Stone Age humans were picky about which rocks they used for making tools, study finds
Not only did these early people make tools, they had a mental picture of where suitable raw materials were located and planned ahead to use them, traveling long distances.
By around 2.6 million years ago, early humans had developed a method of pounding rocks together to chip off sharp flakes that could be used as blades for butchering meat.
This allowed them to feast on large animals like hippos that gathered near a freshwater spring at the Nyayanga archaeological site in Kenya.
'But hippo skin is really tough" — and not all rocks were suitable for creating blades sharp enough to pierce hippo skin, said co-author Thomas Plummer, a paleoanthropologist at Queens College of the City University of New York.
Co-author Emma Finestone of the Cleveland Museum of Natural History added: 'When we think about stone tools, not every rock is equal in terms of the quality of tools.'
At the Nyayanga site, researchers found durable blades made of quartzite, a rock material that they traced to streambeds and other locations around 8 miles (13 kilometers) away. The new research appears in the journal Science Advances.
'This suggests they've got a mental map of where different resources are distributed across the landscape,' said co-author Rick Potts of the Smithsonian 's Human Origins Program.
Previously, researchers had assumed the stones may have been found within just a mile or so of the freshwater spring site.
The new study shows that 'these early humans were thinking ahead. This is probably the earliest time we have in the archaeological record an indication of that behavior,' said Eric Delson, a paleoanthropologist at the American Museum of Natural History, who was not involved in the research.
The oldest previously known example of early human ancestors transporting raw materials for tool-making was about 600,000 years later than the Nyayanga site.
Researchers said it's unclear who these early toolmakers were — whether members of the Homo genus or a related but extinct branch of the family tree, such as Paranthropus.
Homo sapiens did not arise until much later, around 300,000 years ago.
But the knack for seeking out the best raw materials to make simple technology dates back nearly 3 million years. 'We today are a species that's still technology-dependent — using tools to spread around the world and adapt to different environments,' said Finestone.
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Exposure to some common Pfas changes gene activity, new study finds
New research suggests exposure to some common Pfas or 'forever chemical' compounds causes changes to gene activity, and those changes are linked to health problems including multiple cancers, neurological disorders and autoimmune disease. The findings are a major step toward determining the mechanism by which the chemicals cause disease and could help doctors identify, detect and treat health problems for those exposed to Pfas before the issues advance. The research may also point toward other diseases potentially caused by Pfas that have not yet been identified, the authors said. The study is among the first to examine how Pfas chemicals impact gene activity, called epigenetics. 'This gives us a hint as to which genes and which Pfas might be important,' said Melissa Furlong, a University of Arizona College of Public Health Pfas researcher and study lead author. Pfas are a class of about 15,000 compounds most frequently used to make products water-, stain- and grease-resistant. They have been linked to cancer, birth defects, decreased immunity, high cholesterol, kidney disease and a range of other serious health problems. They are dubbed 'forever chemicals' because they do not naturally break down in the environment The study checked the blood of about 300 firefighters from four departments across the country who were exposed to high levels of Pfas. The chemicals are the main ingredient in most firefighting foam, and are frequently used in 'turnout gear' worn by firefighters because of their heat repelling properties Furlong said she was surprised to find the number of genes and biological pathways that were impacted by Pfas, which suggests the chemicals may cause or contribute to a broad range of health problems. The study did not prove the chemicals cause certain diseases, but findings point to biological changes that might precede disease. Genes play a range of roles in developing or preventing disease, and Pfas essentially change the way the genes are supposed to act, Furlong said. A gene may act as tumor suppressor, but the Pfas interferes with how it expresses, which affects whether cancer develops, or the type of cancer. For example, PFOS, among the most common and dangerous Pfas compounds, reduces levels of miR-128-1-5p, a gene tied to cancer development. Branched forms of PFOS were linked to changes in five other genes, including some that regulate cancer development. Sign up to Detox Your Kitchen A seven-week expert course to help you avoid chemicals in your food and groceries. after newsletter promotion Different Pfas and chemical structures were found to affect different genes, and were associated with different health outcomes. Not all compounds impacted gene expressions. The research found connections among Pfas-related gene changes and biological pathways involved in leukemia, as well as bladder, liver, thyroid and breast cancers. Other genes and biological pathways were involved in Alzheimer's disease, and autoimmune and infectious diseases such as lupus, asthma and tuberculosis. Furlong said it remains unclear at which step in the biological processes disease is triggered, but the picture is clear enough to point to possible treatments. Pharmaceutical companies are trying to develop drugs that could alter gene activity and potentially prevent Pfas-linked disease from developing.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Stone Age humans were picky about which rocks they used for making tools, study finds
