logo
Maoist Influence In Maha Shrinks To 16 Talukas, Gadchiroli Remains Key Battleground

Maoist Influence In Maha Shrinks To 16 Talukas, Gadchiroli Remains Key Battleground

Time of India27-06-2025
Nagpur: The Maharashtra govt has declared that Maoist influence in the state is now confined to just 16 talukas, with 12 in Gadchiroli district and four in Gondia, signalling a significant decline.
A government resolution (GR) on Friday highlights the waning strength of the Maoist movement, particularly in their former stronghold of Abujmarh, straddling Maharashtra and Chhattisgarh. The GR also directed the Maharashtra director general of police (DGP) to monitor and review the Maoist tag on the twin districts of Gadchiroli and Gondia and submit a detailed report.
Security forces estimate that only around 30 armed fighters of the People's Liberation Guerrilla Army (PLGA) and 15 logistics supporters remain active in the region, with their leadership facing an imminent collapse.
The GR supersedes earlier notifications from 2004 and 2005 that identified multiple districts, including Nanded, Yavatmal, Chandrapur, Bhandara, Gondia, and Gadchiroli as Maoist-hit, said sources. Over the years, sustained operations by security forces significantly weakened the Maoist grip. A 2021 review led to the current classification, designating the entire Gadchiroli district (12 talukas) and four talukas in Gondia— Gondia, Salekasa, Arjuni Morgaon, and Deori — as Naxal-affected.
Gadchiroli has been a focal point of anti-Maoist operations, with significant successes in recent years. Over the past two years, approximately 35 Maoists were neutralised, 65 surrendered, and 70 were arrested in the district. In contrast, Gondia has seen minimal Maoist activity, with only three cadres surrendering and one arrested in the same period. The stark reduction in Maoist strength is attributed to relentless security operations, loss of local support, and internal disarray within the Maoist ranks.
Abujmarh, once a formidable bastion, is now described as a tottering stronghold, with security forces closing in on the remaining cadres.
The state's efforts to curb Naxalism date back to govt decisions in 2004 and 2005, which initially declared multiple districts and talukas as Naxal-affected. Subsequent reviews and GRs in 2013, 2014, and 2015 refined these classifications, reflecting the evolving situation. The 2021 Cabinet meeting further emphasised aligning Maharashtra's list of Naxal-affected areas with the Central Government's designations, prompting the latest review.
The DGP's report, which informed the recent GR, underscores the sharp decline in Maoist activities and the need for continued vigilance.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Malegaon blast verdict: Who is Lt Col. Prasad Purohit? The army officer who faced terror charges and walked free after court's acquittal
Malegaon blast verdict: Who is Lt Col. Prasad Purohit? The army officer who faced terror charges and walked free after court's acquittal

Time of India

time37 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Malegaon blast verdict: Who is Lt Col. Prasad Purohit? The army officer who faced terror charges and walked free after court's acquittal

NEW DELHI: Lt Col. Prasad Shrikant Purohit is an Indian Army officer who became a central figure in one of the most controversial terror cases in the country's recent history the 2008 Malegaon blast case. At the time of his arrest, he was serving as a Lieutenant Colonel in military intelligence. On September 29, 2008, a bomb strapped to a motorcycle exploded near a mosque in Malegaon, Maharashtra, killing six people and injuring over 100. The Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) arrested Lt Col. Purohit in November 2008 for allegedly being part of the conspiracy that led to the blast. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai His arrest marked the first time a serving army officer had been implicated in a terrorism-related case in the country. Purohit spent nearly nine years in custody before being granted bail by the Supreme Court in September 2017. The case against him and others became politically and socially contentious, especially after the term 'Hindu terror' entered the public discourse. Purohit himself claims this phrase was first used shortly before the blast by a political party leader, suggesting a narrative was being framed even before the event. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 20 Unforgettable Cars from the Past Undo In his final statement before a special NIA court, Purohit denied all charges, calling the entire case a fabrication. He alleged that senior officers of the ATS tortured him physically and mentally during his illegal detention in Khandala, where he claims he was treated 'worse than a prisoner of war.' He also alleged that he was pressured to name prominent leaders from right-wing organisations like the RSS and VHP, including now-Uttar Pradesh CM Yogi Adityanath. Purohit claimed that false evidence, including RDX, was planted to implicate him. According to his court statement, witnesses were coerced, threatened at gunpoint, and tortured into giving statements dictated by the ATS to align with a political agenda. He accused investigating officers of having orchestrated extra-judicial killings of other suspects and fabricating evidence to fit a pre-decided narrative. He further argued that his work in military intelligence which included reports on fugitive underworld don Dawood Ibrahim's alleged links to Maoist groups and an intelligence brief on Zakir Naik's funding activities may have made him a target. He believes these reports, which also named certain politicians, could have contributed to his framing. Despite the years-long legal ordeal, Lt Col. Purohit was reinstated in the Army pending trial and continued to serve. 'Even after coming out on bail, my conviction never changed,' he said on Thursday, expressing gratitude for the opportunity to keep serving the nation. A special court acquitted all seven accused, including him, in the Malegaon blast case, stating there was 'no reliable and cogent evidence' against them. The court underscored that terrorism has no religion and that convictions cannot be based on mere perception. Reflecting on his long battle, Purohit remarked, 'No investigating agency is wrong; it is the people serving in these agencies who are wrong. This nation is great. We must take care that wrong people do not rise and make people like us suffer.'

