logo
These Foods May Lower Your Risk of 6 Cancers, New Study Suggests

These Foods May Lower Your Risk of 6 Cancers, New Study Suggests

Yahoo4 days ago
Reviewed by Dietitian Mandy Enright, M.S., RDN, RYTKey Points
A new study links dairy to lower risks of heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and certain cancers.
The study links both high-fat and low-fat dairy to better heart health.
Fermented dairy, like yogurt and kefir, offered the most health benefits to those who ate them regularly.Dairy is a key part of dietary guidelines in many countries, and for good reason! It's packed with high-quality protein, essential minerals like calcium and magnesium and vitamins such as B12 and A, making it a nutritional powerhouse.
Most dietary guidelines recommend two to three servings of dairy daily to keep our bodies fueled and healthy. Yet, many of us, at least in the United States, don't quite hit that target. Research shows that dairy can help lower the risk of certain chronic diseases, and certain options can support gut health too.
A group of researchers aimed to explore the connections between dairy consumption and various health outcomes in adults by conducting a scoping review. This included looking at how dairy might affect heart health, different types of cancer, body composition, mortality, and other areas like type 2 diabetes, bone and joint health, and brain function. While there are plenty of systematic reviews on dairy and health, this scoping review looked at all types of dairy and their effects across a wide range of health outcomes, and the results were published in the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.
How Was This Study Conducted?
To explore how dairy consumption affects health, researchers conducted a detailed review of existing studies. An expert designed the search strategy, focusing on two main themes: dairy consumption and its impact on health.
The team used a pre-tested template to pull key information from the studies, such as the number of participants, study design, health outcomes and whether the results showed dairy having a positive, negative or neutral effect. Researchers identified 29 health outcomes related to diet, which were grouped into five main categories:
Heart and Blood Vessel Health: This includes conditions like heart disease, strokes (all types), high blood pressure and other cardiovascular issues.
Cancer: Various types of cancer were linked to diet, such as breast, colorectal, lung, stomach and prostate cancer, among others.
Body Weight and Composition: This covers issues like being overweight, obesity and weight gain.
Mortality: This includes overall death rates and deaths specifically related to heart and blood vessel diseases.
Other Issues: These include type 2 diabetes, bone health, joint problems (like arthritis) and cognitive health (brain function).
Some reports covered multiple health outcomes, so the total number of connections between diet and health is higher than the number of studies. Researchers then looked at how eating different types of dairy, like milk, cheese, yogurt and fermented dairy (e.g., yogurt, kefir), affects health. They analyzed 281 associations between dairy and health outcomes, such as heart health, cancer, body weight and diabetes.
Ultimately, this scoping review carefully mapped out the existing evidence on dairy consumption and its effects on a wide range of health outcomes, highlighting areas where more research is needed.
What Did The Study Find?
The study found interesting associations between consuming certain types of dairy and certain outcomes. But when it came to eating dairy of any kind, most studies found that eating any dairy reduced the risk of health concerns like heart disease, certain cancers (e.g., bladder, breast, colorectal), type 2 diabetes and obesity. Five studies linked dairy to higher risks of cancers like liver, ovarian, and prostate cancer.
When the researchers drilled down to evaluate how specific types of dairy are linked to certain outcomes, they found:
Milk
Fifty-one studies looked into milk specifically, and from those studies and others, the researchers noted 13 positive associations between milk consumption and a reduced risk of certain health issues, including lower chances of developing oral, bladder and colorectal cancers. However, the majority of studies found no significant effect of milk on health outcomes.
Cheese
