
Why Substack's $20 Million Bet Could Reshape the Creator Economy
Substack's $20 million creator fund is a clear signal that creator ownership and control are becoming the new standard. As platforms shift and algorithms change, creators are reclaiming their audiences, their income and their digital identities.
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
Substack recently made a bold move in the battle for creator loyalty by launching a $20 million creator fund aimed at attracting and retaining users.
Since its launch in 2017, the platform has consistently emphasized creator independence by allowing writers to own their mailing lists and charge subscribers for access to their content. This model was aimed at providing a sustainable income for independent creators without relying on advertisers or algorithms.
Substack's new creator fund is its latest move at positioning itself as the stable, creator-first alternative where owning their audience is a core part of the user experience. It's an enticing appeal to creators who are tired of platform whiplash and ready to take back control of their content, their income and ultimately their online presence.
This announcement underlines a broader trend in the industry. Creators are looking for consistency and control over their work, especially as many social media platforms become less predictable. TikTok is facing potential regulatory challenges. Instagram's algorithm continues to shift and X remains in a constant state of change. In this environment, creators are rethinking their digital strategies.
In fact, some have spoken openly about the way algorithm changes on platforms have directly impacted their businesses, illustrating how disruptive these sudden changes can be to their brand, followers, reach, engagement and more. Now, they're looking for long-term, sustainable ways to build and maintain their audiences online.
That's where platforms like Substack resonate with creators. Just look at success stories on the platform like Heather Cox Richardson's Letters from an American, or Lenny Rachitsky's Lenny's Newsletter — both built loyal, paying audiences on their own terms. They reflect a growing realization in the creator space that independence and control matter.
Related: How to Start a Business Newsletter on Substack
Independence is in demand
Frequent platform shifts are more than just an annoyance for creators. They force creators into a constant cycle of adaptation, from navigating new algorithms and reconfiguring content to having to reintroduce themselves to their audiences. This can lead to burnout, frustration and also chip away at audience loyalty and visibility. When creators are always starting over, trust erodes, consistency suffers and the momentum that fuels their growth slows significantly.
These disruptions can also have real financial consequences for creators. Sudden drops in engagement, algorithmic demotions or going quiet on certain platforms can mean lost income, fewer brand deals and a fractured audience that's hard to piece back together.
This is why creator independence centered around ownership is becoming more of a necessity. Diversifying where content is distributed is a smart strategy, but anchoring a digital presence in a place that is fully owned is critical.
The platforms that understand this and empower creators to build and own their own content and digital identities will be the ones that win long-term loyalty. They also help foster a healthier creator ecosystem.
Related: How I Made $250000 in One Year as a Content Creator
Domains' growing role in creator independence
That said, even the most creator-friendly platform is still…a platform, within which terms can change, fees can shift and features can evolve. While Substack and others are taking a big step forward in this regard, the smartest creators are realizing a hard truth: right now, if they build their brand on someone else's platform, ultimately the creator doesn't own it — the platform does.
Creators know they deserve control over their brand and audience without dependency on third-party platforms. Discovery should serve creators, not someone else's platform. This is why personalized domain names managed by the user are becoming an essential part of the creator journey.
A personalized domain name gives creators a permanent home that isn't subject to algorithm changes, content policies or other pivots. They provide a direct, unfiltered line to an audience. If a platform changes its policies or disappears entirely, a creator's domain becomes the place where followers know to return. It remains one of the most reliable and sustainable ways to establish and maintain a lasting brand presence, allowing creators to control how they present themselves online, without interference from third-party platforms.
A memorable domain name also helps creators rise above the noise. It strengthens their brand and helps new followers find them more easily through search, word-of-mouth and direct engagement.
Related: After a 12-Year-Old's Side Hustle Made Over $4,000 in 1 Day, He and His Dad Grew the Business to Nearly $50,000 a Month: 'It Takes Commitment'
A brighter future for creators
While social and content platforms will still play an important role for creators, they should not be the ultimate destination for their audiences and digital identities. At the end of the day, platforms like Substack help creators get noticed and build an online presence, but a personalized domain name that the creator manages helps ensure audiences remain engaged.
This concept will become increasingly vital as the creator economy continues to evolve. We'll see the creator industry led by those who've built sustainable digital ecosystems on their own terms. So, creators, as platforms continue to compete for your attention, remember this: your domain name isn't just a website. It's the most powerful tool to unlock your digital independence and build a brand that lasts.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Washington Post
23 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Amazon CEO tells employees that AI will shrink its workforce
Amazon chief executive Andy Jassy told employees in a Tuesday memo that he expects artificial intelligence to thin their ranks, reducing headcount at what is now the United States' second-largest private employer. '[I]n the next few years, we expect that this will reduce our total corporate workforce as we get efficiency gains from using AI extensively across the company,' the memo said. It was also posted publicly.


