logo
Take this simple step as you approach retirement

Take this simple step as you approach retirement

Independent6 days ago
While most retirement portfolios include allocations to stocks and bonds in the years leading up to retirement, most retirement savers don't hold much more than an emergency cushion in cash.
Thus, an important job in the years before retirement is building up that cash cushion.
The good news is that cash yields are up, meaning cash holdings aren't the 'dead money' they were a few years ago. And equity investments have performed well, too—at least until very recently. That means that most investors can build their cash stakes, at least in part, by pruning appreciated holdings.
Here's some guidance on the amount, source, and location of those liquid reserves, according to the Bucket approach to retirement portfolio planning.
Rightsizing Bucket 1
Your cash bucket should consist of one to two years' worth of portfolio withdrawals, not living expenses.
In order to set up Bucket 1 initially, think through your cash flow sources for the first few years of retirement.
For example, let's say a 66-year-old wants to retire in two years and expects that he'll need to spend $80,000 per year, in total, from his $1.5 million portfolio, at that time. He wants to delay filing for Social Security until age 70, so all of his spending will come from his portfolio in those first few years of retirement. After that, roughly half his spending needs will come from Social Security.
If he wanted to be conservative, he could build a cash cushion consisting of $160,000—his years 1 and 2 portfolio withdrawals.
His Bucket 2—high-quality bonds—would consist of eight years' worth of portfolio withdrawals, which at that point will be $40,000 per year. The remaining $1 million and change could go into a globally diversified equity portfolio.
Where to put the money?
It's also worth considering the 'where' of your liquid reserves. To do so, consider your sequence of withdrawals in retirement.
Taxable accounts are often first in the queue for retirement withdrawals because their ongoing tax costs are higher than tax-sheltered accounts.
But some retirees may benefit from spending from their tax-deferred accounts early in retirement, with an eye toward reducing future required minimum distributions and tax bills. This is a good spot to get some advice from a financial or tax advisor.
Armed with the knowledge of where you'll turn for your spending in the first part of your retirement, you can then figure out where best to hold your liquid reserves.
Where to get the money?
The next step is figuring out how to build up this reserve. Ideally, you'd give yourself a couple of years to enlarge your cash position rather than having to find the money just before retirement.
For preretirees who are still saving for retirement, start by directing new contributions into cash. Say, for example, the aforementioned retiree is directing a couple years' worth of IRA and 401(k)contributions to cash. He could arrive at nearly half his target cash allocation by the time he reaches his retirement.
There's also potential bonuses and inheritances. If you've recently received a surprise cash injection, the assets are a logical source for bulking up cash reserves.
Another solid option is to build up cash by peeling back on highly appreciated asset classes, especially US stocks. Trimming equities and adding those assets to cash and bonds reduces risk and helps cover cash flows for the first few years of retirement.
Finally, you can reduce risky positions. Consider the employer stock you know you should scale back on or the individual-stock portfolio that's duplicative of what's in your mutual funds. Such holdings can be ideal sources when building up your cash reserves, but mind the tax consequences if you're selling them from a taxable account.
___
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A pause on higher tariffs for China is due to expire Tuesday. Here's what to know.
A pause on higher tariffs for China is due to expire Tuesday. Here's what to know.

The Independent

time3 minutes ago

  • The Independent

A pause on higher tariffs for China is due to expire Tuesday. Here's what to know.

