
Inside the nightmare at 345 Park Avenue, a Manhattan office tower under attack
Then an associate walked over to his desk and gave him the horrifying news: There was an active shooter in their office building. 'My heart sank to my stomach," Ferrer said.
He was ushered into a partner's office with about 15 co-workers, as colleagues pushed a desk across the door and put blankets up on windows in the room. They sat together in a circle.
As a gunman rampaged through 345 Park Ave., an unthinkable nightmare unfolded for the thousands of employees who work at the landmark New York office tower, which is home to such firms as the private-equity giant Blackstone and KPMG, as well as the National Football League.
In the end, four people were killed—an off-duty police officer, a security guard, a senior Blackstone executive and a real-estate firm employee—while others were hospitalized with injuries. The shooter, 27-year-old Shane Tamura from Las Vegas, left a suicide note saying he believed he had had chronic traumatic encephalopathy, a brain disease associated with head injuries, and he was apparently blaming the NFL.
The center of Manhattan is populated with fancy hotels and office towers including 345 Park that house banks, hedge funds, law and accounting firms, most of them under security protocols that restrict access to buildings. The appearance of security plus a reputation as a lower-crime environment has long kept most Midtown workers feeling safe.
But employees are adapting to a reality where grievances can be channeled into violence aimed at American corporations. Last year a brutal attack unfolded less than a 15-minute walk away, when UnitedHealthcare's chief executive officer was gunned down outside a Hilton hotel.
As Tamura entered the lobby of 345 Park at around 6:30 p.m., armed with what authorities said was an M4 rifle, a Blackstone star executive, Wesley LePatner, 43 years old, was on her way out to meet a colleague for a drink. She tried to take cover behind a pillar, but was shot and killed. The colleague she was meeting came down in the elevator and saw LePatner lying on the ground.
Meanwhile, word trickled up to employees still in the firm's offices, which span roughly two dozen floors. Blackstone employees got two automated messages in quick succession — the first said to evacuate the building and a second said to shelter in place and wait for the police to come.
A midlevel Blackstone employee was working late and heading downstairs to pick up her DoorDash dinner. She had already pressed the elevator button when the delivery driver messaged her with the news: There was a shooter in the lobby. She crammed into a mother's room, which requires a keycard to enter, along with several colleagues.
Another Blackstone employee came into the lobby right after the shooting and saw a chaotic scene. She and others ran to a storage room. When they realized they were trapped, they decided to take the service elevator up to another floor. There they found people still at their desks and told them to disperse. This person and around 15 others barricaded themselves in a bathroom.
Blackstone regularly holds active-shooter trainings for employees that reiterate the importance of 'ABC," a shorthand that instructs people facing a threat to avoid, barricade and, as a last resort, confront an assailant.
Blackstone President Jonathan Gray was in his office on the 44th floor when colleagues told him LePatner had been shot. Chief Executive Officer Stephen Schwarzman wasn't in the building.
A helicopter near the scene of the shooting Monday.
During his lobby firing spree, the shooter killed a New York Police Department officer, Didarul Islam, 36, as well as Aland Etienne, a security guard. He also hit an NFL employee who was on his way out. Commissioner Roger Goodell told staff after the shooting in a letter that the employee was 'seriously injured" but stable at a hospital.
There were no indications that Tamura breached the league's offices, which are on the fifth through eighth floors. Still, with word spreading of an active shooter, the employees who hadn't left for the day hunkered down and hid in the offices. Staff received notices of the attack and updates from the league's security service, with the first one arriving at 6:52 p.m.
'Gunfire reported outside 345 Park Ave," the message said. Another one, 14 minutes later, advised employees to shelter in place.
The league's floors in the building, with tributes, large photos and memorabilia in every direction, were turned into a makeshift shelter. Goodell wasn't in the building at the time of the attack.
Tamura appeared to have shot at one of the waist-high glass turnstiles in the building's lobby, a Blackstone employee said, before making his way onto an elevator. He rode up to the 33rd floor of the building, hoping to find the NFL offices but instead landed at the office of the real estate management firm Rudin Management. There, he killed a Rudin employee, Julia Hyman before shooting himself in the chest.