Cheese consumption showed promising results in 20 studies, many of which found it reduced the risk of health concerns like heart disease and even some cancers, including breast and colorectal cancer. On the other hand, 25 studies reported no effect of cheese on health outcomes. Only two studies linked cheese to an increased risk, specifically the risk of prostate cancer.
Yogurt
Yogurt stood out as particularly beneficial, with 25 studies showing it reduced the risk of health issues such as heart disease, type 2 diabetes and cancers like bladder, breast and colorectal cancer. But it's important to note that another 25 studies found no effect of yogurt on health outcomes. Importantly, none of the studies linked yogurt consumption to an increased risk of any health problems.
Fermented Dairy
Fermented dairy products showed the most consistent benefits, and 13 studies delved specifically into fermented dairy. Across all studies, researchers noted that 13 findings supported a relationship between fermented dairy and a reduced risk of negative health outcomes, including heart disease, stroke and cancers like bladder and breast cancer. Additionally, four studies reported no effect, while only one study linked fermented dairy to an increased risk.
High vs. Low-Fat Dairy
Most of the 27 studies that looked at high vs. low fat dairy and certain outcomes focused on dairy as a whole, rather than just milk, and primarily examined how it affects heart health. They also explored links between dairy fat content and other health outcomes, such as certain cancers (breast, colorectal, ovarian and prostate), body weight, diabetes and mortality. And most studies found no difference in health risks between high-fat and low-fat dairy. In fact, both full-fat and reduced-fat dairy were often linked to better heart health. Only two studies found that full-fat milk was associated with a higher risk of heart problems. As for cancer, most studies found that full-fat dairy either had no effect or was linked to a lower risk of certain cancers.
While this study provides valuable insights into the relationship between dairy consumption and health, it does have some limitations. First, it relies on existing studies, which means the quality and design of those studies can affect the findings. For example, some studies may not account for other factors like overall diet, lifestyle or genetics that could influence health outcomes. Additionally, the results are based on associations, not cause-and-effect relationships, so we can't say for sure that dairy directly causes the observed benefits or risks.
How Does This Apply to Real Life?
This research highlights that including dairy in your diet can be a smart choice for supporting overall health. For example, yogurt and fermented dairy products consistently show benefits for heart health, type 2 diabetes and even reducing the risk of certain cancers.
To include more dairy, try swapping your usual snack for a yogurt, adding milk to your morning coffee or cereal, or sprinkling some cheese on your salad or pasta. Even small changes like these can help you get closer to the recommended two or three servings of dairy a day.
That said, it's important to remember that your overall diet matters too; what you eat with your dairy is an important detail to focus on. For example, a yogurt parfait with fresh berries and nuts makes for a balanced snack, and a veggie-packed omelet with a sprinkle of cheese can be a nutritious meal. On the flip side, pairing dairy with high-sugar or heavily processed foods might offset some of its health benefits. The key is to think of dairy as part of a bigger picture for a well-rounded, balanced diet that supports your health in the long run.
Our Expert Take
This scoping review published in the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition sheds light on the relationship between dairy consumption and health, offering a broad overview of how different types of dairy may impact various health outcomes. The study found that dairy, particularly yogurt and fermented products, is often associated with reduced risks of heart disease, type 2 diabetes and certain cancers. Overall though, the overall findings suggest that dairy can play a positive role in a balanced diet.
For everyday life, this means that incorporating dairy into your diet can be a practical way to support your health, but it's essential to do so thoughtfully. Focus on nutrient-rich options like yogurt, cheese and milk, and pair them with nutritious foods like fruits, vegetables and whole grains to support overall health.
Read the original article on EATINGWELL
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

