As China, Russia escalate cognitive warfare, experts say Seoul needs counterstrategy
The Korean Association of Area Studies co-hosted the seminar themed, 'Security Threats of Cognitive Warfare and Trump's Second-term Strategy on China,' on Friday with the Institute for National Security Strategy and the Sejong Institute at the ROKAUS Hotel in Seoul.
The seminar featured two sessions: Session 1, 'Cognitive Warfare Security Threats and Complex Crisis on the Korean Peninsula,' and Session 2, 'Trump's Second-term China Strategy and Regional Hybrid Threats," according to the three co-host organizations.
Lee Ho-ryoung, president of the Korean Association of Area Studies, said in her opening remarks, 'North Korea is intensifying its 'invisible cognitive warfare,' such as cyber influence operations and GPS jamming.'
'Therefore, a comprehensive, all-encompassing response is needed to counter the cognitive warfare targeting the Korean Peninsula by revisionist powers, including China and Russia," Lee said.
Han Suk-hee, president of the Institute for National Security Strategy, assessed that 'China favors hybrid warfare, such as ppsychological division and information operations shaping public opinion, over direct military conflict" in his congratulatory address.
"China is pursuing a strategy to sow division between the United States and its allies by intervening in issues like historical disputes between Korea and Japan and controversies over weapons system acquisitions.'
Experts at the seminar shared the view that cognitive warfare threats from China and Russia targeting the Korean Peninsula are evolving and emphasized the need for proportional responses by the South Korean government, according to the press statement by the three co-hosting organizations.
The experts specifically recommended that the Korean government encourage diverse research on cognitive warfare and conduct objective, professional assessments of Chinese and Russian cognitive warfare strategies.
In addition, the experts stressed that the new South Korean administration, which will take office after the June 3 early presidential election, should incorporate cognitive warfare threats and response measures into the national security strategy to lay the groundwork for building a government-wide cognitive warfare response system.
The experts also emphasized the importance of drawing lessons from the characteristics of cognitive warfare identified in recent conflicts such as the Ukraine war and the Israel-Hamas war in the process of developing the strategy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
![[Wang Son-taek] Key points for a successful S. Korea-US summit](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F08%2F06%2Fnews-p.v1.20250806.1623e74727d4440280554c628d9e41a6_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![[Wang Son-taek] Key points for a successful S. Korea-US summit](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fall-logos-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fkoreaherald.com.png&w=48&q=75){kind=small}
Korea Herald
3 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Wang Son-taek] Key points for a successful S. Korea-US summit
The upcoming South Korea-US summit scheduled for this month is poised to become a landmark diplomatic event in the history of the alliance — regardless of its outcome. Under President Donald Trump's renewed leadership, the United States is aggressively redrawing the international order. The administration's approach has discarded traditional norms of multilateral cooperation in favor of a transactional, unilateral model. At the heart of this shift is an escalating tariff war. South Korea has also felt the impact. In late July, Seoul and Washington reached a surprising and lopsided agreement: despite the Korea-US Free Trade Agreement, which originally guaranteed tariff-free trade, Korea will now face a 15 percent tariff on exports to the US. This concession was made to reduce Trump's initial demand of a 25 percent tariff. In exchange, Korea agreed to invest $350 billion in the United States and to import $100 billion worth of US energy products. These numbers are staggering. Unsurprisingly, this has shaken confidence in the alliance. Within South Korea, growing embarrassment and frustration have raised questions over whether the alliance is still grounded in mutual respect — or if it has devolved into an asymmetric arrangement driven solely by US pressure. In this context, the upcoming summit between President Lee Jae Myung and President Trump carries immense importance. Ideally, the two leaders would agree on ways to enhance the alliance and reduce uncertainty. But optimism must be tempered. Trump is a notoriously unpredictable figure. Since beginning his second term in January, he has grown even more inflexible in his positions. For many global leaders, meeting with Trump has become a nerve-wracking ordeal. In February, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy experienced a disastrous summit in Washington. During a 40-minute meeting, Trump, and Vice President JD Vance openly cornered Zelenskyy, accusing him of recklessness and dismissing his diplomatic appeals. In May, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa was subjected to a bizarre ambush at the White House. Trump unexpectedly raised unfounded claims about 'white genocide' in South Africa and used misleading footage to pressure Ramaphosa in front of the press. Diplomacy is built on mutual respect and reliable communications. Yet Trump's actions suggest a deliberate strategy of shaming foreign leaders to achieve domestic political gains. While history offers many examples of powerful states bullying weaker ones, Trump's overt and often theatrical humiliations of heads of state are without modern precedent. There is no guarantee that President Lee Jae Myung will be treated differently. Hoping for a summit that yields a comprehensive agreement may be overly ambitious. A successful summit may simply mean that the alliance remains intact and that relations between the two leaders do not fray. To achieve even this limited success, the South Korean government must be thoroughly prepared. First, anticipate Trump's theatricality. Trump has shown a pattern of using summits for spectacle. Some incidents, like the Ramaphosa ambush, were clearly premeditated. To avoid confrontation, South Korea should convey to the White House that there is no reason for hostility between the two sides. Second, while Trump has frequently harassed foreign leaders perceived as weak, he tends to respect strong leaders. He has openly expressed admiration for authoritarian figures like Putin, Xi Jinping and Kim Jong Un. This is not because of ideology, but because he associates strength with authority. President Lee should project confidence and national support — not arrogance, but firm resolve. Any perception that President Lee is weak could prompt Trump to treat him as prey, rather than a peer. Third, remember that Trump is