
GOP turns the gears on spending plan
THE CATCH-UP
THE OTHER BIG COMEBACK IN THE CAPITAL THIS YEAR: 'The Most Liked Man in D.C. Might Be This Silver-Haired Russian Ready to Reset NHL History,' by WSJ's Jason Gay: 'Alexander Ovechkin is nine goals away from toppling Wayne Gretzky's career mark of 894, a record once considered unbreakable.'
TODAY'S ACTION ON THE HILL: The House Ways and Means Republicans are meeting today to start drafting the tax portion of the GOP's party-line bill. The session is expected to last all day and will be followed by a second meeting on Wednesday. And at 4 p.m., the Rules Committee will have a hearing on advancing the stopgap funding bill and other legislation. It's expected to clear the panel, setting up a vote on the spending bill on Tuesday.
RECONCILABLE DIFFERENCES: A group of House Republicans are urging their party to preserve the clean energy tax credits in Democrats' climate law — issuing a fresh warning that they may oppose the party's budget bill if those incentives get axed, POLITICO's Josh Siegel and James Bikales scooped.
The 21 House Republicans — whose districts have drawn billions in new investments because of the Inflation Reduction Act incentives — said in a letter shared exclusively with POLITICO that developing clean energy was critical for the U.S. to meet Trump's goal of becoming 'energy dominant.'
'We have 20-plus members saying, 'Don't just think you can repeal these things and have our support,'' said Rep. Andrew Garbarino (R-N.Y.), who organized the letter.
Hitting home: The spending bill released this weekend could have major side effects for D.C., officials in the District say, 'potentially leading to about $1 billion in overnight cuts impacting everything from the city's law enforcement to schools,' per WaPo's Meagan Flynn. 'If it passes, the city, whose local budget is overseen by Congress, would be treated as a federal agency and be forced to revert to its 2024 budget spending levels for the remaining six months of this fiscal year, until Oct. 1.'
MAJOR SHAKEUPS AT WAPO: Matt Murray, the executive editor at the Washington Post, issued a new staff-wide memo today outlining a variety of major changes 'meant to broaden the outlet's coverage and reach a wider audience,' Axios' Sara Fischer reports.
'As part of the newsroom overhaul, the Post will divide its national desk into two sections that focus on national reporting, and politics and government coverage, respectively. The politics and government desk 'will encompass most of our reporters and editors covering the political scene and the government, which remain a central pillar for The Post,' Murray wrote.
''The Economics and Economic Policy team from Business will move to this department.' The national desk, 'which incorporates the America team, the education team, and the GA desk in Washington, will have a remit to cover the United States and important issues and figures outside of Washington and across the country more broadly,' he added.
Perhaps the most notable news out of the paper this morning, though, is the resignation of longtime columnist Ruth Marcus, who said in a note sent to colleagues that she was exiting after 40 years after CEO Will Lewis decided 'to spike a column that I wrote expressing concern about the newly announced direction for the [opinion] section and declined to discuss the decision with me.' Read Marcus' full note to staff and her resignation email to Lewis and Jeff Bezos
FOR YOUR RADAR: 'Harvard pauses hiring amid 'financial uncertainties' under Trump,' by POLITICO's Mackenzie Wilkes
EXPLOSIVE STORY: 'Man accused as 'predator' by Rep. Nancy Mace breaks his silence,' by CNN's Randi Kaye and Meridith Edwards
Good Monday afternoon. Thanks for reading Playbook PM. Drop me a line at gross@politico.com.
8 THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW
1. IN THE DOGE HOUSE: As Elon Musk's DOGE team continues its push to reshape the federal bureaucracy, there's a pair of fresh accounts detailing just how the incursions are playing out across the government.
At the SSA: A former Social Security Administration official says Musk's team 'came in aggressively,' WaPo's Lisa Rein reports, 'demanding access to sensitive taxpayer data and refusing briefings on how the agency ensures the accuracy of its benefit systems. They recklessly exposed data in unsecured areas outside Social Security offices, the official said, potentially disclosing personally identifiable information on almost every American to people not authorized to see it. And representatives sent by the U.S. DOGE Service refused to explain why they needed taxpayer information that is protected by law, the former official said.'
