Chef boiled to death in horrifying two hour execution so brutal it was outlawed
Richard Roose was executed by being boiled alive in 1531 after he was accused of poisoning dinner party guests - with the horrific method of death later outlawed
A sumptuous dinner party in Lambeth, south London, in 1531 ended in horror as guests became violently ill, leading to one of history's most harrowing executions – being boiled alive.
The cook, Richard Roose, fell under suspicion for the illness after allegedly lacing the food with a mysterious powder. He was condemned by King Henry VIII for the act of poisoning and sentenced to an unprecedented and gruesome death.
Roose's final moments were marked by a chilling first in British penal history as he became the inaugural victim to be publicly boiled alive.
Contemporary records indicate that Roose was fastened to a gibbet, akin to a gallows, before being plunged repeatedly into a scalding cauldron. Witnesses reported that he "roared mighty loud" and endured two hours of torment before succumbing.
The method of execution by boiling was intentionally designed to inflict a prolonged and excruciating demise through severe burns, reports the Daily Star.
Although heat burns destroy skin cells, it is often the subsequent shock from extensive injuries that proves fatal. This state of shock, characterised by inadequate oxygen supply to the body, can be lethal.
According to the NHS, signs of shock include a pallid complexion, clammy skin, an accelerated heartbeat, rapid and shallow breathing, and loss of consciousness. Severe burns can lead to soft tissue shrinkage causing skin tears and reduced fat and muscle volume.
Additionally, the intense heat from burns may cause muscles to contract involuntarily, which can result in flexed joints. Recent research has shown that extreme heat damage can precipitate respiratory failure through direct injury to the airways, which can be fatal.
Indeed, respiratory failure is one of the leading causes of death among burn victims, especially those with inhalation injuries.
History recounts how Richard Roose suffered severe blistering due to burns, but it's not documented whether his cauldron contained water, oil, or wax.
Other historical accounts describe a gruesome practice where victims were placed into cool liquids, which were then heated to boiling point as a form of execution. This prolonged and brutal method was intended to delay the body entering into shock, thus maximising the pain experienced.
In a YouTube video detailing this story, viewers shared their dismay at the barbaric punishment, with one commenting on the "worst execution."
Another viewer said: "It's hard to fathom the brutality these people inflicted on one another. We are the cruellest of all living species."
Yet another added: "Even if guilty this punishment is beyond evil."
This method of execution was so brutal that it was later outlawed by Edward VI in 1547. However, accidental deaths by boiling can still occur today.
For instance, in 2016, a 23 year old tragically died and was dissolved after falling into a hot spring at Yellowstone National Park in the US. When his body was found, the water was reportedly at a boiling point of 100°C (212°F).
The World Health Organisation reports that an estimated 180,000 deaths annually are due to burn injuries. In 2019, two Russians were boiled alive in a sink hole when they failed to swerve their vehicle last minute - plunging into scalding water.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
What is the most common mental health misinformation on TikTok?
