Accountants call for capital gains tax
RNZ
A group representing more than 3000 accountants in New Zealand has called for a rethink of the tax system, including the introduction of a capital gains tax.
CPA Australia has made a submission in response to Inland Revenue's long-term insights briefing, which warned that tax would need to
increase in the coming years.
The organisation agreed with Inland Revenue on many of the pressures on the New Zealand system, including an ageing population that would mean fewer working taxpayers, and higher pension and healthcare costs.
Productivity was also a problem, along with the cost of living and AI potentially changing how people worked.
It said the country's tax base was narrow with a heavy reliance on income tax and GST, which make up the
bulk of the tax take.
It said the absence of a capital gains tax put pressure on the other taxes.
It suggested adding a CGT, land tax and even GST changes to help recalibrate the tax mix, as well as indexing tax brackets to inflation so that people's tax bills did not increase over time when their income was only keeping pace with inflation.
CPA said it was also worth considering making KiwiSaver compulsory, means-testing super and providing more tax incentives for retirement savings, such as a model in which contributions and returns were not taxed.
The chair of CPA's New Zealand Tax Committee, Angus Ogilvie said unless there were significant changes to the way superannuation was set up, there were clear issues around a long-term structural deficit.
"We are not bringing in sufficient revenue to cover the cost of the existing welfare system and running the government, which is problematic. One option is to increase economic growth, which will bring in more revenue as a result but one wonders whether that alone will close that gap."
He said New Zealand had long been described as a "broad-based low rate tax system".
"For many years it was just that. The base was fairly comprehensive and the rates were relatively low. But now the top personal tax rate has gone to 39 percent, I don't think anyone could argue that is low. The company tax rate is one of the highest in the OECD. We argue that we aren't that low rate, nor are we broad-based.
"With a couple of exceptions, we don't tax capital gains in New Zealand, that's quite unusual in the OECD context. Pretty much every OECD country has some for of CGT, Australia certainly does but New Zealand does not. If we want to broaden that base, we need to consider a CGT."
He said CPA was suggesting it should apply to assets purchased from a certain date, so that it was not retrospective.
"The downside is it would take some time before it realised a reasonable amount of revenue but we acknowledge that you have to start somewhere. The alternative is to put all assets into that net but that would verge on impossible.
"You have to value all those assets, some of them are easy to value, like property, but you can imagine a small business, valuing the assets in terms of what it would sell for in an active market, if it's a specialist business it's difficult to ascertain without a property valuation process. That's always been a very valid criticism of a CGT.
"If it's based on assets that are purchased after a particular date then it becomes very easy."
He said the superannuation settings needed to be revisited, but it was a political question that was difficult for politicians to deal with.
"Universal provision of super for everyone over the age of 65 is very expensive. It's not means tested in any way - in Australia it is."
He said something would need to be done. "I don't think there's anyone who seriously believes going to get on top of structural deficit issue unless the economy grows and that doesn't seem to be happening spontaneously so what other options have we got?"
He said putting GST up was another option, but it would hit lower-income earners hard because they spent a greater proportion of what they warned. That could require an adjustment to welfare settings.
CPA was not in favour of a wealth tax because it could prompt people to shift wealth to other countries without such a tax.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Do more expensive KiwiSaver funds give a better return?
