western defence companies

Mint13 hours ago
China is limiting the flow of critical minerals to Western defense manufacturers, delaying production and forcing companies to scour the world for stockpiles of the minerals needed to make everything from bullets to jet fighters.
Earlier this year, as U.S.-China trade tensions soared, Beijing tightened the controls it places on the export of rare earths. While Beijing allowed them to start flowing after the Trump administration agreed in June to a series of trade concessions, China has maintained a lock on critical minerals for defense purposes. China supplies around 90% of the world's rare earths and dominates the production of many other critical minerals.
As a result, one drone-parts manufacturer that supplies the U.S. military was forced to delay orders by up to two months while it searched for a non-Chinese source of magnets, which are assembled from rare earths.
Certain materials needed by the defense industry now go for five or more times what was typical before China's recent mineral restrictions, according to industry traders. One company said it was recently offered samarium—an element needed to make magnets that can withstand the extreme temperatures of a jet-fighter engine—for 60 times the standard price. That is already driving the cost of defense systems higher, say suppliers and defense executives.
The squeeze on critical minerals highlights how dependent the U.S. military is on China for much of its supply chain—giving Beijing leverage at a time of rising tensions between the two powers and heated trade negotiations. Defense manufacturers supplying the U.S. military rely on minerals that are mainly produced in China for microelectronics, drone motors, night-vision goggles, missile-targeting systems and defense satellites.
While companies have tried to find alternative sources of these minerals in recent years, some of the elements are so niche that they can't be economically produced in the West, say industry executives.
China's Foreign Ministry didn't respond to a request for comment.
In addition to the more recent export controls on rare earths, China has since December banned sales to the U.S. of germanium, gallium and antimony—which are used for things like hardening lead bullets and projectiles, and to allow soldiers to see at night.
Some companies now warn of looming production cuts if more minerals aren't forthcoming.
On Wednesday, the chief executive of Leonardo DRS said the U.S.-based defense firm is down to its 'safety stock" of germanium.
'In order to sustain timely product deliveries, material flow must improve in the second half" of 2025, CEO Bill Lynn said on a conference call. The company is the U.S. subsidiary of Italian defense giant Leonardo.
Germanium goes into the company's infrared sensors, which are used in missiles and other equipment. Lynn said that the company is looking at diversifying its supply chain while also finding ways to replace it in its products.
The Pentagon is requiring defense contractors to stop buying rare-earth magnets that contain China-sourced minerals by 2027. As a result, some companies have sizable stockpiles of magnets. But suppliers and defense companies often hold less than a year's worth—some just a few months—of many other critical mineral stockpiles.
Drone manufacturers are among the most vulnerable, because many are small startups and have very limited revenue or supply-chain savvy, and never got around to acquiring large stockpiles of rare-earth magnets and metals, say some in the defense industry.
A drone flies overhead during a military parade in Washington, D.C., in June.
'I can tell you…we talk about this daily and our companies talk about it daily," said Dak Hardwick, vice president of international affairs at the Aerospace Industries Association, a U.S. defense and commercial aerospace trade group.
More than 80,000 parts that are used in Defense Department weapons systems are made with critical minerals now subject to Chinese export controls, according to data from defense software firm Govini. Nearly all of the supply chains for key critical minerals used by the Pentagon rely on at least one Chinese supplier, Govini said, meaning restrictions from Beijing can cause widespread disruptions.
Since stepping up export controls earlier this year, China has begun requiring companies to provide extensive documentation of how they will use the rare earths and magnets they import. Chinese regulators often demand sensitive information, such as product images and even photos of production lines, to ensure none of the materials go to military use, say Western buyers.
One Western company that supplies Chinese-made rare-earth magnets to both civilian and defense companies says its requests for imported magnets have recently been approved for many civilian purposes—but rejected or delayed for defense and aerospace.
In May, New Hampshire-based ePropelled, which makes propulsion motors for drones, received unsettling questions from its Chinese magnet supplier. The supplier sent Chinese government forms demanding drawings and pictures of ePropelled's products and a list of buyers. It also asked for assurances that the rare-earth magnets China would supply ePropelled wouldn't go toward military applications.
'Of course we are not going to provide the Chinese government with that information," said Chris Thompson, vice president of global sales for ePropelled. The company has about 100 customers, including large American defense contractors and drone manufacturers in Ukraine.
So its Chinese suppliers paused shipping, and ePropelled had to delay some customer orders by one or two months—double the amount of time it usually takes to deliver its motors. The company sought alternative suppliers in the U.S., Europe and Asia, including buying magnets from vendors in Japan and Taiwan, although they too rely on rare earths from China.
The company also struck deals with startup magnet producers Vulcan Elements in North Carolina and Oklahoma-based USA Rare Earth. However, those startups won't have supply ready for ePropelled until at least the end of this year and will need to build up alternative sources of Chinese-dominated minerals as they scale up production.
Metal traders say that because China demands to know the end user of rare-earth magnets and metals, it isn't approving licenses for traders to stockpile.
The Department of Defense has awarded grants to expand production of niche materials, including $14 million in funding last year to a Canadian company to produce germanium substrates used in solar cells for defense satellites. In July, the Pentagon took an even bigger step when it agreed to pay $400 million for 15% of MP Materials, the operator of the largest rare-earths mine in the Americas, which is rapidly scaling up its magnet manufacturing capacity.
The Pentagon didn't respond to a request for comment.
Reporters gather outside the London venue of U.S.-China trade talks in June.
On an earnings call last month Lockheed Martin CEO James Taiclet called the MP Materials agreement groundbreaking and said it would help ensure the supply of magnets needed in its F-35 jet fighters and cruise missiles. But building up new supply will take time.
The Defense Department early last year established the Critical Minerals Forum, an effort in part to spur more mineral supply-chain projects in the U.S. and allied countries, including helping metals miners secure funding to increase their output of critical materials like antimony and germanium.
Defense companies that traditionally outsourced the purchase of critical minerals to sub-suppliers are now using their market heft to try to acquire sources of key materials themselves. Major defense companies 'are starting to get more and more panicked as they go, because they recognize that they're just not going to get the magnets, no matter what happens, unless they get involved," said Nicholas Myers, the CEO of Phoenix Tailings, a Massachusetts startup that produces rare-earth metals.
Beijing is signaling that it takes its mineral export bans very seriously. Earlier this year, one U.S. defense supplier, the United States Antimony Corporation, tried to ship 55 metric tons of antimony mined in Australia to its smelter in Mexico. The load transited via the Chinese port city of Ningbo—until recently a routine practice.
But in April, while the shipment was being transloaded in Ningbo, China customs detained it for three months, prompting United States Antimony to ask the State Department and White House for help.
The Chinese released the shipment in July, on the condition that it be sent back to Australia and not to the U.S. When it arrived in Australia, United States Antimony learned that product seals had been broken. It is currently working out whether the antimony has been tampered with or contaminated.
'The shipping company, everyone who was involved, they'd never seen this happen before," said company CEO Gary Evans.
Neither the White House, the Defense Department nor the State Department provided comment.
Write to Jon Emont at jonathan.emont@wsj.com, Heather Somerville at heather.somerville@wsj.com and Alistair MacDonald at Alistair.Macdonald@wsj.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘No Marathi vs non-Marathi', says Maharashtra CM Fadnavis, with an advise to Nishikant Dubey
‘No Marathi vs non-Marathi', says Maharashtra CM Fadnavis, with an advise to Nishikant Dubey