Early human ancestors during the Old Stone Age were more picky about the rocks they used for making tools than previously known, according to research published Friday. Not only did these early people make tools, they had a mental picture of where suitable raw materials were located and planned ahead to use them, traveling long distances. By around 2.6 million years ago, early humans had developed a method of pounding rocks together to chip off sharp flakes that could be used as blades for butchering meat. This allowed them to feast on large animals like hippos that gathered near a freshwater spring at the Nyayanga archaeological site in Kenya. 'But hippo skin is really tough" — and not all rocks were suitable for creating blades sharp enough to pierce hippo skin, said co-author Thomas Plummer, a paleoanthropologist at Queens College of the City University of New York. Co-author Emma Finestone of the Cleveland Museum of Natural History added: 'When we think about stone tools, not every rock is equal in terms of the quality of tools.' At the Nyayanga site, researchers found durable blades made of quartzite, a rock material that they traced to streambeds and other locations around 8 miles (13 kilometers) away. The new research appears in the journal Science Advances. 'This suggests they've got a mental map of where different resources are distributed across the landscape,' said co-author Rick Potts of the Smithsonian 's Human Origins Program. Previously, researchers had assumed the stones may have been found within just a mile or so of the freshwater spring site. The new study shows that 'these early humans were thinking ahead. This is probably the earliest time we have in the archaeological record an indication of that behavior,' said Eric Delson, a paleoanthropologist at the American Museum of Natural History, who was not involved in the research. The oldest previously known example of early human ancestors transporting raw materials for tool-making was about 600,000 years later than the Nyayanga site. Researchers said it's unclear who these early toolmakers were — whether members of the Homo genus or a related but extinct branch of the family tree, such as Paranthropus. Homo sapiens did not arise until much later, around 300,000 years ago. But the knack for seeking out the best raw materials to make simple technology dates back nearly 3 million years. 'We today are a species that's still technology-dependent — using tools to spread around the world and adapt to different environments,' said Finestone. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Medical News Today
6 hours ago
- Medical News Today
What makes 'superager' brains more resistant to aging?
Research is ongoing about what components contribute to healthier brains as people age. Recent research identified some unique brain features of 'superagers,' people at least 80 years old who perform cognitively similarly to people decades younger. The research also identified that superagers tended to be more sociable than their peers. More research into superagers could lead to interventions that help protect people have better cognitive function than others as they age, and this is an area of scientific study.A study recently published in Alzheimer's & Dementia details the unique features of a group of superagers. These people meet certain word recall cognitive criteria in later research suggests that superagers are very sociable and also identified unique brain characteristics of this group, such as higher levels of von Economo neurons, also known as 'spindle neurons.' These unique brain cells appear to be involved in emotional processing and social makes a person a 'superager'?This research looked at 'the first 25 years of the Northwestern University SuperAging Program.' This program seeks to see if it's possible to avoid the decline in brain capacity that comes with age and the possible biological phenotype — or observable traits — related to this avoidance. The paper explains that the term superaging was developed by the Northwestern Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (ADRC).Superagers are people who are 80 years old or older who meet a certain score on a test called the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test. Superagers' scores are similar to those of people between the ages of 56 and 66. Superagers were also at least average for age in other areas of cognitive function. Right now, there are 133 active participants in the Northwestern ADRC Clinical Core. Researchers have conducted 77 autopsies to look at the brain features of deceased participants, based on brain donation. Researchers did not pinpoint a lifestyle linked to superaging. Some participants followed a healthy lifestyle while others followed less healthy also appeared to have similar medical problems to their neurotypical peers. However, superagers were noted as being sociable, enjoying extracurricular activities, and endorsing extraversion. They were also more likely to rate their relationships positively than their neuroimaging, researchers found that superagers did not display cortical thinning, a thinning in the outer layer of the brain, that nonsuperagers there is more research needed to see if superagers start with larger brains, researchers suggest that cortical thinning happens more slowly in also identified an area of the brain called the anterior cingulate that had more cortical thickness compared to younger neurotypical participants. This area of the brain is involved in things like emotion and social networking. In the anterior cingulate gyrus, there were also higher levels of nerve cells called von Economo neurons. This was even in comparison to younger individuals. Researchers