'Golden ticket' visa for the rich fails to pay its way
Right of entry, including for one investor who intended sinking at least $2.5 million and another who had twice that amount to spend, was discarded because the applicants were "more fiscally costly and contribute less to the economy than other skilled visas", according to previously classified documents.
Debate about the visa class was renewed before the federal election in May after video surfaced of then-opposition leader Peter Dutton being asked about the initiative at a fundraiser and saying, "I think we'll bring it back".
Labor attacked him over plans to reinstate the visa, with Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke branding it a "cash for visa" scheme.
The Business Innovation and Investment Program provides a pathway for entrepreneurs and investors to get permanent residence in Australia through several subclass visas.
There are four main streams of the subclass 188 visa as part of the program.
These include a significant investor stream for people planning to invest at least $5 million, an investor stream for people who can invest at least $2.5 million and an innovation stream for business owners with an annual turnover of at least $750,000 and $1.25 million in assets.
Home Affairs Department documents obtained under freedom of information laws previously protected under legislative secrecy reveal those on innovation and investment program visas paid less tax than other skilled migrants.
Despite the investment threshold, the average Business Innovation and Investment Program visa holder had a taxable income of just $25,000 compared to skilled migrants' $64,000, Grattan Institute analysis cited by the department determined.
A government review of the program found in 2019/20, "even after considering investment income, BIIP investors and significant investors still earned less income and paid less tax than other skilled visa holders".
"This level of income is less than expected given the level of investment required."
The Home Affairs Department noted Australia didn't have a problem attracting foreign capital and determined the visas were unlikely to generate significant levels of additional investment.
There was $5.385 billion in investment associated with more than 1000 significant investor grants from primary applications of the visa class between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2022.
But this was a drop in the ocean of Australia's total foreign investment pool of more than $20 trillion.
Mr Burke scrapped the program on July 31, 2024 - just days after being sworn in as home affairs and immigration minister.
But 15,000 primary and secondary applications remained in the backlog as of February 9, 2025, despite more than 3000 people having withdrawn their applications after refund provisions were introduced in September 2024.
Only 23 withdrawals were from the significant investor stream and 40 from their dependents, meaning the significant investor and investor subclasses accounted for more than 3700 of the total applications.
Mr Burke issued a directive in February 2025 to intentionally throttle processing of the two investor visas by downgrading their priority in the line, behind the entrepreneur and business innovation streams.
The department said it was considering other options to manage the significant investor, including using laws to delay processing and removing the pathway to permanent residency.
But Mr Burke was warned sidelining the investor streams risked irking state and territory governments that weren't happy the visa had been scrapped because it would risk investment in key projects.
The opposition hasn't ruled out bringing back an investment visa in some form as it reviews its immigration policies after its election defeat.
A special Australian visa for foreign investors who stumped up millions of dollars was scrapped because they paid less tax and added little economic benefit.
Right of entry, including for one investor who intended sinking at least $2.5 million and another who had twice that amount to spend, was discarded because the applicants were "more fiscally costly and contribute less to the economy than other skilled visas", according to previously classified documents.
Debate about the visa class was renewed before the federal election in May after video surfaced of then-opposition leader Peter Dutton being asked about the initiative at a fundraiser and saying, "I think we'll bring it back".
Labor attacked him over plans to reinstate the visa, with Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke branding it a "cash for visa" scheme.
The Business Innovation and Investment Program provides a pathway for entrepreneurs and investors to get permanent residence in Australia through several subclass visas.
There are four main streams of the subclass 188 visa as part of the program.
These include a significant investor stream for people planning to invest at least $5 million, an investor stream for people who can invest at least $2.5 million and an innovation stream for business owners with an annual turnover of at least $750,000 and $1.25 million in assets.
Home Affairs Department documents obtained under freedom of information laws previously protected under legislative secrecy reveal those on innovation and investment program visas paid less tax than other skilled migrants.
Despite the investment threshold, the average Business Innovation and Investment Program visa holder had a taxable income of just $25,000 compared to skilled migrants' $64,000, Grattan Institute analysis cited by the department determined.
A government review of the program found in 2019/20, "even after considering investment income, BIIP investors and significant investors still earned less income and paid less tax than other skilled visa holders".
"This level of income is less than expected given the level of investment required."
