logo
Japan's trade win, bond yields and Singapore's big bet on the STI

Japan's trade win, bond yields and Singapore's big bet on the STI

Business Times3 days ago
Japan's new trade pact with the US has sent the Nikkei soaring. But is the euphoria justified?
In this episode of Market Focus Weekly, a podcast from The Business Times hosted by Emily Liu, Endowus CIO Hugh Chung joins the show to unpack the headlines moving Asian markets this week from bond market jitters and central bank silence to a billion-dollar boost for Singapore's Straits Times Index (STI).
And if you're wondering whether the de-dollarisation narrative holds water, or where retail investors are looking beyond the US, we've got you covered.
Why listen?
Because Japan just bagged a trade win but is the rally overcooked?
Markets love momentum, but some parts of the Nikkei are already looking pricey.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Because bond yields are climbing quietly but steadily
Japan's 30-year yield just breached 3 per cent. That's not nothing.
Because Singapore's MAS is putting real money on the table
A S$1.1 billion injection to lift market participation? It's a move worth watching.
Because everyone's talking about de-dollarisation but should you care?
The noise is loud, but the fundamentals may tell a different story.
Market Focus Weekly is a markets podcast from The Business Times, hosted by Emily Liu. Catch past episodes on Spotify, Apple Podcasts or at bt.sg/podcasts.
Do you have a market mystery you want decoded? Drop us a note at btpodcasts@sph.com.sg.
---
Written and hosted by: Emily Liu (emilyliu@sph.com.sg)
With Hugh Chung, chief investment officer, Endowus
Edited by: Chai Pei Chieh & Claressa Monteiro
Produced by: Emily & Chai Pei Chieh
A podcast by BT Podcasts, The Business Times, SPH Media
---
Follow Market Focus Weekly podcasts every Friday:
Channel: bt.sg/btmktfocus
Amazon: bt.sg/mfam
Apple Podcasts: bt.sg/mfap
Spotify: bt.sg/mfsp
YouTube Music: bt.sg/mfyt
Website: bt.sg/mktfocus
Do note: This podcast is meant to provide general information only. SPH Media accepts no liability for loss arising from any reliance on the podcast or use of third party's products and services. Please consult professional advisors for independent advice.
Discover more BT podcast series:
BT Money Hacks at: bt.sg/btmoneyhacks
BT Correspondents: bt.sg/btcobt
BT Podcasts: bt.sg/pcOM
BT Branded Podcasts: bt.sg/btbrpod
BT Lens On: bt.sg/btlenson
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BYD runs India remotely as China tensions shut out top brass
BYD runs India remotely as China tensions shut out top brass

Business Times

time3 minutes ago

  • Business Times

BYD runs India remotely as China tensions shut out top brass

[NEW DELHI] China's BYD is forging ahead with its attempts to expand in India despite roadblocks from the government that are preventing the electric vehicle maker from conducting key business dealings there. Like most Chinese companies, BYD has been unable to obtain visas for executives after a deadly clash between Indian and Chinese soldiers along a disputed Himalayan border in 2020 sparked a major deterioration in political ties. That's seen the EV giant resort to holding board meetings and high-level business interactions in Colombo in Sri Lanka and Kathmandu in Nepal, and even as far away as Singapore, according to sources familiar with the matter. Ketsu Zhang, BYD's managing director for India, has been unable to obtain a work permit since he left the EV maker's local base in Chennai, despite government efforts to facilitate his travel, said the sources, who asked not to be identified because they're not authorised to speak publicly. Zhang worked from the carmaker's headquarters in Shenzhen in 2021 before moving to Tokyo this year, they said. From Japan, he oversees Asian markets including India, the sources said. An on-the-ground presence is particularly important for manufacturers, given the need for quick decision making, addressing productivity issues and establishing community ties. Cold shoulder The cold shoulder is mutual. As recently as March, travel restrictions were still being wielded in the political spat. That month, an Indian contingent wanting to visit a major meeting of BYD car dealers in Shenzhen had to be scaled down after the majority of participants, including the company's employees based in India, were unable to obtain visas, a source familiar with the matter said. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up A representative for BYD in India declined to comment. Despite the operational difficulties, BYD has proved popular with Indian drivers, sales in the first half of this year are nearly touching the total units sold in 2024. Indian officials have been clear that they will not welcome investment from the carmaker – Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal said earlier this year that it's a 'no' to BYD due to caution around the nation's strategic interests. India has already rejected BYD's US$1 billion plan to build a plant in partnership with a local company. This leaves the Chinese firm unable to qualify for reduced tariffs on imported EVs in exchange for establishing a substantial manufacturing presence in India. The freeze contrasts with the experience of Tesla Its chief executive officer Elon Musk met with India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi in the US earlier this year. The US carmaker opened its first showrooms in India this month, with deliveries set to begin as early as August. Tesla does not have plans to establish local manufacturing, meaning it faces import taxes of as much as 110 per cent for fully-assembled vehicles. Expanding overseas is critical for BYD, which risks missing its target to sell 5.5 million cars this year as demand in China stagnates and it draws the ire of Beijing following rounds of heavy price discounting. But without the ability to invest in manufacturing in India, BYD relies on its assembly plant in the southern city of Chennai, which has an annual capacity of 10,000 to 15,000 units, to meet Indian demand. Hefty duties The company also imports most cars it sells in India, but hefty duties, aimed at shielding domestic firms, effectively double the cost of a vehicle and India restricts volumes unless a model has received a local roadworthiness certificate. While tensions between China and India are thawing, it's unclear whether curbs on professional visas will be lifted or if BYD will ever be welcomed with open arms. Still, there are tentative signs of progress. Earlier this month, India allowed Chinese nationals to apply for tourist visas again. BLOOMBERG