At the IRS: Right in the middle of tax season, Trump has ordered massive cuts to the IRS, which means the agency now 'may struggle even more with its basic mission of collecting taxes,' NYT's Andrew Duehren writes. 'Work-intensive investigations into large businesses and rich Americans could decline, a drop in enforcement that would add to the deficit even as Elon Musk says his team is helping narrow it.' Current and former officials 'described deep uncertainty as the I.R.S. cycled through three leaders in a matter of weeks and Mr. Trump's team moved to rapidly remake one of the government's most fundamental agencies.'
One to watch: Musk is sitting down for an interview with Fox Business Network's Larry Kudlow, which will air at 4 p.m. It'll be his first major interview since he appeared on Fox News alongside Trump last month and since POLITICO's Dasha Burns and Kyle Cheney reported the details of last week's explosive Cabinet meeting in which Trump reined in some of Musk's powers.
2. SCOTUS WATCH: The Supreme Court today agreed to take up a case out of Colorado 'to decide whether state and local governments can enforce laws banning conversion therapy for LGBTQ+ children,' AP's Mark Sherman writes. 'Colorado is among roughly half the states that prohibit the practice of trying to change a person's sexual orientation or gender identity through counseling. The issue is whether the law violates the speech rights of counselors. Defenders of such laws argue that they regulate the conduct of professionals who are licensed by the state.'
3. THERE'S ALWAYS A TWEET: 'Deleted tweets show top State Department official spread false rumor about Rubio's sexuality, called him 'low IQ,'' by CNN's Andrew Kaczynski and Em Steck: 'The deleted tweets from Darren Beattie, the acting under secretary of state for public diplomacy, were uncovered as part of a CNN review of his social media and include a mixture of insults and harsh attacks against [Secretary of State Marco] Rubio. … Though Beattie left up several of his most inflammatory posts, he does appear to have purged criticism of Rubio from his feed. Beattie deleted tweets suggesting a deep hostility toward Rubio — particularly after the then-senator voted to certify the 2020 election results and condemned the January 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. One deleted tweet also attacked Rubio for criticizing possible Russian actions in Ukraine.'
4. FARMVILLE: Across America's farmland, a Biden-era USDA program sought to reward farmers for projects that were environmentally conscious. 'The project description labeled them 'climate resilient farming practices' to appeal to President Joe Biden's green priorities. Now, the Trump administration is considering axing the project, along with hundreds of other agreements 'related to climate initiatives,' according to internal USDA documents and two people familiar with the agency's deliberations,' WaPo's Nicolás Rivero and Sarah Blaskey write. 'The whiplash shows how farmers have been caught in the middle of a political battle over the language used to describe federal programs.'
5. THE REAL-WORLD IMPACT: ''I don't feel safe': Trump's passport gender policy sparks fear for trans travelers,' by WaPo's Hannah Sampson: 'For travelers caught up in the Trump administration's new policy on passports, leaving the country has become difficult or impossible. Some Americans are in limbo, waiting for word on their passports' statuses after applying for updates. Others are in shock after receiving passports that misgender them. … Seven transgender and nonbinary people have challenged the policy in federal court and asked a judge to grant the plaintiffs passports under the previous policy.'
6. THE OTHER SIDE OF THE COIN: 'Who Likes Tariffs? Some U.S. Industries Are Eager for Them,' by NYT's Peter Eavis: 'There are deep pockets of support for [Trump's] trade policies in the business world, particularly among executives who say their industries have been harmed by unfair trade. In particular, the leaders of American steel and aluminum companies have long contended that foreign rivals undercut them because those rivals benefit from subsidies and other government support. And they say that tariffs, when imposed without loopholes, have been effective at spurring more investment in the United States.'
7. IT AIN'T EASY BEING GREENLAND: 'Trump Looms Over Greenland's Election, but Voters Have Other Concerns,' by NYT's Christian Ulloriaq Jeppesen, Maya Tekeli and Jeffrey Gettleman: 'Greenland's leading political parties are presenting different visions for the future and some are pushing for a new relationship with the United States and quick independence from Denmark, which colonized Greenland hundreds of years ago and still controls some of its affairs. But for many of Greenland's 56,000 residents — a tiny population on the world's biggest island — geopolitics is not a priority. At the recent town hall debate and in interviews with voters, Greenlanders expressed much more prosaic worries, often about living costs, unemployment, schools and health care.'
