BBC director of music steps down after Bob Vylan Glastonbury scandal
Lorna Clarke, the BBC's director of music, was reported by The Times as stepping back from her day-to-day responsibilities – including overseeing live music events - following the backlash to livestreaming Bob Vylan's performance last month.
Other senior BBC staff have also temporarily relinquished their day-to-day roles over the Glastonbury controversy - pending an investigation.
The news of Clarke's resignation comes after UK culture secretary Lisa Nandy condemned the "appalling and unacceptable scenes" and said she had called BBC director-general Tim Davie after the broadcast of Bob Vylan's set.
Nandy claimed there is "a problem of leadership" at the BBC, and criticised the corporation over its decision not to pull the livestream after Bob Vylan's frontman shouted 'death, death to the IDF' (Israel Defence Forces).
Nandy also said in Parliament that 'chanting death to the IDF is equivalent to calling for the death of every single Israeli Jew' - a comment that was heavily criticised online.
In a statement last week, the BBC apologised to viewers for broadcasting the performance. The statement said that Bob Vylan's comments were 'offensive and deplorable' and the broadcasting organisation admitted that despite considering the set 'high risk' it deemed the concert suitable for live streaming.
It then added that the BBC will no longer broadcast any performances it deems to be 'high risk'.
Several artists including have backed Bob Vylan with a letter, which stated: 'Again, the media is trying to distract you from the real story. The outrage sparked (...) is merely a smoke screen for the lack of reporting on the destruction of the Palestinian people. They are starving children, where is the media's outrage at Israel's continued obliteration of a whole nation?'
However, Bob Vylan have found their Glastonbury appearance under criminal investigation and have been dropped from upcoming festivals in the UK and France.
Furthermore, the band have reportedly been dropped by their agents and have had their US visas revoked.
The duo has spoken out in defence of their set and comments, saying it is vital to 'teach our children to speak up for the change they want' and that they are not calling for 'the death of Jews or Arabs or any other race or group' but wish for the 'dismantling of a violent military machine.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
2 hours ago
- LeMonde
War in Gaza causes rift within the British left
The clatter of wooden spoons striking saucepans echoed off the nearby social housing buildings. "David Lammy, be afraid! We'll see you at The Hague! [home of the International Criminal Court]," chanted the hundred or so demonstrators, waving Palestinian flags and paper watermelons, who gathered on the evening of Monday, August 4, in Tottenham, a working-class neighborhood in North London, to protest outside the foreign secretary's offices. "I was so excited when Labour got into power last Summer. But they immediately forgot all their electoral promises," said 26-year-old Emilia (the protestors quoted by their first names did not wish to give their last name), wrapped in a keffiyeh. "But they immediately forgot all their election promises." She said she felt the party did not respect its voters, "They take us for granted." Spike, 28, holding a sign demanding the resignation of "Starmer, the genocide," was even more outspoken. "Labour is supposed to be the party of the working classes, of the common people, but they have betrayed all the principles upon which they are built," the young man said, his face covered by a black bandana. "They all have to go immediately."
Local France
7 hours ago
- Local France
'Doesn't seem fair' - British pensioners speak out over apparent change to French citizenship rules
After almost eight years of living in France, British retiree Colin Howard, 68, decided it was time to apply for French nationality. "I feel French, I feel like I belong here," Colin explained. Colin, a certified B2 ( upper intermediate ) French speaker, has spent a significant amount of his time in France building relations with his local community. "Since 2017, I have taught weekly and fortnightly French lessons as a volunteer to non-French-speaking immigrants, and I continue to do this two years after retiring," Colin said. Using his background as a teacher, Colin also spent four years as a volunteer teaching English to a group of French people, and since 2021, he has served as the president of an Anglo-French integration association near his home in Charente, in south-west France. "I thought 'I contribute some to French society', so I'll give applying for nationality a go," Colin said. Colin sent in his application in October 2024. He supplied additional documentation when asked and passed various levels of checks, including the police visit and the 'assimilation' interview at the Deux Sèvres préfecture. Advertisement Over a year and a half later, in July 2025, Colin's application was rejected. As for the official reason of rejection, the local authority wrote: "You have never worked in France, and the entirety of the income you receive is not from a French source." "It does not seem fair," Colin said. "Whether deliberately or by accident, it discriminates against people of a certain age. "This is saying that if you are of a certain age, and you live on a private pension, savings or a state pension, if you apply for nationality, you will not get it." Colin's is not the only such case in recent weeks, with several retirees in France reporting on social media that they too have been turned down for citizenship on the grounds of not having income in France. The Local spoke to Liz Combes, a 73-year-old retired teacher, who was rejected in June 2025 on the grounds that she had no income in France. "I was really, really upset. I had been ill since then, and my friend noticed that I'd been ill since this all started. It's true. My health has been affected. I have put in an appeal, but I have absolutely no hope that it will work," Liz said. Liz and her husband bought a second home