not persuaded by logic — he is influenced by emotion. Many European leaders have learned that flattery often works where facts do not. While sycophancy is distasteful, directly contradicting Trump in public or humiliating him at the negotiating table is unwise. Managing his ego is not appeasement — it is strategic calibration. If a deal is reached, framing it as a product of Trump's leadership will likely help sustain momentum. In fact, this approach should apply in all diplomacy, not just with Trump. But in Trump's case, it is essential. Fourth, Trump thrives in highly orchestrated events where he is center stage and commands international attention. The 2018 Singapore summit with Kim Jong Un is instructive: when Trump perceived the summit as favorable, he was willing to engage and compromise. Similarly, Trump's attitude toward former President Moon Jae-in evolved. While initially skeptical during their first meeting in June 2017, Trump was noticeably more cooperative during the Seoul summit in November that year. In Seoul, Trump reportedly took a strong interest in visiting the Demilitarized Zone and warmed to President Moon. He showed that his attitude can shift when he feels respected or engaged in a dramatic setting. Fifth, Trump is eccentric, but still shrewd. His apparent rudeness is often a simple tactic to bolster his domestic image. His core concern is winning — especially on issues that matter to his base. If South Korea can identify areas of cooperation that align with Trump's domestic political agenda, those can be repackaged as victories for him while also serving Korean interests. One area of interest is shipbuilding. Trump has repeatedly emphasized revitalizing US manufacturing, particularly in industries like naval shipbuilding. South Korea could offer more specific ideas in this field. Moreover, emerging sectors such as artificial intelligence, semiconductors and green technology present opportunities for joint initiatives. The key is to shape these proposals so they appear as Trump's ideas or triumphs. In summary, direct confrontation must be avoided, while strategic praise should be deployed. President Lee must project charisma, not submission. Mutually beneficial programs should be framed as Trump's victories. Expectations for the summit should be lowered. Trump's diplomacy is erratic, but not inscrutable. With careful preparation and psychological foresight, the summit can avoid disaster — and perhaps even yield progress. In this high-stakes encounter, restraint, strategy and narrative control will be more valuable than policy details.
Korea Herald
17 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Seoul shares close nearly flat with mixed sector performance
South Korean stocks finished nearly unchanged Wednesday as gains in tourism and retail shares offset losses in semiconductors and pharmaceuticals. The local currency slipped against the US dollar. The benchmark Korea Composite Stock Price Index climbed 0.14 point, or 0 percent, to close at 3,198.14. Trade volume was a little slim at 319.8 million shares worth 10.7 trillion won ($7.7 billion), with winners outnumbering losers 644 to 236. Foreigners and institutions sold a net 67.5 billion won and 53.7 billion won worth of local shares, respectively, while retail investors purchased a net 46.9 billion won. Tourism and retail shares led the daily gain following the government's decision to start a visa waiver program with Chinese group tourists from next month. Hotel Shilla jumped 4.79 percent to 49,250 won, and Shinsegae increased 3.27 percent to 176,900 won. Major cosmetics firm AmorePacific rose 1.26 percent to 128,800 won, and Kolmar Korea gained 2.79 percent to 99,400 won. Energy shares were also among the winners, as Doosan Enerbility mounted 2.31 percent to 66,300 won and the state-run Korea Electric Power Corp. vaulted 7.44 percent to 41,150 won. However, chip and drug stocks went south as Trump said again he would announce new tariffs on those imports soon. Chip giant Samsung Electronics fell 1.57 percent to 68,800 won, and its rival SK hynix retreated 1.9 percent to 258,500 won. SK Biopharmaceuticals tumbled 8.89 percent to 101,500 won, and Samsung Biologics dropped 1.9 percent to 1,031,000 won. The local currency was quoted at 1,389.5 won against the greenback at 3:30 p.m., down 1.2 won from the previous session. (Yonhap)
Korea Herald
17 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Seoul's adjustment to S. Korea-US military drill could put alliance to test: think tank
Despite Seoul floating talks of adjusting the scale and timing of the annual South Korea-US military exercise scheduled for mid-August, doing so would weaken Washington's trust in its decadeslong ally, a report by a local think tank said Wednesday. The report, published in Korean by the state-affiliated Korea Institute for Defense Analyses, said that under current circumstances, an adjustment to the Ulchi Freedom Shield drill could undermine 'the efforts and willpower expressed by the US Forces Korea to continue the S. Korea-US joint military exercises." This could weaken both Washington's and the USFK's trust in Seoul, it noted. The think tank also warned that a potential one-sided concession from Seoul in the area of defense, without a proper negotiation with Pyongyang, could devalue the South's efforts and, later, even its negotiating power. The report addresses Unification Minister Chung Dong-young's remarks in July to reporters, saying that he plans to recommend to President Lee Jae Myung to 'make adjustments' to the large-scale drill scheduled for mid-August. The Lee administration has repeatedly gestured for an inter-Korean thaw, including removing the South's anti-Pyongyang loudspeakers installed across the border. Chung's remarks closely followed comments from North Korean leader Kim Jong-un's influential sister, Kim Yo-jong, in July. She said Pyongyang was not interested in reviving talks with Seoul and denounced the 'aggressive' military exercises jointly conducted by South Korea and the US. The North has routinely condemned the joint military drills as a rehearsal for invasion and a provocation. There is a possibility that the North is aiming to establish a favorable environment when potentially reviving talks with both the US and the South, according to KIDA. Adjustment to the scale of the South Korea-US military exercises would be one of Pyongyang's conditions to achieve such an environment, alongside a USFK troop reduction, a declaration to end the 1950-53 Korean War and official admission of the North's status as a nuclear power. Aligned with these likely goals, Kim Yo-jong's latest comments were aimed at testing the alliance between the Lee administration and the Donald Trump administration and their willingness to carry out the annual joint military exercise, according to the KIDA. The report released Wednesday was titled 'North Korea's negotiation strategy shown through Kim Yo-jong's comments and how (South Korea) should respond.'