Malaysia's banks missed the digital moment, and now AI is forcing a reckoning, says veteran banker
Malaysia's banks missed the digital moment, and now AI is forcing a reckoning, says veteran banker

Business Times

time4 hours ago

  • Business Times

Malaysia's banks missed the digital moment, and now AI is forcing a reckoning, says veteran banker

[KUALA LUMPUR] Malaysia missed a crucial opportunity between 2018 and the Covid-19 pandemic to modernise its banking sector and become a regional digital leader. As that window closed, industry players now face greater challenges to achieve growth, said veteran banker Andrew Sheng. 'Between 2018 and the pandemic, that was the time for a huge transformation online. Especially during pandemic, everyone moves online – work, shopping and finance. That was when banks needed to go all in on digital, but we missed it,' the 79-year-old former central banker and currently an adjunct professor at the University of Malaya and Tsinghua University told The Business Times. He noted that while other markets were embracing rapid technological upgrades, driven by competition, user expectations and regulatory shifts, many Malaysian banks remained conservative, slow-moving, and hesitant to innovate. 'That was the time for a huge transformation online. But the digital offerings of Malaysian banks, in my view, are slightly dated,' he said. Sheng previously served as chairman of the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong from 1998 to 2005, and held roles as a central banker with both the Hong Kong Monetary Authority and Bank Negara Malaysia. Sheng also acted as chief adviser to the China Banking Regulatory Commission. In recognition of the impact he made, Time magazine included him among the 100 most influential people in the world in 2013. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up Sheng noted that some of the country's largest banks had previously shown ambition beyond national borders, particularly CIMB and Maybank with their regional expansion strategies. But even those forward-looking moves lost momentum in recent years. 'Since 2018, they have become more cautious… And then came the pandemic, when digital transformation should have been accelerated. But I don't see agentic offerings. My bank knows my spending patterns, but it's not giving me tailored investment advice or proactive digital tools,' he added. The shortcomings go beyond the lack of advanced digital products. Sheng points to fundamental failures in basic customer service – failures that expose the sector's resistance to modernisation. 'Some of the banks are still in this old-fashioned call centre model,' he said. 'When you call them in the middle of the night, you either get somebody in Bangladesh or the service just isn't available.' Even basic digital tools such as chatbots, which are widely deployed across South-east Asia, remain underused or poorly implemented in Malaysia. He described this as a systemic issue – one rooted not in technology, but in culture and governance. 'Getting a bank to move digitally when most of the staff are less digitally oriented is a major management challenge. The boards and CEOs need to be totally digitally focused. But most are made up of former bankers or businesspeople. They see the threat, but they don't internalise it. 'TechFin' is eating the bankers' lunch Former central banker Andrew Sheng said: 'Platforms using crypto, blockchain, and decentralised finance are eating the banks' lunch. And that trend is only going to accelerate.' PHOTO: ANDREW SHENG While Malaysian banks stagnated, technology platforms surged ahead, not just supporting finance, but redefining it, and Sheng believes the real disruption isn't traditional fintech, where banks adopt tech tools, but what he calls 'TechFin' – where tech companies disrupt finance from the outside. 