A 90-day pause on imposing higher tariffs on China is due to expire on Tuesday and it is unclear if it will be extended. After the most recent round of China-U.S. trade talks, held late last month in Stockholm, Chinese and U.S. officials said they expected the deadline to be extended for another 90 days. The U.S. side said the decision was up to President Donald Trump. So far there has been no formal announcement about whether he will endorse an extension or push ahead with the higher tariffs. The uncertainty has left businesses in limbo and a decision to raise the import duties could jolt world markets. SILENCE FROM WASHINGTON AND BEIJING Trump has repeatedly shifted deadlines and tariff rates, and neither side has indicated what it plans for Tuesday. Extending the Aug. 12 deadline for reaching a trade agreement with China would forestall earlier threats of tariffs of up to 245%. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Trump was deciding about another 90-day delay to allow time to work out details of an agreement setting tariffs on most products at 50%, including extra import duties related to illicit trade in the powerful opiate fentanyl. Higher tariffs are aimed at offsetting the huge, chronic U.S. trade deficit with China, which hit a 21-year low in July as the threat of tariffs bit into Chinese exports. It's not unusual for the U.S. to give hints on where talks stand, but it's rare for China to make announcements until major decisions are set. CHINA RESISTED CUTTING AN EARLY BARGAIN Prohibitively high tariffs on Chinese exports to the United States would put huge pressure on Beijing at a time when the Chinese economy, the world's second largest, is still recovering from a prolonged downturn in its property market. Lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic have left around 200 million of its workers reliant on 'gig work,' crimping the job market. Higher import taxes on small parcels from China have also hurt smaller factories and layoffs have accelerated, But the U.S. relies heavily on imports from China for all sorts of products, from household goods and clothing to wind turbines, basic computer chips, electric vehicle batteries and the rare earths needed to make them. That gives Beijing some powerful leverage in the negotiations with Washington. Even with higher tariffs, China remains competitive for many products. And its leaders are aware that the U.S. economy is only just beginning to feel the effects of higher prices from Trump's broad tariff hikes. For now, imports from China are subject to a 10% baseline tariff and a 20% extra tariff related to the fentanyl issue. Some products are taxed at higher rates. U.S. exports to China are subject to tariffs of around 30%. Before the two sides called a truce, Trump had threatened to impose 245% import duties on Chinese goods. China retaliated by saying it would hike its tariff on U.S. products to 125%. MUCH IS AT STAKE A trade war between the world's two largest economies has ramifications across the global economy, affecting industrial supply chains, demand for commodities like copper and oil and geopolitical issues such as the war in Ukraine. After a phone call with Chinese leader Xi Jinping in June, Trump said he hoped to meet with Xi later this year. That's an incentive for striking a deal with Beijing. If the two sides fail to keep their truce, trade tensions could escalate and tariffs might rise to even higher levels, inflicting still more pain on both economies and rattling world markets. Businesses would refrain from making investment commitments and hiring, while inflation would surge higher. Companies are in an 'extended wait-and-see mode,' Oxford Economics said in a recent report.

The year's most dubious stock trades by politicians come to light
The year's most dubious stock trades by politicians come to light

