Britain's top ten modern status symbols for the home from solar panels to underfloor heating, survey shows
Energy-efficient improvements just don't give home owners the same buzz as a swanky new renovation.
HOUSE THAT? Britain's top ten modern status symbols for the home from solar panels to underfloor heating, survey shows
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
HOMEOWNERS are shunning expensive eco-features like solar panels in favour of new kitchens and bathrooms, a report claims.
The study of 2,000 property owners found more than half are prioritising cosmetic makeovers because they believe it adds more value and offers instant gratification.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
6
Homeowners are opting for new kitchens over eco-features like solar panels
Credit: Getty
6
Almost 40 per cent said they would rather spend on a new bathroom suite
Credit: Getty
6
Many would rather splash out on a new kitchen (48 per cent) or bathroom suite (39 per cent) than invest in insulation (19 per cent) or energy-efficient heating systems (31 per cent).
And 43 per cent admit they opt for these flashy upgrades simply because they want something new to enjoy – with 16 per cent confessing they just love the thrill of a fresh home feature.
While 53 per cent said energy-efficient improvements just don't give them the same buzz as a swanky new renovation.
The research, commissioned by Skipton Building Society, part of the Skipton Group, coincides with the release of The Big Retrofit report, which follows the energy efficiency transformation of a previously fossil-fuel reliant home.
The report, developed with Leeds Beckett University and the University of Leeds, reveals how the retrofit of a typical 1930s detached home – featuring triple glazing, solar panels and an air source heat pump – cut carbon emissions, improved comfort, and boosted the home's EPC rating from D to B.
Phil Spencer, TV star, property expert and Move iQ founder, said: 'It's easy to get caught up in choosing statement tiles or bold paint colours, but the most valuable home improvements aren't always the most Instagrammable.
'Green upgrades not only save money in the long run, but they can also boost comfort, value and sustainability, all without spoiling the look of your home.'
But it seems a new kind of 'keeping up with the Joneses' is sweeping through Britain's streets and cul-de-sacs – and this time, it's all about going green.
More than a quarter (28 per cent) now say they know a neighbour who's made big low carbon technology or energy efficiency related changes to their home – and 53 per cent of these have been inspired to follow suit.
As a result, 48 per cent have looked into getting solar panels, 24 per cent have explored upgrading their loft insulation – and 15 per cent would consider installing triple glazed windows.
George Michael's £10m London mansion gets modern makeover after row with neighbours over buildings 'left to rot'
For 38 per cent, it was hearing their neighbours had managed to cut their energy bills that got them interested.
Another 36 per cent said seeing what was actually possible gave them a lightbulb moment, while 30 per cent felt more confident after seeing the results up close.
Almost half (47 per cent) of all homeowners now reckon making eco improvements has become a modern-day status symbol, according to the research conducted by OnePoll.
Charging an electric car on the drive is seen as one of the leading signs you've 'made it' (32 per cent) – followed by underfloor heating powered by renewables (28 per cent) and having a heat pump (25 per cent).
Michaela Wright, head of group sustainability at Skipton Building Society added: 'This research suggests we may be seeing a shift from 'keeping up with the Joneses' to 'greening up with the Jones'.
'As more people see their neighbours investing in greener technologies, it naturally sparks curiosity and motivation to do the same.
'There's something powerful about seeing these changes up close – it makes the benefits feel more real and achievable.
'The idea of a modern status symbol is evolving, and now things like solar panels, heat pumps and electric cars are part of that.
6
His and hers washbasins are another modern status symbol
Credit: Getty
6
Underfloor heating is another common luxury investment
Credit: Getty
6
A new bathroom can elevate the feel of a home and add to its value
Credit: Getty
'It's a positive sign that more energy efficient choices are becoming aspirational, not just practical.
'We understand that making energy-efficient home improvements might not be at the top of everyone's priority list.
'That's why we took on the journey ourselves – to help demystify the retrofit process through The Big Retrofit project.