'Since Covid, the dominant issue is not fintech – it's the financialisation of technology. It's TechFin rather than FinTech. The tech platforms overwhelm the finance industry,' he explained. The competitive imbalance is stark, with tech companies having better software, more data, less regulation, and far more agility than traditional banks. Furthermore, they do not carry much debts. Banks, on the other hand, are highly leveraged, highly regulated, and can't seem to compete, he said, noting that such a scenario isn't theoretical. Across Asia, consumers now use mobile-based QR code systems, which are operated by tech firms, not banks – to transact in real time, said Sheng, adding that the beneficiaries aren't the banks, but e-wallet providers such as Alipay, WeChat Pay, or even small fintech startups. This disruption extends far beyond payments. Sheng warns that even core financial activities, lending, wealth management, insurance, are being unbundled and digitalised by faster, leaner players. 'Platforms using crypto, blockchain, and decentralised finance are eating the banks' lunch. And that trend is only going to accelerate,' said Sheng, who is set to deliver the keynote address at MyFintech Week, Malaysia's flagship fintech event, scheduled for early August. Tokenisation is the next frontier With a population of just 33 million, Malaysia lacks the market size to build scale slowly. PHOTO: AFP Compounding the threat is the rapid evolution of tokenised digital assets, which Sheng believes is a development that will radically transform capital markets and trade. Yet again, Malaysia is playing catch-up. 'Practically anything can be tokenised today… Liabilities, assets, and even a scribble by the next Picasso can be turned into a digital asset and sold,' he said. Tokenisation, enabled by blockchain and decentralised infrastructure, allows assets to be divided, digitalised, and traded globally in real time. Gold, carbon credits, and even commodities such as palm oil are now being explored as tokenised products. 'If palm oil could be tokenised and made available to someone like me to buy a ton because I like the weather, why not?' Sheng said. 'But the reality is, I can't do it right now in Malaysia. Someone else will.' And that's the real danger. He noted that if Malaysia does not act, others will dominate the digital asset space, and consequently, Malaysian capital, investors, and talent will go elsewhere. 'If you're not going to do it, someone else will… The money and the flows will go elsewhere,' he added. With a population of just 33 million, Malaysia lacks the market size to build scale slowly. Countries such as Vietnam and the Philippines, with over 100 million people each, are better positioned to develop digital ecosystems quickly and able to attract regional liquidity. Power shift to asset managers Non-bank players such as Citadel and Jane Street, which have grown into trading behemoths that rival conventional banks in volume and influence. PHOTO: REUTERS Beyond Malaysia and South-east Asia, Sheng observed that the global financial system is undergoing a quiet but profound power shift, away from conventional banks and towards dominant asset managers and trading platforms. 'Technology tends to concentrate. The top five banks in any country dominate most of the banking business. But the top five asset managers, not necessarily banks, are now just as powerful, if not more,' he said. He noted that while large banking institutions such as JPMorgan and UBS remain influential, their growing strength lies less in traditional lending and more in their roles as global asset managers and market traders. He cited UBS' increasing weight in asset management and JPMorgan's dominance across the dollar market, investment banking, and trading. Sheng also highlighted the rise of non-bank players such as Citadel and Jane Street, which have grown into trading behemoths that rival conventional banks in volume and influence. He noted that such a trend is being accelerated by digitalisation and scale. Technology amplifies the advantages of incumbents with deep data, large capital bases, and global reach, pushing smaller or slower institutions further to the margins. At the same time, he warned, banks in emerging markets such as Malaysia are falling behind in digital transformation, leaving them vulnerable. 'Every bank needs to ask: how do we cut costs, improve productivity, manage risk, and create new value?' Sheng said. 'Those who don't ask that question now may not be around to answer it later.'

