Council wins court ban on illegal encampments
A council has successfully applied for a court order which bans members of Gypsy and traveller communities from camping in part of its area.
Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council, in Hampshire, was granted a one-year renewal of a High Court injunction.
Previous bans have greatly reduced unlawful encampments in the area, while neighbouring boroughs without injunctions have seen an increase, the court was told.
However, Kirsty Brimelow KC, sitting as a deputy judge, said the borough was not meeting the needs of Gypsies and travellers and should reconsider a decision not to provide them with a transit site.
In her written judgement, Ms Brimelow said: "A transit site would satisfy anxiety of Gypsies and travellers that they might be moved from whenever they stop in the borough."
The injunction, lasting until 3 April 2026, was granted against "persons unknown", who were not represented in court.
It covers the town of Basingstoke, as well as rural areas around Bramley, Silchester and Tadley Common.
Previous injunctions in Basingstoke and also in Test Valley have deterred encampments and gave police enhanced powers of arrest, the court was told.
However, in neighbouring areas without injunctions, the problem had escalated, the judge heard.
Reading in Berkshire currently had 59 unauthorised encampments, police told the court.
Giving evidence, Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council said it feared the return of previous problems involving untreated human faeces in fields, intimidation of residents, noise and financial harm.
It acknowledged that anti-social behaviour was not representative of the Gypsy and traveller community.
The authority said it was updating its local plan, calling for new sites.
In September 2024, the borough approved a "negotiated stopping policy", tolerating encampments on council-owned land on a case-by-case basis.
Ms Brimelow renewed the injunction, covering 10% of the borough where encampments would be "especially harmful".
You can follow BBC Hampshire & Isle of Wight on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
HM Courts and Tribunals Service
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
5 hours ago
- Fox News
A speeding ticket led me to Ronald Reagan's hometown and a deeper understanding of America's president
My wife, four daughters and I were driving a rented minivan from Chicago to St. Louis for my cousin's wedding when I suddenly became aware of a police car behind me with flashing lights, signaling me to pull over to the shoulder of the road. A clean-cut, very young and very nice police officer looking to be in his early 20s approached my window and asked me if I realized I had been driving in a construction zone where the speed limit was 45. I told him I could swear the sign had just said 65. He acknowledges that the speed limit was 65 awhile back, but it had most recently been 45. It wasn't until later that I figured out that I was the latest victim of a speed trap, and I would be charged with driving 20 miles over the speed limit. As the officer filled out the ticket, I noticed his hands were shaking. Must be new on the job, I figured and, sensing his weakness, I tried to see if he wouldn't let me off with a warning. He said he couldn't and noted I must appear in court in a month. "But I'm visiting from California," I pleaded. "There's no way I can come back in a month." He urged me to call the court and see if they'd speed up my court appearance. It was only then, as he finished writing the ticket that I looked at it and noticed that the jurisdiction in which my "crime" had been committed was Dixon, Illinois, the hometown of Ronald Reagan. As I tried to process this information, I was reminded of what my mother, who was just as devout as Reagan's mother, often said, that there is a Divine Plan, and that nothing is random in a universe where God orders the steps of His children. Which in my case meant that I was being led to Dixon, against my will, perhaps for a reason. But I still had details to attend to: Following the officer's suggestion, I pulled over and called a clerk at Dixon City Hall to explain my predicament. She agreed I could come and see the judge – but not until the next day. So, I announced to the family, we were spending the night in Dixon, Illinois. We exited the highway at downtown Dixon and settled into the Holiday Inn. After eating some pizza, we decided to see the sights. I've never been to Dixon and had no idea this trip was going to take me by it, but as long as we were there, I decided to make the most of it and learn as much about Reagan as I could. We went to a gas station and asked for directions to two places I feel I needed to visit to better understand Ronald Reagan: the Rock River where he saved 77 lives as a lifeguard, and one of his childhood homes on Hennepin Avenue. We drove down a dusty trail to get to the river and spent nearly an hour looking for the famous log that Reagan was said to have carved a notch in for each life he saved. But of course, there was nothing to be found. After a relaxing afternoon explaining to my kids the significance of the Rock River, visiting the edge of its