logo
Democrats see Trump's big bill as key to their comeback

Democrats see Trump's big bill as key to their comeback

Gulf Today2 days ago
Steve Peoples and Hannah Fingerhut,
Associated Press
It is big and it is beautiful, President Donald Trump says. But for many Democratic leaders, the tax break and spending cut package passed by Trump's Republican allies in Congress on Thursday represents the key to the Democratic Party's resurgence. Even before the final vote, Democratic officials were finalizing ambitious plans for rallies, voter registration drives, attack ads, bus tours and even a multiday vigil, all intended to highlight the most controversial elements of Trump's "big beautiful" bill: deep cuts to the nation's safety net that will leave nearly 12 million more people without health coverage and millions of others without food assistance, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
In political battlegrounds across Alaska and Iowa, Pennsylvania and California, Democrats have begun to use the bill against Republicans. Democrats are promising that the Republican president's domestic policy achievement to date will be the defining issue of every major election between now and next fall's midterms. "One thing is abundantly clear: Republicans own this mess and it's an albatross around their necks heading into the midterms," Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin told the medeia. "This is the least popular legislation in modern history, and the more voters learn about it, the more they hate it. That's a clear directive for Democrats — we're going to make sure every single voter knows who is responsible." Even with early public opinion on their side, however, it's far from certain that the legislation will be the political winner Democrats hope.
The Democratic brand remains deeply unpopular, the party has no clear leader, its message is muddled and core elements of the Democratic base are frustrated and drifting. Some of the bill's provisions will not take effect until after the 2026 election, so voters may not have felt the full impact by the time they vote. At the same time, it's unclear how many voters are paying attention to the Washington-based debate. The Democratic super political action committee Priorities USA warned this week that Democrats must work harder if they want their message to break through.
"We can't just assume that because we're angry that the voters that we need to communicate with are angry. Everyone needs to step up and realise the enormous challenge that's in front of us," executive director Danielle Butterfield said. "We're nowhere near a good starting place."
The bill provides for $4.5 trillion in tax breaks that were enacted in Trump's first term and would have expired if Congress failed to act. New breaks will allow workers to deduct tips and overtime pay. There are $1.2 trillion in cuts to Medicaid and food stamps and a major rollback of green energy investments. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the package will add $3.3 trillion to the deficit over the decade. Privately, some Democrats conceded that Republicans were smart to pass the bill on the eve of a holiday weekend when fewer voters would be paying attention. As some Democrats in Washington predicted a political backlash across America, the response was somewhat muted Thursday at a Democratic event in Iowa, barely 10 miles from the State Fairgrounds where Trump later drew thousands for an evening rally.
An audience of roughly 100 people listened as local Democratic officials railed against the legislation and called on voters to oust Republican Rep. Zach Nunn, the local congressman, for supporting it. Audience member Michael Rieck, 69, said Iowa Democrats left him a message about the rally, but when he went online to learn more, "there was nothing."
"I texted back to them that I didn't see any advertisement," he said. "They slowly corrected that. I'm still not impressed with what they did to advertise this event."
Rieck said he wants to see different factions of the party better coordinate their message. Progressive activists were moving through Minnesota in a big green bus as part of Fair Share America's 29-stop "stop the billionaire giveaway" tour. The group is focused on Republican-led congressional districts where elected officials have largely stopped having in-person town halls with constituents. "We know we're fighting upstream," said Fair Share's executive director, Kristen Crowell. "But when people hear exactly what's in this bill, they're adamantly opposed." The bill is generally unpopular, according to polling conducted throughout the month of June, although some individual provisions are popular.
For example, a Washington Post/Ipsos poll found that majorities of US adults support increasing the annual child tax credit and eliminating taxes on earnings from tips, and about half support work requirements for some adults who receive Medicaid. On the other hand, the poll found that majorities oppose reducing federal funding for food assistance to low-income families and spending about $45 billion to build and maintain migrant detention centers.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GHF proposed camps for Palestinians to 'reside, de-radicalise and re-integrate'
GHF proposed camps for Palestinians to 'reside, de-radicalise and re-integrate'

Middle East Eye

time35 minutes ago

  • Middle East Eye

GHF proposed camps for Palestinians to 'reside, de-radicalise and re-integrate'