Office workers leaving an area near the scene of the shooting Monday.
Ferrer, the KPMG employee, said he and his colleagues spent two to three hours holed up in the partner's office, calling loved ones and following news and updates from leaders of the firm. 'We were pretty much freaked out until we got out of there," he said.
KPMG said it was 'not aware of any significant physical injuries" to its employees.
As night fell, police led employees of the buildings' tenants out floor by floor, starting with the higher floors. Some were still being escorted out of the building at around 10 p.m.
The building was closed to tenants Tuesday as investigators combed through the crime scenes. Gray teared up talking about LePatner on a call with Blackstone employees.
In an internal memo sent to employees early Tuesday, KPMG U.S. Chair and CEO Tim Walsh said the firm plans to provide counselors and other resources on the ground and virtually to employees. It reminded employees of a mental-health hotline that was available to call.
'Please stay safe and support each other," the memo said.
Write to Mark Maurer at mark.maurer@wsj.com, Miriam Gottfried at Miriam.Gottfried@wsj.com and Andrew Beaton at andrew.beaton@wsj.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
26 minutes ago
- First Post
Rs 13-lakh bond to enter US? How Trump's new visa rule could affect tourists
The US may soon ask applicants for select business or tourist visas to pay up to $15,000 (around Rs 13.2 lakh) as a security bond. The rule would apply to travellers from countries with high visa overstay rates and poor internal document security. Those who overstay their visas would forfeit the bond, while travellers who follow the rules would get the amount refunded read more The move comes as the Trump administration continues to tighten visa requirements for foreign applicants. Reuters/File Photo The US could soon require applicants for certain business or tourist visas to pay up to $15,000 (nearly Rs 13.2 lakh) to enter the country. The move, which may make the procedure unaffordable for many, is aimed at curbing visitors who overstay their visas in the US. ALSO READ | Has Trump made US world's worst tourism destination this year? According to a Federal Register notice, the programme gives US consular officers the authority to impose bonds on visitors from countries with high rates of visa overstays. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD As per regulations from the US Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, tourists and business travellers would get their bonds back only when they leave the US, become naturalised citizens, or die. But why is the move being implemented? Which countries will be affected? How will the process work? We answer all these questions below: US visa bonds: What you need to know In a notice, the US State Department announced that it will launch a 12-month pilot programme in which applicants from countries with high visa overstay rates and weak internal document security may be required to pay bonds of $5,000, $10,000 or $15,000 when applying for a visa. According to an official document obtained by The Washington Post, the programme aims to 'protect America's borders and the American people by holding foreign visitors accountable for departing the United States on time.' Travellers who do not leave the US before their visa expires will lose their bond, while those who follow visa rules will get their money back. The move is aimed at curbing visitors who overstay their visas in the US. Reuters/File Photo 'Aliens applying for visas as temporary visitors for business or pleasure and who are nationals of countries identified by the department as having high visa overstay rates, where screening and vetting information is deemed deficient, or offering citizenship by investment, if the alien obtained citizenship with no residency requirement, may be subject to the pilot programme,' the notice said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Until now, consular officers already had the power to impose bonds on visa applicants, but the State Department's official Foreign Affairs Manual had stated that 'such bonds will rarely, if ever, be used,' according to the notice. The online notice will be published in the print edition of the Federal Register and is expected to come into effect on August 20, according to The New York Times. The move comes as the Trump administration continues to tighten visa requirements for foreign applicants. Which countries will be affected? The bonds will apply to travellers from countries with very high visa overstay rates. The official notice has not named any specific countries or explained how visitors would be able to claim their refunded bond when leaving the United States. ALSO READ | Is Trump's 'polarising rhetoric' driving tourists away from US? The US State Department has said that the list of affected countries will be announced on the ' website at least 15 days before the pilot programme begins. A State Department spokesperson told Reuters that countries will be selected based on 'high overstay rates, screening and vetting deficiencies, concerns regarding acquisition of citizenship by investment without a residency