Netanyahu and Trump to meet again amid rising Gaza ceasefire hopes
Donald Trump
will meet
Israeli
prime minister
Binyamin Netanyahu
on Tuesday night, the second meeting between the two leaders in 24 hours, raising speculation that a
Gaza
ceasefire and hostage release deal may be close.
In advance of talks at the White House on Monday night, Mr Trump said it was his impression that
Hamas
wants a deal.
US envoy Steve Witkoff, who will fly to Qatar this week to join the Israel-Hamas proximity talks, said: 'We have an opportunity to finally get a peace deal.'
Under discussion is a two-month truce, during which 10 of the remaining 20 hostages believed to still be alive will be released; Israeli forces will withdraw from most of Gaza and there will be a surge in humanitarian aid.
READ MORE
Negotiations will begin on a permanent end to the war, with Hamas seeking assurances from Mr Trump that the talks will continue if no agreement is reached within 60 days.
The majority of the Israeli public supports ending the war in Gaza and there was another reminder of the high cost of the 21-month military operation when five soldiers were killed on Monday in a Hamas ambush in Beit Hanoun in the northern Gaza Strip.
Mr Netanyahu is not opposed to ending the war, provided it ends under conditions that include the dismantlement of Hamas's military and governmental capabilities.
A senior Israeli official said that 80–90 per cent of the ceasefire agreement with Hamas has already been agreed, but that the negotiations may take more than a few days, and he spelled out Israel's vision of a postwar Gaza.
'The finishing picture of the war in Gaza – no Hamas,' he said. 'Hamas has laid down its arms, its men have surrendered, and its leaders have been exiled. That is the finishing picture, when another force has taken control over the strip – the
Palestinian Authority
, no; but local clans and possibly Fatah operatives, yes.'
Defence minister Israel Katz has instructed the army to prepare a plan to establish a 'humanitarian city' in Rafah, which would eventually house the entire population of the Gaza Strip, in a move condemned by human rights groups as forced population transfer and a war crime.
Mr Netanyahu was asked at the beginning of his meeting on Monday with Mr Trump whether the plan to permanently relocate Palestinians from Gaza was still on the agenda.
He replied by saying that the decision would be left to the residents themselves.
'President Trump had a brilliant vision. It's called free choice. The people who want to stay – they can stay. But if they want to leave, they should be able to leave. It shouldn't be a prison.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
'This is my final message': Journalist assassinated by Israel had warned about his fate
LAST UPDATE | 58 mins ago 'IF THESE WORDS reach you, know that Israel has succeeded in killing me and silencing my voice.' Those were some of the final words of journalist Anas al-Sharif, 28, who was killed in Gaza overnight alongside fellow reporter Mohammed Qreiqeh and cameramen Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal and Moamen Aliwa. It's been described by their network, Al Jazeera, as a 'targeted assassination' by Israel outside Gaza City's Al-Shifa Hospital. Al-Sharif, who was one of the only journalists still reporting from the centre of the devastation, was the subject of a 'smear campaign', his colleague said, prior to his death. Israel had accused al-Sharif of being a 'Hamas terrorist', which both he and Al Jazeera continuously refuted. The United Nations had warned that al-Sharif would be targeted amid the 'unfounded' accusations. 'I call on all States, especially those who pride themselves on being champions of media freedom and safety for journalists, not to remain silent in the face of this blatant assault on journalists,' said Irene Khan, the UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of expression, in July. Advertisement 'On the one hand, Israel refuses to allow any international journalists to enter Gaza, and on the other, it ruthlessly smears, threatens, obstructs, targets and kills the few local journalists remaining as the only eyes of the outside world on the ongoing genocide.' Palestinians carry the bodies of journalists, including Al Jazeera correspondents Anas al-Sharif and Mohamed Qreiqeh, who were killed by the IDF Alamy Alamy The Council to Protect Journalists said there is a pattern of the state labelling journalists as militants without any evidence. More than 186 journalists have been killed since the start of the Israel-Gaza war on October 7, at least 180 of those journalists are Palestinians killed by Israel. Speaking about the death of his colleagues, Al Jazeera's managing editor Mohamed Moawad told RTÉ's Morning Ireland that they didn't imagine they'd see the Israeli government openly threaten journalists. 'A government was threatening a journalist who was 24 hours on air, uncovering the atrocities in Gaza City. '[Al-Sharif's] work is corroborated by so many news outlets around the globe.' He said journalists in the region not only risk being attacked, but they're also experiencing hunger and deprivation, just as thousands of Gazans are. Al-Sharif was 'giving a voice to the voiceless', Maowad said, and the government 'wants to silence the truth'. Related Reads Israel kills prominent Al Jazeera journalist and four colleagues in strike on media tent Legality vs Reality: Could Western leaders face consequences for complicity in genocide? 