
YouTube reportedly tests new two-person premium plan in India: Eligibility, pricing and details
Reportedly, the initiative marks the Google-owned platform's latest effort to expand its subscription business as it looks to reduce its reliance on advertising revenue.
Under the trial, YouTube is offering the two-person Premium plan in India for ₹ 219 per month, while the Music Premium equivalent is priced at ₹ 149 per month, the publication added. To qualify, both subscribers must be at least 13 years old, hold a Google account, and belong to the same Google family group.
Confirming the development, a YouTube spokesperson told Moneycontrol: 'We're exploring new ways to offer more flexibility and value to our Premium members, including testing a two-person Premium option, allowing two people to share a subscription at a lower price.'
Currently in India, individual YouTube Premium plans are priced at ₹ 149 per month, while student and family plans cost ₹ 89 and ₹ 299 respectively. For Music Premium, the monthly rates are ₹ 59 for students, ₹ 119 for individuals, and ₹ 179 for families.
The new plan is expected to appeal to couples, roommates, or any two people sharing a household who wish to save on subscription costs while maintaining separate user profiles. The move mirrors similar offerings by other streaming platforms, including Spotify's Duo plan.
YouTube has been actively pushing its subscription services, recently increasing prices in India by up to 58 per cent across various tiers in August 2024. The company has also intensified its crackdown on ad blockers worldwide.
'Subscriptions are a key pillar of our business,' Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai noted during the company's April 2025 earnings call. 'We continue to broaden our subscription portfolio, including the recent expansion of our Premium Lite pilot in the US, providing users a new way to watch most YouTube videos without ads.'
Premium Lite, currently available in the United States, Australia, Germany, and Thailand, offers ad-free viewing across categories like gaming, cooking, and education, but excludes music videos, Shorts, and background play.
First Published: 5 May 2025, 04:41 PM IST
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

NDTV
28 minutes ago
- NDTV
"We Are Back": White House Launches Official TikTok Account
Washington: The White House launched a TikTok account on Tuesday, as President Donald Trump continues to permit the Chinese-owned platform to operate in the United States despite a law requiring its sale. "America we are BACK! What's up TikTok?" read a caption on the account's first post on the popular video sharing app, a 27-second clip. The account had about 4,500 followers an hour after posting the video. Trump's personal account on TikTok meanwhile has 110.1 million followers, though his last post was on November 5, 2024 -- Election Day. TikTok is owned by China-based internet company ByteDance. A federal law requiring TikTok's sale or ban on national security grounds was due to take effect the day before Trump's inauguration on January 20. But the Republican, whose 2024 election campaign relied heavily on social media and who has said he is fond of TikTok, put the ban on pause. In mid-June Trump extended a deadline for the popular video-sharing app by another 90 days to find a non-Chinese buyer or be banned in the United States. That extension is due to expire in mid-September. While Trump had long supported a ban or divestment, he reversed his position and vowed to defend the platform -- which boasts almost two billion global users -- after coming to believe it helped him win young voters' support in the November election. Trump's official account on X, formerly Twitter, has 108.5 million followers -- though his favored social media outlet is Truth Social, which he owns, where he has 10.6 million followers. The official White House accounts on X and Instagram have 2.4 million and 9.3 million followers, respectively.

NDTV
3 hours ago
- NDTV
Google Fined $36 Million Over Anti-Competitive Deals With Australia Telcos
Google has agreed to pay an Aus $55 million (US $36 million) penalty for striking "anti-competitive" deals to pre-install only its own search engine on Android mobile phones sold by two leading Australian telecoms firms. Australia's competition authority said it had launched proceedings in the Federal Court and jointly submitted with Google Asia Pacific that it should pay the fine. The court would now decide whether the agreed penalty and other orders were "appropriate", the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission said in a statement released on Monday. "Conduct that restricts competition is illegal in Australia because it usually means less choice, higher costs or worse service for consumers," said the commission's chair, Gina-Cass Gottlieb. Google had cooperated with the competition commission and admitted reaching the deals with telecoms firms Telstra and Optus, which were in place from December 2019 to March 2021, the body said. In return for only installing Google's search engine, Telstra and Optus had received a share of the resulting advertising revenue, the commission said. "Google has admitted in reaching those understandings with each of Telstra and Optus, it was likely to have had the effect of substantially lessening competition," it said. Google said it was pleased to have resolved the regulator's concerns over the provisions, adding that they had not been in its commercial agreements for "some time". "We are committed to providing Android device makers more flexibility to preload browsers and search apps," a Google spokesperson said. Telstra and Optus entered court-enforceable agreements last year not to make new agreements to pre-install Google search as the default on Android devices, the competition watchdog said.