requirement, and foreign policy considerations'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The department has not provided an estimate of how many applicants might be impacted. Notably, Donald Trump has made tackling illegal immigration a key focus of his presidency. In June, he issued a travel ban that fully or partially blocks citizens of 19 countries from entering the US on national security grounds. Many of the countries named in Trump's travel ban also have high overstay rates, including Chad, Eritrea, Haiti, Myanmar, and Yemen, Reuters reported. The US Travel Association, which represents major companies in the tourism sector, has estimated that the visa bond pilot programme is likely to be limited in scope, affecting around 2,000 applicants, mainly from a small number of countries with relatively low travel volumes to the US. Several African countries, including Burundi, Djibouti, and Togo, also recorded high overstay rates, according to data from US Customs and Border Protection for the 2023 fiscal year. The US Travel Association also warned that the fee could deter travel, stating that 'if implemented, the US will have one of, if not the highest, visitor visa fees in the world.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Is US facing decline in tourism? The announcement comes at a time when the US is seeing a notable drop in tourism. According to The Guardian, the country recorded an 11 per cent fall in foreign visitors in March. The tourism sector is expected to lose billions of dollars this year as a result of the Trump administration's policies. Travel from Canada and Mexico has dropped by 20 per cent year-on-year, according to the US Travel Association. The US is seeing a notable drop in tourism. Reuters/File Photo There have also been growing reports of tourists and visitors with valid visas being detained by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice). Recently, users on social media described Las Vegas as a 'ghost town' after photos and videos showed empty roads and once-crowded casinos. According to a Wall Street Journal report, tips for service workers in the city have dropped by 50 per cent due to the fall in tourism. With inputs from agencies


The Print
39 minutes ago
- The Print
‘Unjustified & unreasonable': India calls out US, EU over double standards on Russia trade
'India has been targeted by the United States and the European Union for importing oil from Russia after the commencement of the Ukraine conflict. In fact, India began importing from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the conflict. The United States at that time actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy markets stability,' Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said in a statement. Trump's latest threat was 'unjustified and unreasonable', India said, adding that it 'will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security.' New Delhi: India has called out the double standards of the US and the European Union (EU), following President Donald Trump's threat to raise tariffs due to New Delhi's continuing purchase of Russian oil. 'In this background, the targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable. Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security.' Jaiswal's response comes after Trump's latest outburst on his social media platform Truth Social asserting that India is 'not only buying massive amounts of Russian oil' but selling the refined products on the open market for 'big profits.' Trump added: 'They [India] do not care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA.' This is not the first time that Trump has threatened the imposition of additional penalties on India for the purchase of Russian oil. The American President had earlier promised a 25 percent tariff on India along with penalties that are till date unspecified. The 25 percent tariff rate is set to come into effect on 7 August. The US President has long railed against India's purchase of Russian oil, and has been pushing India to purchase more energy from the US. However, while New Delhi is willing to entertain the idea, it has maintained that it will continue to purchase at the best available price on the global market. 'India's imports are meant to ensure predictable and affordable energy costs to the Indian consumer,' Jaiswal said, pointing out that for New Delhi such purchases are a 'vital national compulsion.' The spokesperson further called out the duplicitous nature of both the US and the EU for continuing to trade with Russia that are not as important to their economies as the purchase of oil is for India. Also Read: Hours after slapping tariffs on India, Trump declares deal with Pakistan to develop oil reserves EU/US trade with Russia The EU in 2024 had a bilateral trade in goods worth EUR 67.5 billion with Russia in addition to an estimated EUR 17.2 billion in services, the MEA pointed out. Further, Jaiswal highlighted that the trade between the EU and Russia was not just focussed on energy, but also on mining products, fertilisers, iron and steel and machinery products. The EU last month unveiled its 18th sanctions package that took aim at a refinery in India that is partly owned by Rosneft, a