logo
Dis-Chem pulls CeraVe from shelves over copycat claims

Dis-Chem pulls CeraVe from shelves over copycat claims

News246 days ago
Gabby Jones/Bloomberg via Getty Images
Dis-Chem has pulled Nutriwomen's Dermacare line from its shelves after a year-long dispute at the Advertising Regulatory Board over alleged copycat packaging.
L'Oréal South Africa alleged that Dermacare copied the branding of its CeraVe skincare line, and the Advertising Regulatory Board found in its favour.
Nutriwomen argues it isn't bound by the ARB's authority. Despite appeals, the ARB upheld its ruling.
For more financial news, go to the News24 Business front page.
Dis-Chem has pulled Nutriwomen's Dermacare skincare line from its shelves after a year-long dispute over alleged copycat branding.
The dispute began in May last year with L'Oréal South Africa alleging Dermacare copied the branding of its CeraVe skincare line, citing similarities in font, colour, design, and product information layout.
In the original complaint to the Advertising Regulatory Board (ARB), L'Oreal argued that the Dermacare packaging intentionally exploited the advertising goodwill that the well-known French brand had grown in the South African market since its local introduction in 2022.
The ARB had ruled in favour of L'Oréal South Africa, giving Nutriwomen three months to revise its Dermacare packaging.
While Nutriwomen argued it wasn't subject to the ARB's jurisdiction as a non-member, it engaged in the proceedings and appealed the decision in October 2024.
READ | L'Oreal SA claims rival copied its packaging — and watchdog agrees
The ARB ordered Nutriwomen again to either amend its packaging design or remove the product line from retailers' shelves by 16 January 2025. It further instructed ARB members not to advertise Dermacare products until the designs had been amended.
Photographic evidence submitted to the ARB in May appeared to show that Nutriwomen had not amended the packaging design.
It also showed that Dis-Chem had continued to sell the products in their infringing packaging at its outlets and online platforms long after the January 2025 deadline.
L'Oréal provided the Advertising Appeal Committee (AAC) with photos taken between April and May that show Dermacare products in Dis-Chem stores in Sandton City and Mall of Africa.
'Dis-Chem first received a notification from L'Oreal on this matter on 20 January 2025 and notified all stores nationally to remove the affected Dermacare products from shelves, with a similar directive given to its online store,' a spokesperson told News24, explaining that it had received a similar directive from the Cosmetic, Toiletry, and Fragrance Association of South Africa (CTFA) in March.
Dis-Chem is a member of the CTFA, which, in turn, is a member of the ARB.
Dis-Chem said it had not received any other prior communication from the ARB or CTFA in this regard, and that it 'has always abided by industry body regulations and rulings'.
Dis-Chem's online store still had some Dermacare products listed around noon on Monday.
'While the Dis-Chem website continued to show product visibility, this was an operational oversight that has subsequently been remedied,' Dis-Chem told News24 on Monday afternoon. 
Jurisdiction
In its response to the most recent complaint, Nutriwomen argued that it was not bound by the ARB's rulings as it is not a member of the board, nor was it a member of the CTFA anymore. It had been bound by the previous rulings of the ARB by virtue of its indirect membership through its membership of the CTFA.
The ARB took note that Nutriwomen did not renew its membership to the CTFA for 2025 after its unsuccessful argument that the matter does not fall within the purview of the ARB.
CeraVe stated in its most recent submission that it considered Nutriwomen's arguments against the ARB's jurisdiction to be 'misleading and made in bad faith'.
The Advertising Appeal Committee (AAC) confirmed that Nutriwomen was in breach of its obligations, rejecting its jurisdictional objection. The AAC also concluded that Dis-Chem, as an ARB member through the CTFA, was responsible for ensuring compliance with its directives.
L'Oréal requested the following sanctions on Nutriwomen: immediate compliance with the ruling, pre-publication review of all future advertising, publication of a summary ruling at Nutriwomen's cost, and possible public listing as a defaulter.
The ARB granted two of the four requests and ordered that Dermacare products be pulled from retailers and that Nutriwomen submit proposals for amended designs with the original advertisement and the ARB's previous ruling, together with the most recent ruling to the Association for Communication and Advertising's (ACA) Advisory Service for pre-publication advice at its own cost.
It noted that while Nutriwomen can be held to previous rulings, the enforcement of the ARB's most recent ruling is complicated by it no longer being a member of CTFA.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Govt gives Transnet R95bn in guarantees
Govt gives Transnet R95bn in guarantees