8. HOLLYWOODLAND: 'Hollywood Pivots to Programming for Trump's America,' by WSJ's Joe Flint: 'The embrace of right-leaning programming is a stark contrast to much of the past few decades in Hollywood. … Now, the entertainment industry is pulling back on diversity, equity and inclusion efforts on the business side. Television agents and some executives say privately there has also been a chilling effect on any programming that could be perceived as 'woke.' Furthermore, the president's legal battles with ABC News and CBS's '60 Minutes' also present a threat to the industry.'
TALK OF THE TOWN
Michelle Obama is launching a new video interview podcast show, 'IMO,' with her brother Craig Robinson. The NYT reviewed the first two episodes, writing that the hosts 'mainly offered advice based on their life experiences, and refrained from addressing current events or politics.'
Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker is stoking the 2028 flames, as he's set to headline the New Hampshire Democrats' McIntyre-Shaheen 100 Club Dinner on April 27, per Fox News' Paul Steinhauser.
MEDIA MOVES — Daniel Barnes and Hassan Kanu are joining POLITICO. Barnes will be a Washington law and lobbying reporter and previously was a reporter at NBC. Kanu will be a regulatory law reporter and is an American Prospect, Reuters and Bloomberg Law alum.
TRANSITIONS — Sean Conway is rejoining Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld as a partner in the telecom, media and technology practice. He most recently was deputy chief counsel for the National Telecommunications and Information Administration and is an FCC alum. … Peter Butkovich is now a legislative assistant for Rep. Kristen McDonald Rivet (D-Mich.). He most recently was a research assistant for Sen. Gary Peters (D-Mich.) and the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee minority.. … Carla Zeppieri is joining SMI as a VP. She previously was deputy assistant secretary of Defense for industrial base resilience. …
… Emilie Simons is joining Airbnb to lead policy and corporate comms for North America. She most recently was deputy assistant to the president and senior deputy press secretary for the Biden White House. … Douglas Gates is now national security adviser and prospective general counsel for Sen. Todd Young (R-Ind.). He previously was counsel at WilmerHale in the defense, national security and government contracts group. … Drew Myers is now press secretary and digital director for Rep. Eric Sorensen (D-Ill.). He previously was deputy press secretary for Bob Casey's reelect and is a Jacky Rosen alum.
Did someone forward this email to you? Sign up here.
Send Playbookers tips to playbook@politico.com or text us at 202-556-3307. Playbook couldn't happen without our deputy editor Zack Stanton and Playbook Daily Briefing producer Callan Tansill-Suddath.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
28 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump backs security deal for Ukraine following high-stakes summit with Vladimir Putin
WASHINGTON — President Trump has committed in principle to providing 'security guarantees' to Ukraine to safeguard its frontier from Russia following a possible peace deal, The Post has confirmed. The precise contours of those security guarantees, which were discussed by Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Anchorage on Friday, remain unclear, however. Trump has not committed to sending US troops and previously ruled out NATO membership for Ukraine. The security may amount to a European-led initiative with America's support, a source familiar with the talks said. French President Emmanuel Macron and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer offered to send peacekeeping troops to Ukraine earlier this year, which would place on their nations' shoulders the human and financial cost of shielding Kyiv after the US has already spent $200 billion since Moscow's invasion began in 2022. The US has a mutual defense agreement with the UK and France, meaning that their presence on the frontlines would offer a form of protection to Ukraine resembling NATO membership — Trump has adamantly rejected formal admission of Kyiv to the military alliance — which Putin vehemently opposes. Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization maintains that if one NATO is attacked, it would be considered an attack on all 32 members of the group. Ukraine would, as part of the hypothetical peace deal, cede land currently occupied by Russia. 3 President Trump discussed the possibility of giving Ukraine a 'mutual defense' deal. AP 3 The arrangement came after a series of calls between Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders, Ukrainian Presidential Press Off/UPI/Shutterstock Such an agreement would obligate Ukraine's European allies to respond to any future attacks on the country, The Telegraph reported Saturday. Putin allegedly agreed to the arrangement, according to The Telegraph. But European leaders were trying to clarify what role the US would play under such an agreement, sources told The Economic Times. The arrangement came after a series of calls between Trump, Zelensky and European leaders, the Agence France Press reported. 'As one of the security guarantees for Ukraine, the American side proposed a non-NATO Article 5 type guarantee, supposedly agreed with [Russian leader Vladimir] Putin,' a source told the AFP. 3 Putin invaded Ukraine in February 2022. Getty Images Word of the potential security guarantee came as it emerged that Zelensky will head to Washington, DC, to meet with Trump in the Oval Office on Monday.