As plans to revitalise SGX spur liquidity, companies should prioritise shareholder value and accountability
As plans to revitalise SGX spur liquidity, companies should prioritise shareholder value and accountability

Business Times

time4 hours ago

  • Business Times

As plans to revitalise SGX spur liquidity, companies should prioritise shareholder value and accountability

THE national effort to revitalise the local market kicked into a higher gear last week, with the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) announcing the appointment of the first batch of fund managers under its S$5 billion Equity Market Development Programme (EQDP). MAS said on Monday (Jul 21) that it will place a combined initial sum of S$1.1 billion with Avanda Investment Management, Fullerton Fund Management, and JP Morgan Asset Management. Participants in the EQDP are expected to focus on the mid-cap and small-cap segment of the market, and pursue fund strategies that improve liquidity and broaden investor participation. The next phase of fund manager selection under the EQDP is expected to be announced by the fourth quarter of 2025. MAS also said last week that S$50 million has been set aside to enhance the Grant for Equity Market Singapore (Gems) scheme, to support new listings and strengthen the equities research ecosystem. In addition, MAS outlined plans to better enable investors to seek recourse if they suffer losses due to market misconduct. Not surprisingly, these moves reinforced the already bullish sentiment in the market. The Straits Times Index ended last week more than 1.7 per cent higher – led by DFI Retail Group, which climbed 13.1 per cent on news of a bumper dividend payout. Other big gainers included property counters such as CapitaLand Investment (up 3.3 per cent), City Developments (up 8.1 per cent) and UOL Group (up 2.8 per cent). BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up ST Engineering, the best-performing component of the STI so far this year, was up 5.6 per cent last week amid reports of continued contract wins. Among the banks, DBS was up 4.4 per cent while UOB rose 0.4 per cent. OCBC slipped nearly 0.9 per cent. There was also a surge of interest last week in non-STI stocks that analysts expect will be pursued by fund management firms that receive EQDP funds. For instance, Maybank's list of 'potential EQDP beneficiaries' included: AEM (up 11.7 per cent), ComfortDelGro (up 13.1 per cent), Food Empire (up 8.4 per cent), Frencken Group (up 15.2 per cent), iFast (up 5.1 per cent), Nanofilm Technologies (up 17.3 per cent), Sheng Siong (up 2.9 per cent), and UMS Integration (up 4.8 per cent). Given this positive reaction, it seems to me that the EQDP could be a potent driver of the Singapore market in the months ahead. In fact, if the funds under EQDP are made available to small investors, I might invest some of my own money in them. Prioritise shareholder value There are, of course, lots of reasons to worry that liquidity created by the EQDP in the smaller-cap segment of the market will ultimately prove to be fleeting. For one thing, some of the complementary supply-side initiatives to improve the vibrancy of the local market and draw more exciting listings are not new. The Gems scheme, for instance, was originally introduced in 2019 to defray the cost of seeking a local listing, and develop the equities research ecosystem. MAS said last week that the latest S$50 million being allocated to the programme will provide additional funding for research on listed companies, and help research houses reduce the cost of distributing their work through digital media. There will also be new funding support for research on private companies with a strong Singapore presence. The idea is to stoke investor interest in these companies, and build a pipeline of potential listings. Meanwhile, listing grants under Gems will be expanded to cover Singapore Depository Receipts (SDRs), and foreign Depository Receipts with underlying Singapore stocks. The overall funding for primary listed exchange-traded funds (ETFs) will also be increased, while a new funding sleeve will subsidise cross-listed and feeder ETFs. These moves are aimed at broadening the investor base for Singapore equities and spurring liquidity in the local market. But why were earlier rounds of subsidies for research and new listings not more successful? Why would it be different this time around? Was a big demand-side initiative such as the EQDP the only missing piece to the puzzle? My own view is that the EQDP has the potential to make a big difference in boosting overall liquidity in the Singapore market. In the end, however, this liquidity will flow towards opportunity. Back in February, as the STI began breaching new all-time highs for the first time in nearly 18 years, this column pointed out that the robust gains charted by the index since the end of 2023 were driven by a narrow group of companies – which had been actively unlocking value and strengthening their core businesses. The key to restoring the vibrancy of the Singapore market is for more companies to similarly prioritise shareholder value. Fund managers under the EQDP should use their influence as shareholders to ensure this happens at the companies in which they are invested – even if it means running up against the vested interests of their boards and controlling shareholders. Accessibility and accountability This brings me to the idea of enabling investors to seek recourse when they suffer losses due to market misconduct. MAS said it will consult later this year on proposals to enable investors to ride on a court action or civil penalty to seek compensation. MAS will also consult on proposals to allow for representatives – such as the Securities Investors Association (Singapore), or Sias – to organise and carry out legal action on behalf of investors. In addition, MAS will consult on setting up a grant scheme to defray the costs of organising investors and taking legal action for cases involving market misconduct. While the proposals MAS has in mind may address the 'friction' investors face in taking civil action against companies, I wonder if they will be all that helpful in practice. In the case of Noble Group, for instance, the authorities only commenced investigations in late 2018, more than three years after Iceberg Research began sounding the alarm about the company's financial statements. By the time MAS imposed a civil penalty of S$12.6 million on the group in 2022, most of its value had already been lost. Unless regulators can act more quickly when trouble emerges, investors may have little to gain by trying to ride along with them and may be better off quickly selling their shares instead of seeking recourse. As for representatives taking legal action on behalf of investors, Sias said last week that it 'stands ready to act' if appointed to assist with any litigation. However, it reiterated its long-held position that it is better to engage with companies in the boardroom rather than a courtroom. 'If this time-tested approach should fail, Sias will then seek mediation at the Singapore Mediation Centre,' it added. The way I see it, Sias should not be pushed to take on a role that does not align with its philosophy. It may be more efficient for MAS to create an entity for the specific purpose of taking legal action on behalf of investors when market misconduct occurs. The appropriate forum for investors to engage with listed companies on most matters, in my view, is neither the boardroom nor the courtroom but the public square. Besides enabling investors to seek recourse when companies stumble, perhaps MAS should also push the boards and management of untroubled companies to make themselves more accessible and accountable to investors. As the EQDP spurs liquidity, this could be an important aspect of forging lasting vibrancy in the Singapore market.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store