Where Kroger's pledge to get rid of plastic bags by 2025 stands
Kroger made the announcement in August 2018, stating it would phase out single-use plastic bags and transition to reusable bags by 2025. The commitment included all of the brands Kroger owns, including grocery chains Dillons, Ralphs and QFC. See NBC4's previous coverage in the video player above.
Battle of central Ohio bagel shops ends as owners reach settlement
In an editorial published in the Cincinnati Enquirer at the time, Kroger CEO Rodney McMullen wrote that the waste generated by the bags at the company's over 2,700 stores – including its subsidiaries – would drop by 123 million pounds per year.
The plan was part of Kroger's 'Zero Hunger Zero Waste' initiative, which aims to address a variety of social and environmental issues, such as food insecurity.
The announcement stated the plan would begin with Seattle-based supermarket QFC, which has a total of nearly 60 locations in Washington and Oregon. QFC completely eliminated single-use plastic bags by April 2019.
While Kroger saw success with QFC, it seems its goal to eliminate plastic bags across all of its stores by 2025 has fallen flat, considering numerous locations still use plastic bags. However, the original announcement did not specify if Kroger's commitment was intended to be accomplished by Jan 1, 2025, or by the end of the year.
The company claims it has made progress toward eliminating plastic bags, with Kroger's 2024 environmental, social and governance report stating 'more than 700' of the stores owned by the company have stopped offering single-use plastic bags to date.
New Big Lots owner to auction leases of several central Ohio stores
The 2024 report still listed phasing out single-use plastic bags as a goal with a target year of 2025. However, the company did not mark the goal as 'on track' like some of its other initiatives, but rather an 'area of focus.'
The company said differences in state and local politics have complicated reducing single-use plastic bags, but did not get into specifics.
The annual report states Kroger 'remains focused on finding feasible ways to reduce the amount of single-use plastic grocery shopping bags used in our stores.' The report did not say when, or if, plastic bags will be phased out.
A prior report from 2020 stated the company was on track to reach the goal of eliminating the single-use bags by 2025. In 2021, Kroger said it was developing a roadmap for the goal amid 'pandemic-related disruptions,' but still listed its status as on track. However, in 2022, the company changed the goal's standing from 'on track' to an 'area of focus,' where it remained in 2023.
Plastic bags frequently end up in landfills or the ocean, with animals often ingesting them, according to the Center for Biological Diversity. The nonprofit also claims that it takes 1,000 years for a plastic bag to degrade in a landfill.
Ohio State students honor, celebrate championship team
Multiple other retailers have eliminated their use of plastic bags to help reduce the negative environmental impacts they can cause. Whole Foods stopped offering plastic bags in 2008, becoming the first American grocer to do so, according to the company. Trader Joe's followed suit in 2019 and Aldi in 2023.
Some states, such as New York and California, have laws banning single-use plastic bags. Kroger, and other grocery chains, have removed single-use bags in states that require it.
Kroger did not respond to a request for comment regarding its future goals and expected timeline when it comes to completely eliminating single-use plastic bags.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Trump Attack on Intel's C.E.O. Could Compound Factory Struggles
At the end of July, Gov. Mike DeWine of Ohio said Intel's chief executive was 'very, very optimistic' about the company's plans to build multibillion-dollar semiconductor factories in his state. This week, President Trump attacked the tech executive, and a Republican senator called for an investigation into delays surrounding Intel's massive construction project outside Columbus. Mr. Trump demanded on Thursday that Lip-Bu Tan, Intel's new chief executive, resign over his past ties to Chinese companies, adding to the woes of a company that Mr. DeWine and other senior figures in Ohio's Republican Party had said would help create a manufacturing boom and turn the state into a 'Silicon Heartland.' To help build its factories, Intel received commitments worth roughly $1.5 billion in federal funding in recent years, as well as a $2 billion incentive package from Ohio. The project has been badly delayed, and the chip maker said this year that the factories would not be operational until at least 2030. The company's challenges in Ohio highlight the risks that federal and state officials took when they financially backed Intel, a once-powerful force in chip manufacturing, an industry now dominated by the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company. Intel's situation is also indicative of the struggles the Trump administration will face as it tries — through the pressure of tariffs and threats from the White House — to shift the bulk of semiconductor production to the United States from Asia. When the Biden administration offered financial incentives through the CHIPS Act, Intel was one of the few American companies that it made sense to back. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Los Angeles Times
