
NICE Approves Sparsentan for Kidney Disease Treatment
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence has recommended sparsentan (Filspari, Vifor Pharma) for treating primary immunoglobulin A nephropathy in adults.
The recommendation reverses NICE's February decision to reject NHS funding for the drug. The regulator had previously said available evidence did not demonstrate value for money.
The manufacturer provided additional analyses and agreed to a price discount, leading to the positive recommendation.
Clinical Benefits Demonstrated
Sparsentan reduces urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) more effectively than standard treatment. The drug may also better maintain kidney function, NICE said.
In its final draft guidance, the regulator recommended sparsentan for IgAN patients with a urine protein excretion of 1.0 g/day or more, or a UPCR of 0.75 g/g or higher.
Treatment should cease after 36 weeks if a patient's UPCR remains at or above 1.76 g/g and has not reduced by at least 20%.
Significant Patient Impact
IgAN affects more than 18,000 people in England. It ranks among the most common causes of chronic kidney disease and kidney failure.
Over 4200 people with chronic kidney disease could benefit from NICE's recommendation.
Standard care for IgAN includes angiotensin-2 receptor blockers such as irbesartan.
Mechanism of Action
Sparsentan works by blocking the receptors for two hormones —endothelin-1 and angiotensin II — that cause kidney damage. By blocking these receptors, the drug reduces the amount of proteinuria and slows down the progression of kidney damage.
Clinical trial evidence has shown that sparsentan reduces UPCR more than irbesartan. Evidence also suggests that sparsentan is better at maintaining kidney function than irbesartan, but this was uncertain, NICE explained.
PROTECT Study Results
The regulator's recommendation was informed by the outcome of the PROTECT study. The double-blind, randomised, active-controlled, phase 3 trial included patients aged 18 years or older with biopsy-proven primary IgAN and proteinuria of at least 1.0 g daily despite maximised renin-angiotensin system inhibition for a minimum of 12 weeks.
Patients were randomly assigned to either receive 400 mg of oral sparsentan or 300 mg of oral irbesartan, both taken once daily.
The sparsentan group showed slower rates of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline. At 36 weeks, sparsentan had significantly reduced proteinuria, a reduction that continued throughout the study.
At 110 weeks, proteinuria, as determined by the change from baseline in UPCR, was 40% lower in the sparsentan group compared with irbesartan patients.
The composite kidney failure endpoint was reached by 9% of patients in the sparsentan group compared with 13% of those in the irbesartan group.
The researchers concluded that treatment with sparsentan versus maximally titrated irbesartan in patients with IgAN resulted in significant reductions in proteinuria and preservation of kidney function.
Treatment Advantages
Sparsentan is taken as a once-daily tablet for long-term use. This differs from targeted-release budesonide, which is limited to 9 months' duration.
NICE said it expected the treatment to reduce NHS pressure by preventing or delaying progression to end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis or transplant.
Helen Knight, director of medicines evaluation at NICE, highlighted the limited treatment options available for the disease. She said that sparsentan offered long-term benefits to patients and 'could make a huge difference to people's lives by delaying kidney failure'.
Fiona Loud, policy director at Kidney Care UK, welcomed the guidance. She noted that IgAN typically affects younger patients, disrupting lives when people have young families or are starting careers.