From Young to Senior: How to Support Rats and Mice Through All Life Stages
From Young to Senior: How to Support Rats and Mice Through All Life Stages

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

From Young to Senior: How to Support Rats and Mice Through All Life Stages

Whether lively young animals or calm seniors, the lives of rats and mice unfold in fast-forward. Because their lifespan is only a few years, it's important for owners to understand the different life stages. Those who want to optimally support their pets should know how behavior and needs change with age—and what matters for mice and rats in each life phase, according to an expert. Short Lifespan with Many Developmental Stages The lifespan of fancy mice is usually between one and a half to two years. Some individuals can live up to four years. Rats generally live a bit longer—between two and three years. Since their youth lasts only a few weeks, these animals make significant developmental strides quickly. Juvenile Phase—Discover, Learn, Grow 'The first weeks of life for rats and mice are rapid,' explains Dr. Barbara Schneider, a specialist veterinarian for behavioral science and a public health officer at the Bavarian State Office for Health and Food Safety (LGL), in a statement. 'During the second week of life, their eyes open, and by about three weeks, the young are weaned from their mother.' During this time, the animals begin to explore their environment, develop initial social skills, and form bonds with peers and humans. Many owners do not experience this life phase with mice and rats, as they are usually only given away once they reach sexual maturity. Mice typically reach sexual maturity at three to four weeks and are fully grown by six to eight weeks. For rats, it takes about two months to reach sexual maturity, and they achieve their final size at around four to five months. Also interesting: Can I extend the lifespan of my rats? Adolescence and Adulthood—Active and Eager to Learn 'From as early as six weeks, when they eat independently and are accustomed to self-determined life in a group, young adults can move to a new home. Especially in the first weeks, they benefit from regular, gentle contact with their human: This provides security and lays the foundation for how the animals will later respond to human contact,' says Dr. Schneider. 'Adulthood is also a good time to teach these intelligent animals tricks. It is simultaneously the most active phase. Here, the animals show their individual personalities and engage a lot with their peers.' During this time, it is particularly important to provide a species-appropriate and varied environment with several peers. Since rats and mice spend most of their time in their home, a cage or suitable enclosure, owners should ensure a stress-free life in this environment. This includes fixed routines, rest periods, and sufficient space with retreats, tubes, and climbing opportunities. Daily free-range time and various activity offerings also help prevent boredom and stress. Senior Phase—Needs Change Much changes with age. Mice show the first signs of aging at about one year, while rats usually do so around 18 months. 'Mobility gradually decreases, the fur may become thinner, and there is a greater need for sleep and rest,' explains expert Schneider. 'Many older animals remain active and curious—just at a slower pace.' To ensure older animals cope well, owners should adjust the environment accordingly. Sleeping and feeding areas should be easily accessible, and climbing levels should be lowered. Health checks should be conducted regularly during this life phase. Issues like weight loss or dental changes can be detected and treated early. An experienced veterinarian should regularly check older animals to identify any non-visible diseases. With attentive care and an adapted environment, rats and mice can lead a fulfilling and as long a life as possible—even beyond the statistical life expectancy. The post From Young to Senior: How to Support Rats and Mice Through All Life Stages appeared first on PETBOOK.

ChatGPT As Your Bedside Companion: Can It Deliver Compassion, Commitment, And Care?
ChatGPT As Your Bedside Companion: Can It Deliver Compassion, Commitment, And Care?

Forbes

time20 minutes ago

  • Forbes

ChatGPT As Your Bedside Companion: Can It Deliver Compassion, Commitment, And Care?

