United Airlines flight reportedly delayed after passenger smokes cannabis in plane toilets
Flight UA1679 was due to take off from San Francisco airport to Cancun in Mexico on 5 August, but was delayed at first due to administrative issues.
The plane's journey was further interrupted, according to reports, as a result of a passenger smoking cannabis in the toilets at the front of the plane while it was still grounded.
A viral Reddit post by someone who said they were on board details that the passenger was caught and removed from the flight. However, due to the flight crew's exposure to secondhand smoke, the pilot refused to take off and a replacement crew was found.
Pilots are randomly drug tested and, if caught over a legal limit, can have their pilot licence revoked.
In the post, a user reported the captain as saying: 'I have 30 years left of my career at United, I'm not willing to risk getting drug tested when I get to Houston.'
The user added that after the crew became concerned about the secondhand smoke exposure, the entire flight was deplaned.
Passengers were then reportedly each handed a $15 (£11.12) meal voucher as compensation for the delay.
FlightAware data shows that the flight eventually arrived in Cancun after a four hour delay.
While it is legal to buy and use cannabis if you are 21 or older in San Francisco, the drug remains illegal on a federal level.
Many places in California are policed by federal authorities, including airports. The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) says that its officers are required to report any suspected violations of law to local, state, or federal authorities.
'TSA's screening procedures are focused on security and are designed to detect potential threats to aviation and passengers,' the organisation notes.
'Accordingly, TSA security officers do not search for marijuana or other illegal drugs, but if any illegal substance is discovered during security screening, TSA will refer the matter to a law enforcement officer.'
Many airports in the US, such as Chicago's O'Hare International, have cannabis amnesty boxes for travellers.
The Independent contacted United but they declined to comment.Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Fury at Southwest Gate Agents' 'Appalling' Announcement During Delay: 'Uncomfortable'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A Southwest Airlines passenger has criticized the behavior of gate attendants during a delayed late-night flight from Baltimore to Boston, claiming the staff used "guilt trip" tactics and public threats to pressure passengers into checking carry-on bags. Reddit user eggiesbb described the pre-boarding scene at Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport (BWI) as "incredibly uncomfortable," saying staff repeatedly demanded volunteers to check their carry-on luggage due to the flight being full. "This is every five minutes," the original poster (OP) told Redditors. "One announcer is saying things along the lines of, 'if you don't volunteer now I will pull you out of your boarding queue, no matter your position, and you will check your bag involuntarily, and then it will be your fault when the flight is late on boarding'." Stock image: A Southwest Airlines airplane takes off. Stock image: A Southwest Airlines airplane takes off. Photo by sanfel / Getty Images User eggiesbb said this happened while passengers were already frustrated by a one-hour delay, pushing the arrival time in Boston to 1:30 a.m. "It is incredibly uncomfortable at this point," the OP shared, adding, "I literally had to walk away and I'm not returning to the gate until it's time to board." Despite the staff's urgency, the passenger said that no actual bag issues delayed the boarding. "The only thing that held us up was two missing passengers," the OP pointed out, "No bag dilemma in sight." 'Minimal effects' In a statement to Newsweek, a spokesperson for Southwest said: "We are continuing to refine our procedures related to checked baggage, carry-on baggage and gate-checked bags as our customer mix leans more heavily toward bookings made on or after May 28, 2025. "We've seen minimal effects on our operational performance to this point." Fellow Reddit users agreed that Southwest has questionable practices at the gate, amid more than 240 comments within four days. "I don't blame the gate agents," one critic wrote, "I do blame Southwest for creating an environment where people are forced to carry their luggage instead of throwing away their money so a corporate executive team can earn another million." A passenger said they flew on Southwest "out of desperation" last week after a flight cancellation with Alaska Airlines, "and their approach to gate checking is EXTREMELY obnoxious. "It was enough for me to remember why I am an elite with Alaska instead. It seems like they're trying to compete with Southwest out of my home airport (SAN) and, after that experience, I hope they win." One person, meanwhile, made a suggestion: "They just need a bingo machine and announce they will be drawing 20 boarding numbers at random to be gate checked." Caught in the Crossfire Flights can create highly dramatic situations, as Newsweek has covered previously. One poster on Reddit explained an awful situation in which he was caught in the crossfire by a man trying hard to contain his vomit. Instead, however, the man sprayed it everywhere, including on the poster. The poster praised the flight crew's response in a message to Newsweek: "It was a long day and an unpleasant experience for sure, but the crew was awesome!" Another poster, meanwhile, was highly satisfied when a woman who sprinted to the front of the plane while it was still taxiing was sent back to her seat by an exasperated flight attendant. That poster told Newsweek the experience of flying has deteriorated: "It's basically a Greyhound bus with wings at this point." Newsweek has contacted eggiesbb for comment via Reddit. To read how Newsweek uses AI as a newsroom tool, click here.