'We're pleased that this new treatment for IgAN will now be an option for patients who need it,' Loud said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The NHS truths the Left don't want you to hear
Until very recently, Health Secretary Wes Streeting tried to market himself as a radical health reformer, who is not afraid to poke sacred cows. While his reform-minded rhetoric always remained at a highly-abstract and general level, Streeting deserved some credit for it, because he did not have to do this. He had the courage to say things which he knew would rub some people up the wrong way, not least the Corbynite wing of his own party. Sadly, that brief period of NHS candour is now officially over. Streeting, the self-styled reformer, is no more. He and his colleagues have fully retreated into their comfort zone. During the recent local election campaign, Labour distributed a leaflet that showed a mock medical bill, and a doctor holding up a credit card reader. The message was clear: vote for us, because this is what the other lot want to do to you. On Twitter/X, Labour are now frequently posting dire warnings about the alleged evils of insurance-based healthcare systems. This is exactly that old-school NHS cultism which Streeting used to disavow until five minutes ago. It may work for him. The NHS may be falling apart, but the cult around is still going strong. In the eyes of its keenest defenders, the NHS can do no wrong. They have quietly dropped the old cliché about the NHS being 'the envy of the word', and replaced it with a slightly more subtle version, which goes something like this: Once upon a time, the NHS used to be the best healthcare system in the world. But then, from 2010 on, it was systematically defunded. It was deliberately run into the ground, so that it can be privatised more easily. A privatised system would mean luxury healthcare for the rich, and Wild West medicine for the poor. None of these claims are true. Let's have a look at each of them in turn. The NHS was never the best healthcare system in the world. The idea that it ever was can be traced back to a ranking compiled by the Commonwealth Fund, an American healthcare think tank, which relies on a very unusual methodology, in which medical outcomes only account for a fifth of the total score. This matters, because on medical outcomes, the NHS has always been one of the worst-performing healthcare systems in the developed world – as even the Commonwealth Fund study shows. There is no turning point after which the NHS's performance suddenly deteriorated. It was just never good in the first place. At the end of the 2010s, age-adjusted real NHS spending per capita was only marginally higher than it had been in the beginning of the decade. Put differently, the NHS budget only just about kept pace with population growth, population ageing, and inflation. This clearly constituted a slowdown in spending increases compared to the previous decade. But it does not constitute a 'defunding'. In any case: that period of relative spending restraint is already over again. The NHS budget was given a massive boost during the pandemic, which has only been partially reversed. Public healthcare spending in the UK stands at just under 9% of GDP: one of the highest levels in the world. Conspiracy theories about secret plans to privatise the NHS have been around for decades. I wrote a report on this three years ago, for which I went through the news archives, and I found warnings about the NHS's imminent demise from every year since 1980. But somehow, it never happens. The NHS remains an unusually state-centred system. Most healthcare systems, including tax-funded ones, use a mix of public, private for-profit and private non-profit providers. There are no plans – secret or otherwise – to privatise the NHS. More's the pity. Because there is nothing wrong with private healthcare systems. There are good examples of private, insurance-based healthcare systems, most notably in the Netherlands and Switzerland, which are nothing like the dreaded system of the US. These systems cover everybody: poor people are exempt from health insurance premiums and co-payments. Under these systems, rich and poor alike get faster access to medical treatment, and better medical outcomes, than they would on the NHS. The only thing these people don't get is a naff feel-good mythology around their health systems. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Otsuka Sibeprenlimab Phase 3 Data Show a Statistically Significant and Clinically Meaningful Proteinuria Reduction for the Treatment of Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy (IgAN)