The Home Affairs Department noted Australia didn't have a problem attracting foreign capital and determined the visas were unlikely to generate significant levels of additional investment.
There was $5.385 billion in investment associated with more than 1000 significant investor grants from primary applications of the visa class between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2022.
But this was a drop in the ocean of Australia's total foreign investment pool of more than $20 trillion.
Mr Burke scrapped the program on July 31, 2024 - just days after being sworn in as home affairs and immigration minister.
But 15,000 primary and secondary applications remained in the backlog as of February 9, 2025, despite more than 3000 people having withdrawn their applications after refund provisions were introduced in September 2024.
Only 23 withdrawals were from the significant investor stream and 40 from their dependents, meaning the significant investor and investor subclasses accounted for more than 3700 of the total applications.
Mr Burke issued a directive in February 2025 to intentionally throttle processing of the two investor visas by downgrading their priority in the line, behind the entrepreneur and business innovation streams.
The department said it was considering other options to manage the significant investor, including using laws to delay processing and removing the pathway to permanent residency.
But Mr Burke was warned sidelining the investor streams risked irking state and territory governments that weren't happy the visa had been scrapped because it would risk investment in key projects.
The opposition hasn't ruled out bringing back an investment visa in some form as it reviews its immigration policies after its election defeat.
A special Australian visa for foreign investors who stumped up millions of dollars was scrapped because they paid less tax and added little economic benefit.
Right of entry, including for one investor who intended sinking at least $2.5 million and another who had twice that amount to spend, was discarded because the applicants were "more fiscally costly and contribute less to the economy than other skilled visas", according to previously classified documents.
Debate about the visa class was renewed before the federal election in May after video surfaced of then-opposition leader Peter Dutton being asked about the initiative at a fundraiser and saying, "I think we'll bring it back".
Labor attacked him over plans to reinstate the visa, with Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke branding it a "cash for visa" scheme.
The Business Innovation and Investment Program provides a pathway for entrepreneurs and investors to get permanent residence in Australia through several subclass visas.
There are four main streams of the subclass 188 visa as part of the program.
These include a significant investor stream for people planning to invest at least $5 million, an investor stream for people who can invest at least $2.5 million and an innovation stream for business owners with an annual turnover of at least $750,000 and $1.25 million in assets.
Home Affairs Department documents obtained under freedom of information laws previously protected under legislative secrecy reveal those on innovation and investment program visas paid less tax than other skilled migrants.
Despite the investment threshold, the average Business Innovation and Investment Program visa holder had a taxable income of just $25,000 compared to skilled migrants' $64,000, Grattan Institute analysis cited by the department determined.
A government review of the program found in 2019/20, "even after considering investment income, BIIP investors and significant investors still earned less income and paid less tax than other skilled visa holders".
"This level of income is less than expected given the level of investment required."
The Home Affairs Department noted Australia didn't have a problem attracting foreign capital and determined the visas were unlikely to generate significant levels of additional investment.
There was $5.385 billion in investment associated with more than 1000 significant investor grants from primary applications of the visa class between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2022.
But this was a drop in the ocean of Australia's total foreign investment pool of more than $20 trillion.
Mr Burke scrapped the program on July 31, 2024 - just days after being sworn in as home affairs and immigration minister.
But 15,000 primary and secondary applications remained in the backlog as of February 9, 2025, despite more than 3000 people having withdrawn their applications after refund provisions were introduced in September 2024.
Only 23 withdrawals were from the significant investor stream and 40 from their dependents, meaning the significant investor and investor subclasses accounted for more than 3700 of the total applications.
Mr Burke issued a directive in February 2025 to intentionally throttle processing of the two investor visas by downgrading their priority in the line, behind the entrepreneur and business innovation streams.
The department said it was considering other options to manage the significant investor, including using laws to delay processing and removing the pathway to permanent residency.
But Mr Burke was warned sidelining the investor streams risked irking state and territory governments that weren't happy the visa had been scrapped because it would risk investment in key projects.
The opposition hasn't ruled out bringing back an investment visa in some form as it reviews its immigration policies after its election defeat.
A special Australian visa for foreign investors who stumped up millions of dollars was scrapped because they paid less tax and added little economic benefit.
Right of entry, including for one investor who intended sinking at least $2.5 million and another who had twice that amount to spend, was discarded because the applicants were "more fiscally costly and contribute less to the economy than other skilled visas", according to previously classified documents.
