Bladder Cancer: 5 Things to Know
Diagnosis typically involves cystoscopy, urine cytology, and cross-sectional imaging such as CT or MRI to assess tumor burden and identify local or distant spread. A biopsy obtained during cystoscopy confirms malignancy and provides critical information for tumor staging, which guides treatment decisions.
Management options range from transurethral resection and intravesical therapy for non-muscle-invasive disease to radical cystectomy and systemic therapies for more advanced cases. These include immune checkpoint inhibitors such as pembrolizumab and fibroblast growth factor receptor-targeted agents like erdafitinib. Emerging research continues to advance biomarker-guided treatment, noninvasive diagnostics, and personalized medicine aimed at improving clinical outcomes.
Here are five things to know about bladder cancer.
1. Artificial Intelligence Is Improving Diagnostic Accuracy and Speed
Artificial intelligence (AI) is playing an increasingly important role in bladder cancer diagnostics by enhancing risk stratification and workflow reproducibility. A 2025 ASCO abstract (MP06-18) described a computational histology AI (CHAI) tool that analyzed digitized H&E-stained histopathology slides to assess tumor morphology and stratify recurrence risk in patients with intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) based on tumor morphology. The AI model identified patients at significantly higher risk of high-grade recurrence and demonstrated strong prognostic performance across independent cohorts.
Beyond risk prediction, AI tools like CHAI highlight the broader potential of integrating AI into pathology workflows. These technologies can reduce diagnostic variability, accelerate turnaround times, and support personalized treatment planning by uncovering histologic patterns that may not be easily detectable by human review. Such advances align with the foundational goals of precision oncology — namely, enabling earlier detection, accurate diagnosis, and personalized treatment guided by individual tumor biology.
2. Mitomycin Offers a Noninvasive Option for Recurrent NMIBC
On June 12, 2025, the FDA approved mitomycin intravesical solution as a first-in-class noninvasive treatment for adults with recurrent, low-grade, intermediate-risk NMIBC. Approval was based on robust data from the phase 3 ENVISION trial, which enrolled 228 evaluable patients. At 3 months, 80% of patients achieved a complete response, defined by the absence of visible tumors on cystoscopy and negative urine cytology, with an impressive 82% likelihood of remaining disease-free at 12 months.
Mitomycin intravesical solution is delivered via an office-based, bladder-retentive gel system, providing a nonsurgical, bladder-sparing alternative for patients who face recurrent disease and wish to avoid a repeated transurethral resection of bladder tumor procedure. The therapy offers a meaningful treatment paradigm shift: instead of undergoing invasive surgery under anesthesia, patients receive six weekly outpatient instillations of mitomycin, allowing for easier administration and potentially fewer complications. While the FDA advisory committee raised concerns over reliance on single-arm data, FDA reviewers emphasized the significant patient benefit in avoiding repeat surgeries.
3. NECTIN4 Amplification May Help Guide Therapy Selection in Metastatic Urothelial Cancer
A growing body of research highlights molecular biomarkers as pivotal tools in guiding therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma. One biomarker gaining significant attention is NECTIN4 amplification, a genomic alteration commonly observed in advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma.
Retrospective data from a study by Klümper and colleagues suggest that NECTIN4 gene amplification, identified using a NECTIN4 -specific fluorescence in situ hybridization assay, may serve as a predictive biomarker in metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Among 108 patients with metastatic disease, amplification was observed in approximately 26%. In this study, NECTIN4 amplification was associated with a 96% objective response rate to enfortumab vedotin, an antibody-drug conjugate targeting NECTIN4 , compared with 32% in nonamplified tumors. Patients with amplified tumors also experienced significantly improved overall survival, with a 92% reduction in mortality risk, and longer progression-free survival (12.8 vs 5.6 months).
While findings like these suggest that NECTIN4 amplification holds promise as a predictive biomarker for response to enfortumab vedotin, clinical implementation will require prospective validation, standardized testing methods, and further research to determine its utility across diverse treatment settings and patient populations.
4. NIAGARA Trial Supports Perioperative Durvalumab for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
The phase 3 NIAGARA trial investigated perioperative durvalumab in combination with neoadjuvant gemcitabine-cisplatin in cisplatin-eligible patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Results presented at ASCO GU 2025 showed a 32% reduction in event-free survival events and a 25% reduction in overall mortality compared with chemotherapy alone. Importantly, the addition of durvalumab also led to higher pathologic complete response rates (37.3% vs 27.5%) and greater circulating tumor DNA clearance, without delaying or compromising radical cystectomy.
