T-Mobile asked by review board to drop unclear savings ads in ongoing carrier battle
The review followed an earlier case from the National Advertising Division (NAD), which also raised concerns. NAD determined that the phrase "plus streaming" did not make it clear that T-Mobile was adding the cost of optional streaming subscriptions to competitors' monthly plan prices to make its own prices appear lower. According to the panel, many customers could reasonably believe the comparison was based on the cost of the mobile service alone.
T-Mobile made some changes during the process, including adding more explicit references to streaming services and updating disclosures. But NARB agreed with NAD that these changes were not enough. The panel said the "plus streaming" wording was too vague and did not clearly explain how the price comparisons worked.
NARB also recommended that T-Mobile avoid implying that:
All T-Mobile plans cost less than similar AT&T or Verizon plans
plans cost less than similar or plans Every customer would save money or save 20% by switching
The panel did not support one NAD finding that the ads implied Verizon charged a mandatory "similar streaming services" fee. T-Mobile said it disagreed with the panel's decision but would follow its recommendations.
Major carriers regularly run ads comparing their prices, coverage, and perks to rivals. These claims can be persuasive for customers deciding whether to switch. However, they also attract close scrutiny from competitors and watchdog groups. Similar disputes have been brought against AT&T and Verizon in the past, showing that challenges over marketing language are common in the telecom industry.
For us consumers, this ruling is a reminder that savings claims often depend on extra factors like streaming subscriptions or limited-time promotions. While T-Mobile still offers competitive value, comparing only headline prices can be misleading. Reading the details and understanding what is included remains the best way to decide if switching is truly worth it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Phone Arena
5 minutes ago
- Phone Arena
AT&T embraces Open RAN, sees it as big game changer in mobile
AT&T is embracing Open Radio Access Networks, also known as Open RAN or O-RAN. This deals with how a radio access network (RAN) is built. The RAN is the part of the mobile network that connects your phone to the core network. The RAN receives and transmits signals between your device and the network using radio waves. It is also the part of a network that makes sure you don't drop your call when moving between cells. RAN also handles how spectrum is allocated among multiple users, and feeds traffic to the core network for routing and switching. Typically, it is made up of base stations and antennas from a single vendor. The interfaces between these components is closed and proprietary. AT&T Chief Technology Officer Jeremy Legg. | Image credit-AT&T O-RAN looks to separate hardware and software and use open, standardized interfaces between them. For example, a mobile operator could use a radio unit (RU) from one vendor and a baseband unit (BU) from another. O-RAN moves some of the functions of the network from proprietary hardware to software that can be run on servers available right off-the-shelf. Not only does this make the network less expensive to build, but it also allows it to be more scalable, which is important when dealing with a business that can grow rapidly. A network operator using O-RAN can go with the best-in-class components from different vendors and build a better network.. If you're a high-level Technology Officer with a mobile provider, the technology is exciting, but it is also cost-effective. During this morning's KeyBanc Technology Leadership Forum fireside chat, AT&T Chief Technical Officer Jeremy Legg gushed over O-RAN. "O-RAN will take the industry, that's not going to be just us," the CTO said. AT&T inked a multi-year $14 billion Open-RAN contract with Ericsson in 2023. That deal met with some criticism because AT&T gave the deal to one of the big infrastructure vendors that Open RAN was supposed to lower the importance of. AT&T has been forced to prove that it doesn't plan on sticking with just one vendor to build its network. Legg made it clear that the nation's third-largest wireless carrier has a multi-vendor RAN strategy. AT&T 's Legg said, "We want to have the ability to have multiple radio and antenna providers for a single RAN," he said. "We want there to be the ability to have virtualized RAN or centralized RAN and have different sets of software that are running on those baseband boxes. That makes a lot of sense." He adds that AT&T is eliminating Nokia equipment and replacing it with Ericsson for its O-RAN network. Legg explained that AT&T decided to go with O-RAN because of the possibility that it would cost less to build such a network. AT&T also desired that its networks be open. As Legg stated, "Ultimately, closed network ecosystems generally break down, and you were starting to see that with a lot of the infrastructure providers for these closed networks. There was a lot of consolidation going on in that industry. Wireless networks have typically been closed and AT&T 's Chief Technology Officer notes, "You can't just plug into a wireless network. O-RAN changes that equation and allows people, through SDKs, RDKs and other software tools, to be able to plug into the network and leverage those services. The carrier is opening up its network and just last week the first Open RAN call using third-party radios was completed at AT&T Labs. AT&T , Ericsson and Fujitsu's 2Finity were involved. Legg says that AT&T believes that using Open RAN is the right path and that the company will continue to believe this.