The Wire
3 hours ago
- The Wire
‘India's Richest Families' Guilty of ‘Profiteering' From Russian Oil: US Treasury Secretary
New Delhi: 'Some of India's richest families' are involved in the country's 'unacceptable' 'profiteering' from buying and reselling Russian crude, a Trump cabinet official said on Tuesday (August 19), indicating no let up in the US's stance against New Delhi's continued purchases of oil from Moscow. US treasury secretary Scott Bessent's remarks also came a day after senior White House trade adviser and economist Peter Navarro wrote in a newspaper column that the proceeds from India's purchases of Russian oil – which he said are unbecoming of an American strategic partner – 'flow to India's politically connected energy titans, and in turn, into Vladimir Putin's war chest'. Recalling in an interview to CNBC that Russian crude went from constituting less than 1% of Indian oil imports just before Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine to around 40% today, Bessent said that India 'is just profiteering'. 'So India is just profiteering … they're reselling, they've made $16 billion in excess profits, some of the richest families in India,' said Bessent, whose role is roughly equivalent to that of finance minister. India's 'arbitrage' in 'buying cheap Russian oil' and 'reselling it as [a] product has just sprung up during the war, which is unacceptable', he continued. Earlier this month, US President Donald Trump announced a 25% 'penalty' tariff on India – on top of an existing 25% 'reciprocal' levy – in response to its sustained purchases of Russian oil despite Moscow's continued aggression against Ukraine. New Delhi termed the penalty, which is scheduled to take effect on August 27, 'extremely unfortunate', saying it was being singled out 'for actions that several other countries are also taking in their own national interest'. When asked in the CNBC interview if China – which is the biggest importer of Russian oil ahead of India but does not face a penalty for its purchases – was not also in the wrong, Bessent said that what Beijing is doing is a 'completely different thing'. 'Well, let's go back and look at the history though … China importing is suboptimal. If you go back and look pre-'22, pre-invasion, 13% of China's oil was already coming from Russia. Now it's 16%. So China has diversified input of their oil,' he said. The treasury secretary's remarks lambasting the 'richest families in India' – Mukesh Ambani's Reliance along with the Russian-owned Nayara are the the largest buyers of Russian oil in India – come a day after Navarro wrote that the surge in India's imports of Moscow's crude 'has not been driven by domestic oil consumption needs' but by 'profiteering by India's Big Oil lobby'. Ambani had also met Trump ahead of his inauguration in January as well as at a state dinner organised for the president in Qatar by its Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani. 'The refiners buy oil at a steep discount, process it and then export refined fuels to Europe, Africa and Asia – all the while shielding India from sanctions scrutiny under the pretence of neutrality … The proceeds flow to India's politically connected energy titans, and in turn, into Vladimir Putin's war chest,' he wrote in an op-ed in the Financial Times. Going on to call India's reliance on Russian oil 'opportunistic and deeply corrosive of the world's efforts to isolate Putin's war economy', Navarro declared that if India 'wants to be treated as a strategic partner of the US, it needs to start acting like one'. New Delhi, which maintains that its purchases of oil are guided by market considerations, said upon Trump's announcing his intention to ratchet up tariffs against India for its purchases of Russian crude that after the Ukraine war began, the US 'actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy markets' stability'. When Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin met in Alaska to discuss an end to the conflict, the Ministry of External Affairs said it 'appreciates the progress made' in the two leaders' summit.