During the GPT-5 launch this week, Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, invited a cancer patient and her husband to the stage. She shared how, after receiving her biopsy report, she turned to ChatGPT for help. The AI instantly decoded the dense medical terminology, interpreted the findings, and outlined possible next steps. That moment of clarity gave her a renewed sense of control over her care. Altman mentioned; 'health is one of the top reasons consumers use ChatGPT, saying it 'empowers you to be more in control of your healthcare journey.' Around the world, patients are turning to AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Claude to better understand their diagnoses and take a more active role in managing their health. In hospitals, both patients and clinicians sometimes use these AI tools informally to verify information. At medical conferences, some healthcare professionals admit to carrying a 'second phone' dedicated solely to AI queries. Without accessing any private patient data, they use it to validate their assessments, much like patients seeking a digital 'second opinion' alongside their physician's advice. Even during leisure activities like hiking or camping, parents often rely on AI Chatbots like ChatGPT or Claude for quick guidance on everyday concerns such as treating insect bites or skin reactions in their children. This raises an important question: Can AI Companions Like ChatGPT, Claude, and Others Offer the Same Promise, Comfort, Commitment, and Care as Some Humans? As AI tools become more integrated into patient management, their potential to provide emotional support alongside clinical care is rapidly evolving. These chatbots can be especially helpful in alleviating anxiety caused by uncertainty, whether it's about a diagnosis, prognosis, or simply reassurance regarding potential next steps in medical or personal decisions. Given the existing ongoing stressors from disease management burden on patients, advanced AI companions like ChatGPT and Claude can play an important role by providing timely, 24/7 reassurance, clear guidance, and emotional support. Notably, some studies suggest that AI responses can be perceived as even more compassionate and reassuring than those from humans. Loneliness is another pervasive issue in healthcare. Emerging research suggests that social chatbots can reduce loneliness and social anxiety, underscoring their potential as complementary tools in mental health care. These advanced AI models help bridge gaps in information access, emotional reassurance, and patient engagement, offering clear answers, confidence, comfort, and a digital second opinion, particularly valuable when human resources are limited. Mustafa Suleyman, CEO of Microsoft AI, has articulated a vision for AI companions that evolve over time and transform our lives by providing calm and comfort. He describes an AI 'companion that sees what you see online and hears what you hear, personalized to you. Imagine the overload you carry quietly, subtly diminishing. Imagine clarity. Imagine calm.' While there are many reasons AI is increasingly used in healthcare, a key question remains: Why Are Healthcare Stakeholders Increasingly Turning to AI? Healthcare providers are increasingly adopting AI companions because they fill critical gaps in care delivery. Their constant availability and scalability enhance patient experience and outcomes by offering emotional support, cognitive clarity, and trusted advice whenever patients need it most. While AI companions are not new, today's technology delivers measurable benefits in patient care. For example, Woebot, an AI mental health chatbot, demonstrated reductions in anxiety and depression symptoms within just two weeks. ChatGPT's current investment in HealthBench to promote health and well-being further demonstrate its promise, commitment, and potential to help even more patients. These advances illustrate how AI tools can effectively complement traditional healthcare by improving patient well-being through consistent reassurance and engagement. So, what's holding back wider reliance on chatbots? The Hindrance: Why We Can't Fully Rely on AI Chatbot Companions Despite rapid advancements, AI companions are far from flawless, especially in healthcare where the margin for error is razor thin. Large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and Claude are trained on vast datasets that may harbor hidden biases, potentially misleading vulnerable patient populations. Even with impressive capabilities, ChatGPT can still hallucinate or provide factually incorrect information—posing real risks if patients substitute AI guidance for professional medical advice. While future versions may improve reliability, current models are not suited for unsupervised clinical use. Sometimes, AI-generated recommendations may conflict with physicians' advice, which can undermine trust and disrupt the patient–clinician relationship. There is also a risk of patients forming deep emotional bonds with AI, leading to over-dependence and blurred boundaries between digital and human interaction. As LinkedIn cofounder Reid Hoffman put it in Business Insider, 'I don't think any AI tool today is capable of being a friend,' and "And I think if it's pretending to be a friend, you're actually harming the person in so doing." For now, AI companions should be regarded as valuable complements to human expertise, empathy, and accountability — not replacements. A Balanced, Safe Framework: Maximizing Benefit, Minimizing Risk To harness AI companions' full potential while minimizing risks, a robust framework is essential. This begins with data transparency and governance: models must be trained on inclusive, high-quality datasets designed to reduce demographic bias and errors. Clinical alignment is critical; AI systems should be trained on evidence-based protocols and guidelines, with a clear distinction between educational information and personalized medical advice. Reliability and ethical safeguards are vital, including break prompts during extended interactions, guidance directing users to seek human support when needed, and transparent communication about AI's limitations. Above all, AI should complement human clinicians, acting as a navigator or translator to encourage and facilitate open dialogue between patients and their healthcare providers. Executive Call to Action In today's digital age, patients inevitably turn to the internet and increasingly to AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Claude for answers and reassurance. Attempts to restrict this behavior are neither practical nor beneficial. Executive physician advisors and healthcare leaders are therefore responsible for embracing this reality by providing structured, transparent, and integrated pathways that guide patients in using these powerful tools wisely. It is critical that healthcare systems are equipped with frameworks ensuring AI complements clinical care rather than confuses or replaces it. Where AI capabilities fall short, these gaps must be bridged with human expertise and ethical oversight. Innovation should never come at the expense of patient safety, trust, or quality of care. By proactively shaping AI deployment in healthcare, stakeholders can empower patients with reliable information, foster meaningful clinician-patient dialogue, and ultimately improve outcomes in this new era of AI-driven medicine.