Hindustan Times

time12 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

‘No Marathi vs non-Marathi', says Maharashtra CM Fadnavis, with an advise to Nishikant Dubey

Amid the tensions over the Marathi language, Maharashtra chief minister Devendra Fadnavis clarified on Monday that there was no such issue in the state and no injustice was being done to either Marathi or non-Marathi speakers. Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis said that no injustice being done to either Marathi or non-Marathi speakers. (X/@CMOMaharashtra) Fadnavis also advised party colleague and MP Nishikant Dubey against crossing into the emotive language matter. He maintained that the controversy over the Marathi language is being created in the state for political reasons. Last month, BJP Lok Sabha MP Nishikant Dubey had hit out at Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) chief Raj Thackeray's "hit below their eardrum" advice to his party workers targeting non-Marathi speakers. Without naming anyone, Dubey had dared Thackeray to come out of the state and said, "Tumko patak patak ke maarenge" (you will be thrashed badly, again and again). Speaking to reporters, Fadnavis advised Dubey to exercise caution and suggested that he should not wade into the "Marathi versus non-Marathi" issue, which is being created for political reasons. "We are capable of handling it. There is no Marathi-non Marathi tension here. No injustice being done to either of them. Both Marathi and non-Marathi speakers in Maharashtra will teach those leaders a lesson who are trying to divide them," the CM asserted. Sena UBT will 'resort to violence' Meanwhile, Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut on Sunday said that his party would resort to violence if needed for the sake of Marathi, daring CM Fadnavis to do whatever he wanted in response. 'Chief minister Devendra Fadnavis, for the sake of Marathi, we will resort to violence. Do whatever you want. This is Maharashtra and it belongs to the people who speak Marathi. One hundred and six martyrs sacrificed their lives for the sake of Maharashtra, for the Marathi people,' Raut said during a press conference. The Rajya Sabha MP wondered if Fadnavis would follow in the footsteps of Morarji Desai, who as the CM of Bombay state, gave orders for firing on Marathi people who were agitating for a state along linguistic lines, including Mumbai. On Saturday, the Shiv Sena (UBT), MNS, and Peasants and Workers Party (PWP), three parties that have seen their strength in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR), shared the stage and played the Marathi pride card to the hilt. This was the second time that MNS and Sena UBT leaders shared the stage after the political reunion of Raj and his cousin, Sena UBT chief Uddhav Thackeray. (with PTI inputs)

Iran blames US for military aggression, demands compensation in talks
Iran blames US for military aggression, demands compensation in talks