an hour ago
Why passengers say they are filing suits over windowless window seats on Delta, United planes
Two class-action lawsuits have been brought against Delta and United over seat configurations where some passengers who say they paid for a window seat say they were left with a blank wall instead of a view. The separate suits on the issue claim that some Delta and United passengers who booked these seats, and in many cases paid a premium to do so, actually had no window, according to the complaint. The complaints said the carriers operate Boeing 737s, Boeing 757s and Airbus A321s with seats that would usually have a window, but due to the design and the placement of air conditioning ducts, electrical conduits, or other parts, the window cannot be installed. Some airlines describe every seat along the side of the plane as a window seat, according to the lawsuits. These lawsuits claim that other carriers including American Airlines and Alaska Airlines, inform passengers during the booking process about so-called "windowless window seats," but that Delta and United did not. Delta and United declined to comment when contacted by "GMA." The standard fee to select a basic economy "window" seat on United can exceed $50, the suit claimed. On international flights, the extra fees can be over $100. The complaint against Delta said a basic economy traveler "might need to spend upwards of $40 to advance to a higher ticket tier, and then must spend over $30 to select a particular window seat." Both lawsuits claim the airlines have sold millions of these seats and the lawsuits aim to rectify costs for passengers who bought them. The Delta suit is led by Nicholas Meyer of Brooklyn, New York, and according to the complaint, Meyer booked a trip on Aug. 5, 2025, from LaGuardia Airport in New York to Orange County, California, with a layover in Atlanta and chose a window seat for the view. But Meyer claims he found himself spending "the ensuing four-and-a-half hour flight next to a blank wall." Plaintiff Aviva Copaken from the United lawsuit claimed she bought three window seats and all three were without a window. The ticket fees ranged from $45.99 to $169.99, per the complaint. Copaken purchased the seats, according to the suit, because she "experiences claustrophobia on flights and enjoys a view while looking out the window of the airplane." United issued a refund to Copaken for the fees for two of her flights but not the third, according to the complaint. The additional plaintiff leading the United suit, Marc Brenman, used points and benefits to select a window seat on his flight from San Francisco to Washington, D.C., that turned out to have no window, the complaint says. He said he was refunded 7,500 miles, which he says was "insufficient."
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
United Airlines flight reportedly delayed after passenger smokes cannabis in plane toilets
A United Airlines flight was allegedly delayed for four hours after a passenger smoked cannabis in the plane's toilets. Flight UA1679 was due to take off from San Francisco airport to Cancun in Mexico on 5 August, but was delayed at first due to administrative issues. The plane's journey was further interrupted, according to reports, as a result of a passenger smoking cannabis in the toilets at the front of the plane while it was still grounded. A viral Reddit post by someone who said they were on board details that the passenger was caught and removed from the flight. However, due to the flight crew's exposure to secondhand smoke, the pilot refused to take off and a replacement crew was found. Pilots are randomly drug tested and, if caught over a legal limit, can have their pilot licence revoked. In the post, a user reported the captain as saying: 'I have 30 years left of my career at United, I'm not willing to risk getting drug tested when I get to Houston.' The user added that after the crew became concerned about the secondhand smoke exposure, the entire flight was deplaned. Passengers were then reportedly each handed a $15 (£11.12) meal voucher as compensation for the delay. FlightAware data shows that the flight eventually arrived in Cancun after a four hour delay. While it is legal to buy and use cannabis if you are 21 or older in San Francisco, the drug remains illegal on a federal level. Many places in California are policed by federal authorities, including airports. The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) says that its officers are required to report any suspected violations of law to local, state, or federal authorities. 'TSA's screening procedures are focused on security and are designed to detect potential threats to aviation and passengers,' the organisation notes. 'Accordingly, TSA security officers do not search for marijuana or other illegal drugs, but if any illegal substance is discovered during security screening, TSA will refer the matter to a law enforcement officer.' Many airports in the US, such as Chicago's O'Hare International, have cannabis amnesty boxes for travellers. The Independent contacted United but they declined to the daily Crossword