Chicago Tribune
28 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Redistricting in Indiana: Republicans raise questions, Democrats have limited options if special session called
As Texas Democrats eye an end to their nearly two-week walkout to block Republican efforts there to redistrict, a growing number of Indiana Republicans have been voicing questions and concerns about redistricting in Indiana. The Texas Democrats announced Thursday they will return provided that Texas Republicans end a special session and California releases its own redrawn map proposal, both of which were expected to happen Friday. Democrats did not say what day they might return. Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbott still intends to push through new maps that would give the GOP five more winnable seats before next year's midterm elections. Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows has said that if Democrats don't return the next time lawmakers reconvene on Friday, the session will end and the governor will immediately benign another one. Abbott put redistricting on the agenda at the urging of President Donald Trump, who wants to shore up Republicans' narrow House majority and avoid a repeat of his first presidency, when the 2018 midterms restored Democrats to a House majority that blocked his agenda and twice impeached him. It is unusual for redistricting to take place in the middle of the decade and typically occurs once at the beginning of each decade to coincide with the census. Last week, Vice President JD Vance visited Indiana to meet with Gov. Mike Braun and other state Republican leaders to discuss redistricting Indiana's nine congressional districts. Braun told the Indiana Capital Chronicle Tuesday that he hasn't yet decided if he'll call a special session for redistricting, but said he and state leaders are 'considering it seriously' as they wait to see what comes out of Texas. 'I think mostly what happens here is going to depend on where Texas goes, because I think they've got five seats in play,' Braun said. The Indianapolis Star reported Friday that Trump invited Indiana Republican lawmakers to the White House for an Aug. 26 meeting. Molly Swigart, a spokeswoman for Senate Republicans, said the meeting was scheduled 'to discuss President Trump's agenda.' Indiana University Professor Emeritus of Political Science Marjorie Hershey said the effort to redistrict is 'a power politics move' because the Republican majority in the U.S. House of Representatives is 'as narrow as it could be.' In the last 100 years, there have been two midterm elections where the party that holds the White House hasn't lost seats in the U.S. House of Representatives, Hershey said. If Republicans lose a handful of seats, they would lose control of the House, she said. 'That would essentially mean the end of President Trump's dominance of the political agenda. He's gotten where he has as a result of having complete control of the Congress,' Hershey said. 'In order to maintain his edge in the House of Representatives in 2026, Trump wants a cushion for Republican House members because he's afraid that otherwise he's almost guaranteed to lose the House.' Historically, redistricting has occasionally occurred between censuses, Hershey said, but it goes against precedent. 'This is not normal in American politics,' Hershey. 'It's not the way that the constitution was written. It's not the way the supreme court has structured election law over time.' Indiana Republican response Indiana was last redistricted in 2021, which left Congressional Republicans with seven seats and Democrats two seats. 'It's not as though Indiana isn't already redistricted in a highly partisan way to favor Republicans, it is,' Hershey said. 'Even squeezing out one more Republican district in Texas or in Indiana might save President Trump from becoming as much of a lame duck as he otherwise would in 2026.' Indiana's First District, held by Democrat U.S. Rep. Frank Mrvan, D-Highland, would be the most under threat for redistricting because it's become more Republican over time — though still Democratically held, Hershey said. The First Congressional District remains Indiana's most competitive seat. In 2022, Mrvan won nearly 53% of the vote against Republican Jennifer-Ruth Green. In 2024, Mrvan saw a small increase in the number of votes to just over 53% when he won against Republican Randy Niemeyer. The problem for Republicans with redistricting the First District, Hershey said, would be Democrats from the First District would be moved into other districts, which could make the other districts more competitive for Democratic candidates. 'Sometimes the majority party in a state gets a little too greedy and thinks, 'we might have a shot at this one additional seat,' and then they end up losing the seat next door and not winning the seat that they had hoped to gain,' Hershey said. Aaron Dusso, an associate professor of political science at Indiana University Indianapolis, said he hasn't seen an appetite from Indiana Republicans to redistrict because of the risk that it will make safe Republican congressional districts more competitive. State Rep. Ed Soliday, R-Valparaiso, said party leadership has reached out to him to gauge his thoughts on redistricting Indiana. Soliday said he told the leadership 'show me the facts, tell me the unintended consequences, then I'll tell you how I'll vote.' 