Extreme heat affects the brain — here's how to protect your cognitive health
In addition to putting stress on the body, hot weather can also take a toll on the brain and mental health.
Dr. Jace Reed, director of emergency psychiatry at Cedars-Sinai Hospital in Los Angeles, emphasized in an interview with Fox News Digital that the brain is a major organ that can be greatly affected by heat.
Extreme heat can cause mental health changes like increased irritability and anxiety, along with decreased memory, attention and reaction time.
This can affect daily interactions socially and professionally, the expert cautioned.
"You may be slower at completing your task or remembering what someone just told you," he told Fox News Digital. "Those can be initial early signs that the heat is affecting your brain and your mental abilities."
Symptoms like extreme confusion could mark the beginning of a heat stroke, which could require hospitalization, the psychiatrist warned.
In a separate interview with Fox News Digital, Thea Gallagher, a doctor of psychology and director of wellness programs at NYU Langone Health, noted that when the body overheats, it struggles to regulate internal balance.
This can lead to disrupted sleep, fatigue and poor concentration, as well as impaired cognitive function, slow reaction times and struggles with decision-making.
The heat can also increase oxidative stress and inflammation in the brain, Gallagher added, which can potentially damage neurons, worsen existing neurological conditions and raise stroke risk.
"Heat exposure may trigger an inflammatory response in the brain," she said. "In cases like heatstroke, inflammation is believed to contribute to symptoms such as confusion and delirium."
Excessive heat can also weaken the protective blood-brain barrier, according to the expert, which makes the brain more vulnerable to toxins and pathogens.
Higher temperatures are also associated with disturbances in mood and violent behavior, especially during prolonged heatwaves.
Psychiatric emergency visits for anxiety, depression and substance use also rise significantly on the hottest days, Gallagher confirmed.
Below are some of the main mental symptoms that can worsen in hot weather, experts cautioned.
People who suffer from mental health conditions such as mood disorders, schizophrenia, anxiety or even dementia are more vulnerable in hot weather.
Some psychiatric medications could make it difficult for the body to regulate temperature or stay hydrated, Gallagher noted, while heat can "intensify" symptoms like agitation or paranoia.
"People with cognitive impairments may not recognize the signs of overheating," she added.
"Some SSRIs (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) can suppress sweat production, which is the body's primary cooling mechanism. This raises the risk of overheating, dehydration and even heat stroke."
"Paradoxically, SSRIs can also cause excessive sweating in some individuals — a side effect known as 'SSRI sweats,'" she went on. "While this might seem like it would help with cooling, it can actually lead to dehydration if fluid intake doesn't keep up."
The experts recommended the following practices to protect brain health in extreme heat.
For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health
"Days are also longer and there are more activities, which can be exhausting," Gallagher noted. "Therefore, it is good to prioritize sleep and rest … and [find] ways to slow down when you can."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is Daycare Harmful? Here's What the Research Really Says
Why pickup tears aren't proof of trauma, and what matters most for your child's development The viral videos are everywhere: a child spots their parent at daycare pickup and instantly bursts into tears. The captions? Bold claims that daycare is harmful or even traumatic. But here's the truth: those reunion tears don't automatically mean distress. Your child sees their safe person, their guard drops, and the big feelings they've been holding in all day come pouring out. It's not a red flag, it's a sign of safety. So, what does the research actually say about daycare, attachment, and child development? And how can parents feel confident in the childcare choices they make? Attachment is about connection, not constant presence The term 'attachment' gets thrown around a lot in parenting debates, and often it's misused. Attachment isn't about being joined at the hip. It's about the quality of your relationship and how consistently you respond to their needs with warmth and sensitivity. One of the most well-known studies on this, the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development, followed over 1,000 children from infancy through adolescence. What did they find? That what matters most isn't whether a child is in daycare, but the quality of that care and the sensitivity of their primary caregivers. Children with warm, responsive parents formed secure attachments no matter how many hours they spent in care. That means you can: Work full-time and still