Lightning Kills Way More Trees Than You Would Ever Believe
Lightning Kills Way More Trees Than You Would Ever Believe

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Lightning Kills Way More Trees Than You Would Ever Believe

A first-of-its-kind study estimates that lightning strikes kill 320 million trees every year. For perspective, these dead trees account for up to 2.9 percent of annual loss in plant biomass and emit up to 1.09 billion tons of carbon dioxide. Even more striking (pun unintended), the study includes only tree deaths caused directly by lightning. It does not include tree deaths caused indirectly by lightning-induced wildfires. Altogether, these findings can improve statistical models that help researchers study forest structure and carbon storage on a worldwide scale. Researchers from the Technical University of Munich (TUM) ascertained these figures using novel mathematical models, which offer an unprecedented overview of how lightning-induced tree mortality impacts the global ecosystem. Related: Classifying tree mortality was no easy task. Dead trees often lack clear visual signs of their cause of death, while others may be too decomposed for meaningful forest forensics. Some tree deaths occur slowly, and most surveys are limited to infrequent observations of isolated deaths after the event has occurred. Some areas, like temperate and boreal forests, are not as well-studied as those in the tropics. So the researchers combined multiple methods to make their global estimate, including using results from another team's camera-based lightning detection system in an old-growth tropical forest in Panama's Barro Colorado Island (BCI). These camera observations were followed up with drone and ground surveys to confirm lightning-struck trees. This BCI data revealed that lightning is highly contagious. A lightning strike can cause a 'flashover' as electricity crosses the air gap between the crowns of neighboring trees, reaching as far away as 45 meters (almost 150 feet) from the initially struck tree. As a result, each lightning strike killed 3.5 trees on average. Testing their model against the real data, they found their model adequately simulated the trees killed by lightning strike. The researchers then applied the validated model to other temperate and tropical forests around the world. To pad out the global averages, the researchers also incorporated two hefty datasets of lightning frequency and density, one from a spaceborne optical network and the second from ground-based observations. According to the simulations, "286–328 million lightning strikes hit the Earth's surface each year," with the majority occurring over ice-free land areas, particularly in the tropics. This resulted in the annual death of 301-340 million trees over the 2004-2023 period, including 24-36 million large trees (over 60 centimeters in diameter). For comparison, natural causes kill around 50 billion trees annually, occasionally creating 'farting' ghost forests. So while lightning is only responsible for 0.69 percent tree deaths overall, it is responsible for up to 6.3 percent of large-tree deaths. Additionally, these numbers appear to be rising. "Currently, lightning-induced tree mortality is highest in tropical regions," says Andreas Krause, a computer scientist at TUM's Land Surface-Atmosphere Interactions lab and the study's lead author. "However, models suggest that lightning frequency will increase primarily in middle-and-high-latitude regions, meaning that lightning mortality could also become more relevant in temperate and boreal forests." The impact may be significant; a separate study predicts a 9-18 percent uptick in large-tree deaths for a 25-50 percent increase in lightning frequency. Most importantly, the study provides evidence that lightning-induced tree deaths are underestimated – if estimated at all. The researchers note that tree mortality is a neglected aspect in the dynamic models that scientists use to study how forests respond to environmental shifts, and should be included in future carbon calculations. This research is published in the journal Global Change Biology. Related News Scientists Found a Mysterious Barrier in The Ocean That Jellyfish Won't Cross Leopard Seal Mating Songs Are Eerily Like Our Nursery Rhymes Massive Earthquake Could Strike Canada as Ancient Fault Line Wakes Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store