Debate about the visa class was renewed before the federal election in May after video surfaced of then-opposition leader Peter Dutton being asked about the initiative at a fundraiser and saying, "I think we'll bring it back".
Labor attacked him over plans to reinstate the visa, with Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke branding it a "cash for visa" scheme.
The Business Innovation and Investment Program provides a pathway for entrepreneurs and investors to get permanent residence in Australia through several subclass visas.
There are four main streams of the subclass 188 visa as part of the program.
These include a significant investor stream for people planning to invest at least $5 million, an investor stream for people who can invest at least $2.5 million and an innovation stream for business owners with an annual turnover of at least $750,000 and $1.25 million in assets.
Home Affairs Department documents obtained under freedom of information laws previously protected under legislative secrecy reveal those on innovation and investment program visas paid less tax than other skilled migrants.
Despite the investment threshold, the average Business Innovation and Investment Program visa holder had a taxable income of just $25,000 compared to skilled migrants' $64,000, Grattan Institute analysis cited by the department determined.
A government review of the program found in 2019/20, "even after considering investment income, BIIP investors and significant investors still earned less income and paid less tax than other skilled visa holders".
"This level of income is less than expected given the level of investment required."
The Home Affairs Department noted Australia didn't have a problem attracting foreign capital and determined the visas were unlikely to generate significant levels of additional investment.
There was $5.385 billion in investment associated with more than 1000 significant investor grants from primary applications of the visa class between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2022.
But this was a drop in the ocean of Australia's total foreign investment pool of more than $20 trillion.
Mr Burke scrapped the program on July 31, 2024 - just days after being sworn in as home affairs and immigration minister.
But 15,000 primary and secondary applications remained in the backlog as of February 9, 2025, despite more than 3000 people having withdrawn their applications after refund provisions were introduced in September 2024.
Only 23 withdrawals were from the significant investor stream and 40 from their dependents, meaning the significant investor and investor subclasses accounted for more than 3700 of the total applications.
Mr Burke issued a directive in February 2025 to intentionally throttle processing of the two investor visas by downgrading their priority in the line, behind the entrepreneur and business innovation streams.
The department said it was considering other options to manage the significant investor, including using laws to delay processing and removing the pathway to permanent residency.
But Mr Burke was warned sidelining the investor streams risked irking state and territory governments that weren't happy the visa had been scrapped because it would risk investment in key projects.
The opposition hasn't ruled out bringing back an investment visa in some form as it reviews its immigration policies after its election defeat.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
3 minutes ago
- The Age
A super-sized GST – with a $3300 cheque in the mail for all
All Australians would receive $3300 a year in exchange for accepting a higher and broader GST under a plan which proponents claim would boost the budget by $28 billion a year while driving up the nation's living standards. Before this month's economic roundtable, independent MP Kate Chaney has backed an idea first floated by leading Australian economist Richard Holden to lift the GST to 15 per cent and extend the tax on food, education, health and childcare services and water and sewerage. This would raise an additional $92.5 billion in its first full year of operation, but would be offset by a $3300 rebate to every person over the age of 18 that would effectively erase the impact of the higher GST on the first $22,000 of an individual's annual purchases. The rebates would leave low- and middle-income earners up to $371 a year better off but slug the nation's top 20 per cent more than $2200 annually, costing the government $68.8 billion. That would leave the Commonwealth with almost $24 billion a year to put towards other services, paying down debt or reducing personal income tax levels. Chaney, who has been working with Holden on the concept for the past two years, said the roundtable had to be open to all tax reform options. Loading 'GST is an efficient tax – it is hard to avoid – and with lower- and middle-income groups potentially better off under this proposal, it can be progressive. Unlike personal income tax, it doesn't hamper productivity,' she said. Holden, who on Thursday will release a paper with fellow economist Rosalind Dixon on the so-called 'progressive GST', said the change would benefit younger Australians who under current tax arrangements paid a disproportionate amount of personal income tax. 'Our proposal would make our taxation system more efficient, make our economy more dynamic and provide the impetus for productivity growth,' he said.
