YouTube reportedly tests new two-person premium plan in India: Eligibility, pricing and details
YouTube has begun piloting a new subscription tier allowing two users to share a Premium or Music Premium membership, with the trial currently underway in India, France, Taiwan, and Hong Kong, Moneycontrol has reported.
Reportedly, the initiative marks the Google-owned platform's latest effort to expand its subscription business as it looks to reduce its reliance on advertising revenue.
Under the trial, YouTube is offering the two-person Premium plan in India for ₹ 219 per month, while the Music Premium equivalent is priced at ₹ 149 per month, the publication added. To qualify, both subscribers must be at least 13 years old, hold a Google account, and belong to the same Google family group.
Confirming the development, a YouTube spokesperson told Moneycontrol: 'We're exploring new ways to offer more flexibility and value to our Premium members, including testing a two-person Premium option, allowing two people to share a subscription at a lower price.'
Currently in India, individual YouTube Premium plans are priced at ₹ 149 per month, while student and family plans cost ₹ 89 and ₹ 299 respectively. For Music Premium, the monthly rates are ₹ 59 for students, ₹ 119 for individuals, and ₹ 179 for families.
The new plan is expected to appeal to couples, roommates, or any two people sharing a household who wish to save on subscription costs while maintaining separate user profiles. The move mirrors similar offerings by other streaming platforms, including Spotify's Duo plan.
YouTube has been actively pushing its subscription services, recently increasing prices in India by up to 58 per cent across various tiers in August 2024. The company has also intensified its crackdown on ad blockers worldwide.
'Subscriptions are a key pillar of our business,' Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai noted during the company's April 2025 earnings call. 'We continue to broaden our subscription portfolio, including the recent expansion of our Premium Lite pilot in the US, providing users a new way to watch most YouTube videos without ads.'
Premium Lite, currently available in the United States, Australia, Germany, and Thailand, offers ad-free viewing across categories like gaming, cooking, and education, but excludes music videos, Shorts, and background play.
First Published: 5 May 2025, 04:41 PM IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Airtel Digital TV removing Zee channels from base packs over price hike
Mumbai: Bharti Airtel-owned direct-to-home (DTH) company Airtel Digital TV said it is removing Zee Entertainment channels from its bouquets due to a recent price hike by the broadcaster, mirroring an ongoing dispute between Sony Pictures Networks India and Tata Play . The DTH company will adjust pack prices to account for the removal of Zee channels and place the broadcaster's offerings on an a la carte basis, requiring subscribers to opt for Zee channels separately. 'Due to recent changes in broadcaster tariffs, Zee Network channels will no longer be part of the Airtel DTH base packs. These pack prices will be adjusted accordingly,' an Airtel spokesperson said. 'All Zee network channels are available on Airtel DTH and can be added individually to the list of subscribed channels at their respective MRPs via channel selection options." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Crossout: New Apocalyptic MMO Crossout Play Now Undo In January, Zee and Sony Pictures Networks India raised the price of their base bouquets by over 10%. Broadcaster JioStar implemented the steepest hike, increasing the price of its base bouquet by 18% to ₹110. While Zee and Airtel Digital TV have not disclosed the financial terms of their deal, the DTH company is estimated to pay ₹300–400 crore annually in subscription fees to the broadcaster. Live Events Sources familiar with the matter said Airtel Digital TV is resisting the price hike by Zee, as the company and other DTH operators aim to control costs and return to profitability. A Zee Entertainment executive, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the broadcaster has no dispute with the DTH company, as the two had signed a reference interconnect offer (RIO) agreement specifying the terms and conditions for interconnection earlier this year. 'I don't understand what the dispute is, because Airtel Digital TV has signed a RIO agreement with us and also implemented the price hike to its subscribers. We are waiting for them to send us the subscriber reports, providing the number of subscribers who are taking our channels and bouquets, and we will bill them accordingly,' the executive added. 'Distribution platforms have to reallocate content spends to reflect the new market dynamics — particularly in the wake of the creation of broadcasting giant JioStar, which has extracted its pound of flesh from the market,' a veteran TV distribution executive said, adding that with overall average revenue per user (ARPU) stagnating, distributors are now compelled to reallocate budgets based on each network's strength. JioStar currently has 34% of the TV viewership market, while Zee holds 17% and Sony Pictures Networks accounts for less than 10%. Recently, Sony Pictures Networks, a Sony Group Corp-owned entity operating under the legal name Culver Max Entertainment, approached the Bombay High Court to challenge a Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal order, which had restrained it from proceeding with a disconnection notice issued to Tata Play. While staying the disconnection notice, TDSAT had also directed Tata Play to pay ₹40 crore to the broadcaster within two weeks, as part-payment against its claimed dues of ₹128 crore. The tribunal stated that this amount would be adjusted against the liability to be determined during the final hearing. A recent report by EY and the All India Digital Cable Federation said India's pay-TV subscriber base dropped from 151 million in 2018 to 111 million in 2024 — a loss of 40 million subscribers. The report also projected a further decline, with pay-TV households expected to fall to between 71 and 81 million by 2030. The decline has been attributed to rising channel costs, increased competition from over-the-top platforms and the growing popularity of free, unregulated services such as DD Free Dish.
The Hindu
32 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Waymo leads autonomous taxi race in the U.S.
