Investing abroad: Here are the pros and cons of using old and new routes
There are multiple ways to invest abroad, and with deepening of markets, more avenues are becoming available.
Here is a look at the advantages and disadvantages of both old and new avenues, and different investor profiles.
Direct purchase of stocks
There are broking firms, either multinational firms or Indian entities with tie-ups with broking firms abroad, who facilitate the execution. Your investment in stocks or bonds abroad is subject to liberalized remittance scheme (LRS) limit of $250,000 per financial year. At a conversion rate of 86 per dollar, it is ₹2.15 crore per financial year.
Provided you do not have any other requirement for money abroad, children's education, or travel, you can utilise this limit. However, one issue here is stock selection. If you are in a different profession, then analysing stocks, that too foreign stocks, is not your forte.
There are entities in India that offer a curated basket of stocks which you can purchase, and they will facilitate the transaction through a broking entity with which they have a tie-up. However, they do not have accountability for the performance of those stocks. You require guidance on picking stocks abroad. Otherwise, it is not advisable to venture into it.
Managed vehicles - mutual funds
Through the mutual fund route, you not only get the advantage of a professional fund management team managing the portfolio, but also the fact that it is not part of the LRS limit. The issue of the MF route is entirely different.
There are RBI limits for the MF industry, of $7 billion for investment abroad and another $1 billion for investments in ETFs abroad. The limits became almost full, and MFs had to stop accepting fresh subscriptions. However, certain MFs investing abroad do accept money from time to time.
There are redemptions, which open up scope for accepting fresh money. Hence, you can go through the MF route. You get the advantage of a fund manager managing your money, or a passive fund following an index abroad, where you can avoid the fund manager risk (risk of the fund manager underperforming a benchmark index).
GIFT City options
There is another avenue in MFs: recently, a fund has been launched under the IFSCA (International Financial Services Centres Authority) jurisdiction at GIFT City. This is a different jurisdiction, not subject to the usual RBI or SEBI regulations. That is, it is not subject to the cap on investments abroad or $7 billion or $1 billion. This is a retail fund, with minimum subscription of $5,000 ( ₹430,000) at a conversion rate of 86.
The term retail fund has a particular connotation: it is a particular fund structure under the IFSCA. This fund is subject to the LRS limit of $250,000 per year. The appeal of this structure is that at $5,000, the ticket size is relatively affordable. There are other outbound products available at GIFT City (other than mutual funds) where the ticket size is higher.
Portfolio management services
There are PMSs available at GIFT City, where you convert your money from your normal rupee bank account to dollar and remit to a bank housed at GIFT. The ticket size is usually $75,000, which is ₹64.5 lakh. Quantum could be lower if the service provider offers 'accredited investors". There is a professional fund manager to manage your portfolio. Money remitted to GIFT jurisdiction is part of the LRS limit of $250,000.
Alternative Investment Funds
There are fund management houses that have Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) under IFSCA guidelines. The fund would be structured as something like 'A Restricted Scheme (Non-Retail) classified as a close-ended category III AIF under the IFSCA FM Regulations".
A restricted scheme is one under a private placement offer to only accredited investors or investors investing above $150,000, and it shall have not more than 1,000 investors.