Mass burial case: Govt doesn't have agenda to protect or trap anyone, says G Parameshwara
Mass burial case: Govt doesn't have agenda to protect or trap anyone, says G Parameshwara

Hans India

timean hour ago

  • Hans India

Mass burial case: Govt doesn't have agenda to protect or trap anyone, says G Parameshwara

Karnataka Home Minister G. Parameshwara on Thursday said that the Congress-led government in Karnataka has no agenda to either protect or frame anyone in connection with the mass grave allegations reported from a prominent Hindu pilgrimage centre in Mangaluru district. Speaking to reporters in Bengaluru, Parameshwara said, "Why did we set up the Special Investigation Team (SIT)? As a government, we want the truth to come out, and in that context, we constituted the SIT. Once the SIT completes its investigation and submits the report, the facts of the case will be revealed. That's all we want - and that's what the public wants as well." He emphasised that there is no political motive behind the move. "There is no agenda to shield anyone or trap anyone on the part of the government. No one should view this with the wrong perception," Parameshwara appealed. "My request is simple... We have already stated that the investigation should be transparent. That is the only agenda of the government," he underlined. Commenting on the controversy surrounding SIT Chief DGP Pronab Mohanty's name being shortlisted for central deputation while the investigation into the mass grave case is progressing, Parameshwara said, "There are many misconceptions. The government had decided to appoint a DGP-rank officer to head the investigation, and in that backdrop, Pronab Mohanty was appointed as the SIT chief. Now, if his name appears on the central deputation list, no final decision has been taken yet." "The Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms (DPAR), which functions under the Chief Minister, will decide whether to send him on central deputation. We have not made any decision yet. False posts are being circulated on this issue; this is inappropriate. What interest does the government have in this?" he asked. In response to a question, Parameshwara stated, "Until the investigation is complete and the report is submitted, we will not speak on the matter. No one should speculate. We are not driven by curiosity - we only want the truth to emerge. Until then, we won't comment further." Meanwhile, the SIT team has completed the excavation of five burial sites as of Wednesday. The team is expected to dig four more sites on Thursday. SIT Chief Mohanty is stationed in Dharmasthala to oversee the operation. He has stated that, so far, the SIT has not recovered any evidence from the burial sites during digging. On July 11, the unidentified complainant in the case, who had claimed that he was forced to bury several bodies of women who were raped and murdered in Dharmasthala village, appeared before a court in Karnataka's Mangaluru district and recorded his statement. He requested that the police exhume the bodies in his presence. He further alleged that the bodies of the women showed clear signs of sexual assault. They were found without clothes or undergarments and bore injuries, suggesting violent acts.

India, UK, Canada, Vietnam: Full list of countries slapped with Trump tariffs vs nations that struck trade deals
India, UK, Canada, Vietnam: Full list of countries slapped with Trump tariffs vs nations that struck trade deals

Mint

time2 hours ago

  • Mint

India, UK, Canada, Vietnam: Full list of countries slapped with Trump tariffs vs nations that struck trade deals

Trump Tariff List: President Donald Trump is not pushing back an August 1 deadline he set for US tariffs to kick in, with his latest tax blow being on India, which has been slapped with a 25 per cent tariff rate. Donald Trump on Wednesday announced a 25 per cent tariff on Indian imports and threatened an additional "penalty" in response to India's energy purchases from Russia. Not just India, Trump has imposed tariffs on a number of nations, while also announcing trade deal with some others. Here is what you need to know about which countries face Trump tariffs from August 1, and which ones have signed a trade deal with the US. US President Donald Trump on Wednesday slapped a 25 per cent tariff rate on all imports from India, plus unspecified penalties on New Delhi for importing energy from Russia that has failed to stop the war in Ukraine. The surprise announcement came a day after Indian officials said that a US trade team would visit from August 25 to negotiate a trade deal. While Trump later clarified that trade talks are still on, he flagged India's participation at the 'BRICS', calling the coalition 'anti-American'. Doubling down on his attack, Trump on late Wednesday said India and Russia can take their 'dead economies down together', clearly frustrated due to the close ties of the two nations. 'I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care,' he said. The Trump tariffs on India will start kicking in from August 1. India: Tariff rate on April 2 - 26%; Tariff rate from August 1 -25% Mexico: Tariff rate on April 2 - NA; Tariff rate from August 1 - 30% Canada: Tariff rate on April 2 - NA; Tariff rate from August 1 - 35% Iraq: Tariff rate on April 2 - 39%; Tariff rate from August 1 - 35% Moldova: Tariff rate on April 2 - 31%; Tariff rate from August 1 - 25% Libya: Tariff rate on April 2 - 31%; Tariff rate from August 1 - 30% Algeria: Tariff rate on April 2 - 30%; Tariff rate from August 1 - 30% Brunei: Tariff rate on April 2 - 24%; Tariff rate from August 1 - 25% South Korea: April 2 tariff rate - 25%; August 1 tariff rate - 15% EU: April 2 tariff rate - 20%; August 1 tariff rate - 15% Japan: April 2 tariff rate -24% ; August 1 tariff rate - 15% Philippines: April 2 tariff rate - 17%; August 1 tariff rate - 19% Indonesia: April 2 tariff rate - 32%; August 1 tariff rate - 19% Vietnam: April 2 tariff rate - 46%; August 1 tariff rate - 20% UK: April 2 tariff rate - 10%; August 1 tariff rate - 10%

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store