
Before climate talks, Tagore, KM Munshi and others championed sustainable living
Well before environmentalism became part of the modern world's policy vocabulary, a group of visionaries had already begun articulating ideas around sustainable living, ecological balance, and decentralised development. Rabindranath Tagore and KM Munshi were among the early 20th-century Indian thinkers who not only shaped cultural and political discourse but also laid down a framework for environmental thinking -- one that has become even more relevant as India faces growing ecological crises.Today, on June 6, as the world observes World Environment Day, the voices of these great thinkers remain absent from mainstream discourse. Despite the undeniable facts before us, we lack the kind of compelling voices that can truly reach and move the masses.advertisementRamachandra Guha's latest book, Speaking with Nature: The Origins of Indian Environmentalism, revisits the works and legacy of the early thinkers and how they at that time were seeing society. These emerge from the deep ethos of civilisational values.What remains striking is how foresighted these individuals were. JC Kumarappa, an economist and close ally of Mahatma Gandhi, had already warned that economies dependent on coal and oil would eventually fuel conflicts between nations.RECLAIMING FORGOTTEN FOUNDATIONS
Rabindranath Tagore's vision of establishing Shatinekatan extended beyond literature and education. He believed that any meaningful idea of national regeneration had to engage with the rhythms of the land and the lifeways of its people.His critique of industrial modernity was early and consistent. He warned against imitating Western models of progress that ignored the lived realities of rural communities. The emphasis on self-reliance, rural renewal, and holistic development shared by him would later influence Gandhian thought, but even independently, his was a voice grounded in the experience of agrarian India.
(AI-generated image)
advertisementTagore called for harmony between progress and restraint. His essays and letters reveal a nuanced understanding of how large-scale industrial activity often displaced local livelihoods and fractured social systems. For him, rebuilding India was as much about nurturing the land as it was about reclaiming cultural dignity.KM Munshi, a Constituent Assembly member and founder of the Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, took a more institutional route. While remembered primarily for his legal and literary contributions, Munshi's work in soil conservation and afforestation was pioneering.He launched the Van Mahotsav in 1950, envisioning it as a nationwide tree-planting campaign to combat deforestation. But beyond symbolism, Munshi advocated for watershed management and ecological planning in a newly independent India struggling with droughts, floods, and food shortages.Munshi believed that environmental regeneration was key to India's development, especially in the context of post-Partition nation-building. Yet, as Guha notes, Munshi's ideological alignment with cultural nationalism complicates his legacy.He sought to link environmental renewal with civilisational pride, which at times echoed exclusionary tones.LESSONS FROM THE PASTWe can also have a look at figures like Radhakamal Mukerjee, who critiqued the limitations of GDP as a measure of national well-being, and JC Kumarappa, who exposed the unsustainable economics of large-scale capitalism.advertisementOne wonders how the early advocates of organic farming might have responded to the Supreme Court's stance on genetically modified mustard, or how JC Kumarappa, with his sharp critique of extractive economies, would have viewed the decision to open up forest lands in Chhattisgarh for coal mining.Their writings forecasted concerns that now dominate global forums -- resource inequality, community displacement, and the environmental cost of unchecked growth.They argued that ecological balance could only be achieved when the voices of peasants, tribal communities, and marginalised groups were part of the solution.The ideas of Tagore, Munshi, and others were not ahead of their time, and perhaps even more so for ours.The roots of Indian environmentalism run deep. But to build on them, we must first remember.Must Watch
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
23 minutes ago
- India.com
Hafiz Saeed Living In Luxury Under Govt Protection, Pakistan Won't Hand Him Over To India, Says Son Talha
Islamabad/New Delhi: In a sensational revelation that tears the mask off Pakistan's counter-terror claims, Talha Saeed, son of 26/11 mastermind Hafiz Saeed, has declared in a new video that his father is safe, protected by the Pakistani government and will not be handed over to India ever. As speculation mounted over the fate of the Lashkar-e-Toiba founder, Talha broke his silence in an interview, dispelling rumours about his father's deteriorating health or imprisonment. Instead, he painted the image of a man who is 'peacefully spending his time writing Quranic commentary and offering prayers' – not languishing in any prison cell, as Pakistan would have the world believe. 'He is absolutely safe, well and living a peaceful life. The idea of handing him over to India is out of the question,' Talha said defiantly. The statement comes amid rising demands from India for Hafiz Saeed's extradition, especially with the 16th anniversary of the 26/11 Mumbai attacks approaching. The UN-designated terrorist, Saeed is accused of orchestrating the bloodbath that left 166 people dead and scores wounded. Yet, his son's words suggest that Pakistan's 'house arrest' may just be a smokescreen for international optics. The New Face of Anti-India Rhetoric? Talha Saeed has been increasingly active in Pakistan's public and media space, frequently spewing venom against India and rallying Islamist sympathisers. Many analysts believe that with Hafiz Saeed aging and reportedly unwell, Talha is now being groomed to take over his father's ideological and operational mantle within the Lashkar-e-Toiba. His interviews are being seen as a calculated PR move – not only to reassure LeT's rank and file but also to send a message to India and the global community: Hafiz Saeed is not going anywhere. Talha's confession is damning for a country that publicly claims to fight terrorism but is safeguarding its most notorious terrorist. Despite assurances given to global watchdogs like FATF, Pakistan appears to be offering VIP treatment to a man responsible for one of the worst terror attacks on Indian soil. India has repeatedly presented evidence of Saeed's involvement in the Mumbai attacks, demanding his extradition. But as Talha's statements now make clear, Islamabad never intended to act on those demands – a stance that undermines its credibility on the world stage. With Talha's open admission now in the public domain, Indian intelligence and diplomatic channels are closely monitoring the developments. The revelations strengthen India's position that Pakistan continues to harbour terrorists under state protection, even while demanding legitimacy and aid from international allies.


