logo
NICE Approves Sparsentan for Kidney Disease Treatment

NICE Approves Sparsentan for Kidney Disease Treatment

Medscape28-05-2025
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence has recommended sparsentan (Filspari, Vifor Pharma) for treating primary immunoglobulin A nephropathy in adults.
The recommendation reverses NICE's February decision to reject NHS funding for the drug. The regulator had previously said available evidence did not demonstrate value for money.
The manufacturer provided additional analyses and agreed to a price discount, leading to the positive recommendation.
Clinical Benefits Demonstrated
Sparsentan reduces urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) more effectively than standard treatment. The drug may also better maintain kidney function, NICE said.
In its final draft guidance, the regulator recommended sparsentan for IgAN patients with a urine protein excretion of 1.0 g/day or more, or a UPCR of 0.75 g/g or higher.
Treatment should cease after 36 weeks if a patient's UPCR remains at or above 1.76 g/g and has not reduced by at least 20%.
Significant Patient Impact
IgAN affects more than 18,000 people in England. It ranks among the most common causes of chronic kidney disease and kidney failure.
Over 4200 people with chronic kidney disease could benefit from NICE's recommendation.
Standard care for IgAN includes angiotensin-2 receptor blockers such as irbesartan.
Mechanism of Action
Sparsentan works by blocking the receptors for two hormones —endothelin-1 and angiotensin II — that cause kidney damage. By blocking these receptors, the drug reduces the amount of proteinuria and slows down the progression of kidney damage.
Clinical trial evidence has shown that sparsentan reduces UPCR more than irbesartan. Evidence also suggests that sparsentan is better at maintaining kidney function than irbesartan, but this was uncertain, NICE explained.
PROTECT Study Results
The regulator's recommendation was informed by the outcome of the PROTECT study. The double-blind, randomised, active-controlled, phase 3 trial included patients aged 18 years or older with biopsy-proven primary IgAN and proteinuria of at least 1.0 g daily despite maximised renin-angiotensin system inhibition for a minimum of 12 weeks.
Patients were randomly assigned to either receive 400 mg of oral sparsentan or 300 mg of oral irbesartan, both taken once daily.
The sparsentan group showed slower rates of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline. At 36 weeks, sparsentan had significantly reduced proteinuria, a reduction that continued throughout the study.
At 110 weeks, proteinuria, as determined by the change from baseline in UPCR, was 40% lower in the sparsentan group compared with irbesartan patients.
The composite kidney failure endpoint was reached by 9% of patients in the sparsentan group compared with 13% of those in the irbesartan group.
The researchers concluded that treatment with sparsentan versus maximally titrated irbesartan in patients with IgAN resulted in significant reductions in proteinuria and preservation of kidney function.
Treatment Advantages
Sparsentan is taken as a once-daily tablet for long-term use. This differs from targeted-release budesonide, which is limited to 9 months' duration.
NICE said it expected the treatment to reduce NHS pressure by preventing or delaying progression to end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis or transplant.
Helen Knight, director of medicines evaluation at NICE, highlighted the limited treatment options available for the disease. She said that sparsentan offered long-term benefits to patients and 'could make a huge difference to people's lives by delaying kidney failure'.
Fiona Loud, policy director at Kidney Care UK, welcomed the guidance. She noted that IgAN typically affects younger patients, disrupting lives when people have young families or are starting careers.
'We're pleased that this new treatment for IgAN will now be an option for patients who need it,' Loud said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Britain caves in to Trump demands on iPhone security
Britain caves in to Trump demands on iPhone security

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Britain caves in to Trump demands on iPhone security