Waymo's autonomous vehicles have become part of the everyday landscape in a growing number of US cities, serving as safe transport options, tourist attractions, and symbols of a not-so-distant future. Their market dominance, however, is far from guaranteed. As Tesla preps to launch its first driverless taxi service in Austin, Texas, this month after numerous delays, Waymo already claims to have more than 250,000 weekly rides across Phoenix, San Francisco, Los Angeles and Austin (in a partnership with Uber). In San Francisco, locals barely notice the steering wheels turning by themselves anymore, with Waymo's fleet of Jaguars also available in parts of Silicon Valley. But for tourists and business travelers, their first Waymo ride often becomes the most memorable part of a trip to the Golden Gate city. In Los Angeles, the vehicles also became a target of protesters against the White House's immigration policies, who set Waymos on fire or covered them in graffiti. That blip aside, Waymo has been going from strength to strength, with the company -- a subsidiary of Google-parent Alphabet, capturing 27% of San Francisco's market share, according to YipitData. The data shows that Waymo has surpassed Lyft, the United States' second-largest ride-hailing service, in the city, while Uber maintains a dominant 50-plus percent market share. Remarkably, Waymo only launched commercial service in San Francisco in 2023 and opened to the general public just one year ago. "People quickly feel comfortable because they perceive these cars as safer than human-driven vehicles," explained Billy Riggs, an engineering professor at the University of San Francisco who studies such vehicles and their integration into daily life. Despite typically higher fares than Uber and longer wait times, Riggs's research reveals that more than a third of users earn less than $100,000 annually: the median salary in the tech capital. Three factors drive this success: safety, the absence of a driver (no need to haggle over what music to play), and well-maintained vehicles. According to a recent Waymo study covering more than 90 million kilometers (56 million miles) of driving, their autonomous vehicles achieved a 92 percent reduction in pedestrian-involved accidents and a 96 percent reduction in injury-causing collisions at intersections. "Even when humans challenge them, the vehicles don't respond aggressively. They're better versions of ourselves," Riggs joked. While better than humans, these vehicles are less passive and hesitant than in their early days. Through continuous data collection on driver behavior and algorithmic adjustments by engineers, Waymo cars have developed "humanistic driving behavior." "That's everything from being able to creep into the intersection if there's a potential blind right turn or nudging into a left-hand turn" against oncoming traffic. Both are legal, "but they would be seen as more aggressive, rather than defensive, human, driving maneuvers." The vehicles have also gained recognition for their smooth accelerations and braking. "My boys say, it's like butter. When they ride with me in our Tesla, I make them sick," he added. The collapse of Waymo's main competitor, Cruise, due to high costs and following poor crisis management after a San Francisco accident, has propelled Waymo to market leadership. It plans to expand to Atlanta, Miami and Washington by 2026. True large-scale deployment, however, requires adapting to different regulations and, more critically, acquiring many more vehicles. The company currently operates 1,500 vehicles across four cities. In early May, Waymo announced plans to build 2,000 additional electric Jaguar I-Pace vehicles next year, all equipped with autonomous driving technology. These vehicles cost approximately $100,000 each, according to an interview with Waymo executive Dmitri Dolgov on the Shack15 Conversations podcast. That means profitability remains a distant goal. In the first quarter, Alphabet's "Other Bets" division, which includes Waymo, recorded net losses of $1.2 billion. "There still could be a scenario where Waymo loses. It's not unrealistic that some Chinese competitor comes in and wins," Riggs said.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Meta and TikTok challenge tech fees in second highest EU court
Meta Platforms and TikTok said a European Union supervisory fee levied on them was disproportionate and based on a flawed methodology as they took their fight with tech regulators to Europe's second highest court on Wednesday. Under the Digital Services Act that became law in 2022, the two companies and 16 others are subject to a supervisory fee amounting to 0.05% of their annual worldwide net income aimed at covering the European Commission's cost of monitoring their compliance with the law. The size of the annual fee is based on the number of average monthly active users for each company and whether the company posts a profit or loss in the preceding financial year. Meta told judges at the General Court it was not trying to avoid paying its fair share of the fee, but it questioned how the Commission had calculated the levy, saying it had been based on the revenue of the group rather than of the subsidiary. Meta's lawyer Assimakis Komninos told the panel of five judges the company still did not know how the fee was calculated. He said the provisions in the Digital Services Act, or DSA, 'go against the letter and the spirit of the law, are totally untransparent with black boxes and have led to completely implausible and absurd results'. ByteDance-owned Chinese online social media platform TikTok was equally critical. 'What has happened here is anything but fair or proportionate. The fee has used inaccurate figures and discriminatory methods,' TikTok lawyer Bill Batchelor told the court. 'It inflates TikTok's fees, requires it to pay, not just for itself, but for other platforms and disregards the excessive fee cap,' he said. He accused the Commission of double counting the companies' users, saying this was discriminatory because users switching between their mobile phones and laptops would then be counted twice. He also said regulators had exceeded their legal power by setting the fee cap at the level of group profits. Commission lawyer Lorna Armati rejected both companies' arguments and defended the Commission's use of group profit as a reference value to calculate the supervisory fee. 'When a group has consolidated accounts, it is the financial resources of the group as a whole that are available to that provider in order to bear the burden of the fee,' she told the court. 'The providers had sufficient information to understand why and how the Commission used the numbers that it did and there is no question of any breach of their right to be heard now, unequal treatment,' she said. The Court is expected to issue its ruling next year. The cases are T-55/24 Meta Platforms Ireland v Commission and T-58/24 TikTok Technology v Commission.
