Zohran Mamdani's victory is a Barack Obama moment
Zaid Jilani
When I found out about New York Democratic Assembly member Zohran Mamdani's upset victory in New York City's mayoral Democratic primary, an old memory popped into my head.
It was the day after Barack Obama trounced John McCain in 2008's presidential election. A friend of mine who was running his student chapter for the state of Georgia greeted me at the student center of the University of Georgia, where we both went to school.
His face was gleaming. He was the son of Liberian immigrants, and Obama's victory had special resonance for him. America - the same country built off the backs of enslaved Africans - was capable of electing a Black man.
'Now you could be elected president,' I told him.
Not missing a beat, he replied, 'Now you could!'
Let's not get carried away, I thought.
This was still the United States of America. Seven years earlier, a group of fanatics who committed the 9/11 attacks had made Muslim Americans such as me synonymous with terrorism in the eyes of millions. Heck, Obama had to swear up and down over and over that he wasn't Muslim just to get elected.
And, in my years working in and around politics since then, my cynicism about this was unchanged. Recall that then-Minnesota Democratic Rep. Keith Ellison - the first Muslim elected to Congress - had to prove to a CNN host that he wasn't 'working with our enemies.' Then Ellison's bid to run the Democratic Party was derailed nine years later in part because of a handful of critical comments he had made about Israel's treatment of the Palestinians. This came only months after Donald Trump was elected in part on a promise to ban Muslims from entering the United States entirely.
Just like our parents had slapped American flags on everything they owned after 9/11, Muslim American politicians and staffers across Capitol Hill and Washington more broadly were counseled to always demonstrate our patriotism first and foremost because it was constantly being questioned by everyone around us.
When I worked at progressive think tanks or left-wing political action committees, my superiors were terrified of coming across as too sympathetic to Muslim American concerns about the Middle East or American foreign policy more broadly. They didn't want to get called antisemitic or be accused of sympathizing with terrorists.
The war in Gaza compounded this sense of feeling besieged. Two presidents in a row have signed up to support what appears to be an endless war against Palestinian sovereignty itself, going far beyond what was necessary to defend against Hamas militancy. As they watched tens of thousands of civilians killed on their TV screens and social media feeds by a military backed to the hilt by American taxpayer support, many Muslims I knew felt like the country had accepted these Palestinian deaths so easily because America simply will never allow Muslims to be coequals.
But Mamdani's victory set off a vibe shift among my Muslim friends, family and colleagues like nothing I've ever seen before.
People I know who believed that America would never accept Muslims for who they were now believe that anything is possible. Maybe my friend at UGA all those years ago wasn't wrong. Maybe there could be a Muslim president in my lifetime.
In that sense, Mamdani's victory is an Obama moment for us.
A young and principled Muslim faced off with the beating heart of the local Democratic establishment, which held nothing back as it sought to tar him as an antisemitic extremist. There is no more politically inflammatory charge in New York, which has the largest Jewish population of any city in America.
And yet not only did he win, he won handily. By breaking this glass ceiling, Mamdani restored faith in the American experiment among millions of American Muslims.
The way he did it mattered, too: Watching Mamdani run what was essentially a joint ticket with Comptroller Brad Lander, a Jewish progressive, I saw a vision of mutual respect and admiration across cultural lines that felt like the best of America.
That it happened in the same city targeted on 9/11 made it all the more poignant as well. The national trauma that defined American life in my childhood did not have to define it in my future. If New Yorkers could give Mamdani a chance, they could give the rest of us one, too.
None of this is to say that I endorse the idea of voting for someone just because they share your faith or ethnicity. I agree with then-Sen. John F. Kennedy, who said in 1960: 'I want no votes solely on account of my religion.'
I think people should vote for the best candidate based on their experience, values and ideas - not based on religious or ethnic tribalism. I worry that Mamdani's relative inexperience could be an issue as he is likely set to govern America's most populated city, and some of his ideas might be too radical. Scrutinizing him on these grounds is warranted.
