logo
Implementing law, growing exports

Implementing law, growing exports

EDITORIAL: The Senate's passage of a bill to limit the death penalty in line with GSP+ requirements may have raised a few eyebrows, but it is a necessary and long-overdue step. For too long, Pakistan has failed to match the rhetoric of economic reform with actual, difficult decisions. If GSP+ demands limiting capital punishment to only the most serious crimes, then that's exactly what must be done; no matter how polarising the conversation.
Exports are not optional. They are a lifeline. Without sustained export growth, Pakistan will keep returning to the IMF, and keep falling further behind its peers. And yet, after all the slogans, special economic zones, policy incentives, and handshakes with trade partners, exports remain stubbornly stagnant. The only thing worse than not being able to grow exports, is not being able to meet conditions that allow access to markets at all.
That's why compliance with the GSP+ framework matters more than ideological grandstanding. It is not Pakistan's prerogative to tell the European Union how to frame human rights laws. Nor should dissenting lawmakers presume they can afford to miss export quotas on the pretext of domestic legal interpretations. The real question is whether Pakistan can protect its citizens without inviting international scrutiny for overreach in criminal justice.
Besides, the argument that crime is deterred by harsher punishment has been debunked the world over. Pakistan is not the only country to have had a public flogging era, or a time of blanket capital punishments. And yet its conviction rates remain abysmally low, with most violent criminals never brought to justice. If the point is deterrence, then it is implementation — not escalation — that delivers results. Laws are only as effective as their enforcement, and that is where Pakistan falls short.
Look no further than the seafood export sector. It just posted its highest-ever volume, but still fell short of the $500 million mark — again. That revenue target has eluded the country for more than a decade now, despite the industry's tireless efforts and policy-level support. Market access limitations, quality control gaps, and regulatory bottlenecks continue to hold it back. These are issues of execution, not intention.
The same holds true for the country's overall export base. Textiles remain too import-dependent, IT exports are throttled by inconsistent policies, and agricultural exporters face market access issues tied to sanitary and phytosanitary standards. Most of these challenges are solvable; if the government focuses more on execution and less on optics.
Complying with GSP+ rules isn't just about pleasing the EU; it is about positioning Pakistan as a responsible, rules-based member of the global economy. That credibility cannot be built with rhetoric or nationalist defiance. It requires institutional commitment, legal alignment, and the maturity to treat external trade as a strategic priority, not a bargaining chip.
Lawmakers opposing the amendment would do well to remember that this is not about letting criminals off easy. It is about taking international obligations seriously so the country can keep what little trade leverage it still holds. If those obligations require reframing certain laws to reflect international norms, so be it.
Pakistan's economy doesn't have the luxury of ideological detours anymore. Export-led growth is the only sustainable path forward. And access to premium markets, especially those with preferential trade frameworks, must be protected at all costs. The sooner we realise this, the better our chances of ever breaking out of the low-growth, high-debt trap.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Constitution exists but it is not followed, says JI chief
Constitution exists but it is not followed, says JI chief

Business Recorder

time43 minutes ago

  • Business Recorder

Constitution exists but it is not followed, says JI chief

LAHORE: Chief of Jamaat-e-Islami Hafiz Naeem-ur-Rehman has said that a cruel and exploitative system continues to dominate Pakistan where the constitution exists but not implemented. 'Even judges today are dissatisfied with the justice system. While the wealthy can buy justice, the poor are left to suffer for generations in the courts,' he said. Addressing participants of the central training workshop at Mansoora on Saturday, he stressed that the Jamaat-e-Islami is striving to provide justice to the people at the grassroots level. 'Feudal landlords exploit the farmers, capitalists and contractors feed off the sweat of labourers, and the sugar mill mafia loots the people while sitting in the government itself,' he said. 'This exploitative rule must end and the public must stand with Jamaat-e-Islami to bring about this change.' Rehman emphasized that the 'Haq Do Balochistan Ko' movement is not a cause of a single ethnic group but a struggle for the rights of the entire province. 'Every citizen deserves equal rights over their resources, their land, and their dignity.' He announced that Jamaat-e-Islami is forming people's committees in every village, town, neighbourhood, and union council across the country. These committees aim to fight injustice and lawlessness, while also tackling drug abuse, especially among youth. 'They will lead community-driven efforts to reform the education system, rehabilitate crumbling public school buildings, and address municipal and civic problems including the care and maintenance of mosques,' he added. The JI chief urged the youth to engage not only in education and sports but also in healthy competition for moral and social development. 'We need youth who lead their communities in good deeds,' he stated. Criticizing Pakistan's deepening debt and subservience to the IMF, he said, 'Those who have chained the country to foreign loans are looting the nation. Big landlords and industrialists refuse to pay taxes while expanding their private businesses by usurping public rights. Meanwhile, the burden is placed entirely on the poor, as the ruling elite continues to raise their salaries and perks.' He said that business and industry is essential for job creation, expanding private empires through land grabbing is an unforgivable crime. 'Jamaat-e-Islami will continue to adopt every legal and democratic path to secure the rights of the working class, small farmers, and oppressed citizens.' Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Promise and peril of low policy rates
Promise and peril of low policy rates