raise a child who's glued to you in the best way. See your child cry at pickup and still know they feel safe and loved. Spend hours apart without weakening your bond, because what matters most is how you connect when you're together. Childcare quality does play a role. The NICHD study found that children were most at risk for insecure attachment when both parental sensitivity and childcare quality were low, a 'dual-risk' situation. But when either relationship was strong, that risk dropped significantly. For a deeper breakdown of the research, including more on the NICHD study and expert perspectives, you can read the full newsletter in the PedsDocTalk Newsletter Library. What about development and childcare? High-quality childcare offers more than a safe place for your child. It can be a training ground for skills they'll use for the rest of their lives. Children in high-quality childcare, especially center-based programs, tend to show small but measurable gains in language and cognitive skills. They're exposed to new vocabulary, interactive storytelling, early problem-solving activities, and age-appropriate routines that build school readiness. These benefits can last longer than many expect. In a follow-up study tracking children into adolescence, higher-quality early care was linked to better academic outcomes in high school, including admission to more selective colleges. For girls in particular, early center-based care was also associated with improved impulse control and fewer risk-taking behaviors in adolescence. Social skills in early childhood are built through everyday moments, and group childcare offers lots of them. Kids get regular practice with things like sharing, taking turns, asking for what they need, working out disagreements, and making friends. In the NICHD study, children who had warm, responsive caregivers and plenty of positive peer interactions were more likely to play well with others by age 3. While the boost was modest, it shows how family relationships and quality childcare can work together to support healthy social growth. One of the biggest emotional skills toddlers and young children are learning is how to regulate big feelings, frustration, disappointment, excitement, fear. That skill develops over time, with the help of calm, trusted adults. Some research shows toddlers may have a short-term rise in cortisol (a stress hormone) when they first start daycare, but with consistent routines and caring relationships, those levels usually settle within a few months. In fact, preschoolers who have secure bonds with their caregivers often see cortisol levels drop as the day goes on, more evidence that strong relationships help children manage stress and feel safe. The hours matter less than the environment One of the biggest worries for parents is whether full-time daycare is 'too much.' Research suggests it's not the sheer number of hours that matters most, it's whether those hours are spent in a space that feels safe and supportive. Longer hours in care were linked to slightly higher reports of behavior challenges in some studies, but mainly when both care quality and parental sensitivity were low. In other words, if your child is in a nurturing, well-structured environment during the day and reconnects with a responsive parent at home, the number of hours apart is not a risk factor on its own. What to look for in childcare? If you're choosing daycare, or re-evaluating your current arrangement, focus on these signs of quality: Warm, responsive caregivers who engage with children at their level–talking, playing, comforting, and setting gentle limits. Low child-to-caregiver ratios so each child receives individual attention. Predictable routines that help children feel secure during transitions. Play-based learning that includes movement, music, storytelling, and sensory activities. Open communication with parents about a child's day, mood, and milestones. Want some more help making this decision? Download the free PedsDocTalk Childcare Guide for tips on what to ask during a tour, how to find a nanny that fits your family, and signs it might be time to switch. Final thoughts There's no one 'right' way to raise a securely attached, emotionally thriving child. Whether you stay home, choose daycare, rely on grandparents, or hire a nanny, what matters most is the love, connection, and consistency your child feels from the people who care for them. Choosing childcare, or not, isn't a measure of how much you love your child. It's a personal decision shaped by your family's needs, values, and circumstances. And that decision deserves support, not judgment. Even with all the research, it's just one piece of the puzzle. Every child is different. Every family is different. What's best for one family might not be best for another. It's less about keeping score and more about finding a rhythm that feels right for your child and sustainable for your family. Read the full newsletter for more on the research, expert debates, and a personal note from me about our childcare journey.
