
SAS war hero who fought in Falklands SLAMS Labour for ‘persecuting & betraying veterans' on 80th anniversary of VE Day
Falklands War legend Aldwin Wight, who led 22 SAS regiment, led a surprise assault on No10, raging that: 'The trust between veterans and their former employer, the government, is broken.'
2
Wight, a former Brigadier, issued a rallying cry to fellow veterans to 'foment a public outcry against the government'.
In a three page dossier, released tomorrow, entitled "commanding officer's statement," he accused the Labour government of 'institutional amnesia'.
He said veterans who served in Northern Ireland faced decades of legal witch hunts which had "denigrated their service," ruined soldiers lives and left many of them trapped in a "doom loop".
He wrote: 'This persecution of veterans is inexplicable, in fact bewildering.'
Wight, who led the SAS from 1992 to 1994, added: 'Having directly contributed to the defeat of the IRA, bent on using murder as a political tool, the veterans of this campaign now find themselves prosecuted by their former employer, the Government they served and trusted, whilst the terrorists have been absolved of their crimes and set free, even compensated.'
It comes after Keir Starmer wrote an open letter to all veterans to say 'how thankful we all are' on the 80th anniversary of the end of World War Two in Europe
Starmer said the debt to veterans 'can never be repaid'.
Wight accused the Prime Minister of forgetting how violent the IRA were.
He wrote: "Nowadays there is a collective institutional amnesia in government of the level of violence perpetrated by the IRA: 4,000 murders, indiscriminate bombing campaigns in Northern Ireland and the mainland, an attempt to kill a Prime Minister, murdering Mountbatten, attacking the City of London, Omagh and other horrors, endless assassinations."
He said the terrorist would never have been beaten and the Good Friday peace never agreed without the work of the SAS and local police.
SAS legend who stormed the Iranian Embassy forced to launch public appeal to pay crippling care home costs
He wrote: 'The SAS, because of its experience and capabilities, drew the hardest task – apprehending armed terrorists when the intelligence indicated a major attack.'
He said all of the operations had 'ministerial approval' and strict rules of engagement.
But he added: 'It is worth remembering the nature of these operations.
'The reality was that a small team was tasked to apprehend armed terrorists, often in the dark, in chaotic and fast changing circumstances.
2
'There was always a direct threat to soldier's lives.'
But he said: 'Professional, committed and experienced soldiers were willing to undertake these operations and face the risks, as they believed they were defending our freedoms.'
In Mach The Sun revealed how the SAS association accused governments of 'badly letting down' veterans.
It urged its members to break cover – and declare their Special Forces backgrounds – in order to lobby MPs about comrades who are 'unjustly hounded for doing their duty'.
In February a Northern Irish coroner sparked outrage among veterans by ruling the SAS had no justification for shooting dead four IRA terrorists armed with assault rifles and an anti-aircraft gun.
Former SAS Regimental Sergeant Major George Simm, 70, slammed the coroner's ruling as 'absurd'.
Tory MP David Davis, who served in the SAS, said Justice Michael Humphreys was 'demonstrably wrong' and had 'ignored plain facts of the case'.
Veterans Minister Al Carns, who served in the Special Forces, said the government would seek a judicial review to overturn the finding.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Spectator
11 minutes ago
- Spectator
Cabinet ministers urge Starmer to recognise Palestine
Parliament may have risen for recess but that doesn't mean that Sir Keir Starmer is getting much of a break. It transpires that the Prime Minister is facing growing calls to immediately recognise Palestine as a state with a number of Cabinet minister understood to be piling pressure on the PM alongside dozens of his backbenchers. On Tuesday, just before MPs left Westminster for summer recess, Health Secretary Wes Streeting urged Sir Keir to recognise Palestine 'while there's still a state of Palestine left to recognise'. He went on: I deplore Israel's attacks on healthcare workers as well as other innocent civilians trying to access healthcare or vital aid. These actions go well beyond legitimate self-defence and undermine the prospects for peace. I sincerely hope that the international community can come together, as the foreign secretary has been driving towards, to make sure that we see an end of this war but also that we recognise the state of Palestine while there is a state of Palestine left to recognise. Streeting isn't the only member of the Cabinet understood to have pushed the issue in meetings. As reported by the Guardian, Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood and Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn have also brought it up. The Health Secretary's intervention follows that of nearly 60 Labour MPs, who sent a letter to Foreign Secretary David Lammy at the start of the month after Israeli defence minister Israel Katz proposed plans to force Gaza's into a camp in Rafah. While Israeli human rights lawyer Michael Sfard described the move was 'about population transfer to the southern tip of Gaza in preparation for deportation outside the strip', the MP group wrote: 'Though an accurate description, we believe there is a clearer one. The ethnic cleansing of Gaza.' Of course, it's not just Labour politicians who have