News24

timean hour ago

  • News24

Govt gives Transnet R95bn in guarantees

South Africa's government approved R94.8 billion in guarantees to further support state-owned rail and port operator Transnet. The allocation includes R48.6 billion to ensure all of the company's debt redemptions will be covered over the next five years, the Department of Transport said in a statement on Sunday. The other R46.2 billion is to mitigate the risks of credit-ratings downgrades on Transnet's debt. Transnet had requested funding from a budget facility that prioritizes large-scale infrastructure projects needed to boost economic growth, with the cash to be used to finance upgrades and equipment orders. After years of underinvestment and state corruption, deliveries on some of South Africa's rail lines have dropped to the lowest level in decades, and its ports rank among the worst in the world. The funds, which add to a R51 billion guarantee facility approved in May, are intended to help the indebted company become profitable. 'Government will continue to work with Transnet to ensure operational and financial improvements in the company, and to accelerate implementation of reforms for the logistics sector, including private sector participation,' the department said. Transnet spokesperson Ayanda Shezi wasn't immediately able to comment on the announcement. Transnet is entirely dependent on government support to service its debt, the ratings agency S&P Global said in a statement on July 10, when it downgraded the company's senior unsecured debt. It warned of a 'downside scenario' if government support weakened. Similarly, measures that would result in an upgrade will take time, making a favourable revision unlikely in the next 12 months, S&P said.

Those who invested in Woolworths Holdings (JSE:WHL) five years ago are up 82%
Those who invested in Woolworths Holdings (JSE:WHL) five years ago are up 82%

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Those who invested in Woolworths Holdings (JSE:WHL) five years ago are up 82%

While Woolworths Holdings Limited (JSE:WHL) shareholders are probably generally happy, the stock hasn't had particularly good run recently, with the share price falling 15% in the last quarter. But at least the stock is up over the last five years. In that time, it is up 55%, which isn't bad, but is below the market return of 100%. Let's take a look at the underlying fundamentals over the longer term, and see if they've been consistent with shareholders returns. AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. There is no denying that markets are sometimes efficient, but prices do not always reflect underlying business performance. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement. During the five years of share price growth, Woolworths Holdings moved from a loss to profitability. That's generally thought to be a genuine positive, so investors may expect to see an increasing share price. Since the company was unprofitable five years ago, but not three years ago, it's worth taking a look at the returns in the last three years, too. In fact, the Woolworths Holdings stock price is 8.6% lower in the last three years. Meanwhile, EPS is up 3.3% per year. It would appear there's a real mismatch between the increasing EPS and the share price, which has declined -3.0% a year for three years. The graphic below depicts how EPS has changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image). Dive deeper into Woolworths Holdings' key metrics by checking this interactive graph of Woolworths Holdings's earnings, revenue and cash flow. What About Dividends? It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. In the case of Woolworths Holdings, it has a TSR of 82% for the last 5 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. This is largely a result of its dividend payments! A Different Perspective Woolworths Holdings shareholders are down 13% for the year (even including dividends), but the market itself is up 24%. Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. Longer term investors wouldn't be so upset, since they would have made 13%, each year, over five years. It could be that the recent sell-off is an opportunity, so it may be worth checking the fundamental data for signs of a long term growth trend. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Even so, be aware that Woolworths Holdings is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about... Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of companies we expect will grow earnings. Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on South African exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store