Russian energy company. The latest EU sanctions also restricted the import of refined oil products from third countries based on Russian crude. Last year India exported roughly $16 billion worth of petroleum products to Europe as a whole, while around $13 billion was exported to the Netherlands in particular. India has become the world's second largest importer of Russian oil, importing roughly $56 billion worth of crude in the last financial year, according to the Ministry of Commerce and Industry. Before the war in Ukraine, Russia was not a top source of crude for India. However, given the imposition of the G7 price cap after Moscow started the current open conflict with Ukraine, the price of Russian oil fell below $60 a barrel. This gave India an opportunity to import cheap crude from Russia. While in the early days, both the US and the EU applied pressure on India to stop its Russian purchases, the previous American administration led by President Joseph Biden eased off towards the end of his term. Trump has in recent weeks pivoted to threatening Russia's energy sales as his attempts to work for a ceasefire continued to flounder. The American President promised to end the war within 24 hours of assuming the presidency while on the campaign trail last year. However, almost eight months into his tenure, the war has continued to rage, while Russia has upped the intensity of its strikes aimed at Ukraine's civilian infrastructure. The American president in the early days attempted to pressure Ukraine to accept a ceasefire, and almost succeeded when both Presidents Vladimir V. Putin and Volodymyr Zelenskyy had agreed to a partial ceasefire. However, within days the negotiations fell through. Trump's early attempts to pressure Zelenskyy led to the public shouting match between the two at the White House earlier in the year. Senator Lindsey Graham announced his intention to introduce a bill that would allow Trump to impose up to 500 percent of tariffs on countries continuing to purchase Russian oil linking the energy purchases to funding Moscow's war machine. However, Jaiswal pointed out that the US continues to maintain trade ties with Russia. The US imports 'uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for its EV industry, fertilizers as well as chemicals,' he said. Officials from Trump's administration, including Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, have criticised India's continued purchase of Russian defence platforms, and called on New Delhi to purchase more American military equipment. Trump had called India and Russia 'dead economies' last week in another outburst on Truth Social. (Edited by Tony Rai) Also Read: Trump announces 25% tariffs for India, will impose additional penalties for purchase of Russian oil


NDTV
44 minutes ago
- NDTV
PM Modi, Trump Once Called Each Other Good Friends. US-India Ties Now Getting Bumpy
New Delhi: The men shared bear hugs, showered praise on each other and made appearances side by side at stadium rallies - a big optics boost for two populist leaders with ideological similarities. Each called the other a good friend. In India, the bonhomie between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and U.S. President Donald Trump was seen as a relationship like no other. That is, until a series of events gummed up the works. From Trump's tariffs and India's purchase of oil from Russia to a U.S. tilt toward Pakistan, friction between New Delhi and Washington has been hard to miss. And much of it has happened far from the corridors of power and, unsurprisingly, through Trump's posts on social media. It has left policy experts wondering whether the camaraderie the two leaders shared may be a thing of the past, even though Trump has stopped short of referring to PM Modi directly on social media. The dip in rapport, some say, puts a strategic bilateral relationship built over decades at risk. "This is a testing time for the relationship," said Ashok Malik, a former policy adviser in India's Foreign Ministry. The White House did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment. The latest hiccup between India and the U.S. emerged last week when Trump announced that he was slapping 25% tariffs on India as well as an unspecified penalty because of India's purchasing of Russian oil. For New Delhi, such a move from its largest trading partner is expected to be felt across sectors, but it also led to a sense of unease in India - even more so when Trump, on social media, called India's economy "dead." Trump's recent statements reflect his frustration with the pace of trade talks with India, according to a White House official who was not authorized to speak publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity to describe internal administration thinking. The Republican president has not been pursuing any strategic realignment with Pakistan, according to the official, but is instead trying to play hardball in negotiations. Trump doubled down on the pressure Monday with a fresh post on Truth Social, in which he accused India of buying "massive amounts" of oil from Russia and then "selling it on the Open Market for big profits." "They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA," he said. The