Daily Mail​

time4 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

The year's most dubious stock trades by politicians come to light

By and Published: | Updated: Members of Congress aren't technically allowed to use insider knowledge to trade stocks while in office, but a couple of well-timed trades have raised eyebrows among eagle-eyed critics. Momentum to ban members of Congress from trading stocks is swelling even as lawmakers make major profits from the turbulent stock market. Right now, existing law allows legislators sitting on military committees buy defense stocks while financial regulators can snap up crypto and bank shares. Though trading on inside information is forbidden, there's little enforcement - and the practice appears rampant on Capitol Hill. Senate proposals would bar even the president and vice president from trading, but wealthy lawmakers claim restrictions would strip incentives and force unfair divestment of their holdings. Others complain they can't survive on their $174,000 salaries alone, fueling a trading bonanza that's generating handsome profits just as ban proposals gain steam. Here the Daily Mail highlights the top most suspect stock trades of the year. Rep. Rob Bresnahan (pictured), R-Pa., a 34-year-old freshman legislator has been one of the most scrutinized traders. He was the former CEO of Kuharchik Construction, Bresnahan's family company, where he is credited with expanding the family business. The Pennsylvania Republican campaigned on banning members from trading, but he has reported more transactions than practically every other lawmaker. 'Bresnahan has filed more stock trades than almost any other member of Congress since entering office this year,' Quiver Quantitative's co-founder Christopher Kardatzke told the Daily Mail. Since being sworn in this January and August 8, the Republican has made at least 617 trades, according to federal disclosures data compiled by Quiver Quantitative. The Republican has repeatedly claimed his financial advisors manager his trades, but when pressed recently by a local radio station on why he doesn't instruct them to halt the transactions he deflected. 'And then do what with it?' the lawmaker told WVIA. 'Just leave it all in the accounts and just leave it there and lose money and go broke?' Bresnahan introduced a bill earlier this year to ban members and their spouses from stock trading, even as he's continued to make transactions. Right before Trump's signature domestic agenda the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' passed Congress, Bresnahan reported sale in Centene, a healthcare company that later lost over half of its share price because of Medicaid cuts contained within the legislation. Democratic attack ads have shredded him for voting for the cuts. 'Honestly I found out about it in real time but the key takeaway is I follow the STOCK Act and I follow the rules,' Bresnahan said when pressed on the stock sale by WNEP . Bresnahan has been widely criticized for being hypocritical about his stock trading. He's claimed his advisors are forbidden from trading in companies held by foreign adversaries, however his disclosures show that he has bought and sold shares in Alibaba, a Chinese e-commerce company. Bresnahan has also indicated he will put his money in a blind trust, where it is managed by someone else and he has no clue about the individual transactions. But setting up such an account takes time, he has claimed. 'The whole process has been excruciating,' he told the Washington Examiner recently. Nearly 170 of the Pennsylvanian's trades occurred just after Trump's early April tariff announcement, dubbed 'Liberation Day' by the White House. In one instance in February, the lawmaker even disclosed a day trade, showing the purchase and sale of Palantir stock on the same day. 'Even if the portfolio is managed by a financial advisor, as Bresnahan has claimed, we're left to wonder why an advisor is day-trading Palantir stock in a U.S. Congressman's account,' Kardatzke said. Firebrand Marjorie Taylor Greene has also gained attention for trading the same stock around the same time - a transaction that has netted her thousands. The Georgia Republican made a flurry of stock purchases around the exact time that Trump instructed the nation that it was 'a great time to get rich, richer than ever before,' on Truth Social. After the market dipped around Liberation Day, Green heeded the president's warning and loaded up on discounted stocks. She purchased tech stock Impinj on April 4, which has since rocketed up over 100 percent in the last few months. And after buying Palantir on April 8, the Georgia Republican has doubled her investment, locking in a return over 115 percent. The tech company provides AI solutions and software to the federal government, including the Pentagon and more recently the Department of Homeland Security. Greene currently sits on the House Homeland Security Committee, the congressional panel that approves funding for DHS and ICE. She also claims her portfolio is managed by a financial advisor. 'Prior to this year, we had only seen one member of Congress ever buy Palantir stock. In the first two months of 2025, we saw six different members buy in,' Kardatzke noted. 'Maybe they all share the same financial advisor. The stock is up 148 percent so far this year.' Legislation to ban trading among members has even received backing from former Speaker Nancy Pelosi (pictured(, D-Calif., who has become notorious for scoring winning trades during her decades in Congress. When she led Congress in 2021 she famously brushed off questions about implementing a stock trading ban for members, citing 'a free market economy.' Though her disclosures show that these trades are done by her husband, Paul Pelosi, it does raise questions as to how he can so frequently beat the market, and by such massive margins. President Donald Trump posted on his own social media site Truth Social Saturday, calling Pelosi a 'disgusting degenerate' over her and her husband's stock trading practices. Trump wrote that 'Crooked Nancy Pelosi, and her very 'interesting' husband, beat every Hedge Fund in 2024.' 'In other words, these two very average 'minds' beat ALL of the Super Geniuses on Wall Street, thousands of them,' Trump also added. 'Speaker Pelosi does not own any stocks and has no knowledge or subsequent involvement in any transactions,' her spokesperson told the Daily Mail before Trump's latest attack on the former Speaker. Between 2023 and early July 2025, over 70 percent of Pelosi's trades were profitable, according to Capitol Trades . The Bay Area couple has also reported call options on AI-focused companies like Nvidia, Alphabet and others. 'I think it's a little bit sketchy just because of how high-risk high-reward option contracts are,' Christopher Josephs, co-founder of Autopilot, a congressional investing app, told the Daily Mail. 'No average everyday person trading does that.' The 85-year-old Democrat got defensive recently when asked by CNN's Jake Tapper to respond to Trump's attacks on her trading practices. 'Why do you have to read that?' Pelosi interrupted when Tapper began asking about members' trading. Neither Greene nor Bresnahan responded to the Daily Mail's request for comment.

