Nattaphon gives security assurances
Gen Nattaphon said on Wednesday he is authorised to serve as acting defence minister under the law governing the Defence Ministry and insisted national security operations in all areas will proceed without disruption.
The defence minister's post, left vacant in the latest cabinet reshuffle, has sparked speculation it is being reserved for Gen Chalermpol Srisawat, a former senator and chief of the defence forces.
By law, Gen Chalermpol, like all former senators, cannot hold public office for at least two years after vacating his Senate seat. This period ends on Sept 30.
Regarding public concerns over Thai-Cambodian border tensions, Gen Nattaphon said the matter is being handled by the Thai-Cambodian Border Situation Administration Centre (TCBSAC) under a resolution passed by the National Security Council (NSC) on June 27.
The centre is implementing measures to manage the situation, he said, adding the overall situation along the border remains unchanged.
All necessary mechanisms are being employed to coordinate with Cambodia to resolve any disputes through bilateral frameworks, especially the General Border Committee (GBC), which is co-chaired by the defence ministries of both countries.
The GBC is responsible for discussing strategic directions and appropriate measures to enhance cooperation and maintain peace and order along the shared border. However, he said the Regional Border Committee, which operates at a regional military level, cannot fully address the current issues.
Gen Nattaphon said there has been progress as Cambodia is more open to engage in dialogue, but negotiations are ongoing and he could not disclose specific details.
He added Thailand remains firm in maintaining its current policy on border checkpoint operating hours.
On Cambodia's International Court of Justice petition over the disputed sites -- Ta Muen Thom, Ta Muen Toch, Ta Kwai, and the Emerald Triangle -- he said the centre is only responsible for managing the border situation and will not involve itself in any legal matters.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bangkok Post
6 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Thai government under pressure
The opposition is stepping up pressure on the government, with the People's Party calling for the appointment of an interim prime minister and dissolution of the House before the end of the year to prevent political deadlock. In a statement released on its official Facebook page on Thursday, the main opposition party outlined several conditions for it to support a new leader, if Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra is removed by the Constitutional Court over the leaked recording of her conversation with Cambodian Senate President Hun Sen about the ongoing border dispute. She is currently suspended from duty, pending the court's ruling. The party said the new prime minister must agree to dissolve parliament by the end of the year and commit to resolving the pressing political, economic and security challenges facing the country. Not only should the next government be legitimate in the eyes of the law and trusted by the public, but it must also be led by competent individuals, instead of being formed through political bargaining, the statement added. The party noted that, as the current parliament can't produce a government with these qualities, a fresh general election must be called in order to form a competent and legitimate administration. In the statement, the party called on acting prime minister Phumtham Wechayachai to use his authority to return power to the people. The party also reiterated that it will remain in the opposition until a new election is held, and that it won't join the government or accept any ministerial positions until its conditions are met. Before parliament is dissolved, the PP said a referendum on setting up a Constitution Drafting Assembly (CDA) to amend the charter must be held. At the same time, the interim government should make an effort to urgently de-escalate the ongoing border dispute with Cambodia and ensure the passage of essential economic stimulus measures to help the public deal with the cost-of-living crisis, it added. If the candidate fails to follow through, then the party and its 142 MPs will use all parliamentary mechanisms available to immediately bring down the government, it warned. The statement highlights the party's effort to strike a balance between preventing a constitutional deadlock and maintaining its role as a principled opposition. It also reflects growing pressure on the fragile coalition government amid rising calls for new elections and political reform. On Thursday, PP leader Natthaphong Ruengpanyawut met representatives from other opposition parties on the first day of the new parliamentary session. It was the first time he had welcomed Bhumjaithai Party leader Anutin Charnvirakul to the opposition in person. Mr Natthaphong said the discussion he had with other opposition members focused on ways to respond to the current political situation and the deepening crisis of confidence in the current government. The opposition unanimously agreed to push back against the government's heavily criticised casino-entertainment complex bill. They demanded that the government withdraw the bill and commit not to reintroduce it. Mr Natthaphong added that the bloc supports initiating a referendum to be organised to gauge public support for the establishment of the CDA. The process hinges on a pending Constitutional Court ruling regarding the amendment of Article 256, which would allow the CDA's creation. As for the no-confidence debate against the government proposed by Bhumjaithai, the decision will depend on the outcome of the Constitutional Court's ruling on Ms Paetongtarn's legal standing. Mr Anutin, meanwhile, clarified reports about him nominating himself as a prime minister candidate, calling them "a significant misunderstanding".
