14K and 18K gold plated jewellery brands: Top 5 to add to your jewellery box; Bling on a budget!
Now, I can enjoy accessorising without worrying about itching or inflammation. Over time, I've found some brilliant gold-plated jewellery brands that not only feel comfortable but also look amazing. So if you've got skin that flares up easily, or you're just after budget-friendly sparkle, here are my top 5 picks.
Giva nails that sweet spot between quality and comfort. Their 18k gold plated jewellery is gentle on sensitive skin like mine, and the minimal designs make everyday styling completely stress-free.
GIVA's 925 Sterling Silver 18k gold plated Leaflet Stud Earrings are delicate yet eye-catching. The gold-toned leaf shape adorned with cubic zirconia adds a subtle sparkle. Perfect for sensitive skin, these studs combine elegance with durability, backed by a 6-month warranty for peace of mind.
GIVA's 18k gold plated Rise In Love Couple Rings set features adjustable sterling silver bands for him and her. The female ring showcases a charming heart centrepiece, making it a perfect gift. Comfortable on sensitive skin and presented in a stylish box with a 6-month warranty.
Rubans brings a vibrant mix of traditional and modern 18k gold-plated jewellery. Their hypoallergenic pieces are perfect for sensitive skin, offering stylish designs without compromising on comfort.
Rubans' 18k gold plated traditional choker set features a stunning necklace with white Kundan stones and emerald green beads, paired with matching stud earrings. Crafted from brass and designed for comfort, this set brings festive charm with skin-friendly plating and secure closures.
Rubans' 18k gold plated Pearl Studded Vintage Filigree Dangler Earrings blend classic Filigree design with modern flair. Crafted from brass and adorned with artificial stones and beads, these lightweight earrings are comfortable on sensitive skin and secured with a post and back closure.
Palmonas blends thick 18k gold vermeil with sterling silver, creating durable pieces that are gentle on sensitive skin. Their minimalist designs offer affordable luxury, perfect for everyday wear without irritation.
Palmonas' 18k gold plated cubic zirconia studded stainless steel chain offers a sleek, minimal design perfect for Western styles. Lightweight and durable, it features a secure lobster closure and gentle plating ideal for sensitive skin, backed by a reassuring one-year warranty for confident everyday wear.
Palmonas Lunar Heart 18k gold plated wraparound bracelet offers a sleek, modern look with stainless steel durability. The gold-toned finish suits sensitive skin, while the easy hook closure ensures comfort and security. Backed by a one-year warranty, it's a stylish addition for everyday wear.
Nishani's modular 925 silver jewellery, plated in 14k gold, offers customisable designs that evolve with your style. Their hypoallergenic pieces are ideal for sensitive skin, combining comfort with elegance.
Nishani's 14K gold plated heart-shaped drop earrings sparkle with cubic zirconia in blue and purple hues. Crafted from silver and secured with an insert closure, these delicate earrings offer comfort for sensitive skin and a charming pop of colour, perfect for adding subtle glamour to any look.
Nishani's Love Band adjustable finger-ring features intricate textured and heart-shaped details in a rich gold tone. Made from silver with 14K gold plating, this ring offers a comfortable fit and a stylish look that suits sensitive skin, perfect for adding a delicate touch to your collection.
Peora's 18k gold plated jewellery blends traditional Indian designs with a modern touch. Their lightweight pieces are ideal for sensitive skin, offering comfort without compromising on style or elegance.
Peora's 18K gold-plated crescent-shaped kundan chandbalis blend traditional charm with a modern twist. Crafted from brass and finished with delicate beads, these earrings come with a secure post-and-back closure and a 6-month warranty, making them a great pick for adding sparkle to your outfit.
Peora's 18K gold-plated pink traditional kundan jewellery set offers a stunning combination of layered and choker necklaces, earrings, and a maang tika. Handcrafted from brass with exquisite beadwork and kundan stones, this set brings a vibrant, elegant touch perfect for festive occasions and special celebrations.
Secret to everyday luxury: Why gold plated bracelets are your new must-have
Vegan handbags for the modern professional: Work smarter, carry kinder
Vegan leather handbag brands that will transform the way you style!
Bag the one you want: Get handbags that speak your language
Top brands focus on quality plating that lasts longer without fading, use hypoallergenic materials, and offer stylish, well-crafted designs that suit everyday wear or special occasions.
With good care, gold plated jewellery can keep its shine for 6 months to a couple of years. The thickness of the plating and how often you wear and clean the pieces play a big part.