'I haven't seen anyone show me about how this would work,' Soliday said. 'I have a lot of questions before I jump on board with this.' Sen. Rick Niemeyer, R-Lowell, said he's discussed redistricting with his colleagues but he's still thinking about his position on redistricting. 'I'm not committing one way or the other,' Niemeyer said. 'We're looking at it and have not made a decision yet. That's where I'm at.' State Rep. Mike Aylesworth, R-Hebron, said the state legislature 'did a good job' redistricting in 2021, but he's waiting to see what the leadership decides about a special session for redistricting. 'I don't think it's necessary, but we'll wait and see what the caucus says,' Aylesworth said. 'I'm hesitant to change things, but we'll see what leadership says.' State Sen. Dan Dernulc, R-Highland, said he's spoken with leadership about redistricting, but that he needs more facts and the 'why' of redistricting. 'I don't see a need for it. I don't want to say yes or no, we're a work in progress on it,' Dernulc said. Indiana Democratic redistricting maneuvers In the Indiana House and Senate, two-thirds of members — or 67 House members and 34 senators – have to be present to call a quorum, according to each chamber's rules. In the House, Republicans hold 70 seats to Democrats 30. In the Senate, Republicans hold 40 seats to the Democrats' 10 seats. Indiana Republicans have enough members to call a quorum. Indiana Democrats 'wouldn't have a lot of options,' Dusso said, other than short-term delay tactics, like requiring readings of the whole redistricting bill or talking for long periods of time on the floor. Democrats can talk about the issue publicly to try to rally support from voters to put pressure on Republicans to not hold a special session on redistricting. 'It doesn't really stop anything from happening, it just slows it down,' Dusso said. The best move, Dusso said, would be for Democrats and lobbyists to talk with Braun now to persuade him not to call a special session. 'I think that's where they can win. Once it's called, I don't think they have a chance,' Dusso said. 'If you can get Braun to relent, I think that's where they're going to have their success.' If redistricting were to occur in Indiana, Hershey said it's likely that lawsuits would be filed. 'I'm sure that the Democrats will fight as hard as they can because there's a point at which the party that's trying to take this unfair advantage just starts to look bad,' Hershey said. 'It's a game of chicken, and we'll have to see who it is who veers away first.' State Sen. Rodney Pol Jr., D-Chesteron, said it's 'problematic' that President Trump has been pressuring Republican states to redistrict in the middle of a census. Trump's decision to do so shows he's scared to face the voters given the policies he's passed. 'He's afraid of his own base,' Pol said. 'It's not how our democracy works.' Given Indiana's Republican supermajority, Pol said Indiana Democrats couldn't leave the state to delay the vote. If a special session were called, Pol said the Democrats would attend and voice their opposition from the House and Senate floors. 'The only thing that we have is our voice,' Pol said. 'We're going to have to show up.'


Chicago Tribune
28 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to meet President Trump on Monday after US-Russia summit secured no halt to fighting
KYIV, Ukraine — Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy will meet Monday in Washington with U.S. President Donald Trump, who has shifted to saying an overall peace agreement — and not a ceasefire — is the next step in ending the 3 1/2-year-old war. Trump's abrupt reversal, aligning himself with a position held by Russian President Vladimir Putin, came in a social media post on Saturday, hours after they concluded a summit in Alaska that produced no agreement to halt the fighting. Putin has long said that Moscow is not interested in a temporary truce, and instead is seeking a long-term settlement that takes the Kremlin's interests into account. After calls with Zelenskyy and European leaders, Trump posted that 'it was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up.' In a statement after the Trump call, the European leaders did not address whether a peace deal was preferable to a ceasefire, saying they 'welcomed President Trump's efforts to stop the killing in Ukraine, end Russia's war of aggression, and achieve just and lasting peace.' Trump and Ukraine's European allies had been calling for a ceasefire ahead of any negotiations. Trump's statement that a peace agreement should be reached before a ceasefire appears to indicate Trump's thinking is 'shifting towards Putin,' an approach that would allow Moscow to keep fighting while negotiating, said Nigel Gould-Davies, a senior fellow at the International Institute of Strategic Studies in London. Zelenskyy, who was not invited to Alaska for the summit, said he had a 'long