"I Was Pissed": Founder Reveals How Hiring Soham Parekh Drained His Resources
"Yes, we hired him. We're building an AI agent in San Francisco. He was eng #5. Recommended by a recruiter, which lent legitimacy. He was eager and crushed our in-person pair programming onsite. I believe he's actually a good engineer," wrote Dhruv on X (formerly Twitter).
While Parekh provided references, Dhruv offered him the job, awaiting responses from the previous employers. He also briefly perused Parekh's LinkedIn, GitHub, open source commits and blog posts to get an idea about the employee they were onboarding.
After accepting the job offer, Parekh said he had a New York trip planned and that he would start after a week.
"He went dark the next week (strange) but texted on weekend excited for Monday. His first day at 9:30 am he calls in sick (strange). Said he'd onboard from home. Gave an address to ship the laptop," said Dhruv.
our soham parekh story:
- yes, we hired him. we're building an AI agent in SF. he was eng #5.
- recommended by a recruiter, which lent legitimacy.
- he was eager and crushed our in person pair programming onsite. i believe he's actually a good engineer.
- some have said "this…
— Dhruv (@dhruvtruth) July 3, 2025
'I was pissed'
What followed was an elaborate gaslighting scheme where Parekh frequently excused himself from turning up at the office and delayed shipping the projects. Dhruv and his colleagues also found that Parekh was working at another company.
"When we called Soham up, he denied it to the end. Said Sync guys were just friends. Either way, we were out. In an ironic twist of fate Sync dropped an employee of the month video the same day that featured none other than Soham."
After terminating his contract, Parekh simply 'dipped' as per Dhruv, who assumed he was a young kid who had made a mistake.
"It was embarrassing until yesterday when I realised how widespread it was. Then I was pissed. then impressed. Still not sure how he pulled it off for so long with in-person startups with long hours, but appreciated the hustle. Hope he had a good reason. Feels like a stressful way to make money."
After the controversy snowballed, Parekh responded, saying, "I'm not proud of what I've done. But, you know, financial circumstances, essentially. No one really likes to work 140 hours a week, right? But I had to do this out of necessity. I was in extremely dire financial circumstances". He also added that he did all the work without the assistance of AI or other engineers.
Parekh has also announced that he has taken up a job at an AI firm, Darwin, a new startup based in San Francisco in the United States. He also clarified that he will not be taking up any more additional jobs
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
19 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Delhi man held for ₹2 crore cyber fraud, links with Chinese-linked syndicate
Gurugram: Faridabad police arrested a 39-year-old Delhi resident, who runs a hotel and nightclub in Dubai, for allegedly orchestrating a ₹2.02 crore cyber fraud in collaboration with a Chinese-linked syndicate, officials said on Friday. Faridabad police arrested a 39-year-old Delhi resident, who runs a hotel and nightclub in Dubai, for a ₹ 2.02 crore cyber fraud. (Getty Images) Bhupesh Arora, originally from Karnal and currently residing in northwest Delhi's Rohini Sector 11, operates a four-star hotel and eight nightclubs in Dubai, police said, adding that he was taken into custody on Wednesday upon returning to India and is now on a four-day police remand. According to investigators, Arora and his business partner, also based in Dubai, ran a cyber fraud operation alongside their hospitality ventures. The duo facilitated illegal fund transfers from India to Dubai using payment gateways, later converting the funds into cryptocurrencies and handing them over to Chinese handlers after deducting a commission. Police said Arora was compelled to return to India 20 days back on the directions of the Punjab and Haryana high court. Faridabad police had got a lookout circular issued for him against which he had moved the high court. Though the court had quashed the circular, it had directed him to come to India and cooperate with the Faridabad police by joining the investigation of the case. Yashpal Yadav, Faridabad Police PRO, said investigators traced Arora through a payment gateway account linked to him, into which ₹2.8 lakh of the duped money was transferred. 'This payment gateway helped us identify Arora. The bank account holder couldn't be traced and may have been created fraudulently,' he said. Arora allegedly retained 30% of the proceeds, with the remaining 70% going to his Dubai-based partner, who liaised directly with the Chinese network, Yadav said. Arora is the 12th person arrested in this case. Police are now pursuing his business partner and three others. 'We will issue an LOC against his partner so he can be arrested on arrival in India,' said Yadav. The victim, whose name police have witheld, a 51-year-old man from Sector 88 in Faridabad, was duped in January 2024 after falling for a fake investment scheme promoted through social media ads. Believing he was investing in stock markets, he transferred ₹2.02 crore to 11 different bank accounts. A case was registered at the Cybercrime Police Station (Central), and police have so far recovered ₹60 lakh, which was returned to the victim. The remaining amount, officers said, had already been siphoned abroad.