But I also want to live in a country where a Muslim candidate for office will be scrutinized based on their record, not their religion. And with Mamdani's victory on Tuesday, America showed Muslim Americans that despite all our cynicism over the past 20 years, this continues to be the best country in the world for minorities - a place where prejudices cannot and will not hold back progress.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
Trump tariffs a stone in the shoe of 'made in USA' cowboy boots
Ryan Vaughan, the CEO of Rio of Mercedes cowboy boot factory tests ostrich leather in Mercedes, Texas. In an unusual consequence of Donald Trump's tariffs, cowboy boots "made in the USA" will suffer from the 30% tariff due to come into force on South Africa, which produces the overwhelming majority of the ostrich leather so prized for these boots. The manufacture of iconic "made in the USA" cowboy boots is set to suffer from President Donald Trump's 30-percent tariffs on South African exports that came into force in August. Texas's most renowned makers of the southern US fashion staple source the ostrich leather they require exclusively from Oudtshoorn. Known as the world's "ostrich capital", Oudtshoorn is home to a few hundred thousand people and about as many of the giant flightless birds. "We just don't know how bad the impact will be, but positive it wouldn't be," said ostrich farmer Laubscher Coetzee of the tariffs that kicked in after South Africa appeared unable to negotiate a new trade deal with Trump. More than half of the global supply of ostrich-derived products - from feathers to leather and meat - comes from nearly 200 farmers around Oudtshoorn who are joined in the Cape Karoo International (CKI) group, said its managing director Francois de Wet. South Africa supplies about 70 percent of the world's production, he said. Luxury handbag manufacturers in France and Italy are among the CKI's main clients. It also ships 20 percent of its ostrich leather to top Texas bootmakers such as Lucchese, Justin and Rios of Mercedes, whose boots are sold at several hundreds of dollars a pair. Ostrich is "an extremely important leather in our industry", Ryan Vaughan, CEO of the Rios of Mercedes manufacturer, said. "It's very resilient, it forms to the foot," he said, wearing a typical cowboy hat. Coming from "a long line of cattle ranchers", his family brand was born in Texas in 1853 and employs 250 people. The tariffs "would make a dramatic impact in our business and in the western industry," he said, "because it's not just us that build a lot of cowboy boots out of ostrich leather". It is also the case of Tony Lama, an El Paso bootmaker supplied by CKI that has given a pair to every recent Republican president. Donald Trump received cowboy boots emblazoned with "MAGA" made out of "American alligator" skin. De Wet from the CKI said he believed the South African supply of ostrich leather to the US manufacturers did not run counter to a push by the Trump administration for production to be brought home. The United States did not have enough ostriches to provide the required leather, he said. "We export the raw material, the ostrich leather. They can't produce it from local ostriches in the US. They don't have them," he said. "They do all the value-adding in the United States," he said. "So therefore, in terms of the pure definition of what the Trump administration would like to see, in this case, we do it already." The soft skins, recognisable by spots left by the large ostrich feathers, are currently sold to American manufacturers for around $20 a square foot. "We exported more than the usual volume of ostrich leather to the US in the past two-three months, so we have a little bit of a buffer," said de Wet. "For the moment we don't expect any layoffs in the short term," he said. But "in the long term, if we have to pick up the full tariff, it will definitely... cause a shrinkage of our business." The consumer could also not be expected to pay an extra 30 percent for the already pricey boots, he said. "So the tariff will have to be split between the exporter... and the importer, and preferably also a part paid by the end consumer." It is the unique climate of the Little Karoo, which gets less than 400 millimetres of rain a year, that makes it ideal for ostrich rearing, said Coetzee, a fourth-generation Oudtshoorn farmer. "That is the reason the ostrich industry is still here 200 years after (it started)," he said. His great-grandfather built the family home in 1896, when the price of ostrich feathers rivalled that of gold because of their value to the women's fashion industry. The extravagant "ostrich palaces" of the time are a reminder of the industry's previous major crisis, when the market collapsed in the early 1900s as the arrival of the low-roofed motor car ended the fashion for high-feathered hats. | AFP
TimesLIVE
6 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Trump administration imposes new sanctions on four ICC judges, prosecutors
US President Donald Trump's administration on Wednesday imposed sanctions on two judges and two prosecutors at the International Criminal Court (ICC), as Washington ramped up its pressure on the war tribunal over its targeting of Israeli leaders and a past decision to investigate US officials. In a statement, US secretary of state Marco Rubio called the court 'a national security threat that has been an instrument for lawfare' against the US and Israel. The move drew ire from France and the UN. Paris urged Washington to withdraw the sanctions, while the ICC said it deplored the designations, calling them 'a flagrant attack' against the independence of an impartial judicial institution. Washington designated Nicolas Yann Guillou of France, Nazhat Shameem Khan of Fiji, Mame Mandiaye Niang of Senegal and Kimberly Prost of Canada, according to the US Treasury and state department. All officials have been involved in cases linked to Israel and the US. 'The US has been clear and steadfast in our opposition to the ICC's politicisation, abuse of power, disregard for our national sovereignty and illegitimate judicial overreach,' Rubio said. 'I urge countries that still support the ICC, many of whose freedom was purchased at the price of great American sacrifices, to resist the claims of this bankrupt institution.'