think that superagers might have this higher nerve density from birth. Researchers also looked for neurofibrillary tangles, a protein buildup in neurons that can be present in Alzheimer's disease as well as in normal researchers found that superagers had fewer neurofibrillary problems than their peers. For example, in superagers, they observed fewer neurofibrillary tangles in the rhinal cortices, an area of the brain. Superagers' brains may be more resistant to cognitive declineResearchers concluded that 'there are at least two pathways to the maintenance of youthful memory capacity in old brains.' They suggest that this type of brain could resist the start of neurofibrillary pathology and be resilient to the cognitive effects of neurofibrillary they observed that superagers had another type of neuron that was bigger. This difference may make a specific brain pathway resist changes like neurofibrillary it could be a reactionary change leading to resilience. When looking at plasma biomarkers, superagers also had lower levels of something called p-tau181, which researchers note was consistent with the lower levels of neurofibrillary degeneration. The findings further support that superagers have enhanced functionality of a component of the brain called the cortical cholinergic system at multiple levels. This system can be affected both in Alzheimer's disease and normal aging. Finally, researchers observed differences in the microglia of superagers. Microglia are cells in the brain that help control the microenvironment of the central nervous superagers, there were fewer activated microglia in the white matter, something that happens in physiological aging. Preliminary findings suggest that microglia in superagers may have distinct features. The authors note the need for more research in this area. In their publication, the authors also included a case study of one superager who was highly independent until she experienced a stroke near the end of her observing her brain, researchers observed certain characteristics. For example, the amygdala and hippocampus areas of the brain were similar to those of a younger person. They also observed features like 'low density of neurofibrillary tangles and pretangles' in the postmortem examination. Kaushik Govindaraju, DO, from Medical Offices of Manhattan and contributor to Labfinder, who was not involved in the study noted the following about the research to Medical News Today: 'We have thought that mental decline with aging is inevitable and even expected/anticipated. We marvel at elderly people who have good memories because for as long as humanity has existed, we have been told and have seen that this is not the biological norm. This research may push back against this in an unprecedented way.'Study limitations and continued researchThis research provides more information on a possible superaging phenotype, but has limitations. For one thing, it examined a fairly small number of participants, and recruitment methods could have impacted the study sample. This particular paper also did not release information on certain components, such as the gender breakdown of the group or ethnicity. This research is ongoing, and this paper noted components of the first 25 years of the research. Some reported data was also based on preliminary findings, like the biomarker data, so more research is needed. Certain eligibility requirements, such as being able to attend in-person visits in Chicago, may also affect the research. Methods of data collection may also be important to note, such as the use of surveys. Researchers also pointed out that current methods for staging of neurofibrillary changes might need to be reevaluated, since it does not reflect the presence of undamaged show one superager who had some neurofibrillary degeneration but also a higher level of normal neurons, which might not be present in neurotypical peers who have the same amount of neurofibrillary degeneration. More research is required to see what features are present from birth in superagers, as well as how the results may apply to the general population. More research into the distinct differences in superagers' brains and why they are present may also be can we learn from superagers?This research could lead to developing strategies to help 'typical' agers. Alexandra Touroutoglou, MSc, PhD, an assistant professor of neurology at Harvard Medical School, and director of Imaging Operations at Frontotemporal Disorders Unit at Massachusetts General Hospital, who was not involved in the recent research, noted the following general benefits of studying people who age well: 'Superagers are exciting because they show that age-related memory decline is not necessarily inevitable. So much of aging research is focused on looking at pathology and disorder, trying to work backwards to what went wrong. But there are things we can learn from those who age exceptionally well. Studying those people who age best could point the way to new treatments, either in terms of interventions or lifestyle changes, that could prolong cognitive health for all the rest of us who age in more typical ways.'Emily K. Hurst, DO, AOA board-certified in Critical Care Medicine, Internal Medicine, and Hospice and Palliative Care Medicine, likewise not involved in the current study, commented that 'identifying superagers and continuing to study their unique characteristics both biologically and environmentally, can determine how the modifiable changes may be translated to others in their quest to deter cognitive decline.''This will be a game changer in avoiding senescence,' said Hurst. 'I hope this article serves to help our society recognize and elevate the value many of those in our community can contribute in years long past retirement, and help medical professionals see our patients in their ability instead of their numerical age.'