Business Recorder

time43 minutes ago

  • Business Recorder

Promise and peril of low policy rates

In an unprecedented policy action that has taken international markets and other domestic players by surprise, the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) has carried one of the most aggressive interest rate cuts in its history. The policy rate has crashed from a high of 22 percent in June 2024 to 11 percent by May 2025 — a total of 1,100 basis-point reduction in less than one year. While this change reflects new-found optimism in the macroeconomic landscape, particularly the steep deceleration in inflation, it also provokes a few red flags about the sustainability of the economic trajectory of Pakistan. The argument for cutting interest rates is intuitively appealing. Despite soaring to almost 40 percent in mid?2023 in the wake of supply shocks, exchange rate depreciation and a surge in global commodities, headline inflation has plummeted to a mere 0.3 percent in April 2025 — the lowest in over 30 years for Pakistan. This disinflation has afforded the central bank a leeway to cut borrowing costs to incentivize private-sector credit, increase investment and deliver fiscal relief through cheaper government borrowings. Furthermore, the external sector has evidenced temporary stabilization. During July-March FY25, the current account surplus was recorded at USD 1.9 billion, supported by remittances, low import requirements and relatively stable global oil prices. The PKR is stable at around 275-285 per USD and far away from the jumpy performance in 2023. These are good tidings for a country perennially suffering from both twin deficits as well as a decline in foreign exchange reserves. But upon closer examination, the situation is more complicated. One, headline inflation has plummeted, but core inflation (which strips out volatile food and energy prices) is still running at about 8 percent as of April 2025. That indicates that underlying price pressures, especially in services and rents, are still sticky. Added to this is the upturn in wage increases; the hike in administrative prices; and the coming delivery, under the new IMF agreement, of the increase in energy tariffs, which could all help revive inflation in the second half of the year. Another cause for concern is the distress in rural economy. Over recent years, much of the disinflation has been the result of unprecedented falls in prices of some agricultural commodities. Wheat prices are down more than 35 percent over the past year, and electricity and fuel costs have eased. Although urban consumers have embraced lower food inflation with open arms, it has hit rural incomes hard. Farmers are unable to meet input costs, and lower crop profitability is eroding the sowing cycle that will come, which in turn could reverse food inflation trends and exacerbate food security fears. The external front looks better, but is not without its vulnerabilities. Pakistan's trade deficit surged to USD 3.4 billion in April, as import appetite started to rebound with credit markets reopening and import restrictions easing. At the same time, FX reserves — now between USD 9bn and USD 14bn — are dangerously low compared to the country's external debt commitments. Pakistan has to repay approximately USD 19 billion in external liabilities per year and a delay in projected inflows from the IMF, bilateral creditors or Eurobond issuance could once again be too much for its reserves. A reverse in commodity prices as well as geopolitical event risk could compound these weaknesses. Fiscal sustainability is another important issue. Although policy rates are lower and save the government money in borrowing costs from the domestic market, this may also result in a situation where the government becomes less vigilant in managing the budget. The total public debt is estimated to be 74 percent of GDP, and the interest payments almost cover 50 percent of total government expenditures. It is very easy to lose space that lower interest payments created for the budget in case of any slack in revenue collection, subsidy reforms, or privatization attempts. Pakistan's tax-to-GDP ratio is still below 10 percent, one of the lowest on the planet, and most of the attempts to broaden the tax base have been blocked over and over by political opponents. Most importantly, the swift process of monetary easing may damage the credibility of inflation targeting by the State Bank. Currently, inflation figures may warrant a conservative approach, but perception of political motivations behind these cuts largely dampens investor sentiment. This comes at a delicate moment during Pakistan's next IMF review, where the Fund scrutinizes fiscal and monetary policy alignment. Straying from set targets or structural benchmarks risks slowing down disbursements, halting Pakistan's access to vital external funding. Moreover, savers' habits and financial stability are at risk. Even though real interest rates are currently positive, savers may be drawn to speculative investments, such as gold and real estate, as bank deposit rates are below inflation-adjusted returns in alternative assets. This could erode official financial intermediation and lead to asset bubbles. Pakistan's high non-performing loan ratios and other regulatory hurdles suggest that commercial banks may be slow to redeploy capital towards profitable private-sector lending now that they have once again benefitted from high risk-free returns during the recent tight cycle. Though Pakistan's transition to a low interest rate environment has provided a short term relief, it isn't the solution to the country's permanent economic problems. It is necessary that policymakers keep vigilance and avoid assuming that rotational improvements are equivalent to structural strength. (The writer is a Research Economist at Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE). She can be reached at: [email protected]) Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Senators decry judicial overreach
Senators decry judicial overreach

Express Tribune

time20 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

Senators decry judicial overreach

A 12-member panel, headed by Adviser to PM on NHLH Irfan Siddiqui, was constituted by PM. PHOTO: FILE Listen to article The Senate on Friday took exception to the Islamabad High Court's (IHC) move to issue stay orders on matters under discussion in parliamentary committees. Terming it a serious breach of privilege, the lawmakers called for the matter to be referred to the Senate's Committee on Rules of Procedure and Privileges. They also urged that the attorney general be summoned to explain the judiciary's overreach into parliamentary affairs. During the session, chaired by Senator Irfan Siddiqui, Senator Saleem Mandviwalla of the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) objected to the stay orders issued by the IHC and Lahore High Court (LHC) against upper house proceedings. "I have never seen stay orders against parliamentary proceedings before. This should be taken seriously," he said, urging the Senate to summon the attorney general. "We never interfere in court proceedings, but judges issuing stay orders against committee actions is direct interference in Parliament. It's becoming a joke." Shahadat Awan supported the call. "We will seek input from the law minister and summon the attorney general for clarification and action." Senator Anusha Rehman said such actions violated Article 66 of the Constitution and constituted a breach of privilege. "Issuing a stay order against a member of Parliament is a direct attack on their privilege," she said, urging the House to refer the matter to the privileges committee and have those responsible appear before it. "No one can stop us from speaking in this House," she added. Senator Kamran Murtaza expressed concern over reports of lawyers being picked up in Balochistan. "If someone has committed a crime, they should be punished under the law," he said. The Presiding Officer responded that a report on the matter would be sought.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store