
Trump-inspired candidate Karol Nawrocki wins Poland's presidential election
Conservative historian Karol Nawrocki, who draws inspiration from Donald Trump, has won Poland's presidential election.
Mr Nawrocki secured 50.89% of votes while his opponent, Liberal pro-EU candidate Rafal Trzaskowski, took 49.11%.
Earlier, an exit poll called the result the other way around - with both men declaring victory.
Mr Nawrocki had positioned himself as a defender of traditional Polish values, aligning himself with US conservatives, including Mr Trump, and showing scepticism towards the EU.
Meanwhile, Mr Trzaskowski, 53, had promised to ease abortion restrictions, introduce civil partnerships for LGBT couples and promote constructive ties with European partners.
The vote has been closely watched in neighbouring Ukraine as well as in Russia, the European Union and the United States - and the final outcome will decide whether Poland pivots towards more liberal norms or takes a more nationalist path.
This vote shows how democratic decisions can come down to slight margins
Adam Parsons
Europe correspondent
@adamparsons
The Polish election is not short of interest.
The turnout may well be the highest ever for a presidential election and it's been followed keenly around the world.
The political views of the candidates are - and apologies for the terrible pun - poles apart.
One is desperate for closer ties with Europe, greater reforms domestically and keen to extend the hand of friendship to Ukraine.
The other is determined to rein in the Polish prime minister's programme of change, grow closer ties with America and stop Ukraine joining the EU.
And there is very little between them.
Two exit polls predicted a result too close to call.
It's also a good demonstration of how big democratic decisions can come down to slight margins.
In a country with more than 28 million voters, this election could be decided by a difference of fewer than 100,000.
A final result won't come until Monday - possible into the afternoon.
Normally, by that point, we know who's going to win and one candidate has already claimed victory.
So far, we don't know the outcome, and both candidates have claimed victory.
This one will be tight.
Poland's new president will have significant influence over whether the country's centrist government can fulfil its agenda, given the presidential power to veto laws.
Poland's new president will have significant influence over whether the country's centrist government can fulfil its agenda, given the presidential power to veto laws.
This runoff follows a tightly-contested first round of voting in May, which saw Mr Trzaskowski win just over 31% and Mr Nawrocki nearly 30%, eliminating 11 other candidates.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
7 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
US vetoes UN Security Council resolution demanding immediate Gaza ceasefire
The 14 other members of the 15-nation council voted in favour of the resolution, which described the humanitarian situation in Gaza as 'catastrophic' and called on Israel to lift all restrictions on the delivery of aid to the 2.1 million Palestinians in the territory. The US vetoed the last resolution on Gaza in November, under the Biden administration, again because the ceasefire demand was not directly linked to the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages. Similarly, the current resolution demands those taken by Hamas and other groups be released, but it does not make it a condition for a truce. President Donald Trump's administration has tried to ramp up its efforts to broker peace in Gaza after 20 months of war. However, Hamas has sought amendments to a US proposal that special envoy Steve Witkoff has called 'totally unacceptable'.

Leader Live
11 minutes ago
- Leader Live
US vetoes UN Security Council resolution demanding immediate Gaza ceasefire
The resolution before the UN's most powerful body also did not condemn Hamas's deadly attack in Israel on October 7 2023, which ignited the war, or say the militant group must disarm and withdraw from Gaza — two other US demands. The 14 other members of the 15-nation council voted in favour of the resolution, which described the humanitarian situation in Gaza as 'catastrophic' and called on Israel to lift all restrictions on the delivery of aid to the 2.1 million Palestinians in the territory. The US vetoed the last resolution on Gaza in November, under the Biden administration, again because the ceasefire demand was not directly linked to the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages. Similarly, the current resolution demands those taken by Hamas and other groups be released, but it does not make it a condition for a truce. President Donald Trump's administration has tried to ramp up its efforts to broker peace in Gaza after 20 months of war. However, Hamas has sought amendments to a US proposal that special envoy Steve Witkoff has called 'totally unacceptable'.


Reuters
12 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump cannot proceed with gutting US Education Department, court rules
BOSTON, June 4 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Wednesday declined to lift a judge's order blocking President Donald Trump's administration from carrying out his executive order to dismantle the U.S. Department of Education and requiring it to reinstate employees who were terminated in a mass layoff. The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the Trump administration's request to put on hold an injunction issued by a lower-court judge last week at the urging of several Democratic-led states, school districts and teachers' unions. The U.S. Department of Justice had asked for a swift ruling from the 1st Circuit so that it could promptly take the case up to the 6-3 conservative majority U.S. Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in its favor. The lawsuits were filed after Secretary of Education Linda McMahon in March announced plans to carry out a mass termination of over 1,300 employees, which would cut the department's staff by half as part of what it said was its "final mission." Those job cuts were announced a week before Trump signed an executive order calling for the department's closure, following a campaign promise to conservatives aimed at leaving school policy almost entirely in the hands of states and local school boards. Trump later announced plans to transfer the department's student loan portfolio to the Small Business Administration and its special education, nutrition, and related services to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. In combination with 600 employees who took buyout offers, the Education Department said the job cuts once implemented would leave it with 2,183 workers, down from 4,133 when Trump took office on January 20. Affected employees were placed on administrative leave on March 21 and were told they would continue receiving full pay and benefits until June 9. The administration argued the cuts were a lawful effort to streamline the agency and cut bloat. But U.S. District Judge Myong Joun on May 22 concluded that the job cuts were in fact an effort by the administration to shut down the department without the necessary approval of Congress, which created the agency in 1979. He said the "massive reduction in staff has made it effectively impossible for the department to carry out its statutorily mandated functions." The Education Department on Tuesday said it notified those employees about the judge's ruling in an effort to comply with it. The administration also appealed, saying that while Trump has made no secret of his desire to abolish the department, his administration understood that only Congress could do so and that the case ultimately concerned a personnel action.