House passes Trump's rescissions request after Epstein fallout delays vote
Congress beat a Friday end-of-day deadline to pass the bill, which is known as a rescissions request, after which the money would have had to be spent as originally intended.
Efforts to release files related to child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein stalled movement on the bill for hours.
The House combined the vote on final passage with a procedural vote, allowing members to pass the package quickly. It passed in a mostly party-line vote, with 216 voting in favor and 213 against. Two Republicans opposed it: Reps. Mike Turner of Ohio and Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania.
The bill targets roughly $8 billion for foreign assistance programs, including the United States Agency for International Development, or USAID. The package also includes about $1 billion in funding cuts for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which supports public radio and television stations, including NPR and PBS.
Mr. Trump hailed the vote on Truth Social early Friday morning, highlighting the cuts to public media funding.
"REPUBLICANS HAVE TRIED DOING THIS FOR 40 YEARS, AND FAILED….BUT NO MORE," he wrote. "THIS IS BIG!!!"
House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters early Friday he's "delighted to send that over to the president's desk for signature, and he'll sign that quickly."
Before the floor vote, the package had to get through the House Rules Committee, where there was heated debate on Democrats' demands for a vote on an Epstein-related measure. All but one Republican on the committee voted against similar amendments when they were first presented earlier this week, further fueling criticism from those who want documents on Epstein released.
The controversy has divided Mr. Trump's base since his administration released a memo earlier this month saying that Epstein had no "client list" and died by suicide in 2019. Some Republicans have pushed for more disclosures in the Epstein case, though Mr. Trump has called the controversy a "hoax."
Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, defended the GOP committee members on Thursday afternoon, saying they were unfairly taking heat.
"They're trying to stick to their job and move the procedural rules to the floor so we can do our work and get the rescissions done for the American people," Johnson said.
Early Friday, Johnson claimed the White House and House Republicans are on the same page on how to handle the controversy surrounding the Epstein files.
"There's no daylight between the president and House Republicans on transparency, and he's been very clear that he wants all credible information, credible evidence, to be turned over to the people, so that the people can decide. We trust the American people and their judgment."
Democrats wanted a vote on a bipartisan measure introduced by Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California that would force the Justice Department to release Epstein-related files within 30 days.
Instead, Republicans voted against the effort and offered a resolution that carries no legal weight to make the files public.
Rep. Jim McGovern of Massachusetts, the top Democrat on the House Rules Committee, noted that there would be no recourse if the Trump administration did not comply with the non-binding resolution.
"This resolution they're offering is a cover vote and I'll be surprised if they even bring it to the floor," McGovern said.
Republican Rep. Virginia Foxx of North Carolina, the committee chair, said it would be up to the majority leader whether the resolution receives a floor vote.
As the committee debated the release of the files, Mr. Trump announced that he asked Attorney General Pam Bondi "to produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval." The request came after the Wall Street Journal published a letter Mr. Trump allegedly wrote to Epstein for his birthday in 2003, which the president called "fake."
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries would not say Thursday afternoon whether he planned to delay a final vote past the deadline by exercising his right under House rules to speak for as long as he'd like, a power he used to make a record-breaking speech earlier this month.
"I expect that I will speak longer than a minute," the New York Democrat quipped.
Jeffries ended up speaking for about 15 minutes.
Senate passed bill early Thursday after criticism
After an hourslong vote series, the Senate narrowly passed an amended version of Mr. Trump's rescissions request earlier Thursday, sending it to the House, which approved a larger package of cuts last month.
The Senate version is about $400 million smaller than last month's House version, after the Trump administration agreed not to cut funding for a global AIDS prevention program to alleviate some of the concerns of Republican dissenters.
Some senators also worried about the implications of PBS and NPR cuts for rural areas, where many residents depend on public radio stations for emergency alerts. The administration promised to find funding elsewhere to alleviate the cuts to the rural stations to win over critics.
In a statement, the president of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting said the decision to eliminate its federal funding will force many local public radio stations to shut down and have "profound, lasting, negative consequences for every American."
Though all but two Republican senators ended up supporting final passage, some said they had reservations about doing so, especially because they had not received details from the administration about how the broader cuts would impact specific programs.
"I suspect we're going to find out there are some things that we're going to regret," Republican Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina said Wednesday before voting for the package.