These findings support perioperative durvalumab as a potential new standard of care for cisplatin-eligible MIBC. By improving survival outcomes and biomarker-based measures of response, the NIAGARA regimen reflects a precision medicine approach to treatment. Given the FDA's recent approval of this combination, the NIAGARA regimen is well positioned to shift the perioperative treatment paradigm in this setting.
5. Y Chromosome Loss May Influence Immunotherapy Response in Men
A growing body of research suggests that loss of the Y chromosome (LOY), a somatic event observed in up to 40% of male patients with bladder cancer, may play a dual role in tumor behavior and immunotherapy sensitivity. LOY has been associated with a more aggressive disease phenotype, including accelerated tumor growth, immune suppression, and CD8+ T cell exhaustion, factors that impair immune surveillance and contribute to poorer outcomes.
Paradoxically, this immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment may also increase susceptibility to immune checkpoint inhibitors. In both murine and human models, LOY tumors have shown enhanced responsiveness PD-1/PD-L1 blockade, likely due to the exhausted state of tumor-infiltrating T cells.
These findings were further supported by a 2025 study showing that LOY in both cancer and immune cells is associated with worse clinical outcomes and may help stratify patients for immunotherapy trials. While prospective clinical data directly linking LOY to checkpoint inhibitor response in bladder cancer are still emerging, the available evidence highlights LOY as a promising predictive biomarker. Ongoing research aims to validate its utility in guiding treatment decisions and refining immunotherapy strategies for men with urothelial carcinoma.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why is GDRX stock up 30% today? GoodRx strikes deal to sell Ozempic and Wegovy after Novo Nordisk's breakup with Hims
Share prices of GoodRx (NASDAQ: GDRX), the American healthcare company and telemedicine service, are currently soaring after the company announced that it will partner with Novo Nordisk to offer the lowest-ever out-of-pocket prices for Ozempic and Wegovy. Unsold completed new-build inventory is so high this $34B homebuilder is turning to investors 'Job hugging' is the newest career trend: Here's what it means—and why Gen Z is into it Spotify just redesigned the way you'll 'listen' to audiobooks According to a press release posted early on August 18, GoodRx has struck a deal with the pharmaceutical giant Novo Nordisk to sell its popular semaglutide medications, Ozempic and Wegovy, for just $499 per month to 'eligible self-paying customers.' GoodRx doesn't sell or dispense any drugs itself, but rather provides savings and coupons that can be applied in pharmacies. Its exclusive Ozempic and Wegovy offerings, available starting today, are the lowest out-of-pocket costs for the medications available on the market. The news comes just weeks after Novo Nordisk cut ties with the telehealth company Hims & Hers Health (NYSE: HIMS) over claims that Hims & Hers was selling 'knockoff' versions of Wegovy. It's a dispute that reflects a broader discussion around whether compounded semaglutide drugs—or non-FDA approved versions of brand-name medicines—are a violation of intellectual property laws. As of this writing, GoodRx's stock is up by more than 30% since market close. Here's what to know about Novo Nordisk's latest partnership and its ongoing legal battles against compounded GLP-1s. GoodRx's collaboration with Novo Nordisk In the last year alone, GoodRx reports that nearly 17 million people visited the site searching for information and savings on GLP-1 medications—a 22% increase from the previous year. 'Demand for GLP-1 medications is at an all-time high, but too many Americans still face barriers accessing them,' Wendy Barnes, GoodRX president and CEO, said in the press release. 'By partnering with Novo Nordisk, we're taking a significant step forward in making these innovative brand-name treatments more accessible for millions of people who need them.' In the past, a spokesperson told Fast Company, GoodRx has worked with both Novo Nordisk and its competitor Eli Lilly to offer commercially insured patients manufacturer savings cards on GLP-1s. The company has also offered savings on other types of weight loss/diabetes treatments, including Contrave, Dexcom G7, Lantus, and Qsymia. However, this is the first time that GoodRx has offered a cash price for a GLP-1. The $499 monthly self-pay cost will be available at more than 70,000 retail locations nationwide. Novo Nordisk's current legal battles over compounded GLP-1s So far, investors' response to GoodRx's new collaboration has been overwhelmingly positive. It stands in sharp contrast to Hims & Hers' recent breakup with Novo Nordisk, which caused the telehealth company's share prices to plummet in late June. Hims & Hers and Novo Nordisk parted ways over Hims & Hers' offering of compounded versions of Wegovy. Back in 2022, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) declared a shortage of GLP-1 medications including Ozempic and Wegovy. Under this shortage notice, pharmacies were permitted to make compounded versions of the brand-name drugs using their active ingredient, semaglutide, and sell them at a lower cost. However, Hims & Hers has continued to sell its compounded version of Wegovy long after the FDA lifted the shortage back in February. Now, Novo Nordisk is arguing that these compounded drugs are both a violation of its intellectual property and potentially dangerous to patients, due to their lack of FDA approval. Early this month, Novo Nordisk announced 14 new lawsuits against small pharmacies, telehealth providers, and weight-loss clinics over compounded versions of Ozempic and Wegovy—bringing its total cases filed on the matter up to more than 130 in 40 states. Experts say that federal compounding laws are just vague enough to allow for various interpretations, meaning that Novo Nordisk's current legal challenges could shape the way courts interpret those boundaries in the future. In a statement to Yahoo Finance, Barnes offered a clear look into GoodRx's stance on compounded drugs: 'There's no question we could have tried to do something sooner from a compounded alternative pathway, but we have been very clear in our belief that it needed to be FDA-approved, lawfully approved. It just wasn't a pathway that we were going to support,' she said. This post originally appeared at to get the Fast Company newsletter:
