
SNP leader attempts to quash rebels with IndyRef2
John Swinney, the First Minister, said that the SNP winning an outright majority at Holyrood should be 'good enough' to force Sir Keir Starmer to drop his opposition to allowing a separation vote.
He argued a precedent had been set at the 2011 election, when Alex Salmond led the SNP to a majority win and then-prime minister David Cameron authorised a referendum.
But a former Cabinet minister in the Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon governments said Mr Swinney was 'living in cloud cuckoo land' given the current level of public support for the SNP.
Alex Neil, a former Scottish health secretary, said backing for the SNP would have to increase by 50 per cent in less than a year for the party to achieve a majority and this was 'almost impossible'.
Successive UK governments have repeatedly turned down SNP calls for a second referendum, with the UK Supreme Court ruling in 2022 that only Westminster can allow another poll.
Speaking alongside Donald Trump at the US president's Turnberry resort in Ayrshire on Monday, Sir Keir accused Mr Swinney of 'the politics of yesteryear' and said the four home nations were stronger together.
Sir Keir said: 'I think that at a time like this, when it's quite clear that there's uncertainty and volatility around the world, the strength of the United Kingdom together is very important for all four nations, very important for Scotland, and that should be our priority.
'That should be our focus, not on the politics which feels like the politics of yesteryear now at a time like this, and I think that the First Minister should probably focus more on his delivery in Scotland than on his constitutional issues and we might have a better health service in Scotland.'
Mr Trump said he recalled there was a 'restriction' in 2014 'like 50 or 75 years before you could take another vote because a country can't go through that too much'. He added that he had heard 'great things' about Mr Swinney.
Sir Keir also said last month that he could not imagine another referendum being staged while he is prime minister and an SNP victory in the May 2026 election would not change his mind.
When she was first minister, Ms Sturgeon claimed that there should be another referendum if there was a majority of independence-supporting MSPs, including SNP and Green members.
But Mr Swinney's new benchmark of an outright SNP majority is much more difficult to achieve under Holyrood's electoral system, which is partly based on proportional representation.
After taking over last year, he initially won praise for overseeing a recovery in the SNP's fortunes following the troubled final months of Ms Sturgeon's premiership and Mr Yousaf's chaotic tenure.
But internal grumbling about his leadership has increased since last month's Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse Scottish Parliament by-election, when Labour pulled off a shock victory and the SNP vote fell by 17 points.
It was reported last month that he risked facing a leadership challenge at the SNP conference in October unless he comes up with a new strategy to achieve independence.
He now plans to table a motion to be debated at the Aberdeen conference arguing that the SNP winning outright in the May 2026 election is the mechanism for triggering another referendum.
'Democratic future'
The First Minister told BBC Radio's Good Morning Scotland programme: 'It's fundamentally a democratic issue here that people in Scotland, in a voluntary union, must be able to choose their own democratic future, and that was accepted after the SNP won a majority in the Scottish Parliament on our own in 2011.
'I'm making the point that having established that precedent, we must be in a position to be able to give the people of Scotland the choice about the constitutional future.'
Mr Swinney argued that 'a generation has now passed' since the 2014 referendum, with a million new voters added to the electoral roll.
Calling for a rerun, he said that 'the way to do that is the way we did it in 2011, which is to elect a majority of SNP MSPs to the Scottish Parliament'.
A senior SNP source told the Daily Record that a combined SNP-Green majority should be enough for another referendum but the experience of the past four years showed 'this is not going to happen'.
But Mr Neil, who last month called for Mr Swinney to be 'replaced immediately', said: 'To win an overall majority the SNP would have to get about 45 per cent of the vote. The SNP is currently at about 30 per cent of the vote and has been stuck at that figure for some time.
'It's almost an impossible task for it to increase its vote share by 50 per cent in the next 10 months given the last 10 years of policy delivery and poor performance under Sturgeon, Yousaf and Swinney.' He said Mr Swinney's announcement was an attempt to silence his critics at the SNP conference.
Rachael Hamilton, the Scottish Tory deputy leader, said: 'John Swinney is like a broken record. In a bid to silence internal critics of his weak leadership, he has thrown diehard nationalists some more red meat on the one issue they all agree on: independence.'
Dame Jackie Baillie, the Scottish Labour deputy leader, said: 'This SNP government has lost its way and ran out of ideas - while one in six Scots suffer on an NHS waiting list.
'Despite that, John Swinney can't end his own obsession with division, and today has confirmed he'll put Scots second to appease his own party.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


