Relief for graduates as government slashes student debt
Federal Education Minister Jason Clare will introduce legislation to slash student debt by 20 per cent and increase the income that graduates need to earn before minimum repayments kick in.
It is the first bill the Albanese government will put before parliament at the start of its second term.
People earning between $60,000 and $180,000 will save hundreds of dollars each year under the changes.
Someone earning $70,000 will save the most — $1300 a year — on minimum repayments due to an increase to the thresholds at which the debts must be paid back.
Savings vary between incomes in the bracket, with people pocketing anywhere from $200 to $850.
Professor Bruce Chapman, the architect of the HECS scheme, said it would make it fairer by giving those on lower salaries more money in their pockets, while their debts remain the same in nominal terms.
'It looks bigger, in real terms it's not bigger,' he told AAP.
But the top priority should be reviewing the price of each degree because humanities students finish with the highest level of debt and end up being the lowest-paid graduates.
'All the prices are wrong,' Chapman said. Education Minister Jason Clare will introduce legislation to reduce university student debt. Credit: AAP
Clare said reforms were being looked at, after the failure of the former Liberal government's job ready program.
The program aimed to fill skills shortages by making it cheaper to study courses such as teaching, nursing and psychology while doubling the cost of popular degrees including law, communications, business, humanities and the arts.
'If the intention there was to reduce the number of people doing arts degrees, it hasn't worked,' Clare said.
'People study the courses they're interested in, that they want to do, that they love.'
The universities accord final report branded the program 'deeply unfair' because it punished students following their interest, and called for it to be scrapped.
It recommended that fees reflect future earning potential, as part of 47 recommendations to reform the sector.
Other aspects about how HECS is paid off also needed to be addressed, Chapman said.
HECS repayments are taken from a person's pay slip if they earn above an income threshold.
But the money is not immediately taken off the HECS debt and is instead deducted as a lump sum at the end of the financial year after indexation has been applied on June 1.
This means a higher debt is indexed as the repayments have not been deducted and the university accord recommended it be reformed to make the system fairer.
The Australian Tertiary Education Commission has been established in an interim capacity to implement long-term university reform and will review the HECS system over the next 12 months.
Clare will introduce further legislation in the coming months to set the commission up as a permanent body.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
9 News
4 minutes ago
- 9 News
'A drop in the ocean': HECS debt relief welcomed but some say it won't go far enough
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here Young Australians say they are still facing decades of repayments for their student loans, despite Labor introducing a bill to slash HECS debts by 20 percent. Education Minister Jason Clare tabled the bill on Wednesday as the re-elected Albanese government's first act in parliament. Clare said the legislation would cut the debt of three million Australians, with the average HECS debt of $27,600 being reduced by around $5500. Julia Wilding says she will still be saddled with an enormous debt, even after a 20 percent reduction. (Supplied: Julia Wilding) The reform will also raise the minimum amount before people have to start making HECS repayments from $54,435 to $67,000 and reduce minimum repayments. "This is a big deal for three million Australians, in particular, a lot of young Australians," Clare said. "Just out of uni, just getting started, this will take a weight off their back." Western Australian Julia Wilding graduated from six years of study to become an optometrist in 2023. The 25-year-old was left with a HECS debt of $130,000, and also paid $34,000 for her final six months of study upfront as she had reached the cap on the amount she could borrow from the government. Wilding said while she welcomed the $26,000 reduction in her HECS debt, it still felt like "a drop in the ocean". Wilding calculated it would take her about 30 years to pay off her HECS debt, and that was before the annual indexation applied to her loan was taken into account. "At this rate, I'll still probably be in my 50s when I finally pay it off - and I was 17 when I started uni. It's quite depressing." Wilding said she loved her job and did not regret going to university to study in her chosen field, however, the cost of her education was onerous. "The financial road is very difficult. When I think about it, it's just such an inordinate amount of money, that you just have to laugh about it sometimes," she said. Sydney woman Katie, who asked for her surname to be withheld, has a HECS debt of around $110,000 after graduating with three degrees - one in the arts, another in classical music and a third in publishing. She now works in the not-for-profit sector and estimates that she will be in her 80s by the time she pays off her HECS debt, assuming she continues to work full-time. "I appreciate any reductions," Katie said. "However, I do think that all HECS debts should be erased. It's a little bit difficult to take seriously the argument for not doing that when most of the people making those arguments got their education for free, but any relief is good relief." Students are seen walking through the Sydney University's campus. (Flavio Brancaleone) Katie said there were a number of ways the government could make things easier for students struggling with growing HECS debts, including bringing back government co-payments for voluntary contributions, or making extra contributions tax deductible. A common complaint of the current HECS system is its yearly indexation schedule. While HECS repayments are taken out of a person's salary throughout the year, these payments are kept aside by the ATO and not deducted from the total amount owing until after indexation is applied on June 1. Katie said this process seemed particularly unfair and should be changed. "They take your money out of our paycheck each pay cycle, but they don't actually pay it off until they've added the indexation, which kind of feels a bit like a slap in the face." It's a call echoed by Senator David Pocock, who told parliament he wanted to see the date of indexation altered. "It is outrageous that people with HECS debts are being charged indexation, effectively interest, on money they've already repaid to the ATO," he says. Pocock said the federal government needed to "stop going for the headline" and "embrace hard reform" when came to higher education. A wide-ranging review of the entire university system, called the Universities Accord, was commissioned by the federal government, and its findings were released in February, 2024. Clare said the government had already taken steps to address some of the recommendations included in the report, including introducing payments for students completing practical work placements as part of their studies. "There's a lot of work to do to make our higher education system better and fairer," Clare said, adding the next move would be to look at changing the funding system to be more "needs-based" and follow individual students, a reform which would benefit disadvantaged backgrounds and students from regional Australia. education university national Australia federal politics CONTACT US Auto news: Why Australians are still driving around without insurance.