In the Phase 3 VISIONARY study, sibeprenlimab achieved a statistically significant and clinically meaningful 51.2% (P<0.0001) reduction in proteinuria at nine months of treatment when compared to placebo The safety profile of sibeprenlimab was favorable and consistent with previously reported data Immunoglobulin A nephropathy is a progressive, immune-mediated, chronic kidney disease that can lead to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) over the lifetime of most patients under current optimized standard care Sibeprenlimab filed its Biologics License Application (BLA) and received Priority Review designation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with a target action date of November 28th, 2025 PRINCETON, N.J. & TOKYO, June 06, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. and Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Co. Ltd. (Otsuka) today presented results from a pre-specified interim analysis of the Phase 3 VISIONARY study (NCT05248646) evaluating sibeprenlimab, for the treatment of immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) in adults. Patients treated with sibeprenlimab achieved a 51.2% (P<0.0001) reduction in proteinuria (as measured by 24-hour uPCR [urine protein-to-creatinine ratio]) at nine months of treatment when compared to placebo1. The data were presented during a late-breaking clinical trials session at the European Renal Association (ERA) Congress in Vienna, Austria. The study, the largest Phase 3 IgAN trial conducted to date, also showed the safety profile of sibeprenlimab was favorable and consistent with previously reported data1. Specifically, 76.3% of patients treated with sibeprenlimab experienced any Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) versus 84.5% in the placebo group.1 Patients who experienced a serious TEAE were 3.9% treated with sibeprenlimab compared to 5.4% treated with placebo. Sibeprenlimab received Priority Review designation from the FDA last month following its BLA filing in March. Proteinuria reduction is a recognized surrogate marker correlating with delaying progression to kidney failure and has been used as an endpoint in IgAN clinical trials to support accelerated regulatory approvals2. Sibeprenlimab is an investigational monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits the activity of APRIL (A PRoliferation-Inducing Ligand) in adults with IgAN. APRIL plays a key role in the 4-hit process of IgAN pathogenesis and is an important initiating and sustaining factor in IgAN progression by promoting the production of pathogenic Gd-IgA1 and immune complex formation3,4,5,6. By selectively binding and inhibiting APRIL, sibeprenlimab reduces the amount of immunoglobulin A (IgA) and Gd-IgA1 levels1. Lower levels of Gd-IgA1 in people with IgAN provide less substrate for immune complex formation7. Sibeprenlimab is administered in a single-dose prefilled syringe for subcutaneous injection every four weeks intended for self-administration or administration by caregiver, providing patients the option of convenience at home. "We are confident about the potential of sibeprenlimab and are grateful to the patients who are helping to further the science by participating in these important trials," said John Kraus, M.D., Ph.D., executive vice president and chief medical officer, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. "Proteinuria control is an important independent predictor for long-term prognosis, and this interim data reinforces our belief that selectively targeting APRIL has the potential to be an effective and safe approach for this progressive and irreversible kidney disease." The VISIONARY study continues in a blinded manner to evaluate the change in kidney function over 24 months as measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and is expected to be completed in early 2026. Further prespecified and exploratory analyses of the data will be conducted to determine the full potential of sibeprenlimab for the treatment of IgAN1. "The VISIONARY Phase 3 interim analysis shows a robust proteinuria reduction of 51.2% in the group treated with sibeprenlimab relative to placebo. These results affirm our belief in the efficacy of sibeprenlimab in the largest Phase 3 IgAN trial to date. The study enrolled a diverse patient population reflective of the disease epidemiology," said Dr. Dana Rizk, professor of medicine in the division of nephrology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. "The safety data emerging from VISIONARY is reassuring and adds to our existing knowledge about sibeprenlimab's safety profile from prior programs. This is very exciting news for patients and adds a therapeutic option with a novel mechanism of action potentially targeting the immunologic pathogenesis of IgAN." About the VISIONARY Study The VISIONARY study is the largest IgAN trial to date, and is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial consisting of approximately 510 adult patients with IgAN who were receiving standard-of-care therapy (defined as maximally tolerated ACE inhibitor or ARB +/- SGLT2 inhibitor), designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sibeprenlimab 400 mg administered subcutaneously every four weeks, compared to placebo1. The primary efficacy endpoint is to evaluate the change in 24-hour uPCR at 9 months compared with baseline. The secondary endpoint is to evaluate the annualized slope of eGFR estimated over ~24 months1. About Sibeprenlimab Sibeprenlimab (formerly VIS649) was designed and engineered by