Many leading brands use nickel-free or hypoallergenic bases to avoid irritation. If you have sensitive skin, look for brands that highlight these features in their products.
Some brands offer repair services, but resizing can be tricky since the plating might wear off during the process. It's best to check with the brand before making a purchase if this is important to you.
Disclaimer: At Hindustan Times, we help you stay up-to-date with the latest trends and products. Hindustan Times has an affiliate partnership, so we may get a part of the revenue when you make a purchase. We shall not be liable for any claim under applicable laws, including but not limited to the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, concerning the products. The products listed in this article are in no particular order of priority.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
6 hours ago
- Mint
A Dutchmans Life Shows Russias Path Not Taken
Derk Sauer, a communist turned journalist, turned capitalist entrepreneur, died this week at 72 after a sailing accident. If you aren't Dutch or haven't been heavily involved with Russia over the last three decades, then you probably haven't heard of him. But he was a hugely important figure for independent Russian media and a man who shaped hundreds of lives if not more, including my own. His is a story that very sadly encapsulates the road that wasn't traveled in post-Soviet Moscow, either by the West in the 1990s, when it mattered most, or by President Vladimir Putin since. When the Soviet Union collapsed, shock therapy — a big bang approach to privatization and ending price controls and other constraints on the market — was prescribed. The idea was for the free market to build a new economy from the rubble of the old. Technology and knowledge transfer from the West would be key. McDonald's Corp. arrived early. Energy majors including ExxonMobil Corp. and BP Plc moved in, hoping to develop neglected and new oil and gas fields. Car manufacturers from General Motors Co. to Mercedes-Benz Group AG were lured by the prospect of selling modern vehicles to those used to having to repair a new Lada before they could drive it. But Moscow also became a kind of Klondike for small-time Western would-be entrepreneurs. Many were carpetbaggers in search of a quick buck. They had the ethics of the Russian oligarchs and criminals with whom they worked to set up anything from casinos to gyms. They came and went with the money. Even blue-chip names like the Harvard Institute for International Development became mired in corruption scandals and left in disgrace. In the end, too little of worth was built. What worked for Poland didn't for Russia, and the result, famously, was a massive transfer of wealth into the hands of a few Russian oligarchs. The economy shrank by almost 15% in 1992 alone. Life expectancy for men fell from to 59 years in 1993 from 64 just three years earlier. Yet this familiar horror show doesn't tell the whole story. Some value was built in the 1990s. When it came to fostering a professional, independent Russian media — a key component in any functioning market democracy — Sauer made a massive contribution. He showed what was possible and what it took to succeed. Sauer arrived before the Soviet collapse to launch a glossy English-language monthly for the Dutch publishing company VNU. As more became possible after 1991, he saw a market for a full-service daily Moscow newspaper, modeled on the Paris-based International Herald Tribune. When VNU didn't buy in, he found investors and started The Moscow Times. He didn't do the usual with such expatriate newspapers, hiring a few low-paid reporters to add some local color to a daily collection of wire stories. Instead, he invested in hiring a sizable team — including myself and older, more experienced hands, including from the IHT and The Washington Post. He used these to train and edit a larger group of young reporters from Russia and abroad. By the time I left after several years as editor in 1997, we had some 60 journalists and editors publishing 32 to 40 pages a day. But this expat-led publishing business soon became a sideshow. Sauer's holding company, Independent Media, expanded to publish Russian editions of a whole range of magazines, from Cosmopolitan and Vogue to Playboy. When an early effort at a Russian-language business newspaper fizzled, he pulled in the Financial Times and Wall Street Journal to create Vedomosti, which quickly became the country's most respected and genuinely independent daily. Nobody, of course, was immune from the wildness of a market that had been liberalized without regulations or institutions in place to create a level playing field. It was a jungle that served mainly the ruthless and the connected. As the money rolled in, Sauer also had to acquire a form of protection, selling a 10% stake in his company to an oligarch. But when either the Kremlin or Russian investors pressured him to shut down coverage that would embarrass them — including access for cash and transfer pricing scandals, respectively — he checked the reporting and let us print. Most important was that he and his family stayed, committing to what they were building. When the first opportunity came to cash out, some co-investors in Independent Media took the money and left. Sauer didn't. He remained even as the market became more difficult and the tolerance of a free press that allowed his stable of newspapers and magazines to thrive began to disappear. After eventually selling the company in 2005, Sauer went on to work with RBC, a Russian news outlet that sought the independence and quality he had come to represent. When The Moscow Times withered in 2017, he