India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
India's ‘Chenab Trap' Chokes Pakistan's Terror Route; Even China On Edge – Here's How
New Delhi: In a moment that may go down as a masterstroke in India's strategic playbook, Prime Minister Narendra Modi on June 6 unveiled the world's tallest railway bridge – the Chenab Bridge – along with a series of infrastructure marvels in Jammu & Kashmir. While hailed as engineering triumphs, these structures hide within them a fierce geopolitical message – India is silently fortifying its Himalayan frontier, and Pakistan and China are not happy. At 359 metres tall, taller than the Eiffel Tower, the steel-arched Chenab Bridge is part of the 272 km Udhampur-Srinagar-Baramulla railway link (USBRL) and connects the Kashmir Valley to the Indian rail grid for the first time. But beyond the awe and applause, it is the military and counter-terror implications that have sent shockwaves across the border. Why Pakistan, China Should Be Worried The bridge sits near the treacherous Pir Panjal Range, a mountainous region that has for decades acted as a gateway for Pakistani infiltrators, including ISI-backed terrorists from the Lashkar-e-Toiba and the Jaish-e-Mohammed. From Poonch and Rajouri to the lush forests near Pahalgam, this route has seen some of the most notorious attacks in India's history. Now, with the Chenab and Anji bridges completed and the valley more accessible to India's armed forces year-round, this infiltration corridor is on the verge of collapse. 'This is not just a bridge. It's a steel-fisted message to our enemies,' said a top defence expert, requesting anonymity. The bridge does not only deter Pakistan. It tightens India's grip over the Jammu-Kashmir-Ladakh axis, critical to countering Chinese aggression along the Line of Actual Control (LAC). Troops, weapons and surveillance units can now move seamlessly – no more seasonal delays or logistical gaps. Hidden Checkmate This 'Chenab Chakravyuh' – as called by military strategists – is a geo-strategic snare apart from being about connectivity. With 24/7 surveillance cameras, anti-corrosion technologies and blast-resistant materials, the bridge is built to withstand earthquakes of 8.0 magnitude and even terrorist bombing attempts. 'They tried to divide us by using religion and terror. We are responding with steel, resolve and railways,' said a senior Indian Army official deployed in the region. Built with inputs from Indian Institute of Technology and the Defence Research, the Development Organisation (DRDO) and global experts, the Chenab Bridge uses high-tensile steel and advanced cable-crane systems. It is designed to last 120 years even under wind speeds of 260 kmph. And with two Vande Bharat trains flagged off from Katra to Srinagar, civilian integration of the region is now irreversible. What rattles Rawalpindi most is that this is blocking terrorists and rendering their long-game obsolete. For years, Pakistan has exploited difficult terrain and porous routes to fuel unrest in the valley. That door just slammed shut. Even Pakistan Field Marshal Asim Munir must now contend with the fact that Pir Panjal no longer favours infiltration, it favours India.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
PM Modi accepts invite to G7 meet after Canada PM calls
NEW DELHI: In a dramatic turn of events, Canadian PM Mark Carney called PM Modi and invited him for the G7 summit that begins eight days from now at Kananaskis in Alberta. Modi accepted the invitation and said he was looking forward to meeting him at the summit. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The announcement by Modi on X followed almost a week of suspense over his participation because of a lack of invitation, drawing barbs from the opposition about his possible exclusion from the summit. India is not a member of G7 but Modi has been invited for all summits since 2019. Modi congratulated Carney on his poll win and thanked him for the invitation. In first foreign trip after Sindoor, PM likely to highlight Pak's terror export As vibrant democracies bound by deep people-to-people ties, India and Canada will work together with renewed vigour, guided by mutual respect and shared interests," Modi posted on X. Without elaborating, a Canadian readout said that "importantly, there was agreement to continued law enforcement dialogue and discussions addressing security concerns". Modi and Carney, who was sworn in as PM in March and won federal elections the next month to cement his position, have pledged to rebuild the relationship that was left tottering by former PM Justin Trudeau's allegation of India's complicity in the murder of pro-Khalistan separatist and Canadian national Hardeep Singh Nijjar. New Delhi has rejected the allegation saying Ottawa hasn't provided any evidence to back its claim. The Indian govt will hope that Canada will ensure enough security to not allow Sikh separatist groups, who had been applying pressure on Carney to not invite Modi, to disrupt the visit. India's official position remains that the main issue with Canada is the leeway provided to Khalistan backers to carry out anti-India activities. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now For India to engage in any serious effort to rebuild the relationship, foolproof security for the country's diplomats, along with a crackdown on extremists and secessionists who seek to hurt Indian interests, is of paramount importance. Modi had last visited Canada in 2015. While the two countries are also said to be considering reappointing high commissioners, both Canadian and Indian authorities maintain they are looking at repairing ties one step at a time. Asked about the Nijjar investigations, Canadian foreign minister Anita Anand said last week that while the rule of law will never be compromised, Canada is looking forward to continuing to build this partnership. "The two leaders discussed the longstanding relationship between Canada and India, including deep people-to-people ties and significant commercial links,'' said the Canadian readout. The summit will also see Modi coming face to face with US President Donald Trump for the first time since their bilateral meeting in Washington in February this year. This will be Modi's first visit abroad since the military conflict with Pakistan and the PM is likely to use the opportunity to highlight India's concerns about Pakistan's continued support to cross-border terrorism and India's use of force to prevent terrorist attacks.