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
RFK Jr. attacks pediatricians' group over vaccine recommendations
The gloves are off in Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s feud with American doctors. Hours after the American Academy of Pediatrics, the professional society for doctors who care for children, issued Covid-19 vaccine guidance contradicting that of the health secretary, Kennedy accused the group of engaging in a 'pay-to-play scheme to promote commercial ambitions of AAP's Big Pharma benefactors' in a post on social media platform X. Kennedy cited donations from Covid mRNA vaccine drugmakers Pfizer and Moderna, among other pharmaceutical companies, to the pediatricians' Friends of Children Fund, which backs projects promoting children's health and health equity. Kennedy said the contributions constituted a conflict of interest and suggested they led to the group's decision to recommend that young children, between 6 and 23 months old, receive Covid vaccines. In May, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention dropped its recommendation that all children 6 months and older get Covid shots. Kennedy at the time said the move was based on 'common sense' and 'good science.' The AAP, however, said it had retained its guidance for young children to get the shots because they are still at risk of severe cases of the disease. 'COVID-19 continues to result in hospitalization and death in the pediatric population,' the group said in a release explaining its recommendations, adding that 'children younger than 2 years old are especially vulnerable to severe COVID-19 and should be prioritized for vaccination.' The pediatric group did not immediately respond to POLITICO's request for comment regarding Kennedy's remarks. Earlier Tuesday, HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon accused the pediatricians of 'freelancing its own recommendations, while smearing those who demand accountability' in a statement to POLITICO. AAP President Susan J. Kressly defended her group's guidance in response, saying they were 'based only in the science, the needs of children, and the care that pediatricians have for the children in every community.' Despite the disagreement over vaccination of young children, both the new CDC guidance and the pediatricians continue to recommend shots for children with underlying conditions that could put them at risk for severe disease. Both have also scaled back recommendations for healthy children older than 6 months, saying that parents of children without underlying conditions should decide on vaccination in consultation with their pediatrician. Why it matters: The pediatricians' split with the CDC underscores the depth of the distrust between the medical establishment and Kennedy — a longtime vaccine skeptic who once said the Covid vaccine was 'the deadliest vaccine ever made' in defiance of scientific consensus. Before Kennedy's arrival, the agency and the pediatricians agreed on vaccine recommendations, but Kennedy's efforts to overhaul federal vaccine policy have upset the relationship. Earlier this summer, he ousted all the members of the expert panel that advises the CDC on vaccines, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, tapping new members with a history of vaccine skepticism. Most recently, Kennedy rescinded $500 million earmarked for research into mRNA technology, which was used to develop the Moderna and Pfizer Covid vaccines. And his latest post isn't the first time he's criticized doctors. The May report from his Make America Health Again Commission assessing the causes of chronic disease in children was laced with accusations that doctors are influenced by the pharmaceutical industry to overprescribe certain medications and fail to treat the root causes of disease. The split also comes as children return to school and the annual fall vaccination campaign for Covid and the flu is beginning. Kennedy suggested that the pediatric group could be exposing its member doctors to liability in his X post, stating that 'AAP should also be candid with doctors and hospitals that recommendations that diverge from the CDC's official list are not shielded from liability under the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act.' The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, which that law created, doesn't cover Covid vaccines, but Kennedy has said he wants to overhaul the system for compensating people who experience serious side effects from vaccines. He would likely need Congress' assent to change it.

Fox News
36 minutes ago
- Fox News
RFK Jr. whips America into shape with new fitness challenge made particularly for ‘young people'
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. details his fitness challenge for America to complete 100 push ups and 50 pull ups in ten minutes on 'Jesse Watters Primetime.'



