&w=3840&q=100)
Best of BS Opinion: India's journey through farms, courts, and climate
India's farm sector, once tethered to diesel pumps and erratic electricity, is beginning to find new wind in its sails through solar energy. Under the PM-KUSUM scheme, demand has surged, with loan sanctions rising 27 per cent to nearly Rs 47,453 crore in FY25. The Ministry of New and Renewable Energy now plans Phase 2, with stronger financial support. Yet, the gust is uneven, notes our first editorial. Land aggregation hurdles and free state electricity blunt incentives. As with a sailboat adjusting ropes, India must align policies to harness solar power fully.
But in the courts, the wind has stalled. Fast Track Special Courts, meant to deliver swift justice in rape and child sexual abuse cases, are themselves slowed by systemic drag. Delhi's FTSCs have cleared less than half their caseload, with POCSO trials stretching to five years. With 50 million cases pending nationwide, the judiciary struggles against headwinds of staff shortages, weak infrastructure, and overburdened forensic labs, highlights our second editorial. Without structural reform, these courts risk sailing without any breeze.
Meanwhile, global climate negotiations, writes Nitin Desai, are another arena where the winds are shifting. At COP30 in Brazil, emerging economies like India face pressure despite their low per capita emissions. Meanwhile, developed nations sail on historical carbon debt yet demand others to row harder. With the world on track for a 2.6-2.8 degree Celsius rise, only stronger commitments from the wealthiest emitters can stop the climate boat from capsizing.
Trade winds, too, are turbulent. Rajeswari Sengupta notes how US tariffs of 50 per cent on Indian goods risk undercutting investor confidence and supply chains. The answer lies not in retreat but in bold reforms and deeper global integration. Handled wisely, this shock could be the gale that redefines India's economic course.
And then, a reminder from culture. In Meet the Savarnas: Indian Millennials Whose Mediocrity Broke Everything, reviewed by Amritesh Mukherjee, Ravikant Kisana unmasks caste privilege as the invisible wind shaping opportunity in India. Through institutions, marriages, and cinema, the breeze lifts some while holding others down. His 'glass floor' metaphor shows how exclusion is not just about ceilings but about who even gets to step on deck.
Stay tuned!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
7 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Court cannot have blinkered vision for paltry remuneration': Gujarat HC orders increased pay for Anganwadi workers, helpers
Stating that the duties and obligations of Anganwadi workers (AWWs) and Anganwadi Helpers (AWHs) are 'onerous' and 'influence the lowest strata of the social fabric', the Gujarat High Court on Wednesday modified and partially reversed a 2024 single-judge order of the HC that had ruled that the AWWs and AWHs should be treated similar to the regularly selected permanent employees holding civil posts in the State or Central Government. In its order, Division bench of Justice AS Supehia and Justice RT Vachhani on Wednesday directed the State government departments to, jointly or exclusively, pay the minimum monthly wages of Rs 14,800 over and above of Rs 10,000 to the AWWs, which is a total of Rs 24,800. The sum is less than the fixed pay of Mukhiya Sevika (of Rs 40,800). Correspondingly, the AWHs shall also be paid the minimum wages of Rs 14, 800, in addition to Rs, 5,500, making a total of Rs 20,300, the court order said. The court has ordered that the AWWs and AWHs should be paid the arrears from the Financial Year that commenced in April 2025, within 'six months from the receipt of the high court order'. Stating that the directions would apply to all AWWs and AWHs working in all Anganwadi Centres across the state, without necessitating fresh petitions before the court, the HC said that the principle of 'equal pay and equal work' cannot be applied to AWWs and AWHs or be compared to any other Class-III or Class-IV employees. The court order stated, 'The onerous and arduous duties and obligations involving pregnant and lactating women and minors, which is unmatched to the duties of other part-time employees… There is also a huge difference between the onerous duties rendered by the AWWs and AWHs and the part-timers employed by other State Departments.' The court said, 'The duties and obligations of AWWs and AWHs influence the lowest strata of social fabric, and their duties cannot be compared to the duties rendered by other part timers engaged for six hours by the State Departments, for whom the policy of minimum wages of paying Rs 14,800 is implemented vide circular dated July 16, 2019. The amount of Rs.14,800 in the said Circular, is fixed from January 1, 2019, considering the minimum wages payable to Class-IV employees.' The court stated that as per the directions of the Supreme Court in the case of Maniben (supra), the AWWs and AWHs were declared to be holding statutory posts. '… the direction issued by the learned Single Judge to treat them at par with regularly selected permanent employees holding posts either in the Central Government or State Government is fallible, since there is fundamental difference in their source of recruitment. There is also a vast difference in their mode and manner of recruitment, requisite educational qualifications etc…,' said the court. The court order further said, 'The AWWs and AWHs, though can be said to be holding statutory posts, and their appointments are neither illegal nor irregular, they still have to satisfy the mandate of the Gujarat Civil Services Classification and Recruitment (General) Rules, 1967, more particularly Rule 4 and Rule 9 thereof. The AWWs cannot be treated at par with Subordinate Service of Class-III. Similarly, AWHs cannot be considered at par with Inferior Service of Class-IV. Class-III and Class-IV employees in the State Government Departments, after undergoing the recruitment process as prescribed under Rules 9 by the respective departments, are placed in particular pay scales.' The court also noted that despite the top court order on the subject of wages, anganwadi workers and helpers are not being paid minimum wages. Referring to an affidavit of July 18, 2025, in which the state had showed the data of the entire state, the court order said, 'On a perusal of the same, we did not find any increase in the wages of the AWWs and AWHs and their plight remains inexorable, hence, this Court cannot have blinkered vision for the paltry remuneration paid to them.'