Bangkok Post
6 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Myanmar ramps up cooperation
CHIANG MAI: Thailand and Myanmar have agreed to strengthen cooperation on cross-border issues, including heavy metal contamination in the Kok and Sai rivers and the suppression of transnational scam operations. The pledge was made during the 37th Regional Border Committee (RBC) meeting held in Chiang Mai from July 2-4. The high-level talks focused on enhancing border security and bilateral development in a constructive and friendly atmosphere. Lt Gen Kittiphong Jaemsuwan, chief of Thailand's Third Army Region, said yesterday that the RBC serves as the primary platform for resolving long-term border challenges. Thai officials raised two key issues: the river contamination and cyber scams. He said contamination in the Kok and Sai rivers is primarily caused by unregulated gold mining near the border, where wastewater containing lead and arsenic is discharged into the waterways. This has adversely affected public health and biodiversity on both sides. Myanmar has agreed to further discuss the issue and work toward a joint solution based on the RBC's agreed framework. Both sides also committed to increasing cooperation on combating cross-border call-centre scams. Chiang Mai governor Nirat Pongsitthithavorn said the provincial administration has been actively addressing the contamination's impact on local residents. The province has conducted ongoing water-quality testing and has allowed residents to submit tap water samples for analysis. In coordination with national agencies, safe drinking water is also being distributed. He noted that while the Kok River currently supplies only limited water for agriculture, heavy metal levels have decreased and are now within safe limits. Authorities are continuing to explore alternative surface and groundwater sources to expand access to safe water. Separately, on Wednesday, the Joint Standing Committee on Commerce, Industry and Banking of the private sector from Upper Northern Region Groups 1 and 2 submitted a petition to its national chairman, urging action on the contamination of the Kok and Mekong rivers. The petition cited serious impacts across health, environmental, economic, and social dimensions, and called for the matter to be escalated to the Thai government, particularly for inspections of mines in cooperation with the Chinese Embassy.
Bangkok Post
7 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Thai politics back at the brink (again)
The Constitutional Court's suspension of Paetongtarn Shinawatra from the premiership is déjà vu, exposing a pattern of systematic manipulation and concoction of political outcomes. After so many dissolutions of leading political parties and repeated bans of elected representatives over two decades, it is time to call a spade a spade. Thailand is a faux democracy. Its core foundations constitute an autocratic regime that does not really care about the country's future and the collective will of its people. This is not to say that Ms Paetongtarn was not in the wrong. Her leaked audio clip with Cambodia's former Prime Minister and Senate President Hun Sen was damning and damaging, whereby she compromised her position and Thailand's national interest by catering to the Cambodian strongman in a misguided attempt to defuse border tensions between the two sides. But having a group of senators from a dubious chamber petition a nine-member Constitution Court to go after her is questionable in itself. The 200-member senate has been hounded by allegations of collusion and vote-rigging, in which the Bhumjaithai Party is accused of gaming and manipulation in the senatorial election in June last year, when the upper chamber was picked from internal nomination processes at local, provincial, and national levels. It must be noted that the Constitutional Court on 1 July dismissed a petition against the Bhumjaithai Party as well as poll staff in the controversial senate election. Although the court has dismissed a petition that called out the controversial senate, questions linger in the minds of many about the integrity of the upper chamber. If this judicial assertiveness takes place as a one-off or once in a while, then we could overlook and consider it as due process in a passable legal and constitutional system. But when political parties and prime ministers are suspended and kicked out after every election for 20 years, something is not right with the democracy. Ms Paetongtarn is the sixth of such suspensions, although her removal or acquittal is still pending. Preceding her as suspended prime ministers were Samak Sundaravej, Somchai Wongsawat, Yingluck Shinawatra, Gen Prayut Chan-o-cha, and Srettha Thavisin. All of them, except Gen Prayut, were members