'We've documented our experience and created a series of resources, to support others who are considering making similar improvements.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Shoppers warned about quick online payment option that could end up costing you £1,000s
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A WARNING has been issued to shoppers over a quick payment option that can cost £1,000s. Which? is urging caution over use of the "pay by bank" feature which lacks key consumer protection. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Which? has issued a warning over the "pay by bank" payment feature Credit: Getty The payment feature lets shoppers pay for products without the need to enter bank details or use a card. It is used by popular online retailers such as WHSmith, Just Eat, Funky Pigeon and Ryanair. You can also use it to settle credit card balances or pay bills. However, Which? has raised concerns people may be unaware it can leave them unprotected if something goes wrong with a purchase. The option lacks Section 75 and chargeback protections that shoppers get when paying through other methods. Under Section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act, a credit card company can be held jointly liable for a purchase that turns out to be shoddy or does not materialise. This means a shopper can potentially get a refund from the credit card company if they cannot recover their costs from a retailer. Those using a debit card or credit card for purchases can also potentially get their money back via the chargeback scheme. Which? said pay by bank is a "potential game changer" for businesses as they can sidestep card transaction fees and also benefit from receiving customer funds immediately. There is also appeal for shoppers as refunds can be processed instantly. Shopping discounts - How to make savings and find the best bargains While card details are not shared when making a transaction – eliminating the risk of them being stolen or compromised. People do have general purchase rights under the Consumer Rights Act, meaning that goods must be fit for purpose, as described and of satisfactory quality. But Which? said these protections are not always easy to enforce and in some cases may end up with people needing to go to a small claims court. People may also face difficulties in the event of a business going bust. This could particularly be the case if there is an issue with a future-dated purchase such as a flight, a festival, or a household big ticket purchase such as a kitchen or a sofa. Jenny Ross, Which? money editor, said: 'Innovations like pay by bank present opportunities for businesses and consumers alike, but they're not without risk, particularly as they lack the rigorous purchase protections you get when paying by card. 'We're calling on the regulator to act to ensure consumers can use pay by bank with confidence, but in the meantime, we'd urge consumers to think carefully before using it to book events or make substantial purchases – for now, your good old-fashioned credit or debit card may be the best option.' A spokesperson for banking and finance industry body UK Finance said: 'There are a range of options for making payments online which provides customers with choice as to how they wish to pay. "Different payment methods do come with different levels of protection and it's worth being aware of these when shopping online, particularly when making higher value purchases." What is Section 75 protection? Section 75 protection offers you consumer protection on credit card purchases worth between £100 and £30,000. It applies to any products or services you've bought that end up being faulty, broken, or were not delivered at all. It also covers you in the case a retailer you've bought from goes bust. Section 75 applies to goods bought online, over the phone or via mail order. You aren't covered by Section 75 if you bought anything with a debit card, but may be under chargeback. To make a claim under Section 75, you need to contact your credit card provider. It should then send you a claim form which you can fill in and your provider will use to process your application. Your card firm might ask you to provide evidence such as a receipt or a report verifying that the item is faulty. In the scenario where a retailer has not gone bust, you should complain to them first. If you find that your card company has been unhelpful and refused your claim, you can take your case to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS). Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@ Plus, you can join our Sun Money Chats and Tips Facebook group to share your tips and stories
Wales Online
4 hours ago
- Wales Online
Major shake-up of how people pay BBC licence fee proposed