Sydney Morning Herald
37 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
$110,000 payment for union peace: Developer's deal in spotlight amid fresh calls to clean up industry
A gangland associate was paid $110,000 by a Gold Coast developer to strike a deal with the CFMEU's Queensland branch four months after the Albanese government forced the union into administration. The revelation of the Sunshine State deal, along with several other alarming new case studies, has prompted a major public intervention by the federal Labor-appointed CFMEU administrator, who is now urging conservative Queensland premier David Crisafulli to use his planned commission of inquiry into the union to attack the underworld. Administrator Mark Irving, SC, has also demanded the Albanese, Allan and Minns' governments shift their 'focus on crime and corruption across the industry'. The Sunshine State deal involved an attempt by Queensland-Melbourne joint venture Glen Q to secure industrial peace on the Gold Coast and culminated in a meeting between the CFMEU's Queensland co-ordinator Matt Vonhoff and Melbourne gangland associate John Khoury. Construction union sources who have spoken to authorities have confirmed the dealings were uncovered during recent federal police raids. The raids unearthed a money trail linking a front company in the name of Khoury's accountant to Glen Q's 16-level project a short drive from Crisafulli's Gold Coast seat. The sources said that acting as a fixer in the Gold Coast affair was Melbourne construction boss turned Queensland government contractor Nick Maric. Maric has for years had Khoury and his business partner Mick Gatto on a retainer to deal with the CFMEU. Revelations about the case have emerged amid separate details of persistent gangland activity in Queensland and down the eastern seaboard. They include a surge of industry involvement by the feared Comanchero bikie gang, including cases in Sydney and Brisbane, the latter in which a Melbourne Comanchero flying squad flew north and allegedly threatened a CFMEU representative. The bikies were ostensibly working with a security and labour hire contractor subcontracted to national construction giant BMD.
Sydney Morning Herald
37 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
In an electorate that screams privilege, an MP needs to pick a side on the housing crisis
The NSW Liberals face a wicked problem. How does the party walk the political tightrope of being pro-housing at the same time many of their constituents, not to mention local councillors, remain wedded to one word: overdevelopment. As Sydney, and indeed the country, contends with a chronic shortage of homes, no NSW Liberal will feel this conundrum more acutely than Vaucluse MP Kellie Sloane. Overdevelopment, once the mainstay of local campaigning for both sides of politics, has morphed into the politically charged term NIMBYism. On the other side of the argument is YIMBYism, which is becoming synonymous with wanting to fix one of the greatest social problems of this generation. Sloane, a moderate who is seen as a future leadership contender, has the seemingly impossible task of ensuring her party reflects the needs of modern Australia (which, as the federal election showed, the Liberals are failing to do) while representing the voters who put her into office. Examining one of Sloane's biggest obstacles to assuming the leadership paints a good picture of how hard her task will be. A major impediment to securing the top job is not a lack of talent, nor party room support. Rather, it is the name of her seat. No electorate in NSW screams privilege has much as hers. While it takes in areas including Bondi Beach and Edgecliff, Vaucluse – with its sprawling homes – is the antithesis of many other areas of the state, not least western Sydney. And the Liberals know this, so much so that there is talk that when the next boundary redistributions are drafted, the Liberals will lobby to have the seat renamed, perhaps back to Bondi (abolished in 1971) or even Waverley (axed in 1990). Loading Seat name aside, Sloane, a former television journalist turned businesswoman, is keenly aware of the housing challenge she has to face in her seat. How she manages it is a different question. At an eastern suburbs housing community forum last month, Sloane told the attendees that the Labor government's policy to build townhouses, terraces and six-storey apartment blocks within 400 metres of town centres was 'quite confronting'. Sloane singled out Rose Bay as being unfairly targeted, arguing the suburb lacked critical services such as a major supermarket or a train line. Later, after her federal colleague Liberal housing spokesman Andrew Bragg took a veiled swipe at her stance, Sloane said she rejected being labelled a NIMBY. 'I am pro-development,' she said, 'it's a responsibility for every community, but I want a guarantee that it comes with investment in infrastructure.'