The controversial US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) has proposed creating camps called 'Humanitarian Transit Areas' in the Gaza Strip to house Palestinians and "deradicalise" them, Reuters reported on Monday. The proposal is part of an overall strategy to end the control of Hamas over the Palestinian enclave. Reuters reported that the $2bn plan was submitted to the Trump administration and recently discussed in the White House. The camps are described as "large-scale" and "voluntary" in the plan, and places that Palestinians can 'temporarily reside, deradicalize, re-integrate and prepare to relocate if they wish to do so'. A slide deck seen by Reuters called for using the sprawling facilities to "gain trust with the local population" and to facilitate US President Donald Trump's "vision for Gaza". New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Reuters could not independently determine the status of the plan, while the group told the news agency the slides were "not a GHF document". GHF said it had studied "a range of theoretical options to safely deliver aid in Gaza", but that it was "not planning for or implementing Humanitarian Transit Areas". There have been repeated references by both the Israeli and US governments to transferring the population of Gaza from the territory, a move that would amount to ethnic cleansing. Israel stopped any aid from entering Gaza for three months after unilaterally ending a ceasefire with Hamas in March. The GHF was set up with US and Israeli backing. with the aim of supplanting United Nations-led aid coordination mechanisms in Gaza. Its rollout of services since May has been chaotic. Israeli forces have killed more than 600 Palestinians and wounded another 4,000 by firing on people desperately seeking access to aid at the GHF's few distribution sites. It was revealed over the weekend that a consulting firm involved in the GHF entered into a multimillion-dollar contract to develop the initiative and modelled a plan to "relocate" Palestinians from Gaza as part of its work. A Financial Times investigation has revealed its work included financial modelling for the post-war reconstruction of Gaza, commissioned by Israeli backers, with one scenario envisioning the "voluntary relocation" of Palestinians from the enclave. This would have involved paying out "relocation packages" to 500,000 people worth $9,000 per person to encourage people to leave the territory. Gaza Humanitarian Foundation may be 'complicit in war crimes', right groups say Read More » The model assumed a quarter of Palestinians would opt to leave Gaza, with three-quarters of them unlikely to return. It estimated the cost of expulsion of Palestinians to be $23,000 cheaper, per Palestinian, than the costs of providing support to them in Gaza during reconstruction. According to the Boston Consulting Group, this side of the operation was conducted without the knowledge of senior management and against their instructions.

Dollar firms against peers as investors brace for Trump tariff deadline
Dollar firms against peers as investors brace for Trump tariff deadline

Zawya

timean hour ago

  • Zawya

Dollar firms against peers as investors brace for Trump tariff deadline

The dollar firmed against other major currencies on Monday, after remarks from U.S. officials offered little clarity on the outlook for tariffs, days ahead of a crucial deadline. Most U.S. trade partners face the prospect of steeper duties at the end of the 90-day moratorium on U.S. President Donald Trump's "Liberation Day" reciprocal tariffs on Wednesday. Trump clarified on Sunday that the new rates would take effect from August 1. He said he will name some dozen countries later on Monday that are receiving letters with their new, higher levies, and he threatened an additional 10% tariff on nations aligning with what he deemed to be the "anti-American" policies of the BRICS emerging economies. "It still feels like this administration is trying to find ways to avoid going all out on fresh tariff positions. We have people talking a (lot) about it, but talking and doing are two entirely different things," said Chris Beauchamp, chief market analyst at IG. "They (the United States) saw what happened with the volatility in April, and I don't think they want to wish that again." Options data reflected that currency markets were pricing in a limited resurgence in volatility ahead of the tariff deadline on expectations further extensions on the deadline were possible. The dollar index, which measures the currency against six major counterparts, rose 0.34% to 97.294 and briefly hit a one-week high. The index extended gains from last week when data reflecting labour market resilience pushed back expectations for imminent monetary policy easing by the Federal Reserve. Still, the index is close to a 3-1/2-year trough and has declined 10% so far this year as investors questioned the safe-haven status of the U.S. currency and reassessed earlier expectations that the U.S. could be spared in the event of a global economic slowdown. The dollar inched up 0.25% to 0.797 against the Swiss franc on Monday, near the January 2015 low it revisited in the previous week. The euro slipped 0.41% to $1.1738 having rallied over 13% so far this year. The dollar reversed an earlier decline and rose 0.78% at 145.725 yen, reaching a one-week high. Investors are concerned that Tokyo and Brussels might not be able to secure deals with Washington ahead of the deadline as progress on agreements with Japan and the European Union has been slow, despite multiple rounds of negotiations. Sterling weakened 0.08% to $1.364, but stayed near its strongest level since October 2021. Currencies positively correlated to risk appetite, such as the Aussie dollar and the New Zealand dollar lost 0.61% and 0.63%, respectively ahead of monetary policy decisions in both countries in the coming two days. The Reserve Bank of Australia is widely expected to cut the cash rate by another quarter point on Tuesday, while New Zealand's central bank is predicted to hold rates steady on Wednesday. U.S. policy uncertainty weighing on the dollar "may not be as potent as in early April, but we think this correlation still matters," Paul Mackel, global head of FX research at HSBC said. (Reporting by Hannah Lang and Johann M Cherian; additional reporting by Kevin Buckland; Editing by Christian Schmollinger, Rachna Uppal, Gareth Jones and Barbara Lewis)

US stocks retreat on tariff uncertainty
US stocks retreat on tariff uncertainty

Al Etihad

timean hour ago

  • Al Etihad

US stocks retreat on tariff uncertainty

7 July 2025 18:20 New York (AFP)Wall Street stocks retreated early on Monday as markets turned their focus back to President Donald Trump's unresolved efforts to win new accords with trading last week's focus on Congress passing the White House's spending plan, Trump announced he would send the first tariff letters Monday to various countries that have yet to reach deals with administration has said steep tariffs would take effect on August 1 if there is no 15 minutes into trading, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was down 0.2% at 44, broad-based S&P 500 declined 0.4% to 6,253.73, while the tech-rich Nasdaq Composite Index dropped 0.6% to 20, on Monday also threatened a further 10% tariff on countries aligning themselves with the emerging BRICS nations, accusing them of "anti-Americanism" after they slammed his tariffs at a summit on individual companies, Tesla slumped 7.5% after Trump blasted CEO Elon Musk's plan to launch a new political party in opposition to Trump's fiscal plans. The back-and-forth escalated a conflict between the two men that investors fear will hurt Musk's companies. Stock Markets Continue full coverage

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store