2 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
OpenAI's GPT-5 met with mixed reviews, confusion in first day
For months, OpenAI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman has been hyping up the capabilities of GPT-5, setting up the launch as a seminal moment for the company. But in the first 24 hours after its release, the new model was met with mixed reviews. In its announcement Thursday, OpenAI said GPT-5 was better at coding and reasoning through complex problems, and touted it as advanced enough to turn chatbot ChatGPT into a Ph.D.-level expert. Some with early access praised the model, with caveats. 'It's my new favorite model,' developer Simon Willison wrote in a blog post, calling it 'competent' and 'occasionally impressive.' He added: 'It's not a dramatic departure from what we've had before.' On various social media platforms, however, ChatGPT users expressed frustration that GPT-5 continued to make up information and trip over simple math and spelling questions. Noah Giansiracusa, an associate professor of mathematics at Bentley University, said he felt the launch was 'underwhelming.' While there were 'some improvements,' he said, 'they were much more marginal than I would've hoped.' At least some of the reaction may come down to confusion over what's happening under the hood. Unlike OpenAI's prior software, GPT-5 automatically switches between models of varying levels of sophistication depending on the query. This approach can help maximize the company's computing resources, but it also means users may not always be engaging with the most powerful version of OpenAI's technology. Asked to identify how many times the letter 'b' shows up in 'blueberry,' for example, GPT-5 initially said 'three' in one test. When told to 'think harder,' however, GPT-5 appeared to engage its more advanced reasoning model and came up with the correct answer. On Friday, Altman responded to some of the feedback and said there was an issue with the system. 'GPT-5 will seem smarter starting today,' he said. 'Yesterday, the autoswitcher broke and was out of commission for a chunk of the day, and the result was GPT-5 seemed way dumber.' The stakes are high for the rollout. OpenAI is vying to keep ahead of growing AI competition from rivals in the US and China. The company is also fighting to convince businesses and individual users to pay up for its premium services to help offset the enormous amount it's spending on talent, chips and data centers to support AI development. The San Francisco-based company kicked off the generative AI boom nearly three years ago with the release of ChatGPT, which was originally powered by an earlier model called GPT-3.5. Since then, the company has released a series of increasingly sophisticated systems, including multiple options that mimic the process of human reasoning. As AI systems advance, it's become harder to say definitively how various services stack up. As of midday Friday, GPT-5 had risen to the top of various categories on LMArena, a popular leaderboard for AI models based on user rankings. But a different benchmark, ARC-AGI-2, puts GPT-5 behind the latest version of Grok from Elon Musk's xAI. In the absence of more definitive assessments, the model wars sometimes come down to vibes. And with nearly 700 million people now using ChatGPT each week, some are bound to disagree over how the model feels. It also takes longer than a day to gauge the value of a new AI system in someone's personal and professional life. Ethan Mollick, a professor at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania who frequently experiments with AI models, marveled at GPT-5's ability to do research, come up with clever written responses and make programming simple, even for a novice. 'GPT-5 just does stuff, often extraordinary stuff, sometimes weird stuff, sometimes very AI stuff, on its own,' he wrote in a blog post. 'And that is what makes it so interesting.' On Reddit, however, the reactions were very different. During an 'Ask Me Anything' session Friday on the platform, Altman fielded pushback from users who were frustrated not to have more say and visibility into which model responds to their queries. Altman said OpenAI would take some steps to address these complaints, including making it 'more transparent.' At one point, Altman responded to a Reddit user's question by noting that OpenAI thinks the 'writing quality' in one version of GPT-5 is better than GPT-4.5. Then he asked: 'Do you find it to be worse?' One user after another were quick to respond: yes. Forgash writes for Bloomberg.
San Francisco Chronicle
3 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Dorel Industries: Q2 Earnings Snapshot
WESTMOUNT, Quebec (AP) — WESTMOUNT, Quebec (AP) — Dorel Industries Inc. (DIIBF) on Friday reported a loss of $44.9 million in its second quarter. The Westmount, Quebec-based company said it had a loss of $1.38 per share. Losses, adjusted for restructuring costs, were 65 cents per share. The maker of bicycles, child safety products and home furnishings posted revenue of $292.4 million in the period. _____