Republican Sens. Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska both criticized Congress, saying it was undermining its budget oversight role by ceding to the White House's, and arguing that any funding cuts should be sorted out during the annual appropriations process. Collins and Murkowski both voted against the package.
Son of man who was violently detained by ICE reacts after release
Wall Street Journal reports Trump sent "bawdy" birthday letter to Epstein, Trump threatens to sue
7.3 magnitude earthquake hits southern Alaska
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
23 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump's mental decline is on vivid display as he rages about Epstein, windmills
He went on lengthy diatribes about windmills. He ranted about the ungratefulness of starving children. He forayed into nonsensical conspiracy theories regarding the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. It was nice of Donald Trump to travel to Scotland and show our European allies firsthand that the United States is led by a self-absorbed and deeply weird man in obvious mental decline. Over the span of a weekend, the U.S. president's addled brain raced about like a dull-witted Labrador attempting to outsmart squirrels. He went on lengthy diatribes about windmills. He ranted about the ungratefulness of starving children. He forayed into nonsensical conspiracy theories regarding the Jeffrey Epstein scandal consuming his administration, while laughably saying upon arriving in Scotland on July 25: 'I'm not focused on conspiracy theories.' Trump's head, based on his overseas babbling, is 90% conspiracy theories and 10% brain cells. Coverage of Trump's Scotland trip doesn't show the extent of his rambling The trip was largely a taxpayer-funded chance for the grifter-in-chief to promote his Scottish golf properties, which in the realm of 'things Trump can do that no other president would ever get away with' barely registers as a blip. It was also a chance for him to talk 'deals' with the European Union and the United Kingdom, with a 'deal' being something resulting in trade tariffs that will negatively impact American consumers. Or as Trump likes to call it, 'Winning.' Opinion: MAGA is realizing Trump lies. How can they trust anything he says on Epstein? News coverage tends to trim Trump's voluminous prattling into digestible soundbites that sound vaguely sane. But if we care about a president's lack of mental acuity – and I've been told by many that we do – it's worth sticking your head in the high-pressure stream of nonsense that shoots out every time Trump opens his face hole. Trump shows he's laser-focused on the scourge of windmills On July 25, Trump deplaned in Scotland and immediately showed reporters he was armed with weapons-grade non sequiturs. 'This immigration is killing Europe,' he said, racistly. 'And the other thing, stop the windmills killing the beauty of your countries.' Two days later, he sat with European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen, who looked like she would love to be elsewhere, and uncorked this: 'And the other thing I say to Europe, we will not allow a windmill to be built in the United States, they're killing us. They're killing the beauty of our scenery, our valleys, our beautiful plains. And I'm not talking about airplanes, I'm talking about beautiful plains, beautiful areas of the United States, and you look up and you see windmills all over the place, it's a horrible thing. It's the most expensive form of energy; it's no good. They're made in China, almost all of them. When they start to rust and rot in eight years, you can't really turn them off, you can't bury them, they won't let you. But the propellers, the props, because they're a certain type of fiber that doesn't go well with the land, that's what they say. The environmentalists say you can't bury them because the fiber doesn't go well with the land; in other words, if you bury them, it will harm our soil. The whole thing is a con job.' OK. That was a thing nobody asked for. It's also filled with lies – wind isn't the most expensive form of energy, and windmills last far longer than eight years – but who would expect honesty from someone rambling like that? Again with the windmills? Heck, just let the old man cook. And Trump wasn't done with windmills. On July 28, during his meeting with U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, the president said: 'It destroys the beauty of your fields, your plains, your waterways, and look out there – there's no windmills. But if you look in another direction, you see windmills.' Are the windmills in the room with us right now, Mr. President? Propose prosecuting Beyoncé? Check! Babble incoherently? Check! Trump did take a break from talking crazy over the weekend to post something crazy on social media, writing July 27 that Beyoncé should be prosecuted for a nonexistent $11 million payment from Kamala Harris' presidential campaign. So that happened. And it's not ideal. On July 27, alongside von der Leyen, Trump was asked how he feels about the images of starving children in Gaza, to which he said: 'That whole place is a mess. The Gaza Strip, you know, was given many years ago, said that they could have peace. That didn't work out too well. When Israel gave that up, whoever was the prime minister at the