Visterra, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Otsuka. Pre-clinical and early-stage trials of sibeprenlimab were also conducted by Visterra. Sibeprenlimab is an investigational monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to and inhibits the activity of APRIL and plays a key role in the 4-hit process. By selectively binding and inhibiting APRIL, sibeprenlimab reduces the amount of immunoglobulin A (IgA) and Gd-IgA1 levels1. Lower levels of Gd-IgA1 in people with IgAN provide less substrate for immune complex formation7. Decreased immune complex formation should result in diminished deposition in the kidney, and reduced proteinuria and kidney inflammation8. By reducing the production of Gd-IgA1, sibeprenlimab may help slow kidney damage and progression toward ESKD3,4,5,6. By inhibiting APRIL, sibeprenlimab may help address one of the IgAN-specific drivers for nephron loss. About IgAN and APRIL IgAN is a progressive, immune-mediated, chronic kidney disease that typically manifests in adults aged 20-40 years and leads to ESKD over the lifetime of most patients9,10,11. IgAN is characterized by the accumulation of Gd-IgA1 complexes in the kidneys. IgAN can lead to progressive loss of kidney function and, eventually, ESKD, imposing a significant burden on patients10. Despite supportive care, there is an unmet need for treatments that address the root causes of the condition. Continued research in the disease remains crucial to uncovering opportunities for advancement in our understanding and treatment of patients 5. APRIL, a cytokine in the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family, is integral to the pathogenesis and progression of IgAN. It promotes the survival and class switching of B cells to produce IgA, particularly the pathogenic galactose-deficient IgA1 (Gd-IgA1) that forms immune complexes in the kidneys5. About Otsuka Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. is a global healthcare company with the corporate philosophy: Otsuka–people creating new products for better health worldwide. Otsuka researches, develops, manufactures, and markets innovative products, with a focus on pharmaceutical products to meet unmet medical needs and nutraceutical products for the maintenance of everyday health. In pharmaceuticals, Otsuka is a leader in the challenging areas of mental, renal, and cardiovascular health and has additional research programs in oncology and on several under-addressed diseases including tuberculosis, a significant global public health issue. These commitments illustrate how Otsuka is a "big venture" company at heart, applying a youthful spirit of creativity in everything it does. Otsuka established a presence in the U.S. in 1973 and today its U.S. affiliates include Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. (OPDC) and Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. (OAPI). These two companies' 2,250 employees in the U.S. develop and commercialize medicines in the areas of mental health and nephrology, using cutting-edge technology to address unmet healthcare needs. OPDC and OAPI are indirect subsidiaries of Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., which is a subsidiary of Otsuka Holdings Co., Ltd. headquartered in Tokyo, Japan. The Otsuka group of companies employed 35,340 people worldwide and had consolidated sales of approximately USD 14.7 billion in 2024. All Otsuka stories start by taking the road less traveled. Learn more about Otsuka in the U.S. at and connect with us on LinkedIn and Twitter at @OtsukaUS. Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.'s global website is accessible at About Visterra Visterra is a biologics research and early-stage clinical development biotechnology company committed to developing innovative antibody-based therapies for the treatment of patients with immune-mediated kidney diseases and other hard-to-treat diseases. Its proprietary Hierotope® platform enables the design and engineering of precision biologics-based product candidates that specifically bind to, and modulate, key disease targets that are not adequately addressed by traditional therapeutic approaches. The platform also includes Fc engineering capabilities for half-life extension, bispecific antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). Visterra's pipeline includes programs targeting kidney diseases, immunologically-driven diseases and infectious diseases. Visterra is an indirect subsidiary of Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. For more information, visit References Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Study: Phase 3 Trial of Sibeprenlimab in Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy (IgAN). Thompson A, Carroll K, Inker LA, et al. Proteinuria Reduction as a Surrogate End Pointin Trials of IgA Nephropathy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;14(3): Mathur M, Barratt J, Suzuki Y, et al. Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of VIS649 (Sibeprenlimab), an APRIL-Neutralizing IgG2 Monoclonal Antibody, in Healthy Volunteers. Kidney Int Rep. 2022;7(5):993-1003. Chang S, Li XK. The Role of Immune Modulation in Pathogenesis of IgA Nephropathy ( Cheung CK, Barratt J, Liew A, Zhang H, Tesar V, Lafayette R. The role of BAFF and April in IGA nephropathy: Pathogenic mechanisms and targeted therapies. Frontiers in nephrology. February 1, 2024. Mathur M, Barratt J, Chacko B, et al. A Phase 2 Trial of Sibeprenlimab in Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy Patients. NEJM. 2023 Gharavi, Ali G, et al. "Aberrant Iga1 Glycosylation Is Inherited in Familial and Sporadic IGA Nephropathy." Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN, U.S. National Library of Medicine, May 2008, Kant, Sam, et al. "Advances in Understanding of Pathogenesis and Treatment of Immune-Mediated Kidney Disease: A Review - American Journal of Kidney Diseases." American Journal of Kidney Diseases, Apr. 2022, Pitcher, D. Braddon, et. al Long-term outcomes in IGA nephropathy. Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN. Lai K. Iga nephropathy. Nature reviews. Disease primers. 2016 Cheung, Chee Kay & Boyd, JKF & Feehally, J.. (2012). Evaluation and management of IgA nephropathy. Clinical Medicine. 12. s27-s30. 10.7861/clinmedicine.12-6-s27. View source version on Contacts Contacts for Media Otsuka in the U.S. Robert MurphyCorporate CommunicationsOtsuka America Pharmaceutical, +1 609 249 7262 Otsuka in Japan Jeffrey GilbertLeader, Pharmaceutical PROtsuka Pharmaceutical Co., +81 3 6361 7379


Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
U.K. to cut foreign workers, the ‘backbone' of British nursing homes
LONDON — The 23-year-old Nigerian man handed the 78-year-old British woman her noon pill and, on a sunny June day, sat down for a little chat amid the family photos lining her wall. 'Will you miss me if I leave?' Jeremiah Akindotun asked with a smile. 'Oh, I think it's too sad Jerry,' said Suad Lawy, sitting back in her chair. 'You get so attached. What's going to happen to our carers?' Akindotun is a health assistant at Hammerson House, a 116-room nursing home in north London where 58 percent of the clinical staff come from 49 different countries. Across the United Kingdom, foreign workers commonly provide intimate care to elderly Brits, with nearly a third of care staff coming from overseas. But maybe not for long. The British government, struggling to address immigration tensions, announced last month that it was ending the special overseas recruitment program that has been a pipeline for care workers in recent years. Officials said the move was necessary to make the care system less dependent on foreign labor and to root out fraud and exploitation in the fast-track care worker visa program, which was initiated five years ago to ease a staffing crisis in the care industry, one of Britain's biggest employment sectors. The plan funneled more than 220,000 workers into facilities around the country, according to a government-sponsored database, but it also faced problems. Most workers landed with legitimate companies, but thousands were scammed in their home countries by fake employment brokers. Others arrived only to be overworked and underpaid, even sexually exploited, under threats of having their visas canceled. Reputable nursing home administrators, however, said canceling the program outright is a body blow to their efforts to fill more than 131,000 open positions in a system that is creaking under the weight of an aging population. Nursing home care is provided by private companies in the U.K. but largely financed by cash-strapped local governments. British citizens show little interest in the jobs, which are considered low pay, low status and demanding, providers say. 'I haven't had a White British applicant in a year,' said Jenny Pattinson, CEO of the nonprofit that runs Hammerson House and another London care home. Underlying all of this is a debate about immigration that continues to convulse Britain, like most Western nations. A decade after its Brexit vote to leave the European Union, the U.K. is still arguing with itself about how multicultural and globally integrated it wants to be, questions that continue to drive politics. The Labour government, generally considered immigration-friendly, announced the end of the care worker visa program less than two weeks after being crushed in English regional elections by Reform UK, a right-wing, populist party started by anti-immigration activist and Brexit-champion Nigel Farage. Reform UK defeated hundreds of Labour and Conservative incumbents and took control of 10 local councils. Critics say Prime Minister Keir Starmer is trying to dent Reform UK's appeal by making his own rightward pivot on immigration. Cutting the care-worker visa was part of a broader package of immigration changes, including doubling the number of years required for visa holders to become permanent residents and raising the English-language requirement for skilled workers. In announcing the measures, Starmer sparked a backlash within his own party by warning that Britain risked becoming 'an island of strangers,' a phrase in which some found echoes of xenophobic rhetoric. In 