‘Relief' or ‘illogical'? Supreme Court's stray dog round-up order has people divided
The Supreme Court on Monday ordered picking of all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR within eight weeks, directing that they be housed in dog shelters to be created by appropriate authorities.
RWAs welcome SC stray dog order
Several individuals and groups, including Residents' Welfare Association (RWAs), have welcomed the order. Atul Goyal, president of United Resident Joint Action (URJA), an apex body of RWAs in Delhi, said dog bite cases have been rising steadily, and this order will help provide relief from the problem.
"Along with stray dogs, cattle on the roads have also started attacking people and causing traffic jams. The authorities should take similar action for such animals as well," PTI news agency quoted Goyal.
Also Read: Delhi CM vows action plan after SC order to remove stray dogs within 8 weeks
Delhi mayor Iqbal Singh also backed the Supreme Court order, saying the people of Delhi were facing problems.
'I welcome Supreme Court's order as the people of Delhi were facing a lot of problems. We will try our best to implement this order in the next 6 weeks. We don't have shelter homes, but we have 10 operational sterilisation centres. We can make temporary and permanent shelter homes. MCD and the Delhi government will ensure that no one faces problems due to stray dogs. We will make an action plan after holding meetings with our officers,' he told news agency ANI.
Delhi chief minister Rekha Gupta on Monday said the stray dog menace in the city had reached 'gigantic' proportions and assured that her government would soon roll out a comprehensive policy to address the problem in line with the Supreme Court's directives, adding that it will be 'planned and systematic'.
'Illogical': PETA, others slam SC order
Animal protection bodies as well as several politicians have flagged concerns over the Supreme Court order on stray dogs in Delhi-NCR, calling it "impractical, illogical, and illegal".
The India wing of the American animal rights animal protection organisation People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) termed Supreme Court's order to send all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR to shelters within eight weeks as "impractical, illogical, and illegal".
PETA India said that the forced removal of Delhi's community dogs would create "chaos and suffering" for both the animals and residents. PETA India advocacy associate, Shaurya Agrawal, said the Delhi government had 24 years to implement sterilisation programmes, 'implement the ABC rules'. Delhi has 10 lakh dogs and only half of them are sterilised... Housing them in shelters is impractical. It is very difficult. This is going to create chaos and problems. Removal of dogs is inhumane, is cruelty in itself, and the conditions within the shelters are going to be very bad," ANI quoted him as saying.
Animal rights activist and former Union minister Maneka Gandhi called the directive "impractical", "financially unviable" and "potentially harmful" to the region's ecological balance.
Maneka Gandhi said that the scale of the task makes it "unworkable".
'You have three lakh dogs in Delhi. To get them all off the roads, you'll have to make 3,000 pounds, each with drainage, water, a shed, a kitchen, and a watchman. That will cost about ₹15,000 crore. Does Delhi have ₹15,000 crore for this?' PTI quoted Maneka Gandhi as saying.
Later, Maneka Gandhi also said the order is not 'doable', adding that it is a 'very strange judgment given by someone who is in anger'. "Angry judgments are never sensible," she said while speaking to ANI.
The Federation of Indian Animal Protection Organisations (FIAPO) also on Monday called the Supreme Court order 'shocking', adding that it runs 'contrary to global public health guidance, India's own laws, and humane, evidence-based practice.'
The Supreme Court, hearing a suo motu case over dog bites in national capital on Monday, directed that no stray canines will be released back.
In a warning, the Supreme Court said, 'If any person or organisation comes in way of picking up of stray dogs, action will be taken.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Follow pre-posting procedures of DGP scrupulously: HC
Madurai: After the state govt informed that the process for appointment to the post of director general police (DGP) was ongoing, Madras high court on Thursday reiterated that pre-appointment procedures contemplated by Supreme Court, and the consequential orders of the Centre and Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) are to be scrupulously followed to maintain independence and transparency in the matter. A division bench of Justice S M Subramaniam and Justice G Arul Murugan observed that empanelment of officers for appointment to the post is to be strictly done in consonance with the above directives. It was brought to the court's notice that a petition filed before the principal seat in Chennai seeking a similar prayer was dismissed as premature by the coordinate bench by an order dated Aug 4. "We concur with the said view taken by the coordinate bench at the principal seat in view of the fact that the appointment to the post of DGP is yet to be made," the judges observed. In view of the state's submission that the process for appointment to the post is ongoing, the judges said no further interference is required in the petition at this juncture, and disposed of the public interest litigation filed by advocate K Yasar Arafath of Ramanathapuram district. The petitioner stated that the present DGP, Shankar Jiwal, is set to retire on Aug 31. However, the govt has not taken any visible steps to initiate the mandatory process of empanelment of eligible IPS officers and forwarding the names to UPSC for preparation of a panel, as directed by Supreme Court. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo The petitioner said the govt has planned to keep the head of the police force as per its choice to get the support of the police department till the 2026 assembly election. Hence, he moved court seeking a direction to the Centre and state govt to immediately initiate the empanelment process in accordance with the directions of Supreme Court in Prakash Singh v. Union of India judgment. The petitioner also sought a direction to restrain the home secretary from appointing any officer as in-charge or acting DGP or granting an extension to the present DGP without following due process. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Happy Independence Day wishes , messages , and quotes !
