logo
Corbyn is following in the footsteps of the French left

Corbyn is following in the footsteps of the French left

Spectator8 hours ago
Labour has reacted with scorn to the news that Zarah Sultana has resigned from the party to create a new movement with Jeremy Corbyn. It's reported that the MP for Coventry South, who has sat as an independent since July 2024, is still discussing the details of the new party with Corbyn – who is yet to comment on the new outfit – but whatever its form, Labour is unfazed.
Gurinder Singh Josan, the MP for Smethwick, mocked Sultana for returning to 'the irrelevance of the far left'. Another MP, David Taylor said it was a case of 'good riddance' and suggested any other Labour MP opposed to the proscription of Palestine Action should 'follow suit'.
Labour's crowing might come back to haunt them. One suspects Sultana and Corbyn have been hatching something for a while. They may have been inspired first by the success of Jean-Luc Melenchon's la France Insoumise (LFI), and, more recently, the stunning victory of Zohran Mamdani in last month's Democratic primary for mayor of New York. Mamdani's defeat of Andrew Cuomo was celebrated by Melenchon, who wrote of the victor on X:
Opposed to the genocide of the Palestinians, he is obviously already accused of anti-Semitism. He won against a figurehead of the centre-left backed by the local leaders of the cheating Democratic party.
As in France, continued Mélenchon, it is now the radical left and not the 'traditional' left which represents the people.
Melenchon is on good terms with Sanders and Corbyn, a trio of ageing Marxists (their combined age is 232) who have not mellowed with the passing of time. Melenchon met Sanders when he visited New York in April this year to give his first address to an American audience. He also found time to endorse Mamdani.
The Frenchman's association with Corbyn stretches back many years. In a 2022 interview with a French magazine, Corbyn's biographer, Tom Bower, described the pair as ideological 'cousins'.
In 2015 the New Statesman interviewed Melenchon shortly after Corbyn had been elected leader of the Labour party. A delighted Melenchon described Corbyn as 'unique in Europe' because his was the only case where an 'alternative has arisen within a socialist party and won'.
Melenchon's own political career was flagging a decade ago. An outcast from the Socialist party, he had witnessed the bulk of France's white working-class vote for Marine Le Pen in the 2012 presidential election.
Melenchon's problem was that on several issues his views barely diverged from those of Le Pen: the pair were Eurosceptics and protectionists, and also opposed to the wearing of the burka in public. 'To walk in the street entirely covered is a denial of the human right to see someone's face,' Melenchon told the New Statesman. He also reiterated his support for French secularism. 'We're secularists and we're attached to the secularism of the French state: no politics in religion, no religion in politics,' he said. 'I don't have a position on Islam just as I don't have a position on Catholicism, Judaism and Protestantism…because I'm elected for all French people.'
These remarks weren't forgotten by some on the British left who opposed the invitation extended to him to attend the Labour party conference in 2018. They needn't have worried because by the time Melenchon arrived in Liverpool for the conference, he was a different man from the one of 2015.
His Damascus Road experience began in 2016 when he founded la France Insoumise. A year later he polled 7 million votes in the first round of the presidential election (three million more than he'd managed in 2012 as leader of the Left Party). Melenchon was only 600,000 votes shy of Marine Le Pen, who lost to Emmanuel Macron in the second round run-off.
How best to close that gap? Le Pen was the champion of the white working-class so Melenchon chose to become the figurehead for the demographic that the Western left regards as the oppressed of the 21st century: Muslims. Given that there are over six million Muslims in France, it was a canny move. In the 2022 presidential election, Melenchon increased his votes to 7.7 million and was now just 400,000 votes behind Le Pen.
At this point, Melenchon may have realised his age and ethnicity were a brake on his ambition. He needed a young, charismatic Muslim to speak to France's minorities. Step forward Rima Hassan, who was elected an MEP for LFI in last year's European elections, a campaign in which 62 per cent of French Muslims voted for the party.
The 33-year-old was born in a Syrian refugee camp to Palestinian parents. Before 2024 no one in France had heard of her. In a recent poll in Paris Match, she was ranked 44th on the list of most popular personalities.
The right loathe the keffiyeh-wearing Hassan, as they do LFI in general. They wave the Palestinian flag in parliament, describe Hamas as a 'resistance movement' and organise marches to decry 'Islamophobia'.
In 2010, Melenchon described the hijab as 'repugnant and obscene'; now he accuses those who object to it as 'racist'. Jordan Bardella, the president of the National Rally, refers to LFI as 'La France Islamist'.
When Melenchon attended the Labour party conference in 2018 as a guest of Jeremy Corbyn, he acknowledged the similarities between the two and Sanders. He described the 'paradox of an older man representing a cause that has been powered by millions of young people'.
That in itself wasn't enough to win elections. There was a missing ingredient. Melenchon has found it in Rima Hassan and Sanders is an enthusiastic endorser of Zohran Mamdani.
It makes sense for Jeremy Corbyn to team up with Zarah Sultana who, like Hassan and Mamdani, is in her early thirties. 'Magic Grandpa' is in his 77th year and his powers are beginning to fade. But he remains a figurehead to many, particularly the Bourgeois Bohemians, those left-wingers with luxury beliefs who pay good money to go to Glastonbury. Sultana appeals to another demographic, the growing Muslim population.
Melenchon has talked of creating a 'New France'. One imagines that Corbyn and Sultana have similar plans for Britain.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Palestine Action loses legal challenge to block terror ban
Palestine Action loses legal challenge to block terror ban