The Verge
23 minutes ago
- The Verge
Amazon CEO says it will cut jobs due to AI's ‘efficiency'
Amazon CEO Andy Jassy says advancements in AI will 'reduce' the company's corporate headcount over the next few years. In a memo to employees on Tuesday, Jassy writes that Amazon expects the change due to 'efficiency gains from using AI extensively across the company,' without specifying how many employees would be affected. 'As we roll out more Generative AI and agents, it should change the way our work is done,' Jassy says. 'We will need fewer people doing some of the jobs that are being done today, and more people doing other types of jobs.' Amazon has laid off more than 27,000 people since 2022, and most recently cut jobs across its devices and services group and its books division. Jassy notes that Amazon has more than 1,000 AI services and apps that the company is working on or has already built, saying that it's just a 'small fraction' of what it's planning to launch in the future. He notes that workers should also 'be curious about AI' and how to use it to 'get more done with scrappier teams: Those who embrace this change, become conversant in AI, help us build and improve our AI capabilities internally and deliver for customers, will be well-positioned to have high impact and help us reinvent the company. Other companies have shared statements about how they expect AI to impact their workforce as well. In April, Shopify CEO Tobi Lütke told employees asking for more headcount or resources that they should explain why they 'cannot get what they want done using AI.' Duolingo CEO Luis von Ahn also stated that the company plans on replacing contract workers with AI as part of a new 'AI-first' approach.


TechCrunch
24 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Google's Gemini panicked when playing Pokémon
AI companies are battling to dominate the industry, but sometimes, they're also battling in Pokémon gyms. As Google and Anthropic both study how their latest AI models navigate early Pokémon games, the results can be as amusing as they are enlightening — and this time, Google DeepMind has written in a report that Gemini 2.5 Pro resorts to panic when its Pokémon are close to death. This can cause the AI's performance to experience 'qualitatively observable degradation in the model's reasoning capability,' according to the report. AI benchmarking — or, the process of comparing the performance of different AI models — is a dubious art that often provides little context for the actual capabilities of a given model. But some researchers think that studying how AI models play video games could be useful (or, at the very least, kind of funny). Over the last several months, two developers unaffiliated with Google and Anthropic have set up respective Twitch streams called 'Gemini Plays Pokémon' and 'Claude Plays Pokémon,' where anyone can watch in real time as an AI tries to navigate a children's video game from over twenty-five years ago. Each stream displays the AI's 'reasoning' process — or, a natural language translation of how the AI evaluates a problem and arrives at a response — giving us insight into the way that these models work. Image Credits:Google While the progress of these AI models is impressive, they are still not very good at playing Pokémon. It takes hundreds of hours for Gemini to reason through a game that a child could complete in exponentially less time. What's interesting about watching an AI navigate a Pokémon game is not so much about its time of completion, but rather, how it behaves along the way. Techcrunch event Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Boston, MA | REGISTER NOW 'Over the course of the playthrough, Gemini 2.5 Pro gets into various situations which cause the model to simulate 'panic,'' the report says. This state of 'panic' can result in the model's performance getting worse, as the AI may suddenly stop using certain tools at its disposal for a stretch of gameplay. While AI does not think or experience emotion, its actions mimic the way in which a human might make poor, hasty decisions when under stress — a fascinating, yet unsettling response. 'This behavior has occurred in enough separate instances that the members of the Twitch chat have actively noticed when it is occurring,' the report says. Claude has also exhibited some curious behaviors in its journeys across Kanto. In one instance, the AI picked up on the pattern that when all of its Pokémon run out of health, the player character will 'white out' and return to a Pokémon Center. When Claude got stuck in the Mt. Moon cave, it erroneously hypothesized that if it intentionally got all of its Pokémon to faint, then it would be transported across the cave to the Pokémon Center in the next town. However, that isn't how the game works. When all of your Pokémon die, you return to whatever Pokémon Center you used most recently, rather than the nearest geographically. Viewers watched on in horror as the AI essentially tried to kill itself in the game. Despite its shortcomings, there are a few ways in which the AI can outperform human players. As of the release of Gemini 2.5 Pro, the AI is able to solve puzzles with impressive accuracy. With some human assistance, the AI created agentic tools — prompted instances of Gemini 2.5 Pro geared toward specific tasks — to solve the game's boulder puzzles and find efficient routes to reach a destination. 'With only a prompt describing boulder physics and a description of how to verify a valid path, Gemini 2.5 Pro is able to one-shot some of these complex boulder puzzles, which are required to progress through Victory Road,' the report says. Since Gemini 2.5 Pro did a lot of the work in creating these tools on its own, Google theorizes that the current model may be capable of creating these tools without human intervention. Who knows, maybe Gemini will therapize itself into creating a 'don't panic' module.