bought it back to keep it alive, albeit online and in a much-slimmed form. Increasingly under political pressure, he left RBC and then, in 2022, the country. He helped The Moscow Times and other exiled independent Russian outlets, such as the TV channel Dozhd , to relocate to the Baltic States and Netherlands, as they too had to flee. They continue to write and broadcast for Russians on issues such as the war in Ukraine in ways no domestically based media can. What might have been if more Western businesspeople had come to Russia not to join the pillaging that in many cases passed for investment, but to actually build something? Or had lived by the rules of a regulated free-market democracy, the way Sauer did for journalism? If Western governments had tried harder and risked more? Or if international financial institutions had offered something better suited to Russia than shock therapy? And what if Putin and his vertical power system hadn't made fact-based journalism impossible? If the Kremlin had focused on developing a strong, diversified domestic economy, instead of carving up the nation's resources among friends and looking for expansion and glory at the expense of Russia's neighbors? Those are unanswerable questions, and by now, academic. Perhaps there will be another chance, another Moscow opening, forced by a future, younger generation of Russians at a time when the West has grown wiser and less arrogant. All that's clear to me today, though, is that Russia would be a richer, freer, less aggressive and less paranoid nation had it remained open to people like Derk Sauer, rather than force him out with the ecosystem he did so much to foster. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Marc Champion is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Europe, Russia and the Middle East. He was previously Istanbul bureau chief for the Wall Street Journal.
Mint
8 hours ago
- Mint
Why India may not stop buying Russian oil amid US tariff threat: Explained
In a major setback for India, US President Donald Trump announced Thursday a 25% tariff on the import of Indian goods and an additional "penalty" for buying the "vast majority of their military equipment from Russia." Trump said India is Russia's "largest buyer of ENERGY, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to STOP THE KILLING IN UKRAINE — ALL THINGS NOT GOOD!". He also cited "massive trade deficit with India" as the reason behind the high tariff rate of 25%. He added that US has 'done very little business with India, their Tariffs are too high, among the highest in the World.' But a day later, the US President informed that tariff talks with India are still on, raising hope of a respite. "I understand that India is no longer going to be buying oil from Russia. That's what I have heard. I don't know if that's right or not. That is a good step. We will see what happens...," he said on Thursday. There has been no official indication yet if India will stop buying oil from Russia. However, Indian government sources told Reuters on Saturday that India will keep purchasing oil from Russia, and there would be no immediate changes. Not giving in to Trump's pressure, these sources cited the following reasons for buying oil from Russia: 1. "These are long-term oil contracts," one of the sources said. "It is not so simple to just stop buying overnight," they added. 2. Justifying India's oil purchases from Russia, a second source said India's imports of Russian grades had helped avoid a global surge in oil prices, which have remained subdued despite Western curbs on the Russian oil sector. 3. "Unlike Iranian and Venezuelan oil, Russian crude is not subject to direct sanctions, and India is buying it below the current price cap fixed by the European Union," the source said. 4. Meanwhile, sources told news agency ANI that India's energy decisions have been guided by national interest but have also contributed positively to global energy stability. "India's purchases have remained fully legitimate and within the framework of international norms,' they added. 5. These sources said, 'Had India not absorbed discounted Russian crude combined with OPEC production cuts of 5.86 mb/d, global oil prices could have surged well beyond the March 2022 peak of US$137/bbl, intensifying inflationary pressures worldwide.' 6. Meanwhile, Randhir Jaiswal, the official spokesperson of the Ministry of External Affairs, said on August 1 shed light on India's energy sourcing requirements. "You are aware of our broad approach that we look at what is there available in the markets, what is there on offer, and also what is the prevailing global situation or circumstances," he said. India is the second-largest importer of Russian oil after China. According to the New York Times, Russia is currently the source of more than one-third of India's oil imports, up from less than 1 percent before the war. The NITI Aayog's April-June (q1 FY2025) report revealed that in Q1 FY25, India recorded significant y-o-y import growth with Russia (19.69%). India imported about 1.75 million barrels per day of Russian oil from January to June in 2025, up 1 percent from a year ago, according to data provided to Reuters by sources. Meanwhile, Trading Economics cited the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade as revealing that India's imports from Russia of crude oil was US$52.73 billion during 2024. In 2023, Russia was among the top trading partners of India. According to Trend Economy, Russia contributed 26% (58 billion US$) to India's imports (of "Mineral fuels, mineral oils and products of their distillation; bituminous substances; mineral waxes). While India is among the top importers of Russia