ITV News

time23 minutes ago

  • ITV News

Palestine Action loses legal challenge to block terror ban

Palestine Action is set to be banned after a High Court judge refused a bid to temporarily block it from being designated as a terror group. Huda Ammori, the co-founder of Palestine Action, asked the High Court to temporarily block the government from banning the group as a terrorist organisation before a potential legal challenge against the decision to proscribe it under the Terrorism Act 2000. The move is set to come into force at midnight after a High Court judge refused Ms Ammori's bid for a temporary block. Mr Justice Chamberlain said: 'I have concluded that the harm which would ensue if interim relief is refused but the claim later succeeds is insufficient to outweigh the strong public interest in maintaining the order in force.' Lawyers for Ms Ammori were also refused permission to appeal and were told to go to the Court of Appeal itself. The proposal was approved by both the House of Commons and the House of Lords earlier this week and would make membership and support for the direct action group a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Some 81 organisations are already proscribed under the 2000 Act, including Hamas, al Qaida and National Action. At a hearing on Friday, Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, asked the court to suspend the 'ill-considered' and 'authoritarian abuse of statutory power' until a hearing due around July 21. Mr Husain told the London court: 'This is the first time in our history that a direct action civil disobedience group, which does not advocate for violence, has been sought to be proscribed as terrorists.' The barrister said that his client had been 'inspired' by a long history of direct action in the UK, 'from the suffragettes, to anti-apartheid activists, to Iraq war activists'. The hearing later in July is expected to deal with whether Ms Ammori can bring a High Court challenge over the planned proscription. Ben Watson KC, for the Home Office, told the High Court there was an 'insuperable hurdle' in the bid to temporarily block the ban of Palestine Action. The barrister also said that if a temporary block was granted, it would be a 'serious disfigurement of the statutory regime'. He said Palestine Action could challenge the Home Secretary's decision at the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission, a specialist tribunal, rather than at the High Court. Friday's hearing comes after an estimated £7 million worth of damage was caused to two Voyager planes at RAF Brize Norton on June 20, in an action claimed by Palestine Action. Mr Justice Chamberlain said that an assessment on whether to ban the group had been made as early as March, and 'preceded' the incident at RAF Brize Norton. Four people were charged in connection with the incident.