stony banks, and playing there as kids are wont to do, we piled into the car. Next stop: the home on Hennepin Avenue and more insights into Reagan. The home was white and small, and I stopped in the kitchen and in the upstairs room to think about what the scene looked like 75 years earlier when Reagan's mother Nelle busied herself making a meal while her son did his homework. I also stopped to purchase some poems which had been written by Nelle – nothing fancy or even bound, but just a clump of papers which had been stapled together. After taking some pictures in front of the home we were off again; back to the hotel to get ready for my encounter with the judge the next morning. As I passed through the metal detectors with my wife and four young daughters in tow, I quickly found my public defender who told me what I needed to do. I could go to jail, he said, but most likely I'd just have to pay a fine so long as I pleaded guilty. When I explained that I had been merely traveling at the speed of the car in front of me and that there were cars behind me, he just smiled and said I should tell it to the judge – and in a few short minutes I did just that. In fact, I also had video footage shot on my cellphone which showed what happened when I tried to go at the speed limit after my citation. Not only were cars honking at me from behind, but one driver sped around my right side and showed me his middle finger. I had the whole thing on tape to prove to the judge that 45 mph was an unreasonable rate of speed. "How do you plead?" he asked as I stood before him. "Your honor, I'd like to show you some footage I took to show you what happened when I drove at the speed that was posted," I said with a hopeful tone. "Son, I'm not going to watch your video," he says. "Now, how do you plead?" I thought about the public defender's warning about the possibility of jail and my four young daughters who needed their dad to stay a free man. I quickly replied: "Guilty, your Honor," and with that I was on my way to the clerk to pay a hefty $500 fine. The nice lady at the window listened to my story and then looked down at her clipboard. She noted that I was the 19th case that day, and without exactly saying it, something about her smile left me with the strong impression that this was how Dixon kept their city services funded. Nineteen people at $500 a head, hey, that would keep a lot of services funded, I thought to myself. The fact that I fell prey to this speed trap ultimately didn't matter much because when I got back to California, my Aunt Jeanne, who had heard about my predicament, had sent a check to cover the ticket. And, I had come to understand that there was purpose in what had happened and that my trip to Dixon was part of what Reagan would call the "DP" or Divine Plan, for me to better understand a man whom I thought I understood. Excerpted from "Making Reagan: A Memoir From The Producer of The Reagan Movie" by Mark Joseph. The Reagan film is available on DVD/Blu-Ray and at Amazon and iTunes.
Fox News
5 hours ago
- Fox News
Luxury real estate brothers hit with new charges in federal sex trafficking case
New accusations against the three brothers accused of orchestrating a decade-long scheme to sex traffic women were revealed this week as authorities look to further cement their case against the high-profile defendants. Real estate moguls Tal Alexander and Oren Alexander, along with their brother, Alon, are facing charges of conspiracy to commit sex trafficking, inducement to travel to engage in unlawful sexual activity and three counts of sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion, according to a federal superseding indictment. Tal Alexander faces additional sex trafficking and inducement counts, with Alon and Oren Alexander facing an additional charge of aggravated sex abuse, according to court documents. The charges stem from allegations from at least six new victims – including one minor. The brothers pleaded not guilty to all counts, bringing the total to 10 charges against them. "The federal charges in the indictment against Alon, Oren, and Tal Alexander are serious because they involve sex trafficking and aggravated sexual abuse," Kelly Hyman, a trial attorney and host of the true-crime podcast "Unresolved: The Diddy Cases," told Fox News Digital. "Since the charges are brought at the federal level, there can be more severe penalties compared to state level crimes." Federal prosecutors allege the three men lured dozens of victims to be sexually assaulted by promising luxury travel and other expensive accommodations, conspiring for more than a decade and leveraging their real estate industry status to attract women from 2009 to 2021. The brothers allegedly would organize elaborate vacations for their victims, subsequently assaulting the women while traveling. "In sex trafficking cases, deception, drugs, and false pretenses, like promises of luxury travel, could be considered important facts if it goes to the force, fraud or coercion of the sex trafficking," Hyman said. "And thus could have legal weight to prove a case as the prosecution has the burden to prove the charges against a defendant beyond a reasonable doubt. It is ultimately up to the jury