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
Bengali migrants illegally held, says West Bengal; Supreme Court seeks response of 8 states
NEW DELHI: Supreme Court on Thursday sought responses from eight states, including Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra, on a petition by the West Bengal Migrant Workers Welfare Board alleging unauthorised detention of Muslim migrant workers from WB on mere suspicion of being Bangladeshi nationals. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Appearing for the West Bengal govt-run board, advocate Prashant Bhushan accused police in UP, Maharashtra, Bihar, Odisha, Rajasthan, Haryana, Chhattisgarh and Delhi of arbitrarily detaining migrant labourers from Bengal and alleged that some were deported despite sufficient documents to prove Indian nationality. Bhushan said the board had no objection to inquiries to establish nationality of Bengali-speaking Muslims, but detention should be only of non-Indians. Seeking a restraint on such detentions, he was told by a bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi that the court would first consider the states' responses before passing any interim order. The matter will be heard again within a fortnight. The petition, filed under Article 32, challenged the legality of these detentions in light of an MHA letter dated May 2, 2025, authorising inter-state verification and detention of suspected illegal immigrants - issued prior to Operation Sindoor. The board said workers from West Bengal, mostly in low-income, informal sectors in these states, face systemic exclusion on linguistic and economic grounds, but did not explain why they still choose to work outside West Bengal. It alleged such detentions, without lawful procedures, violate Articles 14 & 15, erode dignity, and impede the right to livelihood.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Rebels Against The Raj: How Foreigners Defied Empire To Support India
Long before global solidarity became a buzzword, a handful of Westerners crossed continents to stand with India against British colonial rule. Rebels Against The Raj by historian Ramachandra Guha brought their stories to life, chronicling seven outsiders: four British, two American, and an Irish left their homelands to support India's fight for independence. "A foreigner deserves to be welcomed only when he mixes with the Indigenous people as sugar does with milk," said Mahatma Gandhi, as quoted in the 2022 book. Guha called them "rebels" and compared them to the International Brigade in the Spanish Civil War. Yet unlike soldiers, these travellers were inspired by Gandhi's philosophy of nonviolent satyagraha rather than armed revolt. The Seven Rebels Annie Besant The British social reformer became a leading figure in the Home Rule Movement, advocating for Indian self-governance. "Once she had chosen to become an Indian, she would be an Indian all the way through," Guha wrote in his book. Samuel Stokes A Quaker (a member of the Religious Society of Friends) from Philadelphia, Stokes moved to India, changed his name to Satyanand Stokes, converted to Hinduism, and became a social reformer. Before World War II, he challenged Gandhi's view on nonviolence: "Britain and her allies represent the earlier wave of imperialism as opposed to the new one that threatens the world... Nazis have shown themselves capable of the utmost ruthlessness." Guha wrote Gandhi did not "respond to what was perhaps the greater question raised by Stokes - the fundamental difference between German imperialism and British imperialism." BG Horniman An English journalist and editor of the Bombay Chronicle, Horniman's fearless reporting and support for Indian rights led to imprisonment and eventual expulsion from India. Philip Spratt A British socialist who co-founded India's Communist Party and was jailed for activism. Madeline Slade (Mira/Mira Behen) Daughter of a British admiral, she became Gandhi's close associate and disciple. Decades later, she advised Richard Attenborough on his Gandhi biopic, appearing in the film at Gandhi's side. She also played a role in the Salt March. Catherine Mary Heilemann (Sarala Behen) An Irish woman who worked alongside Gandhi, advancing social reforms and rural development. Ralph Richard Keithahn An American missionary who became a dedicated supporter of India's independence. Arriving in Madurai in 1925, he was inspired by Gandhi's principles of nonviolence and self-reliance, adopting Indian dress and khadi. Later, he embraced Indian spiritual traditions and lived in an ashram.