Medscape
13 minutes ago
- Medscape
Pediatric Pickleball Injuries Surge in 2024
TOPLINE: A recent study showed that pediatric pickleball injuries increased sharply in 2024, with facial injuries being the most common. Younger children faced higher risks for lacerations, whereas older players experienced more joint injuries. METHODOLOGY: Researchers analyzed pickleball-related injuries in pediatric patients (average age, 12.7 years; 61.4% boys) presenting to emergency departments during 2014-2024, representing an estimated 3011 injuries nationally during this period. Researchers conducted narrative searches to identify cases and categorize injury mechanisms. Of 66 patients with information on race, 78.8% were White, 13.6% were Black or African American, and 7.6% were Asian. Injuries were defined as nontraumatic if they resulted from a medical or environmental cause without an external force (eg, sunburn). Traumatic injuries were further subclassified based on the type of external force, including falls, being hit with a paddle, being hit with a ball, noncontact trauma, or unknown causes. TAKEAWAY: Most injuries occurred in teenagers (57.4%) and only 4% of the injuries resulted in hospitalizations; 58.4% of the cases were reported in 2024. Lacerations were the most common injury (23.8%), followed by fractures (13.9%), sprains (12.9%), and abrasions/contusions (10.9%). Facial lacerations (18.8%), sprained ankles (8.9%), and concussions/closed-head injuries (6.9%) were the most frequent specific injuries. Older patients had an increased risk for dislocation (odds ratio [OR], 1.63; P = .03) but were less likely to have lacerations (OR, 0.84; P = .03) or concussions (OR, 0.75; P = .02) than younger patients. The most common injury mechanism was collision with a paddle (34.4%), followed by falls (27.8%). The odds of noncontact trauma increased with age (OR, 1.33; P = .01). IN PRACTICE: Age-related differences in injuries call for "specific prevention strategies" including "lighter paddles and optional headgear for younger children to potentially reduce head trauma, and strength training or technique-focused interventions for older children to help mitigate joint injuries," the study authors wrote. They added "prospective studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of these strategies and to monitor evolving injury patterns as participation continues to grow across pediatric age groups." SOURCE: The study was led by Michaelangelo Coppa, BS, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota. It was published online on July 25, 2025, in the American Journal of Emergency Medicine. LIMITATIONS: Reliance on narrative text due to the absence of a dedicated National Electronic Injury Surveillance System code may have led to underreporting or missed cases. Exclusion of non-ED encounters potentially biased the sample toward more severe injuries. Additionally, the limited clinical details, small sample size, and absence of interventions or long-term outcomes restricted the generalizability of the study findings. DISCLOSURES: The study did not receive any funding, and the authors reported no competing interests. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
Medscape
13 minutes ago
- Medscape
Age Is Just a Number: Blood Cancer Care in Older Patients
Andrew Artz, MD, MS After years spent caring for older patients with leukemias and other hematologic diseases, Andrew Artz, MD, MS, takes pride in his role of moving the field away from one-size-fits-all approaches. Too many times, he's seen older adults kept away from the most effective treatments based solely on their age, without thoughtful consideration of their fitness or personal treatment goals. The director of the Aging and Blood Cancers Program at City of Hope Cancer Center in Duarte, California, Artz said that his ultimate goal is to develop guidelines that embed multiple assessment measures to make it easier for older patients to successfully complete grueling treatments like allogeneic stem cell transplantation and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, even as they provide clinicians with more direction on how to customize the care of individual patients. Simply put, older age has been one of the largest barriers to referral for allogeneic transplantation, he said. 'Historically, we only had the 'eyeball test' [in which the physician bases fitness decisions on visual assessment only] and then the patient basically had to argue with the physician to get what they wanted,' Artz told Medscape Medical News . 'Patients don't want to be dismissed with some imprecise tool, and they don't want to be told they're too old for treatment. Over time, there's been more alignment with what the patients want and what we try to achieve.' Artz is the senior author of a recent paper that shows how far this area of health services research has come. He and coauthors developed and validated a first-of-its-kind composite health assessment risk model for allogeneic transplant recipients older than 60 years. The goal was to test the model's prognostic abilities with non-relapse mortality (NRM) and survival following transplant. The authors studied the prognostic impact of 13 health variables, eventually settling on seven: age, hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index, albumin, C reactive protein, weight loss, patient-rated Karnofsky performance status, and cognition by the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA)—to make up the primary model. They noted that all but MoCA are readily available in the clinic and that cancer guidelines already call for cognitive impairment screening in older adults. 