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman asks question about Soham Parekh, gets response from techie
As news of Soham Parekh , an Indian software engineer, who has been publicly accused of working for several US startups at the same time, spread fast on social media, LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman joined the discussion on X (the app formerly known as Twitter). He posed a question for his followers, with many people responding to the post and Parekh himself chimed in with a reply. 'What do you think Soham Parekh's LinkedIn header is?,' Hoffman asked. Amid scores of responses, Parekh's reply stood out. 'I don't have a LinkedIn,' he said. Soham Parekh responds to 'Moonlighting' claims Parekh publicly addressed the viral allegations of him simultaneously working for multiple US startups, defending his actions and announcing a new, exclusive role. The controversy was sparked by a public "exposé" from Silicon Valley entrepreneur Suhail Doshi . by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is your tinnitus getting worse? Do this immediately (Watch) Hearing Magazine Undo Responding directly to Suhail Doshi's initial social media post, Soham Parekh took to X (formerly Twitter) to share his side of the story. "There's a lot being said about me right now, and most of you don't know the full story," Parekh wrote. "If there's one thing to know about me, it's that I love to build. That's it." He added that he has "been isolated, written off, and shut out by nearly everyone I've known and every company I've worked at." Despite these claims of rejection, Parekh affirmed his commitment: "Building is the only thing I've ever truly known, and it's what I'll keep doing." Parekh announced he has signed an exclusive deal as a founding engineer with a single company in the video AI space, which is set to launch later this month. He concluded his public statement with a defiant tone, adding, "I'm pissed. And I've got something to prove." AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Hans India
22 minutes ago
- Hans India
Sebi bans US-based Jane Street from securities market
Markets regulator Sebi has barred US-based Jane Street Group (JS Group) from the securities markets and directed the group to disgorge unlawful gains of Rs4,843 crore for allegedly manipulating stock indices through positions taken in derivatives segment. This could be the highest disgorgement amount ever directed by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi). In its interim order, the regulator has debarred JSI Investments, JSI2 Investments Pvt Ltd, Jane Street Singapore Pte Ltd, and Jane Street Asia Trading -- entities collectively referred to as the Jane Street Group -- from trading until further notice, while continuing its investigation. Established in 2000, Jane Street Group LLC is a global proprietary trading firm in the financial services industry. It employs more than 2,600 people across five offices in the US, Europe, and Asia, and conducts trading operations in 45 countries. The Jane Street (JS) Group has come under Sebi's scrutiny for allegedly manipulating index levels in the stock market to earn illegal profits, primarily through the highly liquid Bank Nifty and Nifty index options segments. Meanwhile, shares of Nuvama Wealth Management, which is the trading partner of JS Group for Indian stock market, fell over 10 per cent to Rs7,280.50 on NSE. An investigation by Sebi revealed that over 21 expiry days between January 2023 and May 2025, the group executed large trades in the underlying cash and futures markets to influence index movements and profit from massive positions in the options market. Two key strategies were identified-- one involved buying heavily in Bank Nifty stocks and futures in the morning and selling them aggressively in the afternoon to create a softer close, while the other involved concentrated selling or buying in the last two hours of the expiry day to sway index levels. These actions helped the group earn illegal profits of about Rs4,843 crore, even as they incurred smaller losses in cash and futures trades, the regulator said. Sebi also noted that between January 2023 and March 2025, the JS Group recorded substantial trading activity across various segments of the market. The group made gains of Rs44,358 crore from index options trading, which formed the bulk of their profits. However, these were partially offset by losses of Rs7,208 crore in stock futures, Rs191 crore in index futures, and Rs288 crore in the cash market. After accounting for all gains and losses, the JS Group reported a net total profit of Rs36,671 crore during this period, Sebi noted. The case stems from media reports in April 2024, which suggested that Jane Street and its related entities may have used unauthorised proprietary trading strategies in the Indian options market. Sebi noted that the JS Group continued to carry out suspicious trading activities, mainly near market closing on expiry day, by making large and aggressive trades to unfairly influence the index, even after receiving a warning in February and making promises to the NSE to stop such practices. 'Such egregious behaviour, in clear disregard/ defiance of the explicit advisory issued to them by NSE in February 2025, amply demonstrates that unlike the vast majority of Foreign Portfolio Investors and other market participants, JS Group is not a good faith actor that can be, or deserves to be, trusted. In the face of such a strong prima facie case that allowing the JS Group to continue as before may severely compromise investor protection on an extraordinary scale, Sebi has a duty to directly intervene,' Sebi added. Accordingly, Sebi said, 'the total amount of unlawful gains earned by the JS Group from the alleged violations, Rs4,843.57 crore, shall be impounded jointly and severally.' The entities have been restrained from accessing the securities market and are further prohibited from buying, selling or otherwise dealing in securities, directly or indirectly. Additionally, banks where the entities are holding accounts have been directed to ensure that no debits are made, without Sebi's permission, except for the purpose of complying with this order.