of the Shinawatra clan, headed by Thaksin Shinawatra. Except Gen Prayut, who was suspended but later allowed to continue in the premiership, all others were booted out by the court or a military coup. Gen Prayut himself led the coup in 2014. To be sure, this is not just about the Shinawatra clan and Mr Thaksin, who is fighting charges of royal defamation and criminal violation of his jail conditions after returning from 15 years of self-imposed exile. We tend to forget because memories are short around here due to the constant political drama that keeps unfolding. Controversial charges about minor and obscure media shareholdings also led to the dissolution and removal of the Future Forward Party and its leader, Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit, in November 2019. Future Forward's successor, the Move Forward Party, and its leader, Pita Limjaroenrat, faced a similar fate after becoming the largest winner in the May 2023 poll. True, Mr Thaksin's enemies have been going after him and his clan because he indelibly and unwittingly opened up the Thai political system by awakening the rural masses and because he engaged in conflicts of interest and corruption in the process. But the forces that can seize power, impose long bans on elected representatives, and get rid of political parties are focused on the threat of the day and of the era, not just the Shinawatras. Now, we should be wondering that putting Ms Paetongtarn in limbo, even while she continues as culture minister after a cabinet reshuffle that preceded her suspension, will create conditions of political intractability and policy paralysis to frustrate the Thai public into calling for an extra-parliamentary intervention to end the manufactured deadlock. We have seen this kind of drama before in 2005-06, 2008, and 2023-14, when street demonstrations paved the way for either a military coup or a judicial intervention to determine political outcomes. What we do know is that Thailand has regressed internationally and economically over the past two decades because of its political standstill and autocratic preferences. In the interim, Thailand's political environment will be precarious and volatile. Clearly, the so-called "super deal" that brought Mr Thaksin back from exile was believed to keep Move Forward out, not to move Thailand forward under a Shinawatra-led government. Otherwise, Mr Thaksin would not have been put on legal leashes early on, and Ms Paetongtarn would not have landed in the political deep end today. With the court's 7-2 suspension decision and 9-0 to accept the case, her political survival appears doubtful. Even if the court returns a favourable verdict, Ms Paetongtarn will be hard pressed to continue in office in the face of street protests led by a conservative coalition comprising her father's enemies, an opposition grilling in parliament by both Bhumjaithai and Move Forward's successor, the Prachachon (People's) Party, the economic doldrums, and souring public sentiment. Ms Paetongtarn may be seen as a spent force, and her political longevity in the remaining two years of the current parliamentary term looks unlikely. Given that Thailand will always have a national assembly in place, it is still useful to anticipate what type it will be. If the current assembly stays without Ms Paetongtarn because of her expulsion, then a new prime minister will be chosen from the pre-election party lists of nominees. Bhumjaithai's leader, Anutin Charnvirakul, would have a good shot despite his party holding just half of the strength of Pheu Thai's 140 MPs. Pheu Thai's last eligible candidate is Chaikasem Nitisiri. On the other hand, a newly elected assembly would require a new poll. Ms Paetongtarn cannot dissolve the lower house while under suspension, and it is unclear whether acting PM Phumtham Wechayachai can opt for a snap poll. An appointed assembly would normally follow a military takeover. As Thai politics becomes murkier and governance more unruly, the prolonged political vacuum and ineffectual government will likely stoke conservative calls for a military takeover to end the morass and volatility. The risk of such intervention has risen visibly in view of Ms Paetongtarn's suspension, coalition squabbling, government uncertainty, and policy weakness and inertia, including the tariff negotiations with President Donald Trump's trade team and Thailand's budget bill for the next fiscal year from Oct 1. In truth, Thailand finds itself in a messy situation under a fragile democratic system and an entrenched autocracy, not out of randomness and pure chance. Thitinan Pongsudhirak is professor at Chulalongkorn University's Faculty of Political Science and a senior fellow at its Institute of Security and International Studies in Bangkok.
