
Why Substack's $20 Million Bet Could Reshape the Creator Economy
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
Substack recently made a bold move in the battle for creator loyalty by launching a $20 million creator fund aimed at attracting and retaining users.
Since its launch in 2017, the platform has consistently emphasized creator independence by allowing writers to own their mailing lists and charge subscribers for access to their content. This model was aimed at providing a sustainable income for independent creators without relying on advertisers or algorithms.
Substack's new creator fund is its latest move at positioning itself as the stable, creator-first alternative where owning their audience is a core part of the user experience. It's an enticing appeal to creators who are tired of platform whiplash and ready to take back control of their content, their income and ultimately their online presence.
This announcement underlines a broader trend in the industry. Creators are looking for consistency and control over their work, especially as many social media platforms become less predictable. TikTok is facing potential regulatory challenges. Instagram's algorithm continues to shift and X remains in a constant state of change. In this environment, creators are rethinking their digital strategies.
In fact, some have spoken openly about the way algorithm changes on platforms have directly impacted their businesses, illustrating how disruptive these sudden changes can be to their brand, followers, reach, engagement and more. Now, they're looking for long-term, sustainable ways to build and maintain their audiences online.
That's where platforms like Substack resonate with creators. Just look at success stories on the platform like Heather Cox Richardson's Letters from an American, or Lenny Rachitsky's Lenny's Newsletter — both built loyal, paying audiences on their own terms. They reflect a growing realization in the creator space that independence and control matter.
Related: How to Start a Business Newsletter on Substack
Independence is in demand
Frequent platform shifts are more than just an annoyance for creators. They force creators into a constant cycle of adaptation, from navigating new algorithms and reconfiguring content to having to reintroduce themselves to their audiences. This can lead to burnout, frustration and also chip away at audience loyalty and visibility. When creators are always starting over, trust erodes, consistency suffers and the momentum that fuels their growth slows significantly.
These disruptions can also have real financial consequences for creators. Sudden drops in engagement, algorithmic demotions or going quiet on certain platforms can mean lost income, fewer brand deals and a fractured audience that's hard to piece back together.
This is why creator independence centered around ownership is becoming more of a necessity. Diversifying where content is distributed is a smart strategy, but anchoring a digital presence in a place that is fully owned is critical.
The platforms that understand this and empower creators to build and own their own content and digital identities will be the ones that win long-term loyalty. They also help foster a healthier creator ecosystem.
Related: How I Made $250000 in One Year as a Content Creator
Domains' growing role in creator independence
That said, even the most creator-friendly platform is still…a platform, within which terms can change, fees can shift and features can evolve. While Substack and others are taking a big step forward in this regard, the smartest creators are realizing a hard truth: right now, if they build their brand on someone else's platform, ultimately the creator doesn't own it — the platform does.
Creators know they deserve control over their brand and audience without dependency on third-party platforms. Discovery should serve creators, not someone else's platform. This is why personalized domain names managed by the user are becoming an essential part of the creator journey.
A personalized domain name gives creators a permanent home that isn't subject to algorithm changes, content policies or other pivots. They provide a direct, unfiltered line to an audience. If a platform changes its policies or disappears entirely, a creator's domain becomes the place where followers know to return. It remains one of the most reliable and sustainable ways to establish and maintain a lasting brand presence, allowing creators to control how they present themselves online, without interference from third-party platforms.
A memorable domain name also helps creators rise above the noise. It strengthens their brand and helps new followers find them more easily through search, word-of-mouth and direct engagement.
Related: After a 12-Year-Old's Side Hustle Made Over $4,000 in 1 Day, He and His Dad Grew the Business to Nearly $50,000 a Month: 'It Takes Commitment'
A brighter future for creators
While social and content platforms will still play an important role for creators, they should not be the ultimate destination for their audiences and digital identities. At the end of the day, platforms like Substack help creators get noticed and build an online presence, but a personalized domain name that the creator manages helps ensure audiences remain engaged.