RNZ has compared long-term returns to the funds' total cost ratios. Photo: 123RF Does paying more for your KiwiSaver give you a better return? Well, maybe. But maybe not. RNZ has conducted analysis of Morningstar's most recent KiwiSaver data, comparing long-term returns to the funds' total cost ratios. It showed that the highest performers in the conservative category, were Milford, QuayStreet and Fisher TWO. Fisher TWO was charging less than average - at 0.52 percent compared to 0.62 percent. Milford and QuayStreet had high fees relative to the category but were low overall and their returns were higher than some of the more aggressive fund types that would usually be more expensive. Milford had returns of 5.1 percent a year over 10 years, compared to a peer group average of 4.1 percent. Simplicity had the lowest fees for that category but does not have 10 years of returns. Over five years, it returned 1.9 percent a year. Of moderate funds, Generate and BNZ were solid performers. BNZ had fees of 0.45 percent compared to an average of 0.8 percent for that type of fund and was the second best for returns over 10 years. Generate was first but had higher fees, at 1.14 percent. Westpac had the lowest fees and was fourth-best performing. Among balanced funds, Quay St and Milford were delivering strong returns but had some of the higher fees - at 1.03 percent and 1.07 percent respectively, compared to an average 0.75 percent. SuperLife Ethica was the third-best performer and had fees of 0.7 percent. Simplicity had the cheapest funds of that group, at 0.25 percent. It does not have 10 years of history but was 11th over five years. Milford, Generate and Quay St were the outperformers in the growth category. Milford returned 10.4 percent a year over 10 years compared to an average 7.8 percent for that group of funds. But investors were paying higher fees - between 1.25 percent and 1.29 percent compared to an average 0.97 percent. Generate, FisherTWO and Booster were best performing in the aggressive categories. On the flipside, ANZ was the poorest performer in the conservative category but was charging above-average fees. Booster was ranked eighth and was charging 1.11 percent compared to the average 0.62 percent. Among moderate funds, Booster and Fisher Funds appeared to be providing lower returns for higher fees. In the balanced category, ANZ was charging 0.91 percent compared to an average 0.75 percent and was ranked 15th. Booster was 11th with fees of 1.22 percent. Booster also seemed expensive compared to its returns in the growth category. Morningstar data director Greg Bunkall said there did not seem to be a strong correlation between paying more for a fund and getting a better return. "There are some good active - which cost more - and good passive options -which cost less. "Depending on what time period, or cohort you choose you can get widely differing results. My suggestion is as an investor, get an idea about the style you like and then assess those providers who offer that service at that price point and make sure you are in the right risk profile." Stefan Stevanovic, head of international equities at QuayStreet Asset Management, said there was not just one one contributing factor that had helped it perform on a returns to fees basis. "There are numerous drivers at play which have contributed to QuayStreet's strong performance. If we had to summarise it briefly it would be centred around our heavy emphasis of understanding current risks. "This helps with filtering out a lot of the noise and narrows our focus in areas that tend to matter. When you pair that approach with a robust and fundamentals driven portfolio construction process, you tend to see improvement in risk-adjusted performance." Fisher Funds chief investment officer Ashley Gardyne said its funds had delivered solid returns in the past 12 months. "That said, relative to benchmark, our returns aren't where we'd like them to be. "As an active manager there will inevitably be periods when returns lag as well as beat the benchmark. History tells us that performance is cyclical, and occasional periods of underperformance are part and parcel of delivering strong long-term results. Our team are always looking for ways to lift returns and we think we are well placed to deliver strong outcomes in the years ahead." Booster chief executive Di Papadopoulos said the data did not capture the value of all services being offered. "They show that Booster's performance is returning firm results, but don't reflect value delivered with a host of other - and in some cases unique - offerings to our KiwiSaver members. "The Morningstar report also does not account for the level of risk being taken in each fund, which is a measure central to our investment approach; we target lower levels of month-to-month volatility than peer funds, to improve how well funds can withstand market volatility. "A key driver of Booster's investment strategy is to smooth out market highs and lows for KiwiSaver members, such as during global turmoil following the pandemic, and US tariff uncertainty affecting the global economy. Monitoring of the seven-year period up to June 2025 for risk-adjusted returns, has Booster's Socially Responsible (SR) Balanced and Balanced funds ranked third and fourth respectively, out of 16 funds." She said Booster's fees included access to financial advice, free accidental death cover, and access to its budgeting app. The highest-performing fund over the 12 months to June was Koura's Bitcoin fund, which returned 73 percent. Koura founder Rupert Carlyon said it had an annualised 76 percent per year return over three years. It has a total cost ratio of 1.1 percent. "This outperformance has been driven by the normalisation of Bitcoin over this period. "We saw the launch of the ETFs in the US which enabled institutional investors to jump into the asset class. The US now has a very pro crypto administration which is likely to drive the continued growth of Bitcoin and other crypto assets. "When we launched this fund three years ago we had a large number of commentators saying it was inappropriate for KiwiSaver investors to be investing in a high risk and speculative asset such us Bitcoin. Our perspective has always been that investors should be able to pick and choose where they invest their hard earned funds. Our job as a manager is to ensure that they are aware of the risks and invest appropriately to make sure that their retirement is not entirely put at risk. " Financial Markets Authority executive director of licensing and conduct supervision Clare Bolingford said there was inherent subjectivity in what would constitute value for money for investors. "In 2022, the FMA published research which showed different drivers that influence consumers' choice of the KiwiSaver provider and where the consumers see the value and benefits being delivered. In addition, FMA published this guidance on managed funds fees and value for money FMA Funds, which includes principles and useful questions to ask to assist investors. " Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Who's running for Auckland's mayoralty?