time, who I know, who it was, but it was not exactly a very clever thing to do. Because that was given so that they finally have peace, but it's actually made the situation worse. But we'll see what happens. I think Iran is acting up. We have a lot of people acting, we have Venezuela acting up in a different way. They continue to send people that we rebuff at our border. They continue to send drugs into our country, Venezuela. They've been very nasty.' So when shown images of starving children in Gaza, Trump feels the place is a mess because an Israeli prime minister whose name he DEFINITELY knows but isn't going to say gave up the Gaza Strip so there could be peace but that made things worse and Iran is acting up and, hey, let me tell you about Venezuela, which is about 7,000 miles away from Gaza. Opinion: Trump is unpopular, polls show, and he's building an America most Americans hate Republicans would have impeached Biden if he talked like Trump Had former President Joe Biden said something like that, Republicans would have either impeached him or ordered him locked in a room at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. It got worse when Trump was asked if Israel should be doing more to allow food into Gaza to help the aforementioned starving children. The president's few remaining brain cells decided to focus on how ungrateful all those starving people are: 'We gave $60 million two weeks ago, and nobody even acknowledged it, for food. It's terrible, you know, you really at least want to have somebody say thank you. No other country gave anything; we gave $60 million two weeks ago for food for Gaza. Nobody acknowledged it, nobody talks about it. And it makes you feel a little bad when you do that, and you have other countries not giving anything, none of the European countries, by the way, nobody gave but us, and nobody said, 'Gee, thank you very much,' and it would be nice to have at least a thank you.' During his meeting with Starmer, Trump apparently forgot he had been talking about the Gaza Strip the day before and said: 'We do have to take care of the humanitarian needs on what they used to call the Gaza Strip. You don't hear that line too much anymore. You don't hear the Gaza Strip. But it is the Gaza Strip. Amazing.' Yes. Amazing. Epstein, Epstein, Epstein. Trump can't stop talking about the scandal. Trump's mental dullness led him to keep talking about the Epstein scandal he wants everyone to stop talking about, effectively telling the world the Epstein stuff is 'not a big thing,' but probably involves former Democratic President Bill Clinton and a former president of Harvard University and 'hedge fund guys' and was probably made up by Democrats who probably put fake stuff in the Epstein files but then, I guess, didn't use any damning information against Trump before the election. He also gave a third explanation for why he stopped being friends with Epstein and said of the convicted sex offender's notorious island: 'I never had the privilege of going to his island.' The privilege? Spoken like a man whose mind has turned to mush. So nice of Trump to share his cognitive decline with the world. Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at
New York Post
23 minutes ago
- New York Post
Curtis Sliwa pledges — again — to hang up iconic red beret if he wins NYC mayoral race
He'll hang up his hat — if he wins. Guardian Angels founder Curtis Sliwa pledged Monday to retire his iconic red beret if he's elected mayor. 'I was born without a beret, I'll die without a beret, I can take the beret off,' Sliwa said as he led an hourlong manhunt for a dog-hating maniac in Queens, that didn't end up sniffing out the suspect. Advertisement The Republican mayoral nominee has shed his ruby noggin topper more often in recent days as he aims to appeal to well-to-do New Yorkers wary of socialist frontrunner Zohran Mamdani. 'If the people are good enough to elect me mayor, I'll retire the red beret. I won't wear the red beret. But for right now, I guess I'm going to have to switch on-and-off depending on what group I'm with,' he said. 3 Republican mayoral nominee Curtis Sliwa vowed to retire his beret if elected mayor. Michael Nagle Advertisement 3 He made the pledge as he led a manhunt for a monster who lit a pit bull on fire. Michael Nagle Sliwa has promised to ditch the beret before, during 2021's mayoral election, when he was also the GOP candidate. But Big Apple voters at the time evidently weren't jazzed enough by the prospect of a beret-free Sliwa — the bearer of quite the impressive tan line underneath his cap — and overwhelmingly voted Mayor Eric Adams into office. Sliwa wore a different hat, so to speak, for an hour Monday as he led an unsuccessful hunt across South Ozone Park for a monster accused of setting a helpless pit bull on fire last week. Advertisement He plastered fliers with photos depicting the suspect under car windshields and knocked on doors. 3 Sliwa's beret is so inseparable from his head that he has displayed a prominent tan line on the few occasions he has removed it. Stephen Yang The outspoken animal lover — who once showed off the 15 rescue cats inside his 320-square-foot Upper West Side studio apartment — vowed that animal abuse will be a priority if he's elected. 'I'm trying to get everybody to get involved to put this fiend in jail where he belongs,' he said.