messaging appears to have stung PM Modi's administration, which has been hard-selling negotiations with Trump's team over a trade deal by balancing between India's protectionist system while also opening up the country's market to more American goods. "Strenuous, uninterrupted and bipartisan efforts in both capitals over the past 25 years are being put at risk by not just the tariffs but by fast and loose statements and social media posts," said Malik, who now heads the India chapter of The Asia Group, a U.S. advisory firm. Malik also said the trade deal the Indian side has offered to the U.S. is the "most expansive in this country's history," referring to reports that India was willing to open up to some American agricultural products. That is a politically sensitive issue for PM Modi, who faced a yearlong farmers' protest a few years ago. The unraveling may have gained momentum over tariffs, but the tensions have been palpable for a while. Much of it has to do with Trump growing closer to Pakistan, India's nuclear rival in the neighborhood. In May, India and Pakistan traded a series of military strikes over a terror attack by Pakistani terrorists in Kashmir's Pahalgam. But it was Trump's claims of mediation and an offer to work to provide a "solution" regarding Kashmir that made PM Modi's administration uneasy. Since then, Trump has repeated nearly two dozen times that he brokered peace between India and Pakistan. For PM Modi, that is a risky - even nervy - territory. Domestically, he has positioned himself as a leader who is tough on Pakistan. Internationally, he has made huge diplomatic efforts to isolate the country. So Trump's claims cut a deep wound, prompting a sense in India that the U.S. may no longer be its strategic partner. India insists that Kashmir is India's internal issue and had opposed any third-party intervention. Last week PM Modi appeared to dismiss Trump's claims after India's Opposition began demanding answers from him. PM Modi said that "no country in the world stopped" the fighting between India and Pakistan, but he did not name Trump. Trump has also appeared to be warming up to Pakistan, even praising its counterterrorism efforts. Hours after levying tariffs on India, Trump announced a "massive" oil exploration deal with Pakistan, saying that some day, India might have to buy oil from Islamabad. Earlier, he also hosted one of Pakistan's top military officials at a private lunch. Sreeram Sundar Chaulia, an expert at New Delhi's Jindal School of International Affairs, said Trump's sudden admiration for Pakistan as a great partner in counterterrorism has "definitely soured" the mood in India. Chaulia said "the best-case scenario is that this is just a passing Trump whim," but he also warned that "if financial and energy deals are indeed being struck between the U.S. and Pakistan, it will dent the U.S.-India strategic partnership and lead to loss of confidence in the U.S. in Indian eyes." The strain in relations has also to do with oil. India had faced strong pressure from the Biden administration to cut back its oil purchases from Moscow during the early months of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Instead, India bought more, making it the second-biggest buyer of Russian oil after China. That pressure sputtered over time and the U.S. focused more on building strategic ties with India, which is seen as a bulwark against a rising China. Trump's threat to penalize India over oil, however, brought back those issues. On Sunday, the Trump administration made its frustrations over ties between India and Russia ever more public. Stephen Miller, deputy chief of staff at the White House, accused India of financing Russia's war in Ukraine by purchasing oil from Moscow, saying it was "not acceptable." Miller's remarks were followed by another Trump social media post on Monday in which he again threatened to raise tariffs on goods from India over its Russian oil purchases. "India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits. They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine," Trump wrote. Some experts, though, suspect Trump's remarks are mere pressure tactics. "Given the wild fluctuations in Trump's policies," Chaulia said, "it may return to high fives and hugs again." Many expected India to react strongly over Trump's tariff threats considering PM Modi's carefully crafted reputation of strength. Instead, the announcement prompted a rather careful response from India's commerce minister, Piyush Goyal, who said the two countries are working toward a "fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement." Initially, India's Foreign Ministry also played down suggestions of any strain. But in a statement late Monday, it called Trump's criticism "unjustified and unreasonable" and said it will take "all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security." It said India began importing oil from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the Ukraine conflict, calling it a "necessity compelled by global market situation." The statement also noted U.S. trade with Russia. "It is revealing that the very nations criticizing India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia," the statement said.