Eleven people are going up against incumbent Wayne Brown to be the mayor of Auckland. Photo: RNZ / Diego Opatowski Eleven people are going up against incumbent Wayne Brown to be the mayor of Auckland this local elections. While Auckland councillor Kerrin Leoni has emerged as Brown's main challenger, there are still a number of lower-profile candidates vying for the city's top job. This year's contenders include a former political party leader, someone who is running for mayor in Auckland and Christchurch, and a university student. RNZ asked lower-profile candidates, who could be contacted, for one sentence explaining why they want to be mayor and one sentence stating a policy of theirs they want Aucklanders to know about. Six responded. Eric Chuah. Photo: Supplied Dr Chuah, a former strategist for Peter Dunne and the United Future Party, stood as a candidate in the Auckland electorate of Maungakiekie in the 2023 general election. He told RNZ he is over 61. He now had his sights set on the Auckland mayoralty and was going after what he considered to be unnecessary spending, like the CBD's million-dollar Christmas tree . Why do you want to be mayor? "Ensure reduction of excessive spending, transparency and accountability in council tendering process and staff recruitment where proper systems of management, operational and decision making are implemented to ensure fulfilment of Auckland Council's Long-Term Plans and not reacting to situations with ad-hoc solutions and stop gap measures creating long term problems as Auckland Council debt has increased from $11 billion to $14 billion, a $3 billion debt increase in 3 years and rates have increase [sic] 40% in 3 years where a house priced at $1.4 million has a $4000 rate and $1000 water rates with a projected 48% increase in 2026, stated by an Auckland Councilor [sic] in last Governance meeting on July 31st 2025." Policy "Reviewing, auditing past expenditures in contract awards, tendering systems, allocation of ratepayers monies via adopting and implementing, transparency, accountability systems of staff recruitment, management systems of the various CCOs (Council Controlled Organizations) such as AT (Auckland), so as to reduce unnecessary operational costs while maintaining jobs, unnecessary expenditure such as $1 million Christmas tree (Dec.2024), $1 million toilet and $1.2 billion road cone spent from 2020-2025 of which $400-$500 million could be overspent." Ted Johnston. Photo: Supplied The lawyer and former leader of the New Conservative Party is having another crack at the mayoralty after getting hit with an egg during a mayoral candidate debate in 2022. This time around, the 64-year-old has honed in on the city's traffic woes. Why do you want to be mayor? "I am seeking the Mayoralty as, no other candidate has solutions for Auckland's growing problems, and I cannot implement these crucial reforms, otherwise." Policy "A vastly expanded, efficient and inexpensive public rail system is crucial to bolster Auckland's economy and development, as well as to lower congestion and costs for all Aucklanders." Rob McNeil. Photo: Supplied McNeil is running under the Animal Justice Party banner. On the party's website, it stated the animal advocate loved long walks on the Auckland CBD waterfront. Why do you want to be mayor? "I will ensure animals have a voice in Auckland's decision-making, recognising the intrinsic link between animal welfare, environmental health, and human well-being. Lasting progress begins with local councils committed to protecting the interconnected web of all life." Policy "Among other policies for Aucklanders, we're fighting for mandatory funded desexing of dogs and cats - to stop the preventable deaths of thousands of animals while reducing council costs and community." Ryan Pausina. Photo: Supplied Pausina was an Auckland mayoral candidate in 2022. He told RNZ he is 48-years-old and a product developer. Why do you want to be mayor? "For starters, I have defined for the first time in history who should be the mayor of Auckland, out of all of us, who should be the mayor is determined by expertise in the fields of science relative to city works, city management and city civics, of which, that one person is required to serve for that role." Policy "Static speed-bump phase-out is a fun one, every time a vehicle slows down and passes over a speed bump, then accelerates away, a tiny teaspoon of petrol is wasted and in Sweden, they have created a speed bump technology to govern speed without wasting fuel or energy and annoyance in the process." Jason Pieterse. Photo: Supplied Pieterse told RNZ he is a 24-year-old engineering student doing his honours at AUT, making him the youngest of the bunch. Why do you want to be mayor? "I am running for mayor because I want to drive forward changes that support and improve the lives of every resident that calls this city home." Policy "I would have to say my most interesting policy is a housing proposal that would make near all housing costs much more affordable and accessible." Peter Wakeman. Photo: Supplied The 64-year-old described himself as a former passenger jet pilot. He is also running for mayor of Christchurch this local elections. A candidate with his name has run for mayor of Christchurch in almost every election since 1998. Why do you want to be mayor? "Wakeman is standing for Mayor in Auckland and Christchurch to be more effective in achieving Government policy that puts more money in everyone's pockets." Policy "Get more money into circulation by getting central Government to replace GST with Financial transaction tax (FTT) to reduce all of our costs of living and creation of debt free money by RBNZ." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Mediawatch: RNZ flags changes to claw back listeners