Thousands of influencers peddle mental health misinformation on social media platforms – some out of a naive belief that their personal experience will help people, others because they want to boost their following or sell products. As part of a Guardian investigation, experts established clear themes to the misinformation contained in videos posted with a #mentalhealthtips hashtag on TikTok. Several videos about borderline personality disorder suggest symptoms that are everyday experiences – such as feeling anxiety when people change plans, experiencing mood swings, a fear of abandonment and mirroring people's behaviour to be liked. Another video purports to show how depression manifests in the workplace as a lack of concentration, feeling tired, having low energy levels, a loss of appetite and irritability. 'While some of the 'symptoms' overlap with depression, these can be attributed to a range of afflictions and struggles,' said Liam Modlin, a therapist and psychology researcher at King's College London. One video said that people with bipolar disorder experience mood swings because their emotional pendulum swings more widely and rapidly than most. However this is a misunderstanding, since people experience extended mood changes over periods of weeks rather than rapid 'mood swings'. 'This is an example of misappropriating a mental health diagnosis to wrongly explain or justify behaviour,' said Dan Poulter, a former health minister and NHS psychiatrist. 'A person with bipolar disorder may find this trivialising of their experience of living with a debilitating and serious mental illness.' Another popular video suggests that when someone is about to die by suicide they become 'almost bipolar' – 'language [that] can further stigmatise mental health', said Prof Rina Dutta, a consultant psychiatrist and psychiatry professor at King's College London. Another video claims signs of abuse are constantly apologising; breaking down during small disagreements; needing reassurance; struggling to be open; being hypersensitive to criticism, and hiding feelings. 'The behaviours it describes, while potentially present in abusive dynamics, are not exclusive to abuse and may occur in a variety of other contexts,' said Modlin. 'By presenting these signs without sufficient context or diagnostic nuance, the video risks encouraging viewers to self-diagnose or mislabel complex relational struggles as abuse.' This was the most common form of misinformation contained in the videos. One video promotes a method it said was cheaper than therapy and had fewer side effects than antidepressants that could enable people 'to heal from trauma in an hour' and involved writing about the traumatic experiences for 15 minutes non-stop. 'No research suggests this is sufficient for cure, definitely not in an hour, and there is risk of independently forcing oneself back into this traumatic mindset without the support of an experienced therapist,' said Amber Johnston, an accredited psychotherapist. Another clip suggests that crying is self-soothing and good for processing emotions, including by stimulating the release of cortisol. 'Cortisol changes related to crying are complex and cannot be distilled down in this way,' said Amy Durden, a psychotherapist. 'Crying can bring relief but not always. It can be self-soothing but if the person crying judges their crying negatively, they do not experience this benefit and may feel acute shame.' Several videos featured glib quotations that the experts viewed as unhelpful such as: 'If you're not changing, you're choosing', while another popular quotation said: 'When you feel like everyone hates you, sleep. When you feel like you hate everyone, eat. When you feel like you hate yourself, shower. And when you feel like everyone hates everyone, go outside.' 'This is a huge oversimplification of how to address complex emotional states,' said Durden. 'It seems to be pulling from behavioural activation in CBT, but without any context or individualisation.' A specific breathing technique for treating anxiety was promoted in another video. 'There is no single, universally effective breathing technique that is helpful in all cases,' said David Okai, a consultant neuropsychiatrist. 'If performed incorrectly, the exercises can be the equivalent of hyperventilation, which can be extremely unpleasant and exacerbate anxiety.' Another video suggests depression is caused by alcohol, tobacco, MSG, caffeine, sugar and hydrolysed wheat. Modlin said that although lifestyle factors can contribute, 'this framing is overly simplistic and potentially misleading', since there are complex interwoven factors, including genetics and neurobiology, psychosocial stressors, childhood adversity, medical conditions and personality styles. Other clips promote supplements including saffron, magnesium glycinate and holy basil extract to ease anxiety. Although the psychiatrist Famia Askari said there are some studies showing benefits to some of these, there is not sufficient consensus for these to have become part of clinical practice – they are also manufactured supplements, in contrast to the 'natural' claims that featured. Two videos recommend admission to psychiatric units based on personal experience, including one suggesting someone had considerably improved after six days, and another offering a template for children to ask their parents to have them admitted. Poulter said this was 'misleading' and can 'create misconceptions' about the benefits of inpatient admission. 'Inpatient admission can in fact create and reinforce maladaptive coping mechanisms,' he said. 'It is also very rare that someone would be driving themselves into mental health hospital in the way depicted by the video.' Another video depicts someone in a hospital gown in what appears to be a psychiatric ward stating: 'I was too honest with my psychiatrist.' This could be harmful as it is 'potentially encouraging people to not be honest and open with healthcare professionals about their mental health', said Poulter. In another clip, a woman gives her strategies for managing anxiety, including eating an orange in the shower. 'There is no evidence-base for eating citrus in the shower as a means to reducing anxiety, and I would worry that this would lead on to an ever-increasing spiral of unusual behaviours,' said Okai.