and China, the country is among the top exporters to the US. India remains a substantial exporter of refined petroleum products and other mineral fuels. "The primary destinations for these exports include the Netherlands, the United Arab Emirates, and the United States," Niti Aayog's report said. The USA is among the top importers of Indian goods, accounting for almost 33% of the total merchandise exports, according to NITI Aayog's report. It showed that the USA is India's top export destination in these categories: Minerals fuels & products, Natural or Cultured pearls, Electrical machinery & Equipment, Nuclear reactors, Pharmaceuticals products. NITI Aayog's April-June (q1 FY2025) report This contradicts Trump's 'little business with India' claim. The report also revealed that 'there is significant potential for Indian service exporters to expand their presence in major export markets such as the USA.' Tariffs are taxes imposed by a government (the US government in this case) on goods and services imported from other countries. They are simply an extra cost added to foreign products when they enter the country. Foreign goods get relatively more expensive, possibly driving up demand for domestic products. "Tariffs give a price advantage to locally produced goods over similar goods that are imported, and they raise revenues for governments," according to the World Trade Organization (WTO). However, some domestic industries may rely on imported materials and parts. In this case, the rise in prices of imported materials and parts would lead to face higher costs of production (by domestic producers). "If the domestic producers pass higher costs of production onto consumers, it will also push up prices of domestically produced goods," Oxford Economics explains. There's a possibility of lower export demand in the country (India) where the tariffs are imposed, since their goods have become relatively more expensive in the importing country (US).
Mint
8 hours ago
- Mint
Will Trump's tariff war push India closer to Russia and China?
Trump 2.0 was expected to be good for India. But after early promise, ties have unexpectedly soured. Mint examines the sudden reversal, what India should do next, and whether recent developments could strengthen the Russia-India-China (RIC) axis. 1. Has the India-US relationship hit a low? Yes. On 27 June, US President Donald Trump announced a 25% tariff on goods imported from India, along with an unspecified penalty for New Delhi's continued defence and energy trade with Russia. His rhetoric stung even more than the tariffs. Trump accused India of having some of the 'highest tariffs in the world" and 'the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary trade barriers." The next day, he escalated further, saying that Russia and India 'can take their dead economies down together." Simultaneously, Trump is cosying up to Pakistan, finalizing a trade deal with Islamabad last week. 2. What triggered Trump's anger? Experts point to several factors. India's reluctance to open up its agriculture sector during trade talks has frustrated Trump. Some believe that the tariff hike may be a pressure tactic to force broader market access. His ire over India's energy and defence ties with Russia is also strategic: it's seen as part of a larger bid to pressure President Vladimir Putin to end the war in Ukraine. Trump, some believe, now realizes he was outplayed by Putin. He is also suspicious of India's growing alignment with BRICS, which he views as an anti-Western bloc. He fears BRICS could start a common currency that could rival or replace the US dollar as the standard currency. Another, more personal factor: India did not credit Trump for helping de-escalate the brief India-Pakistan conflict earlier this year. Pakistan, in contrast, publicly acknowledged his role. Trump is reportedly miffed that India didn't nominate him for the Nobel Peace Prize. 3. How has India reacted? Though caught off guard by the sudden downturn in the bonhomie, India's response has been restrained. The government has said it will protect national interests while continuing bilateral trade negotiations in good faith. The Ministry of External Affairs emphasized that the India-US partnership is rooted in shared interests, democratic values, and strong people-to-people ties—and has weathered turbulence in the past. 4. Will Trump's actions push India close to the Russia-China axis? That would require a fundamental shift in India's foreign policy, but some experts don't rule it out. Trump has once again unsettled a friend (India) while courting an adversary (Pakistan), which has hit a nerve in New Delhi. Last week, China publicly backed a Russian proposal to revive the RIC trilateral mechanism, calling it crucial for regional and global stability. 5. Could a thaw in India-China ties help? Possibly. After the Galwan Valley clashes in 2020, India-China relations froze. But recent months have seen attempts at normalization, including ministerial visits and a meeting between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Xi Jinping at the BRICS summit in October 2024. 6. What should India do? Most foreign policy experts advise caution. India's ties with the US extend beyond Trump's presidency and should not be derailed by short-term volatility, they say. While a stable relationship with China is welcome, they caution that it remains a strategic rival. India, they add, must work to resolve trade irritants and ensure a mutually beneficial agreement with the US. It should reiterate its commitment to a multi-aligned foreign policy and emphasize its long-standing ties with Russia, even as Moscow's share in defence supplies has declined in recent years.