This concept will become increasingly vital as the creator economy continues to evolve. We'll see the creator industry led by those who've built sustainable digital ecosystems on their own terms. So, creators, as platforms continue to compete for your attention, remember this: your domain name isn't just a website. It's the most powerful tool to unlock your digital independence and build a brand that lasts.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Apple (AAPL) Upgrading Siri with AI-Powered Apple Intent
Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) is one of the tech stocks with strong return on equity. On August 10, it was announced that the company is working on a significant upgrade to its AI voice control, which will change how people use iPhones. Reports indicate that the company is working on an upgraded version of App Intents that will make Siri the true hands-free controller for devices. App Intents will enable people to use their voice to instruct Siri to perform complex operations, such as finding a specific photo, editing it, and sending it off. Thanks to artificial intelligence integration, the digital assistant can comment on an Instagram photo or scroll through a shopping app and add items to a cart. With the new upgrades, Apple is exploring ways to make its voice control operate with precision inside interfaces. The upgrades would mark an important milestone and fulfillment of a promise that Siri made 15 years ago. It will also be a significant upgrade to the company's hardware. Without App Intents, Apple's products would be less compelling than those offered by Amazon and Google. Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) is a technology company that designs, manufactures, and markets smartphones, personal computers, tablets, wearables, and accessories. It also sells a variety of related services, including software, digital content, and subscription-based services. The stock boasts of a high return on equity of 149.81%, affirming its ability to convert shareholder equity to profit. While we acknowledge the potential of AAPL as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 13 Best NYSE Penny Stocks to Invest in Now and 10 Best 52-Week High Stocks to Buy According to Analysts. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. 擷取數據時發生錯誤 登入存取你的投資組合 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
It's Time Investors Give Qualcomm Stock a Little 'Respect'
Qualcomm (QCOM) stock ticked lower yesterday after the bell despite delivering a solid fiscal third-quarter earnings beat. Despite since bouncing back today, this dip highlights what analysts say is a persistent lack of "respect" for the semiconductor giant that investors should reconsider. The wireless technology leader reported fiscal third-quarter revenue of $10.4 billion, topping analyst estimates of $10.34 billion with a 10% year-over-year increase. Non-GAAP earnings per share of $2.77 exceeded forecasts by 2.2%, yet the market's lukewarm response underscores ongoing skepticism about the company's prospects. More News from Barchart Warren Buffett Warns Investing At 'Too-High Purchase Price' Even for 'an Excellent Company' Can Undo a Decade of Smart Investing Why Archer Aviation's (ACHR) Post-Earnings Tailspin Looks Like a Favorably Mispriced Opportunity BitMine Immersion Now Holds 1.15 Million Ethereum Tokens. Should You Buy BMNR Stock Here? Our exclusive Barchart Brief newsletter is your FREE midday guide to what's moving stocks, sectors, and investor sentiment - delivered right when you need the info most. Subscribe today! What investors may be missing is Qualcomm's successful pivot beyond smartphones. While handset chip revenue grew a modest 7% to $6.3 billion, the company's diversification strategy is gaining serious traction. Automotive revenue surged 21% to $984 million, hitting a quarterly record, while Internet of Things (IoT) revenue jumped 24% to $1.7 billion. The company's expansion into artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure and PC processors, with its Snapdragon X platform, is expected to power over 100 PC models by 2026. The recent $2.4 billion acquisition of Alphawave Semi strengthens its data center capabilities as AI demand continues to surge. Qualcomm returned $3.8 billion to shareholders through dividends and buybacks while maintaining healthy margins. In fiscal 2025 (ending in September), Qualcomm is forecast to pay an annual dividend of $3.59 per share, up from $3.51 per share in fiscal 2024. Moreover, these payouts are forecast to increase to $3.91 per share in fiscal 2028. Is Qualcomm Stock a Good Buy Right Now? Qualcomm recently unveiled an ambitious road map to reach $22 billion in combined automotive and IoT revenues by fiscal 2029. Nakul Duggal, GM of Auto, IoT, and Cloud, highlighted Qualcomm's decade-long transformation of automotive architecture through its Snapdragon Digital Chassis platform. Qualcomm's safety-certified Advanced Driver-Assistance System (ADAS) stack will debut globally with BMW's Neue Klasse vehicles, marking a key milestone in autonomous driving technology. With 20 OEMs programmed for Autopilot solutions launching within 18 months, Qualcomm is positioned to capitalize on the growing demand for ADAS. The automotive segment's $45 billion design win pipeline includes substantial ADAS opportunities, with management noting that one-third of this backlog represents the next major growth driver beyond traditional infotainment systems. CEO Cristiano Amon also revealed advanced discussions with a leading hyperscaler for custom ARM-based solutions, targeting fiscal 2028 revenue generation. The $2.4 billion Alphawave IP acquisition provides critical connectivity IP to complement Qualcomm's Oryon CPU and Hexagon NPU processors. Management emphasized their focus on inference optimization, targeting efficiency metrics like tokens per dollar and tokens per watt as AI workloads scale. Moreover, the multi-year Xiaomi agreement ensures Snapdragon 8 Series platforms will power flagship devices with increasing volumes annually across China and global markets. This partnership will help Qualcomm strengthen its position in China, where the company has operated successfully for three decades. Qualcomm's diversification strategy appears well-positioned for sustained growth across multiple high-value markets. What is the Target Price for QCOM Stock? Analysts tracking QCOM stock expect sales to rise from $39 billion in fiscal 2024 to $47 billion in fiscal 2028. In this period, adjusted earnings are forecast to expand from $10.2 per share to $13.3 per share. QCOM stock trades at a forward price to earnings multiple of 13x, below its 10-year historical average