Yvette Cooper has dropped a controversial demand for a 'backdoor' into people's iPhones under pressure from the White House. Tulsi Gabbard, Donald Trump's director of national intelligence, said the UK had agreed to withdraw an order to Apple that it made earlier this year. It comes after Mr Trump and JD Vance, the vice-president, demanded that the Government drop its plans. The order required Apple to break the end-to-end encryption it uses to secure iPhone backups that include a person's photos and messages, potentially allowing security services access to the content of suspects' iPhones. Privacy campaigners had said the creation of a backdoor would have jeopardised millions of people's security. 'Over the past few months, I've been working closely with our partners in the UK, alongside @POTUS and @VP, to ensure Americans' private data remains private and our Constitutional rights and civil liberties are protected,' Ms Gabbard said on X. 'As a result, the UK has agreed to drop its mandate for Apple to provide a 'back door' that would have enabled access to the protected encrypted data of American citizens and encroached on our civil liberties.' The Home Office and Apple were contacted for comment. The Government order was the first known demand to break encryption under surveillance laws that have been dubbed a 'snooper's charter'. Ministers have never confirmed the existence of a so-called technical capability notice, but government lawyers appeared in a secret court hearing in March after Apple challenged the order. Mr Trump had criticised the Government over the matter, saying it was like 'something that you hear about with China'. Apple removed the 'advanced data protection' system for British users in February but was still subject to the Home Office order, which applies worldwide, and had appealed to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal. In a blow to the Government, the panel ruled that the case would not have blanket secrecy after a legal challenge from media organisations including The Telegraph. A government spokesman said: 'We have long had joint security and intelligence arrangements with the US to tackle the most serious threats such as terrorism and child sexual abuse, including the role played by fast-moving technology in enabling those threats. 'Those arrangements have long contained safeguards to protect privacy and sovereignty: for example the Data Access Agreement includes critical safeguards to prevent the UK and US from targeting the data of each other's citizens.'We will continue to build on those arrangements and we will also continue to maintain a strong security framework to ensure that we can continue to pursue terrorists and serious criminals operating in the UK. We will always take all actions necessary at the domestic level to keep UK citizens safe.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Solve the daily Crossword

What to Know About the Protests Outside U.K. Hotels Housing Asylum Seekers
What to Know About the Protests Outside U.K. Hotels Housing Asylum Seekers

New York Times

time2 hours ago

  • New York Times

What to Know About the Protests Outside U.K. Hotels Housing Asylum Seekers

On Tuesday, a judge in England is set to decide whether to block a hotel in Epping, northeast of London, from being used as accommodation for asylum seekers. In recent weeks, the hotel, The Bell, had become the center of repeated protests, which have at times become violent, after an asylum seeker staying there was charged last month with sexually assaulting a teenage girl, which he denies. The district council applied for an injunction barring the hotel from housing asylum seekers, stating that doing so violates planning rules and 'poses a clear risk of further escalating community tensions already at a high, and the risk of irreparable harm to the local community.' If the council's case is successful, it may provide a template for other places in Britain seeking to prevent hotels from being used as accommodation for asylum seekers. But how did this issue begin, and why does it pose such a challenge to the government? Why are asylum seekers being housed in hotels? Under British law, the government has a longstanding legal obligation to provide accommodation for asylum seekers who would otherwise be homeless while their applications are being considered. Most asylum seekers have been barred from working in Britain since the early 2000s, when the Labour government at the time wanted to prevent people from using the asylum system to gain access to work opportunities in Britain. As a result, unless asylum seekers have family or friends willing to provide accommodation, or significant funds, the government must give them accommodation. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

UK drops demand for backdoor into Apple encryption
UK drops demand for backdoor into Apple encryption

The Verge

time2 hours ago

  • The Verge

UK drops demand for backdoor into Apple encryption

The United Kingdom will no longer force Apple to provide backdoor access to secure user data protected by the company's iCloud encryption service, according to US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. 'Over the past few months, I've been working closely with our partners in the UK, alongside @POTUS and @VP, to ensure Americans' private data remains private and our Constitutional rights and civil liberties are protected,' Gabbard posted to X on Monday. 'As a result, the UK has agreed to drop its mandate for Apple to provide a 'back door' that would have enabled access to the protected encrypted data of American citizens and encroached on our civil liberties.' This announcement follows the UK issuing a secret order in January this year, demanding Apple provide it with backdoor access to encrypted files uploaded by users worldwide. In response, Apple pulled its Advanced Data Protection (ADP) encrypted iCloud storage offering from the UK and challenged the order, winning the right to publicly discuss the case in April. Earlier this year, US officials started examining whether the UK order had violated the bilateral CLOUD Act agreement, which bars the UK and US from issuing demands for each other's data. This pressure from the US sparked reports last month that Britain would walk back the demands it issued to Apple, with one unnamed UK official telling the Financial Times that the UK 'had its back against the wall,' and was looking for a way out. While it's unclear if the UK would negotiate new terms with Apple that avoid implicating the data of US citizens, an unnamed US official told The Financial Times that such negotiations would not be faithful to the new agreement. With the order now reportedly removed, it's unclear if Apple will restore access to its ADP service in the UK. We have reached out to Apple for comment. The UK Home Office has refused to comment on the situation. Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Jess Weatherbed Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Apple Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All News Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Policy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Security Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store