High Court judge refuses to temporarily block Palestine Action terror ban
High Court judge refuses to temporarily block Palestine Action terror ban

The Herald Scotland

time24 minutes ago

  • The Herald Scotland

High Court judge refuses to temporarily block Palestine Action terror ban

The move is set to come into force at midnight after a High Court judge refused Ms Ammori's bid for a temporary block. Mr Justice Chamberlain said: 'I have concluded that the harm which would ensue if interim relief is refused but the claim later succeeds is insufficient to outweigh the strong public interest in maintaining the order in force.' Lawyers for Ms Ammori were also refused permission to appeal and were told to go to the Court of Appeal itself. Shortly after the decision was handed down, Ms Ammori said that she would be 'seeking an urgent appeal to try to prevent a dystopian nightmare of the Government's making'. She added: 'The Home Secretary is rushing through the implementation of the proscription at midnight tonight despite the fact that our legal challenge is ongoing and that she has been completely unclear about how it will be enforced, leaving the public in the dark about their rights to free speech and expression after midnight tonight when this proscription comes into effect. 'Hundreds of thousands of people across the country have expressed support for Palestine Action by joining our mailing list, following and sharing our social media content and signing petitions, and many, including iconic figures like Sally Rooney, say they will continue to declare 'we are all Palestine Action' and speak out against this preposterous proscription, demonstrating how utterly unworkable it will be.' In a 26-page judgment, Mr Justice Chamberlain said that 'some of the consequences feared by the claimant and others who have given evidence are overstated'. He continued: 'It will remain lawful for the claimant and other persons who were members of Palestine Action prior to proscription to continue to express their opposition to Israel's actions in Gaza and elsewhere, including by drawing attention to what they regard as Israel's genocide and other serious violations of international law. 'They will remain legally entitled to do so in private conversations, in print, on social media and at protests.' He added: 'That said, there is no doubt that there will be serious consequences if the order comes into effect immediately and interim relief is refused.' The proposal was approved by both the House of Commons and the House of Lords earlier this week and would make membership and support for the direct action group a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Some 81 organisations are already proscribed under the 2000 Act, including Hamas, al Qaida and National Action. Protesters gathered outside the central London court on Friday (Lucy North/PA) At a hearing on Friday, Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, asked the court to suspend the 'ill-considered' and 'authoritarian abuse of statutory power' until a hearing due around July 21. Mr Husain told the London court: 'This is the first time in our history that a direct action civil disobedience group, which does not advocate for violence, has been sought to be proscribed as terrorists.' The barrister said that his client had been 'inspired' by a long history of direct action in the UK, 'from the suffragettes, to anti-apartheid activists, to Iraq war activists'. The hearing later in July is expected to deal with whether Ms Ammori can bring a High Court challenge over the planned proscription. Blinne Ni Ghralaigh KC, also representing Ms Ammori, told the court that there was no 'express provision' to protect lawyers representing her in the potential legal challenge from criminal consequences if the ban came into effect. She also said that if the ban came into effect the harm would be 'far-reaching', could cause 'irreparable harm to large numbers of members of the public', including causing some to 'self-censor'. Ms Ni Ghralaigh later named Normal People author Sally Rooney, who lives abroad and 'fears the ramifications for her, for her work, for her books, for her programmes' if she shows support for Palestine Action. 'Is the Prime Minister going to denounce her, an Irish artist, as a supporter of a proscribed organisation?' 'Will that have ramifications for her with the BBC, etc?' Ms Ni Ghralaigh asked. A further hearing is expected later in July (Lucy North/PA) Ben Watson KC, for the Home Office, told the High Court there was an 'insuperable hurdle' in the bid to temporarily block the ban of Palestine Action. The barrister also said that if a temporary block was granted, it would be a 'serious disfigurement of the statutory regime'. He said Palestine Action could challenge the Home Secretary's decision at the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission, a specialist tribunal, rather than at the High Court. Friday's hearing comes after an estimated £7 million worth of damage was caused to two Voyager planes at RAF Brize Norton on June 20, in an action claimed by Palestine Action. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, stating that the vandalism of the two planes was 'disgraceful' and that the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage'. Mr Justice Chamberlain said that an assessment on whether to ban the group had been made as early as March, and 'preceded' the incident at RAF Brize Norton. Four people were charged in connection with the incident.