Energy giant takes £4bn hit as Trump goes to war on ‘con job' wind farms
Energy giant takes £4bn hit as Trump goes to war on ‘con job' wind farms

Telegraph

time4 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Energy giant takes £4bn hit as Trump goes to war on ‘con job' wind farms

More than £4bn was wiped off the value of the world's biggest offshore wind farm developer after Donald Trump declared war on renewable energy projects. Shares in Ørsted plunged by an unprecedented 29pc in early trading to a record low after it revealed it would seek to raise 60bn Danish kroner (£7bn) from a new stock offering as it battles a downturn in the industry. The company, which is majority owned by the Danish state, will hold an extraordinary general meeting on Sept 5 to approve the plans. Rasmus Errboe, chief executive, said the company had been hit by 'adverse market developments in the US', where the president is waging a war against the wind industry. Mr Errboe said the company's fundraising through shareholders was the 'best solution' to strengthen the company's balance sheet and fund its Sunrise Wind development, off the coast of New York. 'Con job' It comes after Mr Trump briefly halted work on a separate wind farm off the coast of New York in April and last month branded the renewable energy source a 'con job' during a visit to Scotland. He said at his Turnberry golf course that turbines spoiled the landscape and sucked in hefty subsidies, adding: 'The whole thing is a con job. It's very expensive.' President Trump has rolled back subsidies for the renewables industry under his tax cutting bill working its way through Congress. He suspended licensing for new wind farms on his first day back in office in January. His hatred of turbines stems from a long planning battle he had with Scottish authorities. He opposed plans for a major North Sea wind power development that he complained could be seen from his Aberdeenshire course, but lost the case. Ørsted usually funds wind farms by selling off stakes in the projects. However, it said on Monday that it was cancelling its planned sale for its New York scheme in favour of the new share issue. Mr Errboe said: 'Ørsted and our industry are in an extraordinary situation with the adverse market development in the US on top of the past years' macroeconomic and supply chain challenges.' Lene Skole, chairman, said the company faced an 'unprecedented regulatory development in the US' which meant raising money from shareholders was 'the best path forward'. Jenny Ping, an analyst at City, said Ørsted's decision was 'sensible' in the long run but 'likely painful' in the short term, while Ahmed Farman, at Jefferies, added the move was 'clearly negative'. Under the share issue, the Danish state will maintain its 50.1pc stake in the energy company, Ørsted said. A spokesman for Norway's Equinor, which holds a 10pc stake, said it would 'assess the proposal'. The company also plans to raise more than 35bn Danish kroner from selling stakes in its energy projects over the next two years. It plans to invest around 145bn Danish kroner during that time and insisted its earnings guidance for this year remains on track. The fundraising plans come amid wider turbulence at Ørsted. In May, the company pulled the plug on the 2.4-gigawatt Hornsea 4 project off the east of England as it blamed rising costs and interest rates. Wind farm operators are expected to be offered bumper subsidies by Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, to attract bids for renewable energy contracts in an auction that launched last week. A wind auction in 2023 failed to receive any bids after ministers initially refused to raise the subsidies on offer. They later backed down, with Mr Miliband overseeing a record £3bn of contract for difference awards last year.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store