1968, Enoch Powell was kicked out of the Tory shadow cabinet after saying in his famous 'rivers of blood' speech that White Britons 'found themselves made strangers in their own country.' Starmer rejected the comparison in an interview with the Guardian newspaper, saying that 'migrants make a massive contribution to the UK, and I would never denigrate that.' Immigration has bedeviled both Labour and Conservative prime ministers for years. Both legal immigrants and asylum seekers arriving on small boats surged to a peak of 906,000 by June 2023. The numbers are falling as restrictions imposed by the then Tory government and the new Labour government kick in, with net migration into the country down to 431,000 in measures released in May. But the issue remains divisive as a record 11,074 people arrived in small boats in the first four months of this year. Care home operators accused Starmer of going after their workers because they are easier migrants to block than those crossing the English Channel without permission. 'In my humble opinion, this is a knee-jerk reaction to the surge in votes for Reform,' Pattinson said. 'The government is saying 'Right, we've got to do something about immigration. Where is the largest body of workers coming from abroad? It's the care sector.' There aren't many aspects of British life in which immigration plays a larger, or more emotional, role than in health and social care. Migrants from the British commonwealth, and particularly the postwar 'Windrush' generation of workers recruited from the Caribbean, fill the ranks of beloved National Health Service. Nurses of colors danced and flew through the air as part of a tribute to the NHS in the Opening Ceremonies of the 2012 London Olympics. Lawy, a former secondary schoolteacher from Hampshire, a county that is 90 percent White, who has formed bonds with her Nigerian, South Asian and Filipino caregivers, said she had little experience with multiculturalism before moving to Hammerson House following a stroke. 'It's really opened my mind,' she said. 'My sister used to say she enjoyed living in a diverse community and I really didn't know what she meant,' Lawry said. 'Now I do.' Hammerson House is a Jewish care home. But Ayesha Khan, a Muslim physical therapist from Pakistan who arrived through the visa program last year, said she has felt welcome and useful. Managers told her to step away for prayers whenever she needed to and the only comment she has gotten about her hijab was from a questioner making sure she was not wearing it against her will. 'It's not just a home for residents here, it's a home for me,' Khan said. These ties make the new restrictions even more explosive, experts said, even as they acknowledged that there was a need for some reform of the abuse-prone visa program. 'It's a sacred cow, immigration is the backbone of the U.K. care system,' said Rob McNeil of Oxford University's Migration Observatory. 'There is a snap response, 'Oh my god, how terrible.' But if they don't resolve things at a structural level there will be consistent problems.' The program started in 2020 under Prime Minister Boris Johnson to address a drain of European workers that followed the Brexit vote. A lack of oversight, critics charge, allowed shady enterprises and outright fraudsters to operate alongside legitimate care providers. In a crackdown last year, government investigators revoked the licenses of 470 sponsoring organizations, leaving 39,000 guest workers stranded without jobs. 'A third of our calls now come from care workers,' said Olivia Vicol, head of Work Rights Centre, a legal advocacy group. Nursing home operators say the government has itself to blame for letting the bad actors flourish and that the staffing crisis will only get worse as a result of cutting the whole program without beefing up training, incentives and pay for British citizen to take the jobs. That could create even more political backlash for the government. 'This program was poorly designed at the outset and it's kind of obvious lever to pull when net migration numbers go up,' said Robert Ford, political science professor at the University of Manchester. 'But there will be an uproar if there is major crisis in care homes.' The government said it was immediately suspending new overseas recruitment through the program, but that current visa holders could apply for renewals until 2028. The number of family members workers can bring was cut, and they will now be required to stay 10 years for a sponsoring facility, instead of five, before being free to explore other work. For Akindotun, the health assistant, the changes put his whole future in doubt. With a master's degree in clinical psychology, he and his wife and toddler daughter arrived in the U.K. two years ago with hope that he could eventually work as a therapist. His training has been invaluable in dealing with Hammerson's elderly, infirm residents, he said. 'I have much to give here,' he said before sitting down with a 91-year-old who asks him to draw pictures for her. 'It's very demoralizing to feel that the government don't want us.'