High Court judge refuses to temporarily block Palestine Action terror ban
High Court judge refuses to temporarily block Palestine Action terror ban

Rhyl Journal

time29 minutes ago

  • Rhyl Journal

High Court judge refuses to temporarily block Palestine Action terror ban

Huda Ammori, the co-founder of Palestine Action, asked the High Court to temporarily block the Government from banning the group as a terrorist organisation before a potential legal challenge against the decision to proscribe it under the Terrorism Act 2000. The move is set to come into force at midnight after a High Court judge refused Ms Ammori's bid for a temporary block. Mr Justice Chamberlain said: 'I have concluded that the harm which would ensue if interim relief is refused but the claim later succeeds is insufficient to outweigh the strong public interest in maintaining the order in force.' Lawyers for Ms Ammori were also refused permission to appeal and were told to go to the Court of Appeal itself. Shortly after the decision was handed down, Ms Ammori said that she would be 'seeking an urgent appeal to try to prevent a dystopian nightmare of the Government's making'. She added: 'The Home Secretary is rushing through the implementation of the proscription at midnight tonight despite the fact that our legal challenge is ongoing and that she has been completely unclear about how it will be enforced, leaving the public in the dark about their rights to free speech and expression after midnight tonight when this proscription comes into effect. 'Hundreds of thousands of people across the country have expressed support for Palestine Action by joining our mailing list, following and sharing our social media content and signing petitions, and many, including iconic figures like Sally Rooney, say they will continue to declare 'we are all Palestine Action' and speak out against this preposterous proscription, demonstrating how utterly unworkable it will be.' In a 26-page judgment, Mr Justice Chamberlain said that 'some of the consequences feared by the claimant and others who have given evidence are overstated'. He continued: 'It will remain lawful for the claimant and other persons who were members of Palestine Action prior to proscription to continue to express their opposition to Israel's actions in Gaza and elsewhere, including by drawing attention to what they regard as Israel's genocide and other serious violations of international law. 'They will remain legally entitled to do so in private conversations, in print, on social media and at protests.' He added: 'That said, there is no doubt that there will be serious consequences if the order comes into effect immediately and interim relief is refused.' The proposal was approved by both the House of Commons and the House of Lords earlier this week and would make membership and support for the direct action group a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Some 81 organisations are already proscribed under the 2000 Act, including Hamas, al Qaida and National Action. At a hearing on Friday, Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, asked the court to suspend the 'ill-considered' and 'authoritarian abuse of statutory power' until a hearing due around July 21. Mr Husain told the London court: 'This is the first time in our history that a direct action civil disobedience group, which does not advocate for violence, has been sought to be proscribed as terrorists.' The barrister said that his client had been 'inspired' by a long history of direct action in the UK, 'from the suffragettes, to anti-apartheid activists, to Iraq war activists'. The hearing later in July is expected to deal with whether Ms Ammori can bring a High Court challenge over the planned proscription. Blinne Ni Ghralaigh KC, also representing Ms Ammori, told the court that there was no 'express provision' to protect lawyers representing her in the potential legal challenge from criminal consequences if the ban came into effect. She also said that if the ban came into effect the harm would be 'far-reaching', could cause 'irreparable harm to large numbers of members of the public', including causing some to 'self-censor'. Ms Ni Ghralaigh later named Normal People author Sally Rooney, who lives abroad and 'fears the ramifications for her, for her work, for her books, for her programmes' if she shows support for Palestine Action. 'Is the Prime Minister going to denounce her, an Irish artist, as a supporter of a proscribed organisation?' 'Will that have ramifications for her with the BBC, etc?' Ms Ni Ghralaigh asked. Ben Watson KC, for the Home Office, told the High Court there was an 'insuperable hurdle' in the bid to temporarily block the ban of Palestine Action. The barrister also said that if a temporary block was granted, it would be a 'serious disfigurement of the statutory regime'. He said Palestine Action could challenge the Home Secretary's decision at the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission, a specialist tribunal, rather than at the High Court. Friday's hearing comes after an estimated £7 million worth of damage was caused to two Voyager planes at RAF Brize Norton on June 20, in an action claimed by Palestine Action. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, stating that the vandalism of the two planes was 'disgraceful' and that the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage'. Mr Justice Chamberlain said that an assessment on whether to ban the group had been made as early as March, and 'preceded' the incident at RAF Brize Norton. Four people were charged in connection with the incident.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store