'It is encouraging that the primary-CHARM score was the only prognostic factor for overall survival in a multivariate analysis along with disease risk assessed by the refined Disease Risk Index,' the authors wrote. 'This met our study framework to quantify patient vulnerability to gauge NRM separate from disease risk tools.' Artz recently sat down with Medscape Medical News . The following interview has been edited for clarity. What drew you to focus on improving care for older adults with blood cancers? Even very early in training, I noticed that many of our clinical trials inappropriately exclude older adults. And we can't necessarily infer effects on older adults to the younger adults in the trials. I grew up in West Virginia, where people's health was generally less robust than elsewhere. My grandfather was an immigrant who lived a very healthy lifestyle, exercising and generally staying active. He did all the things that now are formalized in studies about keeping the mind and body active. That made me wonder about what makes some older adults healthier than others. Why did you decide to focus on health services research vs clinical research? During premedical training, I worked in nursing homes as a nurse's aide and saw older people who were frail and deconditioned and that really stuck with me. I struggled with how to wed my interest in the biology of cancer and hematology with caring for older adults. Eventually I settled on looking at aggressive malignancies and transplant curative-intent approaches for people who historically might be given palliative therapy or no therapy. I began to realize we could pursue curative approaches for some of these patients. I am very appreciative of my translational and basic science colleagues. I view myself as someone who takes the baton from them and moves into studying these discoveries with pragmatic clinical trials to understand real-world outcomes. How has the concept of fitness for treatment evolved in older patients? Patients will change over time, of course, but we can potentially intervene to change their fitness or resilience. Some limitations or vulnerabilities can be improved, and we can also use people's strengths to help them prepare for and tolerate treatment. Risk stratification is one step, but it's really using that information to then make decisions to ensure people recover faster. To me, tailoring our approaches to both treatment and the optimization of their health and fitness is the best because that's how we expand eligibility and access for our patients. How do you get older patients ready for CAR T or transplant? On an individual level, we'll ask patients what they would like to recover to and use that as a motivator. But in the research setting, we use a set of patient-reported tools and simple objective measures that are reproducible. There won't be a single easy tool, but most of the tools are complementary and overlapping. Comorbid conditions are essential to optimize, whether by adding or adjusting medications or doing something else to limit further damage. We are very active and targeted in optimizing patients and then using a shared decision-making model to motivate patients. We'll explain that, if you lose weight, you won't have enough muscle mass for treatment. And we might also need to change some medication that's making you orthostatic and keeping you from staying active to keep up your muscle mass. Most of the time it's not as simple as just sending someone to physical therapy because it's not fair to ask a physical therapist to try to make someone stronger in 4 weeks without considering other factors. What is the most important element of care optimization in older adults? It's realizing that because each patient has different limitations and each treatment is different, it's up to you to offer treatment options based on both the disease and the specific patient and their goals, above and beyond the standard considerations that apply to all patients. It's like saying airbags should be available for everyone in the car, but how each person adjusts their seat for the ride depends on how tall they are. That requires a little bit more effort to tailor the solution. Also, social support is critical, including making sure caregivers are available and can advocate for the patient. We universally recommend that and then broaden and deepen social support as needed to help with common geriatric syndromes like weight loss, functional decline, and polypharmacy. We also work with patients to develop both short- and long-term goals for their recovery because that tends to keep them and their families motivated. Artz reported an advisory role for AstraZeneca and Magenta Therapeutics and provided consulting to AbbVie.