Things to know about GIFT City route
Similarly, when there is a redemption from investments abroad but the money stays within GIFT, there is no LRS implication. It can be remitted abroad later when required.Joydeep Sen is a corporate trainer (financial markets) and author. Views are personal.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
28 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump has risked US-India ties for a cheap win
Great partnerships are built slowly and destroyed quickly. In torching trust for the sake of a few headlines and a Nobel nomination, Trump risks more than a temporary chill Trump actions suggest a transactional mindset in which strategic relationships are subordinated to momentary political wins and rhetorical jabs. Representational image 'In geopolitics, there are no permanent friends or enemies, only permanent interests.' – Lord Palmerston From Warmth to Whiplash Few bilateral relationships have been cultivated with more care over the last two decades than that between the United States and India. The strategic logic was clear: as Asia's other democratic giant, India could help anchor an Indo-Pacific balance of power to check China's rise. But President Donald Trump, in a matter of months, has managed to turn goodwill into suspicion. What began with a 'MAGA plus MIGA equals mega partnership' in February has degenerated into public insults, punitive tariffs, and a humiliating tilt towards Pakistan. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The consequences go well beyond bruised egos. They threaten to undo years of steady alignment between the two largest democracies, alignment that took decades to build and that the US can ill afford to squander. The Tariff Hammer Trump's decision to slap a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods, then double it to 50 per cent, was framed as punishment for New Delhi's continued imports of Russian oil. Yet the hypocrisy is glaring: China, America's main strategic rival, buys far more Russian oil without incurring such penalties. The president's taunt 'They can take their dead economies down together' was not only factually wrong (India's economy is booming) but needlessly insulting. For India, it confirmed that Washington's so-called 'strategic partnership' can be tossed aside the moment it becomes inconvenient. Lisa Curtis, a veteran South Asia hand who served on Trump's National Security Council, calls this approach 'mystifying' and 'short-sighted'. The words are diplomatic; the implications are blunt. This is self-sabotage. Kashmir: The Breaking Point If the tariffs soured the mood, the Kashmir episode poisoned it. In May, after a terrorist attack sparked tensions between India and Pakistan, the US quietly urged restraint, standard practice in such crises. But Trump couldn't resist claiming full credit, even boasting that he had threatened India to force a climbdown. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This crossed a red line. India has never accepted third-party mediation on Kashmir. Modi's government took the extraordinary step of publishing its call minutes with Trump, stressing 'at no point' had there been mediation. Indian commentators called it 'typical Trump overreach'. The damage was compounded when Pakistan publicly praised Trump's 'peacemaking' and even nominated him for the Nobel Prize he so covets. For New Delhi, the symbolism was clear: Washington had chosen public flattery from Islamabad over strategic discretion with India. Playing Favourites Soon after, Pakistan secured a tariff reduction from 29 per cent to 19 per cent. India's rate stayed at 50 per cent. That sent a starker message than any speech: a supposed partner was punished harder than an adversary. For many in India's foreign policy establishment, this rekindled the suspicion that the US still sees South Asia primarily through a Pakistan-centric lens, a Cold War hangover they thought was long gone. More Than Trade STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The damage isn't confined to tariffs and Kashmir. Indian students face increased harassment on American campuses under a tightening immigration regime. Deportations of undocumented Indians have spiked. Meanwhile, Trump's attendance at the upcoming Quad summit in India is now in doubt. Curtis is unequivocal: 'Prime Minister Modi is just not going to trust President Trump anymore.' Without personal trust, strategic logic will not hold the partnership together. China and Russia Waiting in the Wings It is naïve to think India will simply pivot to Beijing. The two countries remain strategic rivals, with unresolved border disputes and conflicting ambitions in the Indian Ocean. But Modi is preparing to visit China for the first time in seven years, a signal that New Delhi is willing to thaw ties when it suits its interests. Russia, meanwhile, remains a trusted partner in defence and energy. President Putin's planned visit to India underscores Moscow's enduring relevance. If Washington keeps pushing India away, it risks accelerating a Eurasian convergence that US strategists have spent decades trying to prevent. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Strategy Demands Consistency The US-India partnership was never about sentiment. It was built on shared interests, counterbalancing China, securing supply chains, and stabilising the Indo-Pacific. Such a partnership demands steadiness and respect for India's strategic autonomy. Trump's approach has been neither steady nor respectful. His actions suggest a transactional mindset in which strategic relationships are subordinated to momentary political wins and rhetorical jabs. That is not how great-power partnerships survive. A Self-Inflicted Wound Palmerston's maxim about permanent interests is more than a cynical quip; it is a warning. The US and India will always have differences, over trade, over Russia, over immigration. But these must be managed quietly, without public humiliation, if the broader strategic compact is to hold. In torching trust for the sake of a few headlines and a Nobel nomination from Islamabad, Trump risks more than a temporary chill. He risks driving India to hedge harder with Beijing and Moscow, fracturing the delicate geometry of Asian geopolitics. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Great partnerships are built slowly and destroyed quickly. Washington still has a narrow window to repair the damage. But if it fails, it will discover, too late, that India, once alienated, will not be easily won back. Ashutosh Kumar Thakur is a Bengaluru-based management professional, literary critic, and Curator. He can be reached at ashutoshbthakur@ The views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
India.com
28 minutes ago
- India.com
SBI makes BIG announcement, home loan rates increased by..., EMIs to now cost more for customers; Here's What it means for new borrowers
SBI makes BIG announcement, home loan rates increased by..., EMIs to now cost more for customers; Here's What it means for new borrowers Even though the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has cut the repo rate to 5.5 per cent to make borrowing cheaper, the State Bank of India (SBI) has increased home loan rates for new borrowers by 25 basis points. SBI's home loan interest range has now gone up from 7.50 per cent – 8.45 per cent to 7.50 per cent – 8.70 per cent . This means people with lower credit scores could end up paying more, as the highest interest rate has been raised. Other public sector banks, such as Union Bank of India, Bank of India, Bank of Maharashtra, and Central Bank of India, currently offer rates starting from 7.35 per cent and going up to over 10 per cent, depending on a borrower's credit history. Experts say other public banks might also increase rates following SBI's move, even though the RBI's repo rate cut was meant to bring down loan costs and give people some financial relief. Earlier, SBI had said in a report that the RBI's repo rate cut would make home loans cheaper. The impact would be felt fastest in loans linked to the External Benchmark Lending Rate (EBLR), which make up about 60% of all loans given by Scheduled Commercial Banks (SCBs), according to SBI Research. As of August 2025, most new SBI home loans are tied to the EBLR, which is calculated as the RBI's repo rate plus a fixed spread. How SBI's Rate Hike Could Affect Home Loan Borrowers Let's take an example of a Rs. 30 lakh home loan over 20 years. Earlier rate (8.45 per cent) EMI: Rs. 25,830 Total repayment: Rs. 61.99 lakh New rate (8.70 per cent) EMI: Rs. 26,278 Total repayment: Rs. 63.06 lakh That's about Rs. 450 extra per month, which may not sound huge at first, but over the full tenure, it adds up to over Rs. 1 lakh more in repayments. For bigger loans: Say Rs. 50 lakh or more, this effect becomes even more significant, making home ownership costlier, especially for first-time buyers.
Hindustan Times
28 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Air Canada suspends operations as flight attendants go on strike
Toronto: Air Canada cancelled hundreds of flights on Friday, impacting tens of thousands of passengers including many flying to and from India, as it responded to a strike by its flight attendants. Two Air Canada planes are seen on the tarmac of the Pierre-Elliott Trudeau Airport in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, on Friday. (AFP) The airline announced it had 'suspended all operations' for Air Canada and Air Canada Rouge flights following the strike by its 10,000 flight attendants represented by the Canadian Union of Public Employees. The strike began early on Saturday. Among the flights impacted by cancellations were direct flights from Toronto, Vancouver and Montreal to New Delhi, as well as those from Calgary with a stopover in London. With the strike action slated to begin on Saturday, Air Canada announced on Friday evening that 623 flights had been cancelled and 100,100 passengers impacted. On Thursday, the national carrier had announced it had 'begun a phased wind-down of most of our operations, to be completed over the next two days.' The union sought higher pay as well as improved working conditions but no timely settlement had been reached with the airline by the deadline. Travel industry specialists were hopeful there wouldn't be large-scale disruption affecting those traveling between India and Canada. Vibhor Chhabra, director of the Toronto-based Grand Travel, felt that the issue was 'manageable' as Air Canada was a member of the Star Alliance group of airlines. With airlines like Air India also being part of that group, passengers could be transferred to the latter's flights, he said, or to those flying via Europe to India. 'They (passengers) are being moved to other routes, they will be protected by arrangements with other airlines. But some impact will be there,' he felt. Flights returning from India were already impacted even before the strike action started, as Air Canada started cancelling long-haul flights, including those to India, in advance. On Thursday the airline posted on X that the union had rejected attendants' union an agreement to fly passengers back to Canada and as 'a result, 25 000 additional passengers are going to be stranded abroad.' Air Canada has daily flights leaving for Indian destinations including New Delhi, Mumbai, Hyderabad, Amritsar, Ahmedabad, Chennai and Kochi from the cities of Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver and Calgary.