GSM Arena
35 minutes ago
- GSM Arena
Samsung to invest more than $7 billion into chip packaging in the US
Ro, 11 August 2025 After some hiccups with Samsung's chip manufacturing business in the last couple of years, the company is now determined to regain ground in the segment. Ahead of the South Korea-USA summit on August 25, Samsung is said to invest an additional $7.2 billion into its chip manufacturing facilities in the USA. The investment will go into an advanced chip packaging facility in addition to the planned $37 billion investment into chip manufacturing. Samsung plans to produce 2nm and 4nm chips to meet demand from new clients such as Apple and Tesla. It's also a way to avoid Trump's tariffs. The company's original plan included a $44 billion investment, but at the time, the demand for Samsung chips was low, so the Korean tech giant decided to drop the chip packaging facility altogether. Now, it's back on the menu. The information isn't officially confirmed, but it looks like the company will announce it during the summit on August 25. Samsung believes it can outperform the competition in the US because it offers a complete manufacturing solution - chip production, chip packaging, and memory chip manufacturing. TSMC, for example, only offers chip manufacturing and packaging, while SK Hynix only does memory chips. Samsung's Taylor Fab 1 is almost done, and the construction is planned to be complete by the end of this year. However, the equipment needed for chip manufacturing will be installed next year. Source
Phone Arena
35 minutes ago
- Phone Arena
Google Meet's latest update puts the focus back on the content being shared
Google Meet is introducing a new way to make presentations more immersive. Starting today, the platform lets users enter a full screen mode when viewing a presentation or sharing their own screen. This option enlarges the presentation area by maximizing the Meet interface and shrinking the participants' view into a sidebar. The update is rolling out gradually. For Rapid Release Google Workspace domains, the rollout began on July 29, 2025, and could take more than 15 days to reach all users. For Scheduled Release domains, the rollout starts on August 14, 2025, with full availability expected within three days. There are no admin controls for this feature. For end users, the process is simple — when in an active presentation, click the "Enter Full Screen" option at the bottom of the screen. The feature works for all Google Workspace customers, Workspace Individual subscribers, and even those with personal Google accounts. The process of sharing a presentation in full screen on Google Meet. | Image credit — Google This change addresses a common challenge in video calls: balancing visibility between the shared content and the meeting participants. Until now, Meet's interface often left a significant portion of the screen used up by participant windows, even when sharing or viewing slides. The new full screen mode puts the focus firmly on the content that is being presented instead. Competitively, Google is catching up to platforms like Microsoft Teams and Zoom, which have long offered similar full screen or content-focused modes. Teams allows presenters to minimize participant video feeds to prioritize shared screens, while Zoom's side-by-side and speaker view options let users choose how much space the presentation gets. For those who switch between platforms for work or education, this update brings Google Meet in line with these established viewing preferences. While the feature is a welcome addition, it is not without limitations. Users who rely heavily on seeing participant reactions during presentations may find the minimized video feeds less useful. On the other hand, those presenting detailed visuals or data will likely appreciate the increased space. That said, full screen mode feels like a small but meaningful step in making Meet more user-friendly, especially for teachers, business presenters, and remote collaborators. It shows Google is continuing to refine its video conferencing platform to meet user needs and close gaps with competitors.