First Post

time12 minutes ago

  • First Post

Iran blames US for military aggression, demands compensation in talks

Tehran ruled out direct talks with Washington, accusing it of military aggression alongside Israel during a recent 12-day conflict that derailed nuclear discussions. read more Iran said Monday that any future negotiations would hold the United States responsible for attacks on its nuclear installations, but that direct talks with Washington were out of the question. On June 22, the United States briefly joined Israel's battle against Iran, which had stalled discussions on Tehran's nuclear program. 'In any potential negotiation… the issue of holding the United States accountable and demanding compensation for committing military aggression against Iran's peaceful nuclear facilities will be one of the topics on the agenda,' foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei told a press briefing on Monday. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Asked whether Iran would engage in direct talks with the United States, Baqaei said: 'No.' During the course of the 12-day battle, Israel began an unprecedented onslaught in mid-June that targeted Iranian military and nuclear installations while also striking civilian areas. US troops joined the attack by attacking nuclear facilities in Fordo, Isfahan, and Natanz. The fighting halted negotiations that had begun in April and were the highest-level communication between Tehran and Washington since the US abandoned a major nuclear agreement with Iran in 2018. Following the battle, Tehran stopped cooperation with the UN nuclear inspectors and wanted assurances against military action before restarting discussions. Washington has slammed Tehran's demand for compensation as 'ridiculous'. Baqaei said on Monday that Iran was committed to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, but criticised what he described as the 'politicised and unprofessional approach' of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The foreign ministry spokesman said that the IAEA's deputy chief is expected in Iran 'in less than 10 days'. Last month, Iran said future cooperation with the UN agency would take on a 'new form'. On July 25, Iranian diplomats met with counterparts from Germany, Britain and France, in the first meeting since the war with Israel ended. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The three European powers are parties to the 2015 nuclear deal, which unravelled after the US withdrew during Trump's first term. In recent weeks, the trio has threatened to trigger sanctions if Tehran failed to agree a deal on uranium enrichment and cooperation with UN inspectors. Iran has repeatedly called reimposing sanctions 'illegal' and insisted on its right to enrich uranium. Israel and Western nations accuse Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons, a charge Tehran has consistently denied.

Rush Hour: SC raps Rahul Gandhi for China incursion remark, Jharkhand ex-CM Shibu Soren dead & more
Rush Hour: SC raps Rahul Gandhi for China incursion remark, Jharkhand ex-CM Shibu Soren dead & more

Scroll.in

time12 minutes ago

  • Scroll.in

Rush Hour: SC raps Rahul Gandhi for China incursion remark, Jharkhand ex-CM Shibu Soren dead & more

We're building a brand-new studio to bring you bold ground reports, sharp interviews, hard-hitting podcasts, explainers and more. Support Scroll's studio fund today. The Supreme Court told Congress leader Rahul Gandhi that a 'true Indian' would not make remarks such as the ones he made in 2022 about alleged Chinese incursions into Indian territory. However, the court stayed the defamation proceedings against him for three weeks. The case pertains to comments made by Gandhi in December 16 about a clash between the Indian and Chinese armies along the Line of Actual Control in Arunachal Pradesh's Tawang. In response to the court's remark, Gandhi's counsel Abhishek Singhvi said that it was also possible for a 'true Indian' to express concern about the deaths of soldiers during clashes between India and China in eastern Ladakh's Galwan Valley in June 2020. A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and AG Masih, however, asked the Opposition leader how he had verified claims that 2,000 sq km of Indian territory had been occupied by China. Datta asked why the Congress leader had made the allegations on social media instead of raising questions in Parliament. Read more. Jharkhand's former Chief Minister Shibu Soren died on Monday. He was 81. Soren was admitted to a hospital in New Delhi for more than a month and was undergoing treatment for kidney-related ailments. Soren was the founder of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha and the party's chief for 38 years. He served as the chief minister for 10 days in March 2005, for five months between August 2008 and January 2009, and between December 2009 and May 2010. Read more. The Supreme Court questioned the 'tearing hurry' of the Uttar Pradesh government in passing an ordinance that allows it to take over the management of the Banke Bihari temple in Vrindavan. A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi expressed disapproval of the 'clandestine manner' in which the government had secured permission to use temple funds for a Rs 500-crore corridor project. The permission was secured through a May 15 judgement of the Supreme Court, which allowed the state to acquire five acres of land with temple funds. The bench verbally proposed recalling the May 15 verdict and forming a committee, headed by a retired High Court judge, to oversee the temple's management while the validity of the ordinance was being decided. The Tamil Nadu government moved the Supreme Court challenging a Madras High Court order restraining it from naming welfare schemes after living politicians and using the photographs of former chief ministers, ideological leaders and political party symbols in advertisements of the schemes. On Thursday, the High Court passed the order on a plea filed by an All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam MP, who had sought directions to stop the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam government from using Chief Minister MK Stalin's name in public outreach programmes such as Ungaludan Stalin. The petitioner had argued that the practice violated the Supreme Court's earlier directions and the 2014 Government Advertisement Content Regulation Guidelines. The High Court had referred to a Supreme Court ruling that allowed the use of the current chief minister's photo in government advertisements, but ruled that including former leaders or party icons could be seen as political misuse of public funds.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store