Boston Globe
23 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
US-China tariff talks may provide clues on a possible Trump-Xi meeting
Analysts say the talks could set the stage for a possible meeting between President Other issues on the agenda include access of American businesses to the Chinese market; Chinese investment in the United States; components of fentanyl made in China that reach US consumers; Chinese purchases of Russian and Iranian oil; and American steps to limit exports of Western technology — like chips that help power artificial intelligence systems. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The talks ended for the day after nearly five hours on Monday, and were set to reconvene on Tuesday morning. Advertisement Wendy Cutler, a former US trade negotiator and now vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute, said that Trump's team would face challenges from 'a large and confident partner that is more than willing to retaliate against US interests.' Rollover of tariff rates 'should be the easy part,' she said, warning that Beijing has learned lessons since the first Trump administration and 'will not buy into a one-sided deal this time around.' Advertisement 'Beijing is more prepared and will insist on movement on US tech export controls at a minimum — a difficult ask for Washington,' she said, adding that many conversations will take place in the lead-up to any Xi-Trump summit. 'Success is far from guaranteed,' Cutler said. 'There are numerous trip wires that can throw a wrench in this preparatory process.' The US-China trade talks are the third this year, nearly four months after Trump upended global trade with his The Stockholm meeting, following similar talks in Geneva and London, is set to extend a 90-day pause on those tariffs. During the hiatus, US tariffs have been lowered to 30 percent on Chinese goods, and China set a 10 percent tariff on US products. The Trump administration, which just completed a China's Commerce Ministry said last week that the 'consultations' would raise shared concerns through the principles of 'mutual respect, peaceful coexistence and win-win cooperation.' The talks with Beijing are part of a flurry of US trade negotiations set off by Trump's arm-twisting 'Liberation Day' tariffs against Without an extension by Aug. 12, the tit-for-tat US-China tariffs could snap back to the triple-digit levels seen before the 90-day pause reached in Geneva. Many other countries — including some developing ones that depend on exports to the United States — face a deadline of Friday, as the Trump administration has said that letters will go out beforehand with set rates. Advertisement Critics say Trump's tariffs penalize Americans by forcing US importers to shoulder the costs or pass them on to consumers through higher prices. On Friday, Trump told reporters that 'we have the confines of a deal with China' — just two days after Bessent told MSNBC that a 'status quo' had been reached between the two sides. While the Chinese side has offered little guidance about the specifics of its aims in Stockholm, Bessent has suggested that the situation has stabilized to the point that China and the United States can start looking toward longer-term balance between their economies. For years, since China vaulted into the global trading system about two decades ago, the United States has sought to press leaders in Beijing to encourage more consumption in China and wrest greater market access to foreign-made — including American — goods. Other sticking points in the relationship include overcapacity in China — by far the world's largest manufacturer — and concerns about whether Beijing is doing enough to control chemicals used to make fentanyl, analysts say. In Stockholm, the Chinese will likely demand the removal of a Experts say long-term progress in the US-China trade relationship will hinge on structural changes. Those include increased manufacturing in the United States, which is part of Trump's ambition. On the Chinese side, that could involve a reduction of excess Chinese production in many industries, including electric vehicles and steel, and increased Chinese consumer spending to ease imbalances in China's export-driven economy. Advertisement Sean Stein, president of the US-China Business Council, said the the talks in Stockholm offer an opportunity for the two governments to address structural reform issues. Businesses will watch for clues about a possible Trump-Xi summit, because any real deal will depend on a meeting between the pair, he said. A deal is possible because 'a lot of the things that the US wants, the Chinese want as well,' Stein said. China, for example, is interested in buying US soybeans, and aircraft and parts, and Chinese businesses are interested in investing in US manufacturing — which would help meet Trump's goal of reindustrialization. Bessent has also said the Stockholm talks could address Chinese purchases of Russian and Iranian oil.