'No more futile war': Hostage families fear the worst as Israel expands Gaza occupation 'We don't have any correspondent now in Gaza City, and that's telling.' This is my will and my final message. If these words reach you, know that Israel has succeeded in killing me and silencing my voice. First, peace be upon you and Allah's mercy and blessings. Allah knows I gave every effort and all my strength to be a support and a voice for my… — أنس الشريف Anas Al-Sharif (@AnasAlSharif0) August 10, 2025 Al-Sharif is survived by his wife, Umm Salah, and his son. He requested that, in the event of his death, a message be shared on his X account. It reads: 'I urge you not to let chains silence you, nor borders restrain you. Be bridges toward the liberation of the land and its people, until the sun of dignity and freedom rises over our stolen homeland. 'If I die, I die steadfast upon my principles. 'Do not forget Gaza… And do not forget me in your sincere prayers for forgiveness and acceptance.' The National Union of Journalists (NUJ) in Ireland will hold a demonstration at the Spire on Dublin's O'Connell Street today at 6pm to 'express outrage at Israel's ongoing targeting and killing of journalists'. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Trump-Putin meeting: After months strengthening its hand, Ukraine is back to square one
At the start of a week that could be pivotal to its future, Ukraine feels like it is back at square one with Donald Trump . Since he began his second stint as US president in January, Kyiv has tried to win over Trump through flattery – lauding him as the only leader who can make Russia end its invasion – and the promise of profit from preferential access to Ukraine's rare earths and other commodities, joint arms production and other economic schemes. Regardless, the scenario that Ukraine and Europe feared is now scheduled for Friday in Alaska: a summit between Trump and Russian president Vladimir Putin at which their future security will be discussed without them being at the table. Trump's boast that he would need just one day to end Europe's biggest war in 80 years made clear that he had no interest in the complexities of a war that is Ukraine's latest attempt to escape the repressive Russian rule that has bound it for centuries. READ MORE His 90-minute call with Putin in February was the first contact between US and Russian leaders since the Kremlin launched its full invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, and underlined Trump's conviction that he could get a deal without any help from Ukrainian and European leaders who were not even told in advance about the talk. That conversation led swiftly to a meeting in Saudi Arabia between senior US and Russian officials. To Ukraine's insistence that it should be invited to talks on how to end the war, Trump said: 'You should have never started it, you could have made a deal.' When Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy said that Trump seemed to be living in a Russian 'disinformation bubble', the US president lashed out at him as 'a dictator' who had 'better move fast' or he 'won't have a country left'. Their meeting in the White House a week later was a disaster. Talks that were supposed to soothe tempers became a shouting match, as Zelenskiy pressed the US to give Ukraine security guarantees and take a tougher line on Russia, and Trump and his vice-president, JD Vance, accused their guest of being ungrateful, disrespectful and of 'gambling with world war three'. 'You're either going to make a deal or we are out and if we're out, you'll fight it out,' Trump told him. 'You're not in a good position. You don't have the cards right now.' It was a brutal reality check for Zelenskiy and Ukraine. He had started the meeting by showing his host photographs of Ukrainian soldiers emerging emaciated from Russian captivity. But Trump didn't want to see that. Nor did he want to talk about who really started the war, or about the atrocities committed by Russia in places such as Bucha, or the devastation of eastern Ukraine or the millions driven from their homes. He wanted to talk about 'the cards' and who held them. So Ukraine set about strengthening its hand. In mid-March it agreed immediately to adhere to a US call for a 30-day ceasefire if Russia did the same. At the end of April, Kyiv and Washington signed a landmark deal to give the US preferential access to Ukraine's natural resources and fund investment in its reconstruction. At the same time, Europe was also trying to speak Trump's language. If with Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden, European leaders had spoken of US support for Ukraine and its continued leadership of Nato in terms of shared values, historical ties and cherished alliances, now they framed them in terms of profit. Trump agreed last month to keep supplying weapons for Ukraine as long as they were paid for by Nato states. The Netherlands, Denmark, Norway and Sweden have already pledged more than $1 billion (€860 million) to the scheme, which works to counter Trump's frequent complaint that the US is routinely 'ripped off' by European countries. Trump was getting his way with Ukraine and Europe – but not with Russia. Putin rejected a ceasefire and only intensified his air strikes on Ukrainian cities, as his invasion force continued to make slow but steady progress in eastern Ukraine. The Kremlin said there could be no compromise on certain issues: Ukraine must accept the permanent occupation of five regions that Russian troops now fully or partly control; abandon its hopes of joining Nato; and bow to other constraints on its sovereignty, including on the future size of its armed forces. Finally, Trump's patience with Putin seemed to be wearing thin. He said he was 'very disappointed' with the Russian leader, called his military's bombing of civilian targets 'disgusting' and gave Moscow a deadline of August 8th to agree a ceasefire or face 'severe' US tariffs on its goods and on imports from countries – including China – that buy huge quantities of the discounted oil that