ITV News
22 minutes ago
- ITV News
India rejects UK parliament report on transnational repression
India has launched a blistering counterattack against a UK parliamentary report that accused it of waging 'transnational repression' on British soil and misusing global policing tools like INTERPOL to silence political dissidents. In a strongly worded statement on India's foreign ministry denounced the allegations as 'baseless,' 'politically motivated,' and 'drawn from dubious and discredited sources.' 'The deliberate reliance on unverified inputs from proscribed entities with a long record of anti-India hostility calls into question the credibility and objectivity of the entire report,' said MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal, dismissing the claims as an orchestrated smear. The rare diplomatic rebuke was triggered by the release of a hard-hitting report titled 'Transnational Repression in the UK' on July 30 by the UK Parliament's Joint Committee on Human Rights — a powerful cross-party body comprising lawmakers from both the House of Commons and House of Lords. The report accuses multiple foreign governments of targeting exiled dissidents, activists, and journalists who have sought refuge in the UK, creating what it describes as a 'chilling effect' on diaspora communities. India was named among 12 countries, including China, Russia, Iran, and Saudi Arabia, allegedly involved in such practices. While the report reserves its sharpest criticism for what it terms the 'three most flagrant perpetrators' — China, Russia, and Iran — India's inclusion, particularly the accusation of abusing INTERPOL's Red Notice mechanism for political ends, has sparked sharp pushback from New Delhi. The committee's findings draw heavily from evidence submitted by UK-based Sikh advocacy groups, including the Sikh Federation (UK) and Sikhs for Justice. These groups allege that Indian authorities have sought to weaponise international policing tools to harass and intimidate diaspora voices, especially those supporting the Khalistan separatist movement — a claim India has long dismissed as misinformation propagated by extremist elements. While the report has reignited debate within Britain over how to protect residents from foreign interference, India's sharp reaction signals a potential diplomatic flashpoint — particularly amid already sensitive ties following the killing of Sikh separatist Hardeep Singh Nijjar in Canada last year, which also raised questions around cross-border intelligence operations. As both countries navigate a delicate relationship shaped by strategic partnerships and domestic political pressures, the fallout from this latest allegation is likely to echo beyond Westminster and Raisina Hill.


Telegraph
22 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Miliband refuses to publish details of green energy deal with China
Following the decision, the Ministry of Defence raised concerns that the Chinese could use the turbines as spy sensors – but the Treasury was said to be resisting attempts to block the deal because of a desire to encourage inward investment. In Freedom of Information disclosures, the Government revealed that while Mr Miliband had been in China from March 13 to 17, Ofgem officials stayed until March 21. The officials, including Mr Brearley, used four temporary 'burner' phones while in the country, a standard security precaution government visitors are advised to take while in China. An Ofgem spokesman said: 'We always seek to keep expenditure as low as possible to deliver the best value for money and we regularly review our business travel and expenses policy in order to minimise the number of flights Ofgem staff take.' The group's food, local transport, and accommodation costs were paid for by the Foreign Office, the British embassy in China and the UK Integrated Security Fund, they added. The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero insisted it was 'misleading' to suggest memorandums signed with other countries are made 'publicly available'. A spokesman said: 'The MoU is not about encouraging Chinese investment or involvement in the UK critical national infrastructure. 'Instead, it renews a partnership that has been in place for over ten years, and which facilitates the sharing of research and ideas to support the global clean energy transition.'


Daily Mail
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Kemi Badenoch says she no longer feels Nigerian and has given up passport for the country where she was brought up before coming to Britain aged 16
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch has said she no longer feels Nigerian and has given up her passport for the country. Although she was born in Wimbledon, Mrs Badenoch spent most of her childhood in Nigeria before returning to south London at the age of 16, after the country's economy collapsed in the 1990s, to continue her education. She explained that she didn't 'identify' with the country, as she spent most of her life in the UK. And when it came to her passport, she no longer had it up to date. 'I have not renewed my Nigerian passport, I think, not since the early 2000s,' she told the Rosebud podcast. She revealed that she had to get a visa when her father died, describing the process as a 'big fandango.' She said: 'I'm Nigerian through ancestry, by birth, despite not being born there because of my parents… but by identity, I'm not really. 'I know the country very well, I have a lot of family there, and I'm very interested in what happens there.' 'But home is where my now family is, and my now family is my children, it's my husband and my brother and his children, in-laws.' She also made it clear that she felt the Conservative Party was part of her 'extended family'. The North West Essex MP said her early experiences in Nigeria influenced her political views, particularly 'why I don't like socialism.' 'I remember never quite feeling that I belonged there,' she added. The Tory leader shared that the reason she returned to the UK as a teenager was because her parents thought she would have 'no future' in Nigeria. And she said she has not experienced racial prejudice in Britain 'in any meaningful form', she said. 'I knew I was going to a place where I would look different to everybody, and I didn't think that that was odd,' she said. 'What I found actually quite interesting was that people didn't treat me differently, and it's why I'm so quick to defend the UK whenever there are accusations of racism.' Asked if she was made conscious of her 'blackness' after coming to Britain, she said: 'Never. And I think that this is one of the things that probably made me an outlier. She continued: 'I had a couple of instances at school which now I look back and I think "Well, that might have been prejudice" but even then, when I talk about the soft bigotry of lower expectations, teachers saying "You don't need to go to all these fancy universities, just to this poly or this former poly". 'Some of it was just coming from what they thought was a good place, they thought they were being helpful or they were well-meaning. 'I don't think they were trying to disadvantage me. So I didn't feel that way.' But Mrs Badenoch, who moved permanently to the UK when she was 16 in 1996 because of economic turmoil in Nigeria, warned that things could get worse. The mother-of-three said it would be a 'dereliction of duty' to leave a worse world to her children. She added: 'I have mixed-race children. Making sure we keep a socially cohesive society, one where the colour of your skin doesn't matter any more than the colour of your eyes or your hair, is quite important. I think we've done such a brilliant job in the UK, and that's in danger of turning because of people on both extremes.