Photo: RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly It's not news that RNZ National has been losing listeners in recent years. It's been mostly downhill year-on-year since 2019 when over 616,000 people a week were tuning in. This year it has dropped to below 470,000. This week RNZ staff were told that efforts to shore that up have not worked so far - and now there's a new plan underway. "We now need to take a different approach," RNZ chief executive Paul Thompson said. RNZ is appointing a Chief Audio Officer to oversee it and targeting half a million RNZ National listeners by November next year - and another 20,000 one year later. RNZ's target audience will now be "broadly 50-69, male and female" and RNZ National staff will be given data to "better tailor the station to their preferences," Thompson said. "Growing the presence in Auckland" is also a key part of the new strategy. RNZ is moving its Auckland operation into TVNZ's central Auckland premises later this year and now plans to host more radio and production roles there. The new plan is in part influenced by a review carried out by former head of news Richard Sutherland, who left RNZ in July 2023. "I asked him to be frank and robust, and that is what has been delivered," Thompson said when RNZ released it this week after Official Information Act requests. Sutherland certainly has. He warned that if people stop listening it "feeds the idea RNZ is sliding into irrelevance." "Irrelevant stuff gets switched off," he added. He said Auckland must be treated as "the strategic centre of gravity" rather than Wellington. "While the capital remains politically important, the views and preferences of its residents are the tail wagging the RNZ national dog," he wrote. Sutherland's good news for RNZ that he said it has "strengths that provide a foundation for renewal". He cited credible news, trust, and recognition - and public service commercial-free content that's available on many platforms and shared with other media. But he said there was a lack of understanding of the audience within RNZ National as well as a lack of cohesion and urgency. After candid 'no notes' conversations with around 50 staff, he concluded there was "blameshifting" and "low ambition" among staff. He also cited a widespread belief that live listening was a "sunset activity" - and that needed to be stamped out from the top at RNZ. He concluded RNZ National was "trying to please everyone" but it should target people over 50, and primarily 50-69 year olds. "Nuance can wait," Sutherland said, recognising that approach sounded blunt. Sutherland also said - very bluntly - "some people should not be on air". He didn't say who, but he did say RNZ needs one front-rank daytime host from outside urgently - and also an "urgent audit" of its on-air staff. Sutherland's review says key RNZ National time slots should be refreshed "where existing presenters don't align with the target audience." RNZ has told staff there will be "a strong focus on lifting on-air standards" and it is expanding presentation training and running more 'air checks' of the existing output. While some of Sutherland's recommendations align with RNZ's new strategy, RNZ said it was "just one input". The yet-to-be appointed Chief Audio Officer will determine whether Sutherland's other urgings are actioned. But not for nothing did RNZ pay $30,000 for what Thompson - also RNZ's editor-in-chief - described as "an actionable high-level blueprint to turn the station around". RNZ's briefing to staff also said the plan is "not about reducing kaimahi numbers". But it also said "every part of RNZ National needs to work for the available audience - and will be reviewed to ensure that is the case". "This may mean that some programmes or shows are discontinued." Sutherland's review recommended Morning Report and key staff should relocate fully to Auckland, something RNZ said was already underway. On-air changes introduced to Morning Report this month include shorter news bulletins, more conversational treatments of sport, rural and business news, a weekly chief executive officer interview and sports discussion panel, and a head-to-head with opposing MPs every Wednesday. The programme now features fewer recorded and live news interviews, though that varies depending on when news breaks and develops. A sign of further things to come elsewhere on air under the new audio plan, perhaps. Sutherland urged RNZ's top brass to ignore the criticism and opposition his sweeping changes would inevitably spark. Mediawatch asked to speak to Sutherland about his blunt review of his former employer. He deferred to Thompson who also declined. Storm Day, Accenture Song's NZ Lead. Photo: supplied More than ever, broadcasters seeking to retain or boost audiences need to give them what they want. But what people expect is harder to gauge now that people can choose from public and commercial radio networks, commercial TV channels, social media platforms, and global