of 15.4x. If the chip stock is priced at 14x forward earnings, it should trade around $187 in August 2027, indicating an upside potential of 20%. If we adjust for dividend reinvestments, cumulative returns could be over 25%. Out of the 32 analysts covering Qualcomm stock, 15 recommend 'Strong Buy', one recommends 'Moderate Buy', 15 recommend 'Hold', and one recommends 'Strong Sell'. The average QCOM stock price target is $179, above the current price of $154. With a fourth-quarter revenue guidance of $10.3 billion to $11.1 billion and the company trading at attractive valuations, despite its diversification progress, it is hard to see why QCOM stock dipped at all. Analysts may have a point that Qualcomm deserves more investor "respect" for its execution and growth potential beyond traditional mobile markets. On the date of publication, Aditya Raghunath did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Errore nel recupero dei dati Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump debanking order will have limited impact on crypto, experts say
Last week, US President Donald Trump issued an executive order directing bank regulators to rescind guidance that could lead to 'politicised or unlawful debanking.' Crypto businesses, and even some prominent conservatives — including the president himself — have alleged they were denied or lost access to bank accounts at the behest of politically-motivated, Biden-era regulators. But last week's executive order, entitled, 'Guaranteeing Fair Banking for All Americans,' won't do much for crypto businesses that fear they've been locked out of the traditional financial system, according to experts who spoke to DL News. That's because the order does little to root out 'reputation risk.' The term refers to regulators' ability to dissuade banks from engaging supposedly controversial customers, such as pornographers, firearms manufacturers, payday lenders, and crypto companies. Critics of the practice say that banks should only consider objective criteria, such as a customer's financial risk, when deciding whether to offer someone a checking account. Guidance documents and manuals 'This is going to make people happy who have been asking for it, but it's not clear how much good it's going to do them,' Dru Stevenson, a professor at South Texas College of Law Houston, told DL News. The executive order directs bank regulators to remove the use of reputation risk 'or equivalent concepts' that could result in 'politicized or unlawful debanking' from their 'guidance documents, manuals, and other materials.' But it isn't clear that examples of debanking were motivated by politics, according to Stevenson. 'It's not clear to me that they couldn't still allow for reputational risk that would apply to, say, an AI company, because that's not exactly a political issue or something that's unlawful,' he said. And reputation risk can have a downstream effect on banks' profits. 'If you have risk averse investors at one of the gigantic pension funds, or mutual funds, and they find out that Wachovia has gone gung ho about crypto, that might be a reason for them to switch to a more conservative bank,' Stevenson said. Moreover, banks were always free to ignore guidance documents and manuals according to Stevenson. As such, removing references to reputation risk from such documents will likely have little practical effect. 'If you're an agency, you can't go into court and say, 'This person violated our guidance document,'' he said. 'You have to show that they violated the statute or that they violated a codified regulation that went through notice and comment rulemaking.' Management reports Julie Hill, the dean of the University of Wyoming's law school, noted that Trump-appointed bank regulators have already said they will stop using reputation risk. While the regulators have new leadership, they are largely staffed by the same people who served under the Biden administration, Hill added. And reputation risk isn't the only tool regulators can use to pressure banks to reject certain customers. Anti-money laundering laws are one reason banks often reject customers, according to Hill. 'The vast, vast majority of suspicious activity reports don't lead to any sort of follow up, let alone any sort of enforcement,' she told DL News. Moreover, banks are not allowed to tell customers that their account was flagged for suspicious activity. 'We have a situation where banks had to file one or more SARs, and they decided it's just not worth it, we should debank, because we don't want our regulators upset with us, and it's getting expensive to file all these SARs.' Another tool at regulators' disposal: management reports. 'If a regulator suggests to a bank, 'We think this is risky, maybe you want to stop doing it' [but] it's not really that risky, banks might do it anyway,' Hill said, 'because their management rating will get downgraded and then that impacts all sorts of things, including their capital requirements.' Those ratings are also secret, according to Hill. 'Anytime you see a really broad authority with very little limit, and then also a lot of secrecy or lack of transparency about how regulators or banks implement that, you're likely to set up claims for debanking,' she said. Banks' responsibility The executive order also directs the regulators to identify financial institutions that had any 'past or current, formal or informal, policies or practices that require, encourage, or otherwise influence … politicized or unlawful debanking.' Finding examples of politically-motivated debanking could be straightforward if the orders came from federal regulators, according to Hill. 'It's a much harder thing if what you think happened is the banks, for whatever reason, just decided to debank people for political reasons, unconnected with risk or profit or whatever,' she said. 'There's a real question about how we think regulators are going to figure that out and whether we think there's any duty on the bank to voluntarily disclose it.' Whatever the effect of the executive order, both professors agreed that a new administration could reinstate the use of reputation risk unilaterally. 'It kind of highlights how unsticky changes made by the executive branch are when it comes to discretionary enforcement,' Hill said. 'This is one of those things that can change from administration to administration.' Stevenson agreed. 'If we ever get to have other presidents, the next president can just do another executive order and put it all back, like, overnight,' Stevenson said. Aleks Gilbert is DL News' New York-based DeFi correspondent. You can contact him at aleks@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data