Daily Maverick
7 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
California Senate embarks on Democrats' redistricting plan, counter-punch to Texas
By Steve Gorman California Democrats, led by Governor Gavin Newsom, are pushing to achieve fast-track passage of their redistricting effort in the Sacramento statehouse by Friday, just in time to place it on the ballot for a special election on November 4. Newsom, who enjoys a Democratic super-majority in both houses of the state legislature, ultimately seeks voter support of his plan – neutralizing a Trump-backed Texas bill designed to flip five Democratic seats to Republican control in the U.S. House of Representatives. The newly drawn district lines in Texas would go into effect without voter approval, though Democrats have vowed to challenge it in court. The Texas measure cleared a major hurdle on Wednesday when the state House of Representatives in Austin adopted it on an 88-52 party-line vote. The Texas House and Senate, both controlled by Republicans, still must reconcile two versions of the legislation before it goes to Republican Governor Greg Abbott, who said he will sign it. Republicans, including Trump, have openly acknowledged the Texas effort is about boosting their political clout, helping preserve the party's slim U.S. House majority in the November 2026 midterm races. That election already is shaping up as a closely fought contest for congressional control. Democrats and civil rights groups say the new Texas map further dilutes the voting power of Hispanics and Blacks, violating federal law that forbids redrawing political lines on the basis of racial or ethnic discrimination. In pursuing redistricting in mid-decade, both sides are breaking with long-observed political custom of generally altering political maps once every 10 years, following the U.S. Census to adjust for population changes. TEXAS WALKOUT GALVANIZED DEMOCRATS 'Why are we here? Because congressional redistricting is allowed,' Texas Representative Todd Hunter, a prime sponsor of the Republican bill, said before its passage. Consideration of the Texas bill was delayed for two weeks after more than 50 Democratic state House members staged a walkout that temporarily denied Republicans the legislative quorum they needed to proceed. Their collective absence sparked extraordinary efforts by Abbott and other Republican leaders to pressure the Democrats to relent, including civil arrest warrants, the imposition of fines and threats to withhold their pay. The wayward Democrats finally returned to Austin on Monday, by which time their legislative boycott had galvanized Democratic leaders in other states, especially California, where Newsom has vowed to 'fight fire with fire.' 'We're going to punch this bully in the mouth, and we're going to win,' Newsom told reporters in a video conference call on Wednesday. 'This is about the rule of Don versus the rule of law.' He was joined on the call by the Democratic National Committee chair, Ken Martin, along with New Jersey U.S. Senator Corey Booker and Texas Representative Nicole Collier, one of the leaders of the Austin walkout. 'These are the most segregated maps that have been presented in Texas since the 1960s,' said Collier, who represents a predominantly non-white Forth Worth state district. Collier, who spent two nights sleeping in the statehouse rather than submit to police escorts assigned by Republican leaders to newly returned Democrats, said she was forced to clandestinely join the Zoom call from a restroom of the Capitol building, then abruptly leave the call when she was discovered. A visibly shocked Booker remarked: 'Representative Collier in the bathroom has more dignity that Donald Trump in the Oval Office.' The Texas-California clash may be just the start. Other Republican-controlled states — including Ohio, Florida, Indiana and Missouri — are moving forward with or considering their own redistricting efforts, as are Democratic-led states such as Maryland and Illinois. In California, the focus is on a package of three measures. One would allow the legislature to temporarily bypass the state's independent, bipartisan redistricting process, adopted by voters in 2008. The two others consist of the redistricting plan itself and the measure to establish a special election giving voters final say over the new map. In a victory for Democrats, the California Supreme Court on Wednesday swiftly rejected an emergency petition filed this week by four Republican state lawmakers seeking to block legislative action on Newsom's redistricting plan for 30 days.