been vocal on the Middle East. As Mr S wrote in May, more than a dozen senior Tory MPs and peers broke ranks to write to Starmer to urge the PM to immediately recognise Palestine as a state. The seven MPs and six House of Lords grandees have signed a letter that insists 'recognising Palestine would affirm our nation's commitment to upholding the principles of justice, self-determination and equal rights'. The letter was signed by several Tory moderates – including MPs Kit Malthouse, Simon Hoare and father of the house Sir Edward Leigh alongside peers such as Nicholas Soames and Hugo Swire. Mr S was rather interested to note that there were some more surprising signatories, however, with right-wing Conservative MP Sir John Hayes backing the call. Starmer hadn't changed the UK's stance after the Tory group or the Labour backbenchers reached out – but will he be swayed by his own Cabinet ministers? Stay tuned…


The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
Furious Crystal Palace fans launch UEFA protest amid club's Europa League appeal
Crystal Palace fans protested UEFA 's decision to demote their club from the Europa League to the Conference League. The demotion was due to a breach of multi-club ownership rules, specifically concerning co-owner John Textor's involvement with both Palace and Lyon. Members of the Holmesdale Fanatics travelled to UEFA's headquarters in Nyon, Switzerland, to hand-deliver a letter to president Aleksander Ceferin demanding the ruling be overturned. The fan group also presented UEFA with a suitcase of fake money, symbolising perceived contradictions in the organisation's values and conduct. Following the protest, Palace lodged an appeal against UEFA, Nottingham Forest, and Lyon with the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), with a decision anticipated by 11 August.


The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
What are the corruption issues behind Ukrainian protests against Zelensky?
Thousands of people, including veterans, took to the streets of Kyiv on Tuesday evening to protest against president Volodymyr Zelensky's anti-corruption measures. The demonstrations, which have reportedly spread to Lviv and Dnipro, are the first public protests against the Ukrainian president since the Russian invasion in February 2022. Some of those outside Mr Zelensky's presidential office claimed Ukraine was ' turning into Russia ', with placards reading 'welcome to Russia', according to reports. 'We chose Europe, not autocracy,' read one placard by a demonstrator. Another read: 'My father did not die for this.' So why are people protesting, and what are the anti-corruption measures? The Independent takes a closer look below. What are the anti-corruption measures? Kyiv has toughened restrictions on two anti-corruption agencies at the centre of the government's reform drive, rolling back their autonomy in favour of tighter executive control. Stamping out endemic graft - a form of political corruption - is a requirement for Kyiv to join the European Union as well as to secure billions in Western aid. Amendments passed on Tuesday grant the general prosecutor, appointed by the president, strict control over the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (Nabu) of Ukraine and the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office. The vote came a day after Kyiv's domestic security agency arrested two NABU officials on suspicion of ties to Russia and conducted sweeping searches into agency employees on other grounds. Mr Zelensky, whose party holds a majority in parliament, approved the amendments late on Tuesday. Anti-corruption bodies would continue to function 'but without any Russian influence', the president said. Why are people protesting? Demonstrator Vladyslava Kirstyuk, 18, said memories of her childhood in occupied eastern Ukraine, after Russia's covert invasion in 2014, left a strong impression. 'I know what it means for one person to have all the power, when nothing is transparent and everything is working against you," she said. "I don't want it to be the same for us here.' Oleksiy Goncharenko, an opposition MP who voted against the measure, said the bill was 'about the end of the independence of anti-corruption bodies inside Ukraine', blaming the 'personal choice of President Zelensky'. What has been the reaction? The vote drew sharp criticism from the heads of both agencies and a top EU official, and spurred the largest public protests since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Writing on X, EU enlargement commissioner Marta Kos said she was "seriously concerned" by Tuesday's vote. "The dismantling of key safeguards protecting NABU's independence is a serious step back," she said, adding that rule of law was at "the very centre" of EU accession talks. Benjamin Haddad, France's European Affairs minister, said it was not too late for Ukraine to reverse its decision to roll back the autonomy of two anti-corruption agencies at the centre of the country's reform drive. A Western diplomat familiar with Ukraine's reform effort described the developments as "the most dangerous moment" yet for the independence of anti-corruption authorities. "The Ukrainian side is testing the limits more and more," the person said, referring to the patience of Kyiv's allies. After the protests, Mr Zelensky met anti-corruption and security officials on Wednesday and promised the creation of a joint plan to fight corruption within two weeks. "We all hear what society is saying. We see what people expect from state institutions and ensured justice and the effective functioning of each institution,' he said.