The Age
3 minutes ago
- The Age
Bridge protest misread creates new caucus problem for premier
Chris Minns read his MPs the riot act early last year. If his Labor colleagues had a passion for international relations, the premier warned them via an ABC interview, they should head down the Hume Highway and become an MP in Canberra. Minns was referencing MPs speaking out about the bitterly divisive issue of Palestine and Israel, the catalyst for some of the most fiery debates on the floor of NSW Labor Party conferences over decades. In this instance, two of Minns' MPs had signed a letter to Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong, criticising the decision to suspend payments to the main UN agency in Gaza after Israel provided intelligence that it said linked some employees to the October 7, 2023 attacks. 'I can understand people feel passionately about international affairs,' Minns told ABC's Stateline, 'but honestly, if that's your passion, and that's where your desires are, your policy interests are, well, run for federal parliament.' Some 18 months on, Minns had better hope they do not follow his directions because 10 of them – or just shy of 20 per cent of his Labor caucus – revealed their passion/desires/interests when they took part in the pro-Palestine march across Sydney Harbour Bridge on Sunday. The most senior of those MPs, among at least 90,000 protesters, was the government's leader of the upper house and Environment Minister Penny Sharpe. Her attendance sent a clear message that the Left of the party can, despite Minns' instructions, walk and chew gum at the same time. Loading Also on the bridge were former Labor general secretary turned upper house MP Bob Nanva, Emergency Services Minister Jihad Dib and backbenchers Stephen Lawrence, Sarah Kaine, Anthony D'Adam, Lynda Voltz, Cameron Murphy, Kylie Wilkinson and Peter Primrose. Former Labor premier and long-term Palestine supporter Bob Carr joined them. Dib, a Muslim with family ties to Palestine, was understandably motivated to be on the bridge. The others had their own motivation – and they sent a clear message to Minns that being an elected official in NSW does not preclude you from having a position on a humanitarian crisis. It also shows that the caucus Minns has ruled with an iron fist since his election as leader is willing to think for itself. The first caucus meeting after the march, on Tuesday, was heated. MPs were angry. Before he was overruled by the Supreme Court and the protest given the greenlight, Minns said he would not tolerate shutting down the 'central artery' of Sydney, despite there being a history of that happening. (In 2007, the Harbour Bridge was closed for a full day to give US Vice-President Dick Cheney a clear ride through the city.) As is his skill, Minns played to both sides, stressing he had empathy for the plight of civilians in Gaza.
Sydney Morning Herald
3 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
OpenAI's secret lobbying dinner with top Canberra bureaucrats
Since the release of ChatGPT in late 2022, OpenAI has exploded from a little-known not-for-profit to the world's most influential tech company, helmed by its mercurial chief executive Sam Altman. Having helped send the artificial intelligence boom into overdrive, it was only a matter of time before OpenAI would let its lobbying muscle loose on Canberra, where politicians have historically been a little flat-footed in the face of new technological developments. The OpenAI circus came to town in June for a widely publicised lobbying blitz, led by chief economist Ronnie Chatterji, who met with a posse of Labor frontbenchers including Andrew Leigh, Tim Ayres, Andrew Giles and Andrew Charlton. Lots of policy wonks are called Andrew, apparently. Less attention fell on OpenAI's wooing of senior public servants. After a busy day on the hill, Chatterji and the company hosted a private dinner for top public servants at the Boat House, a modern Australian fine diner on the shores of Lake Burley Griffin. On the dance card was the newly appointed Treasury Secretary Jenny Wilkinson (just days into the job), Australian Bureau of Statistics' top statistician David Gruen, Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet Deputy Secretary Nadine Williams, IP (intellectual property) Australia director general Michael Schwager and Peter Anstee from the Department of Home Affairs. The Canberra dinner was just another piece in the Australian lobbying effort that is becoming increasingly sophisticated. The firm recently hired former Tech Council of Australia boss Kate Pounder to lead its local push as Australian policy liaison. Before the Tech Council, Pounder co-founded analytics firm AlphaBeta with Labor assistant minister Charlton, who would later parachute from Bellevue Hill into the federal seat of Parramatta. CBD was not a fly on the wall, and although it was a fairly standard reception for a visiting expert – Chatterji was an economic adviser in Joe Biden's White House – all parties remained shtum on the finer details of the discussions. Nonetheless, we've many questions we'd love to grill OpenAI on. Will AI destroy work as we know it or trigger a robot apocalypse? How can we stop the public discourse from being flooded with slop? What did poor Hayao Miyazaki ever do to hurt you? Perhaps this will come up at the next roundtable.