Major shake-up of how people pay BBC licence fee proposed BBC chairman Samir Shah suggested the current flat fee could be replaced in future The BBC licence fee would be means tested if the proposals were introduced (Image: Getty ) A BBC boss has proposed TV licence fees could be based on the value of one's home in future. Chairman Samir Shah suggested that the current £174.50 fee could be replaced with a progressive payment structure tied to property values. In an interview earlier this year, he proposed that the fee could be linked to council tax bands and collected concurrently, marking his first significant change since succeeding Richard Sharp. He also dismissed the notion of replacing the TV licence with a Netflix-style subscription service, arguing it wouldn't fulfil the BBC's mission to provide something for everyone in the country. Under this proposal, households in higher council tax bands would pay more for BBC services, while those in lower bands might pay less than the current rate. The option to opt out of paying a TV licence would be removed. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here Shah believes this approach would lessen the need to prosecute non-payers, telling The Sunday Times: "It gets rid of the enforcement issue, which is a problem. The idea that not paying the licence fee is a criminal offence seems too harsh." For regions like Northern Ireland, the Isle of Man, and the Channel Islands, where Council Tax doesn't apply, an alternative method would need to be established, reports the Express. Article continues below Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy may be receptive to the idea, having previously described the current model as "harder for poorer households to pay". During the interview, he tackled queries about altering the BBC's funding model and dismissed the idea of a hybrid structure that would offer basic services like news for free while charging for drama or comedy content. He also mentioned that introducing advertising to the BBC would "kill off ITV" and rejected the notion that the BBC should be funded entirely through general taxation, arguing it would "leave the BBC open to influence from the government of the day". Article continues below At the moment, although there are concessions or free licences for certain groups, such as those over 75 who receive Pension Credit, the licence fee does not take personal assets into account. The standard licence fee is set at £174.50 per annum, with a reduced rate of £58.50 for black and white TV subscriptions. For individuals who are blind or severely sight-impaired, there is a 50% concession, bringing the cost down to £87.25.
Scottish Sun
7 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Popular Scots baby store announces shock closure leaving expectant parents out of pocket
Some families have accused the firm of "taking money from people, knowing they were going under" Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) EXPECTANT parents claim to have been left out of pocket after a popular Scots baby store shut its doors without warning. Stirling Pram pulled the shutters down last week after announcing on social media that "despite our best efforts" it had gone bust. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Stirling Pram announced the shock closure on social media last week Credit: Stirling Pram 2 It was an official stockist of renowned brands like Mamas and Papas Credit: Stirling Pram The baby shop, an official stockist of renowned brands such as Mamas and Papas, was a go-to for newborn essentials, including prams, car seats and nursery furniture. Just days before the closure, Stirling Pram launched a half-price "furniture clearance sale" - claiming it was to make space for new stock. But shortly afterwards, the store revealed on Facebook that it would be ceasing trading. In a post on Stirling Pram's now-deleted Facebook account, staff wrote: 'To all our amazing customers, after pouring our hearts into this business it's incredibly difficult to now share that we are closed and going into liquidation. 'Running a physical store in recent years has been more challenging than ever – from the rapid growth of online shopping and price cutting, people increasingly using us just as a showroom for buying online, to the rising costs of rent, utilities, supplies and operations. 'Despite our best efforts, these pressures became too much to bear.' It added: 'This decision hasn't come easily, and we want to say a heartfelt thank you to every one of you who walked through our doors, supported us, and believed in what we were doing.' According to The Courier, employees at the Stirling Enterprise Park store learned they were losing their jobs on the same day the closure was announced. Parents-to-be, who claim to have spent hundreds of pounds on prams and other items, say the company has ignored their attempts to contact them following the announcement. Several have taken to social media, accusing the firm of "taking money from people, knowing they were going under". End of an Era: Beloved Scottish Discount Chain Closes Its Edinburgh Branch One wrote: 'Absolutely fuming, ordered pram, changing unit and other stuff from Stirling Pram in Stirling. 'Paid quite a bit in deposits, only to find out when I tried to contact them they'd gone into administration. 'We're lucky, if we can't get a refund from bank… but for some, they've given their money thinking they're giving their unborn child the best and are left with nothing.' Another added: 'I am very sorry to hear about your shop closing. 'But I'm also very angry as I've have bought and fully paid for my daughter's pram for her first baby, which is currently being held in your store for us until nearer baby's due date. 'I am absolutely disgusted and my daughter at 10 weeks to go certainly does not need this stress of now knowing we have no pram or money to buy another one.' Stirling Pram claimed it had appointed "insolvency practitioners" who would contact existing customers with "more details on next steps". The business was put up for sale ten months ago, described as a "well-established business" with an annual turnover of £650,000. Stirling Pram's website and social media channels have all been deleted.