video streaming giants like Netflix and Disney+. Consultancy business Accenture Song has just released its second annual Brand Experience Gap study putting numbers on the gap between what 80 different New Zealand businesses promise - and what the punters reckon they deliver. Out of six different sectors, media and entertainment companies recorded the biggest gap - 79 percent - in the survey of 1500 people. "The gap is the difference between what a brand promises and what customers actually experience. When the gap is small customers feel valued and are more loyal. And when that gap is wide, trust erodes and people just walk away," Accenture Song's New Zealand lead Storm Day told Mediawatch . The survey does not name specific media outlets or individual scores for them, but Day told Mediawatch it covered streaming services, pay TV, free-to-air broadcasters, online news publishers, and radio audio streaming providers. "The sample is representative of all the major players in New Zealand," she said. "The industry average across all sectors is sitting at 72 percent - so I'm afraid the media and the entertainment sector is our worst performing one. Seventy-nine percent say that media providers are not delivering on their promises, which is pretty scary." Most surveys of trust in news and media are based on peoples' perceptions. Respondents' disapproval of specific practices - such as oft-cited 'sensationalism' - seems to sour their opinion of the entire media. Likewise, those who get news mixed in with other content via social media are much less likely to trust the news overall. "I think that's always at play. Audiences don't always separate the ecosystem in the same way that the industry does," Day told Mediawatch . "If they have a bad experience, whether it's with a regulated newsroom or a global online platform, it really does colour how they view the whole sector. It means that regulated media can't rely on standards alone. "To protect their reputation, they have to keep proving value and trust through the experience they deliver every day. "That's why it's even more important that we actually deliver on trust and think about the customer, not just standards or regulations." Day said regularly refreshing content, offering high quality exclusive content, and ease of access across devices were things people cited for securing their loyalty. A higher number of people said they were getting high quality stuff from our media companies. But the survey also recorded an 81 percent gap in belief that media outlets report with fairness and impartiality. "The biggest gap was people feeling valued and recognised, which tells us that audiences feel quite anonymous and not engaged. Trust was also really fragile. There was an 84 percent gap around acting with honesty, integrity, and keeping promises. "For an industry built on credibility, that's a major risk. But it's also a place where decisive action can make a big difference. Things like clickbait and transparency are really key things to address." Could big changes at RNZ end up widening the 'brand experience' gap? "Purpose... is a great way to galvanise a business reset. Secondly, so is moving beyond just delivering content to actually genuinely recognising audiences. You can use technology in service of that... to genuinely personalise what we're putting out there and actively engage with people. "AI can be used to personalise content and discovery - and flag relevant content and programming. And for local broadcasters especially, making your contribution to New Zealand really visible. Telling people what you're doing and how you're doing it... needs to work hand in hand to build that trust and connection with people." Dr Merja Myllylahti and Dr Greg Treadwell from the AUT's Centre for Journalism, Media and Democracy. Photo: RNZ / Jeremy Ansell Does the Accenture Song survey show the media's reputation rises and falls together - and no one outlet could buck the trend on its own anyway? "I think this sector has had a really tough year. Economic climate as well has a massive influence on the gap. When people are kind of under stress, they really are much more selective about where they spend their money, where they spend their time." But this week, the authors of the most comprehensive survey of trust in New Zealand media said it shows news media can't simply blame 'bad times' and general cynicism for slumping results. "News isn't just another institution like the state, a corporation or a non-profit organisation," said Greg Treadwell and Merja Myllylahti from Auckland University of Technology's Centre for Journalism, Media And Democracy. "We found the trajectories of trust levels for other social institutions - governments, business, NGOs - showed clear links to each other as they rose and fell, more or less in sync, over time. "Trust in news however, has been in its own lane. A fall in trust in government and politics, in other words, is not a predictor of a fall in trust in news," they wrote in The Conversation . "Survey respondents tell us they perceive the news to be politically biased (both left and right), and because too much seems to be opinion masquerading as news. "It seems the trust problems democracies have with their news services need to be addressed on their own terms, not as part of an overall picture." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