and substantive' conversation with Trump early Saturday. He said they would 'discuss all of the details regarding ending the killing and the war' on Monday. It will be Zelenskyy's first visit to the U.S. since Trump berated him publicly for being 'disrespectful' during an extraordinary Oval Office meeting on Feb. 28. Trump, who also held calls with European leaders Saturday, confirmed the White House meeting and said that 'if all works out, we will then schedule a meeting with President Putin.' Trump rolled out the red carpet on Friday for Putin, who was in the U.S. for the first time in a decade and since the start of his full-scale invasion of Ukraine. But he gave little concrete detail afterward of what was discussed. On Saturday, he posted on social media that it 'went very well.' Trump had warned ahead of the summit of 'very severe consequences' for Russia if Putin doesn't agree to end the war. Zelenskyy reiterated the importance of involving European leaders, who also were not at the summit. 'It is important that Europeans are involved at every stage to ensure reliable security guarantees together with America,' he said. 'We also discussed positive signals from the American side regarding participation in guaranteeing Ukraine's security.' He didn't elaborate, but Zelenskyy previously has said that European partners put on hold a proposal to establish a foreign troop presence in Ukraine to deter Russian aggression because it lacked an American backstop. Zelenskyy said he spoke to Trump one-on-one and then in a call with other European leaders. In total, the conversations lasted over 90 minutes. Trump said in Alaska that 'there's no deal until there's a deal,' after Putin claimed the two leaders had hammered out an 'understanding' on Ukraine and warned Europe not to 'torpedo the nascent progress.' During an interview with Fox News Channel before returning to Washington, Trump insisted the onus going forward might be on Zelenskyy 'to get it done,' but said there would also be some involvement from European nations. In their statement after speaking to Trump, major European leaders said they were ready to work with Trump and Zelenskyy toward 'a trilateral summit with European support.' The statement from French, German, Italian, British, Finnish, Polish and European Union said that 'Ukraine must have ironclad security guarantees' and welcomed U.S. readiness to provide them. 'It will be up to Ukraine to make decisions on its territory,' they said. 'International borders must not be changed by force.' EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said 'the harsh reality is that Russia has no intention of ending this war anytime soon,' noting that Moscow launched new attacks on Ukraine even as the delegations met. 'Putin continues to drag out negotiations and hopes he gets away with it. He left Anchorage without making any commitments to end the killing,' she said. Ukrainian and Russian forces are fighting along a 620-mile front line. Since spring, Russian troops have accelerated their gains, capturing the most territory since the opening stages of the war. 'Vladimir Putin came to the Alaska summit with the principal goal of stalling any pressure on Russia to end the war,' said Neil Melvin, director of international security at the London-based Royal United Services Institute. 'He will consider the summit outcome as mission accomplished.' Zelenskyy voiced support for Trump's proposal for a trilateral meeting with the U.S. and Russia. He said that 'key issues can be discussed at the level of leaders, and a trilateral format is suitable for this.' But Putin's foreign affairs adviser, Yuri Ushakov, told Russian state television Saturday that a possible three-way meeting 'has not been touched upon yet' in U.S.-Russia discussions. Zelenskyy wrote on X that he told Trump that 'sanctions should be strengthened if there is no trilateral meeting or if Russia tries to evade an honest end to the war.' In apparent effort to bolster Zelenskyy's hand before he meets Trump, France, the U.K. and Germany will co-host a video call Sunday afternoon of so-called 'coalition of the willing' nations that could, in one way or another, help monitor and uphold any deal to end fighting, French President Emmanuel Macron's office said. Russian officials and media struck a largely positive tone after Friday's summit, with some describing it as a symbolic end to Putin's isolation in the West. Former President Dmitry Medvedev, deputy head of Russia's Security Council, praised the summit as a breakthrough in restoring high-level dialogue between Moscow and Washington, describing the talks as 'calm, without ultimatums and threats.' Putin has 'broken out of international isolation' and back on the world stage as one of two global leaders, and 'wasn't in the least challenged' by Trump, who also ignored an arrest warrant issued for Putin by the International Criminal Court, said Laurie Bristow, who was British ambassador to Russia from 2016 to 2020. 'Unless Mr. Putin is absolutely convinced that he cannot win militarily, the fighting is not going to stop,' Bristow told The Associated Press. 'That's the big takeaway from the Anchorage summit.'