Glasgow Times
2 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Family of Glasgow man missing in Portugal in CCTV plea
Greg Monks was last seen after leaving the main strip in Albufeira in the Algarve region after a night out between the evening of May 27 and the early hours of May 28. The 38-year-old had arrived in the resort town on Tuesday, May 27, for a stag do and has not been seen now for four days. Jillian Monks, Greg's sister, posted an updated plea on Facebook last night. The family is appealing for home camera or doorbell footage from the Cerro de Aguia area between 2am and 5am on May 28. Jillian noted that police believe Greg was in this area around this time. The post reads: "Hi all, thank you for all the information and shares, we truly appreciate it. There have still been no sightings and no updates at present. "I am now seeking help from the residents of the Cerro de Aguia area to please check any home cameras or doorbell footage from between 2am and 5am, as police believe he was in the area around this time. "Please share this if you know anyone in the area. Anyone who has cameras that cover streets or parts of streets, please send me a message. "Thank you all for the support." READ NEXT: Fundraiser launched for family of missing Glasgow man Members of Greg's family have flown out to Portugal to help search for him. We previously reported that a family friend had set up a GoFundMe page to support them. It has so far raised more than £14,000. A statement published on the page reads: 'I have been asked by the family to set this up. Our son Greg Monks, 38, went to Portugal for a stag do on Tuesday, May 27. 'On their first night out, our son Greg never returned to his hotel and has now been reported missing for three days. 'We are desperately seeking Greg's safe return and need your help. There are professional search teams out looking for Greg, and the family have all flown out to try and help find him, but they don't know how long their stay will be. 'They are doing everything they can. Every donation, no matter the size, will make a difference in our efforts to bring Greg home. 'Thank you for your support and prayers.' Greg's family say his disappearance has been reported to the police, the hotel where he was staying, and the British Embassy in Portugal. A spokesperson for the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office previously said: 'We are supporting the family of a British man reported missing in Portugal and are in contact with the local authorities'. The GoFundMe page can be viewed HERE.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Denying joint operations to obese patients is counterproductive
We fear that there are going to be many more stories such as this about the National Health Service before the wounds of a decade of underfunding followed by the coronavirus pandemic start to heal. Rebecca Thomas, our award-winning health correspondent, reports today that obese patients are being denied life-changing hip and knee replacements, and being left in pain as the NHS attempts to cut costs. One-third of NHS areas in England and some health boards in Wales are refusing joint replacement operations to patients who exceed a given body mass index. This is contrary to guidance from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), the body responsible for deciding whether treatments are value for money. Of course, as long as healthcare is rationed, difficult choices will have to be made. And the blunt truth is that all expensive treatments on the NHS are rationed, as they have to be in a system of limited resources. Instead of being rationed by ability to pay, the usual mechanism for rationing in the NHS is queueing. At the same time, however, treatments are also rationed by need, and it is the role of NICE to help to decide which groups of patients should be prioritised over others. We can understand why some parts of the NHS might de-prioritise obese patients for hip and knee replacements. It might be argued that obesity is the cause of joint problems and that therefore treatment should focus on weight loss, or else the problems are likely to recur with the artificial joints. But the NICE guidelines recognise that causation may not be all one way and that for many patients joint problems contribute to obesity rather than the other way round. In which case, joint replacement is the key to reducing weight, allowing patients to exercise more. This is a field of healthcare undergoing rapid transition, as the availability of weight-loss drugs such as Ozempic has changed the options available to patients, offering hope of treatment without surgery. But it remains important that overweight patients do not face a sweeping ban on joint replacement operations on the basis of arbitrary body mass index counts – especially as these BMI limits vary from area to area across the NHS. It is devoutly to be wished that this new government is beginning to turn the NHS round. Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, will confirm at the spending review on 11 June that the health service will be allocated substantial increases in resources over the next four years. Wes Streeting, the health secretary, has already taken the risk of overclaiming the improvement that has been made in just 11 months since the election. He claimed that waiting lists had fallen for six months in a row, only for the latest figure, for month seven, to show a small increase. His claim of having met his target for the number of new appointments 'seven months early' was undermined by figures obtained by Full Fact, the fact-checking charity, suggesting the rate of increase has in fact been slower than last year. We hope that resident doctors will vote against strike action, in order to allow these early, if overstated, signs of improvement to turn into real progress. In the meantime, difficult choices about whom to treat, and whom to treat first, will continue to beset the health service. In making those decisions, doctors must avoid unfair and discriminatory blanket bans based on arbitrary weight limits.