India.com
7 minutes ago
- India.com
‘Made Rs 1 lakh to Rs 100 crore', Jackie Shroff's wife, Ayesha, reveals how he escaped bankruptcy just in time
In the unpredictable world of Bollywood, fortunes can change overnight. One moment, you're riding high on success; the next, you're grappling with unforeseen challenges. For Jackie Shroff and his wife, Ayesha Shroff, this rollercoaster became all too real. Just as they were on the brink of financial despair, an unexpected turn of events altered their destiny. What did Ayesha Shroff say while recalling her days of financial hurdles? In a candid interview, Ayesha mentioned that before their financial downturn, the Shroffs made a strategic investment in Sony Entertainment Television during its launch in India in 1995. Ayesha Shroff recalled this venture as a 'fantastic experience,' highlighting the diverse team they assembled, which included Jackie bringing his fame, alongside experts in banking, television, and computing. How did their deal get finalized? Ayesha Shroff shared that their deal with Sony was sealed after she hosted a grand party for the international executives, attended by top Bollywood celebrities. Though the executives were initially hesitant due to Sony's big business ties, the impressive gathering helped win them over. By the end of the night, they agreed to sign the deal. Ayesha Shroff said their Sony investment was more about people than paperwork, calling it their best and most rewarding deal. She shared that they exited happily due to a group clause and personal choice. What did Ayesha Shroff say about the profit scale? Further, Ayesha mentioned about the growth in initial investment. She said, 'It was much more than what we expected, and if you apply that concept to the deal, it was like Rs 1 lakh to Rs 100 crore back then. I don't think I would have stayed even if the partners wanted to stay on. It was time to leave.' For the unversed, for Jackie Shroff and his wife Ayesha, the 2002 film Boom marked a major setback. It was their first venture into film production, but despite featuring a star-studded cast led by Amitabh Bachchan and other biggies, including Jackie, the movie flopped at the box office, which forced the couple to declare bankruptcy; however, their investment in Sony became a strong move for them. Add as a Preferred Source Story Highlights Jackie and Ayesha Shroff had invested in Sony Entertainment Television during its India launch in 1995, before facing a financial crisis. The deal was finalized after Ayesha hosted a star-studded party for Sony's international team, impressing the executives. Their investment saw massive returns, turning around Rs 1 lakh into nearly Rs 100 crore. Despite their 2002 film Boom failing and pushing them towards bankruptcy, the Sony deal became a financial lifesaver. Jackie and Ayesha Shroff's journey stands out as a story of timing and smart decisions. Just when financial ruin seemed near after the failure of Boom, a well-placed investment in Sony years earlier came to their rescue.
News18
7 minutes ago
- News18
HP: Enraged over Rs 6.78 lakh inflated power bill, Cong MLA Bali seeks enquiry
Last Updated: Shimla, Aug 21 (PTI) Congress MLA R S Bali on Thursday took strong exception to an inflated electricity bill of Rs 6.78 lakh issued to him and sought an enquiry into the matter to ascertain whether it was an error or a conspiracy. When the matter was raised in the Himachal Pradesh Assembly during Zero Hour, Chief Minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu clarified that arrears have been added to electricity bills, but said the invoice has mistakenly shown the figure as Rs 6.48 lakh instead of Rs 2.98 lakh. Sukhu said even the power bill of his official residence, Oak Over, in Shimla was shown as Rs 3.76 instead of the correct figure of Rs 1.43 lakhs. Action will be taken against officials if it is found that the bills were inflated deliberately, he said. Addressing a press conference in the assembly complex here, Bali said the data about the electricity bills was placed in the state assembly and is a part of the proceedings. The data was furnished in reply to a question of MLA Sudhir Sharma and was later published in newspapers. Bali, who is also the chairman of Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation, said Sharma had sought 14 months of electricity bills for the residences of 10 Congress leaders, including the chief minister, his deputy, ministers and himself, all occupying government residences. 'In the reply, the bill for my official residence, 9A Grand Lodge, was shown as Rs 6.78 lakh, and this became part of the Assembly record," he said. The MLA said an analysis of the bill found that it was inflated. Bali also said that he moved into the residence in July 2023, but the bill was issued from January 2023. 'But when I asked for the details from January 2023 to July 2025, my actual bill for 32 months came to Rs 2,98,308, much less than the issued bill of Rs 6.78 lakh," he said. PTI BPL NSD NSD view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Loading comments...