in France in 1996, which they renovated, and the pair became full-time residents of France in 2016, just before the Brexit vote. Advertisement Like Colin, Liz has a strong background of volunteer work and involvement in her local community. She said: "When we committed to being here in France, I said, 'I'm going to have to get involved in things.' "I got involved in our local Franco-British society as the secretary, and alongside the French president of the group, we set up a programme to organise local volunteers to come into schools and teach English. I'm still very involved in that." Liz submitted her application in March 2024, after passing her French language exam, and she had her interview in April. During the interview, Liz remembered the French official being impressed with her volunteer work. "It was all very successful. I had no problem speaking French. "The official told me that it would be normal not to hear for two months. She was very positive, but on the last day of the two months, I got an email with a letter rejecting me on the basis that none of my income came from France. "If I had known 10 years ago that I needed French income, I could have set up a French company to teach, but I was happy to do it for free. I did not need to be paid or get money for it. "The point is that I am retired. I have a very good pension, and I am no drain on society here. We have our health covered by the UK with our S1s, and we have our savings in French accounts. "I have contributed as much as I can. This new knowledge of needing French would I have applied for citizenship? The goalposts have been moved since May when this circulaire came out." Liz and Colin's rejections come despite the fact that over the past two decades, dozens, if not hundreds, of retirees in France have successfully become French - even if all of their income comes from a pension in their home country. Advertisement Both believe that their rejection was related to a recent memo ( circulaire ) sent around to préfecture staff, warning that they should reject applicants who earn the majority of their income from a non-French source. READ MORE: Why do French ministers love to send 'circulaires'? "My file was marked complete in January 2025. By March, I was invited for an interview on the 6th of June. Between those times, Bruno Retailleau (France's interior minister) decided to send his circulaire out about earnings in France," Colin said. While the circulaire, published on May 2nd, did not introduce any official legal changes, it did offer advice and clarification for préfecture employees, including on the topic of foreign-sourced income. Technically, this is not new. French case law has made it clear for many years that applicants must demonstrate that France is the "centre of their economic interests". The French government's Service-Public information page for naturalisations also specifies that applicants must demonstrate "professional insertion" in France, noting the applicant must have a "stable and regular income". Therefore it has long been the case that people living in France but working remotely for a foreign company would be highly likely to be refused for citizenship. People who are neither working nor retired have also traditionally had a hard time satisfying the income requirement. Advertisement But préfecture officials were previously told to examine the application 'holistically'. As a result, many retirees applying with solely foreign pensions have been able to gain nationality based on residency if they showed a well-rounded application in other areas. The Local has contacted the Interior Ministry to request further clarification, and to enquire whether - as seems to be the case - there is a difference in how applications from retirees are being treated. Do you have experience - successful or otherwise - of applying for French citizenship as a pensioner? Please share your experiences in the comments section below, or contact us on news@
Euronews
13 hours ago
- Euronews
Dutch privacy watchdog warns against Israeli terms for aid groups
The Dutch data protection authority has called upon the government of the Netherlands to condemn new Israeli privacy requirements for aid organisations wanting to work in Palestinian territories, claiming they breach the EU's data protection rules. In a statement published on Wednesday, the Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) said that as of September the Israeli government demands that all organisations providing aid must complete a comprehensive registration which includes providing personal data about employees, their parents and children. The AP was asked to look into the issue by an unnamed aid group. 'The aid organisations must also provide names of donors, including 'background information' about those people and the exact amounts they have donated to the aid organisation. What exactly falls under background information is unclear,' the AP said, adding that this information will likely be used for screening and profiling. The privacy watchdog has now called upon the Dutch government to formally protest against this. 'On the basis of the available information, the AP concludes that that aid organisation does not have a valid reason to supply the requested personal data to Israel. It would also not be clear to the aid organisation what happens to the personal data after the organisation has delivered it to Israel,' the statement said. The AP said this would present organisations with the dilemma of choosing whether to defend the rights of their employees or continuing to do their work in Gaza. It asked the Foreign Affairs Ministry to discuss the issue with the European Commission as the registration could also affect other European aid organisations. In addition, the AP will discuss with its European counterparts how this relates to the data transfer agreement – or adequacy decision – that the European Commission has with Israel. That deal states that the protection of personal data in Israel is of the same level as in the European Union. It contacted the Israeli privacy regulator to speak out against the obligations too.