as they are the trier of facts, and the jury will decide what weight to give these facts based on the evidence presented." According to the indictment, the brothers would incapacitate the women before they were sexually assaulted and raped – sometimes alongside multiple men – with some of the attacks happening within hours of meeting the victims. "Often, the Alexander brothers drugged their victims before assaulting them, preventing them from fighting back or escaping," the indictment reads. The three men allegedly operated the scheme from New York City and Miami, Florida, centering the assaults around where their homes and businesses were located. Prosecutors allege that immediately following the attacks, the brothers would "sometimes [offer] the victims material items, including travel, concert tickets, and other luxury experiences." "When prosecuting a sex trafficking case in federal court, prosecutors must demonstrate that 'force, threats of force, fraud or coercion' were used to compel the victim to engage in a sex act," Hyman told Fox News Digital. "However, if the victim is a minor, this specific proof is not required. The prosecution must still prove a defendant knowingly recruited the minor for a commercial sex act, but not particularly through force, fraud or coercion." Alon Alexander's attorney, Howard Srebnick, pointed to his client's willingness to sit for a polygraph test and the subsequent results. "Alon pled not guilty to all counts, including the newly-added count ten accusing him of drugging a woman to have sex with her," Srebnick said in a statement to Fox News Digital. "On January 13, 2025, a retired FBI polygraph examiner tested Alon while in jail. Alon was asked if he ever had sex with any woman he knew had been covertly given drugs, which Alon denied. The polygraph examiner opined that Alon passed the lie detector test, finding 'no significant reactions indicative of deception' by Alon." One of Tal's attorneys, Deanna Paul, referred to previous statements his defense team had provided to Fox News Digital. In March his lawyers said the superseding indictment "changes nothing." "It's a reheated version of the same case—and still does not include conduct that amounts to federal sex trafficking," Paul and Milton Williams said at the time. "The government is trying to stretch a statute beyond recognition to fit a narrative, not a crime." Oren Alexander's attorney did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment. They are currently being held at Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center as they await trial. If convicted of the federal charges, the brothers could face the possibility of 15 years to life in prison.
Screen Geek
a day ago
- Screen Geek
Judge Throws Out $400 Million Justin Baldoni Defamation Suit Against Blake Lively
Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively have been involved with quite the legal debacle, and now a judge has moved things to a new level, having thrown out the $400 million defamation suit that Justin Baldoni filed against Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds. As shared via Variety, the judge found 'that her accusations of sexual harassment were legally protected and therefore immune from suit.' As a result, 'Judge Lewis J. Liman dismissed Baldoni's entire lawsuit – which also alleged extortion and other claims – but allowed him to amend and refile a couple of allegations regarding interference with contracts.' Lively's lawyers shared the following statement regarding the 'total victory' for the situation: 'Today's opinion is a total victory and a complete vindication for Blake Lively, along with those that Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer Parties dragged into their retaliatory lawsuit, including Ryan Reynolds, Leslie Sloane and The New York Times,' the statement begins. 'As we have said from day one, this '$400 million' lawsuit was a sham, and the Court saw right through it. We look forward to the next round, which is seeking attorneys' fees, treble damages and punitive damages against Baldoni, Sarowitz, Nathan, and the other Wayfarer Parties who perpetrated this abusive litigation.' The legal protection allowed the judge to make this ruling is known as 'the litigation privilege,' which the outlet explains 'immunizes legal claims from defamation actions.' Other privileges mentioned as having an impact on this ruling include the 'fair report' privilege. Justin Baldoni accused Reynolds in the suit for having called him a 'sexual predator,' thus the defamation, but the judge noted that this comment was based on Lively's version of the events, and because he did not have a reason to doubt them, believed it was okay. He additionally applied the same logic to Lively's publicist, Leslie Sloane. Now Lively's complaint against Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios is being scheduled to take place in March 2026. Stay tuned to ScreenGeek for any additional updates regarding Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively as we have them. The debacle between the two celebrities is far from over, and now that Baldoni had his defamation lawsuit thrown out, we'll have to see what happens next for him and Lively.