helps replenish Moscow's war chest. The day before the deadline, the Kremlin said Putin was ready to meet Trump. Last Friday's deadline passed without any punitive tariffs being announced. A doubling of tariffs on India unveiled last Wednesday – in part for its continued purchases of Russian fuel – does not take effect until August 27th, allowing plenty of time for it to be revoked if this Friday's summit brings results. The arrangement is a clear victory for Putin. Simply by agreeing to meet Trump – without offering a single concession – he defused the tariff threat, brushed off the White House's 'ultimatum', and secured his first summit with a US leader on American soil since 2007. Trump was also quick to dismiss reports that he had insisted on Zelenskiy also being part of the Alaska summit. Trump's invitation also makes a mockery of the warrant issued for Putin's arrest by the International Criminal Court over Russia's forced deportation of thousands of Ukrainian children; neither Russia nor the US recognise the court. Just as Trump's surprise call to Putin back in February panicked Ukraine and Europe into closer co-operation, so the announcement of the Alaska summit triggered a weekend of somewhat frantic diplomacy. British foreign secretary David Lammy hosted a meeting of top European and Ukrainian security advisers on Saturday that was also attended by Vance, who claimed, without offering evidence, that the summit was 'a major breakthrough for American diplomacy'. He also repeated the kind of rhetoric that so strained US relations with its erstwhile allies six months ago – almost blaming Ukraine and European countries for Russia's continued war of invasion and occupation: 'If you care so much about this conflict, you should be willing to play a more direct and more substantial way in funding this war yourself.' Zelenskiy still hopes for a late invitation to Alaska, and says Ukraine wants peace but will never sign away territory to the invader. European leaders, meanwhile, demand a say in any talks on ending the war and reshaping continental security. But do they have 'the cards'? Putin can offer Trump a deal on Ukraine, vast investment opportunities in Russia, far more rare earths and other commodities than Kyiv could provide, and the kind of grand geopolitical pacts on issues such as nuclear disarmament that would appeal to Trump's belief that he is one of history's great leaders. Ukraine fears the price it might have to pay for the overweening ambition of Trump, America's self-declared 'president of peace'.
Irish Daily Mirror
5 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Israel's military target Al Jazeera correspondent - killing him and others
Israel's military has targeted a prominent Al Jazeera correspondent with an air strike, killing him, another journalist and at least six other people. Anas al-Sharif and his Al Jazeera colleague Mohamed Qureiqa were among those killed while sheltering outside the Gaza City Hospital complex late on Sunday. Officials at Shifa Hospital confirmed the deaths and said the strike also killed four other journalists and two other people. It also damaged the entrance to the hospital complex's emergency building. Israel's military described Mr al-Sharif as the leader of a Hamas cell – an allegation that Al Jazeera and Mr al-Sharif had previously dismissed as baseless. The incident marked the first time during the war that Israel's military has swiftly claimed responsibility after a journalist was killed in a strike. It came less than a year after Israeli army officials first accused Mr al-Sharif and other Al Jazeera journalists of being members of the militant groups Hamas and Islamic Jihad. In a July 24 video, Israel's army spokesman Avichay Adraee attacked Al Jazeera and accused Mr al-Sharif of being part of Hamas's military wing. Al Jazeera called the strike a 'targeted assassination' and accused Israeli officials of incitement, connecting Mr al-Sharif's death to the allegations that both the broadcaster and correspondent had denied. 'Anas and his colleagues were among the last remaining voices from within Gaza, providing the world with unfiltered, on-the-ground coverage of the devastating realities endured by its people,' Al Jazeera said in a statement. Mr al-Sharif reported a nearby bombardment minutes before his death. In a social media post that Al Jazeera said was written to be posted in case of his death, he bemoaned the devastation and destruction that war had wrought and bid farewell to his wife, son and daughter. 'I never hesitated for a single day to convey the truth as it is, without distortion or falsification,' the 28-year-old wrote. The journalists are the latest to be killed in what observers have called the deadliest conflict for journalists in modern times. The Committee to Protect Journalists said on Sunday that at least 186 have been killed in Gaza. Mr al-Sharif began reporting for Al Jazeera a few days after war broke out. He was known for reporting on Israel's bombardment in northern Gaza, and later for the starvation gripping much of the territory's population. In a July broadcast he cried on air as a woman behind him collapsed from hunger. 'I am talking about slow death of those people,' he said at the time. Al Jazeera is blocked in Israel and soldiers raided its offices in the occupied West Bank last year, ordering them to close. Mr al-Sharif's death comes weeks after the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists said Israel had targeted him with a smear campaign. 'Israel's pattern of labelling journalists as militants without providing credible evidence raises serious questions about its intent and respect for press freedom,' Sara Qudah, the group's regional director, said. Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here.
